i have two comment cards, sally stevens an nancy stafford. please come on up. if anyone else wants to speak there are public comment cards in the front you can fill out. >> hi, my name is sally stevens and i'm here today wearing two hats, one is the chair of animal commission and one is the chair of sf dog and both hats encourage you to support animal care and control. the animal control welfare commission voted earlier in month to send the letter of support for acc that i just gave to you have also included a letter from commissioner sherry o'neil who could not be here today emphasizing the important role that acc plays in preparing for and responding to di sasers. sasers. in addition i have numerous letters, together we represent thousands and thousands of dog owners and guardians and we all urge you to support this budget proposal and support animal care and control. it's underfunded and understood staffed and has been for years. the most perezing pressing things get done. there's so much more they could be doing if properly staffed and funded. i'd like to a

. >> hello, i'm sally stevens i was part of the rose group the main concern i see is the policy that directs the city to do an inventory including land under private control and identifies which areas are and a half rec and park department not only where native plants we're not only protecting the remedy amenity but where they can be planted in the future anywhere can be claimed as a and a half area it says they have to be managed like rec and park department airs program that means cutting down healthy trees using heshd. there is restrictions on private land that is a huge land grab please remove policy 4.2 it's a level of mick management of city programs that doesn't belong in the plan so why what is it put in. it sets up a bio process and interesting the city tried to prohibited the development and land use but, however, at the meeting the entirely commissioners have discussed how to get around the decision. if you leave 4.2 in the rose they may claim a mandate to weigh in and you the planning commission will be one stop for the approval the land use instead of the only stop now.