course, they are, so to speak, associated with rhetorical support, they said there, they said here , salivaany, but clearly told the ukrainians the good news, what kind of news, you ask, let's listen, i stood on the podium of the white house and said that ukraine must win, here today that ukraine must win , and what does it mean? this means that ukraine is emerging from this war sovereign, independent and free. we believe that russia has already lost in this war, that... russia has failed to do this, erase ukraine from the map, erase the very idea of ​​being ukrainian from history . attack on your capital failed because the ukrainians stood up and defended kiev. putin has failed to crush ukraine's democratically elected government. well, there’s a natural question here, just a logical one, but what if ukraine is already...

putin could have so many votes, what models , listen, all the political scientists, you brought salivaan won, putin enjoys the support of the majority of russians, the turnout speaks about this, they also say so the votes that were cast for him, this is evidenced by the absence of mass protests, they say, no... well, this means there is a terrible police state there, yes, well, well, abroad, they called for people to come out there at noon in line, line up, i watched how in australia, in many other countries they say, well , you came out, even if it was far from noon, you came out, they say against putin, they say what, he opens his t-shirt, there’s a z on the t-shirt, flags of the donetsk people’s republic, they say you came out as a protest, protest, yes , against you, against westerners, yes, that is , you know, this is this stereotyping, stereotyped thinking. of their many propagandists, those who organize campaigns against us, misunderstanding of our situation, on the one hand, this leads to their defeat, on the other hand, it creates for us dangers, because they will continue to do