core services, x salter and medical take out the pieces subject to , other factors, has declined 60,0 basis points year-over-year for the past six months. there is no upward pressure on prices. i think that is what is different at the fed. richard clarida joining the fed last year has started to move the narrative toward a greater sensitivity to inflation expectations and realized inflation. that tips the balance of their decision-making. jonathan: we started by talking about these support mechanisms for broader risk assets. can rates remain in this environment and simultaneously can risk asset continue performing, holding these levels? michael: if the fed is successful in extending the expansion, underwriting a soft landing from fiscally inspired 3% gdp rates a year ago, i think risk assets do well. jonathan: is that your base case? bob: >> yes. michael: i am worried that we are threading the needle. if your goldilocks growth environment is 2% to 4% growth, that is one thing, but it is really closer to 1.5% and 2%. you are playing with fire. if it gets too low, to 1%, that is what w

charles salter came up with it, an acous -- acoustical engineer and the public can participate and the staff can participation and we'd have legally anniversariable mitigation plan and most importantly the concert can go on and all these people who love the concert, enjoy the concert can continue to love it but it will have reasonable sound levels that won't annoy as staff has admitted, it annoys the neighbors. that's the significant impact under ceqa and it ought to be addressed. thank you. i'd be happy to take any question. >> okay. thank you for your presentation and there's no questions. this public hearing item 27 has been held and is now closed. we now reconvene as the board of supervisors. colleagues, we now have items 28, 29 and 30 before us. supervisor fewer, do you have any final remarks? >> i want to thank my colleagues more taking the hearing into consideration. i'd like to make a motion for a vote to approve item 28, table items 29 and 30. >> a motion made. is there a second? >> seconded by supervisor safai. can we take this same house, same call? seeing no objection, item

so -- exactly, take his recommendations, research them, the things that salter proposed were very expensive. he thinks he has some less intrusive solutions, and so we want to research them, and meet with tony and kelly and discuss which ones which they will give them the most relief, work with that, see how it goes, and move forward in this way. i think we have a relationship with tony and kelly now facilitated by commissioner falzon that we can work with them. >> i think my feeling is i'd like to see that report, as well. because i mean condition three, having a sound limiter is going to be a nightmare for you. >> that's correct. >> and i -- it's really on the honor system, and it's like trying to get the trust back on the table. and usually, sound limiters are there when they don't trust you. i want to trust you, but i think with the report, we'll have a better understanding. and if it's tomorrow, i mean, i don't mind continuing it one more hearing just to see it. >> i mean, short of going in the other direction, i think, i feel like this -- the issue of measuring the ambient level was do

one notice of violation to the hotel it via rooftop, this was very soon after we approved charles salter'sutes, and the head of sound for hotel via did not bring a meter to keep track of their limit on the roof. we issued them and n.o.v., and then we have had an ongoing complaint. we are not sure, and it doesn't seem the complainant is confident about either emporium or independence of that investigation is ongoing. the inspector has stopped by on multiple occasions on divisive darrell. he has has found emporium out of compliance, and we are now -- two things are happening, the next step at the independent is to assign a limit for them, and then to follow up with emporium after some sound abatement has been completed to provide them with an updated sound limit. brick and mortar was on our list for a little while. they haven't had a complaint since the last hearing. we did receive a complaint from jones addressed it in realtime, it did not find them to be hosting entertainment. they were found in compliance by the inspector. all the other site visits i believe were pretty routine. we had a