like google, microsoft, 0penai, that is the company behind chatgpt, and in may, the 0penai ceo sam altmannecomes too hard to comply with the eu rules. he has since walked that back, but do you think these companies will comply with these rules? they will have to. i don't think companies always do so with a big smile, but it is very normal for companies to be bound by laws, and i expect that these big tech companies that we already know, you mentioned microsoft, google, meta, of course, because otherwise they won't have access to the eu markets, and i don't think they will sacrifice it, even if it might have sounded tough on the part of sam altmann. what you think it will take to set global standards beyond the eu, especially with countries like china also developing europe —— developing ai and using facial recognition software? that is a great example of where the european approach, which seeks to limit and even do away with facial recognition and these types of artificial intelligence, is completely different where it is actually used in china by the state to have maximum control over peo

i was just on a podcast and she asked me, what would you have sam altmann do in my answer was put $1rms of another in cooperation is good news. ., ., , ., news. one of the arguments that we hear counter _ news. one of the arguments that we hear counter to _ news. one of the arguments that we hear counter to that - news. one of the arguments that we hear counter to that is - news. one of the arguments that we hear counter to that is that i we hear counter to that is that if the us doesn't develop these countries further, countries that are adversaries well, what is your response to that? it’s is your response to that? it's true that _ is your response to that? it's true that if — is your response to that? it's true that if china _ is your response to that? it�*s true that if china viewed this as risk free, and it wasn't risk—free, but they viewed it as risk—free and theyjust had the gas pedal to get to this outcome while the other actors did not, that would still result in a catastrophe, and this is why in our work we often cite the effect of the film the day after, about nuclear war

we've obviously seen some amazing contributions made from microsoft, with mr sam altmann�*s company,ut we know there are global indicators that show china is leading in 27 out of 34 critical technology areas. 5g is a great example of how we fell behind. i'm here in the automotive capital of the united states in america, in michigan, we are racing to catch up on electric vehicles, racing to catch up on chips. how do we not fall behind on quantum and ai in particular? we've got to do autonomous vehicle technology. on that point, the president has been touting the chips act which includes billions of dollars investment into us technology into manufacturing. it will likely take some time before we see the chips act pay—off, like after 2024. will that be too late? i don't think so because you are hearing of the investments coming in, you are hearing about other positive situations, for example, investments from arizona, i don't think so because you are hearing of the investments coming in, you are hearing about other positive situations, for example, investments from arizona, and the cong

we've obviously seen some amazing contributions made from microsoft, mr sam altmann's company, whichw china is leading in 27 out of 34 china is leading in 27 out of 3a critical technology areas. 56 3a critical technology areas. 5g is a great example of how we fell behind. i'm here in the automotive capital of the united states in america, in michigan, we are racing to catch up on electric vehicles, racing to catch up on chips. how do we not fall behind on quantum and ai in particular. we've got to do autonomous vehicle technology. fin we've got to do autonomous vehicle technology.— vehicle technology. on that oint, vehicle technology. on that point. the _ vehicle technology. on that point, the president - vehicle technology. on that point, the president has - vehicle technology. on that l point, the president has been touting the chips act which includes billions of dollars investment into us technology into manufacturing. it will likely take some time before we see the chips act payoff, like after 2424. :: ., ., ., after 2424. , 2024. too late? i don't think— after 2424. , 2024. too

i was recently on a podcast and i was asked, what would you have sam altmann do and my answer was put what the eu and the us are doing to announce cooperation, and that is good news. ., . , news. one of the arguments we hear counter — news. one of the arguments we hear counter to _ news. one of the arguments we hear counter to that _ news. one of the arguments we hear counter to that is - news. one of the arguments we hear counter to that is if - news. one of the arguments we hear counter to that is if the - hear counter to that is if the us does not develop these technologies further, countries that are adversary �*s or rivals, like china, for example, will. what's your response to that? it example, will. what's your response to that?- example, will. what's your response to that? it is true that if china _ response to that? it is true that if china viewed - response to that? it is true that if china viewed this i response to that? it is true that if china viewed this as | that if china viewed this as risk—free, then they hit the gas pedal to get to this outcome while the us and other

its been a month now since sam altmann the founder of chatgpt you'll remember him was on the hill telling a.i. well, don't expect legislation anytime soon. so as you mentioned this morning the house science, space, and technology committee heard about a.i. and really dug into this. listen to what one expert said as he explained why china wants to get ahead of this. >> can you compare how the chinese communist party and the united states political values influence their research and development priorities for a.i. systems? >> china's very concerned about how it can destabilize their societal structure by having a system they can't control and might say things that be offensive and that could be very destructive to their way of their societal control. reporter: so senate majority leader chuck schumer is also really worried about the ccp that they could leap frog us on a.i. rules and put democracy at stake around the world and this week, he actually laid out his safe frame work, that's to guide lawmakers on passing federal rules that he says would maximize a.i.'s benefits while also protecti

if you're sam altmann how do you handle this? okay, if you're congress, how do you handle this?of work done on how these models are trained, what data is going into them, you're seeing companies like reddit react and they need to be transparent on how they are training the models what data they are using and what they expect that to result in from the model output and from the government perspective, i think we should start developing guidelines on how these models can be trained. i think they have tremendous beneficial impact, but we just need more transparency and more openness in what's actually going on. >> there's been a lot of fear mongering about a.i. and i'm curious where you are, because i've done a lot of research as well into this and guardrails make sense. i don't think it should be coming from congress. it should be coming from the community people like yourself, the experts, but at the same time, you know, you don't want to stifle innovation. dan ives from wedbush says a.i. is basically the iphone revolution. it's the internet revolution. this is a game changer for

notable s include who you're looking at tim cook of apple, sa tya nadella of microsoft and google and sam altmann are going to discuss ways to deepen the partnership between the u.s. and india in a.i., quantum computing, and space. the u.s. is india's largest trading partner and the u.s. is now looking to deepen those ties as a counterweight to china. stuart: that's going to happened to. lauren: final day of the state visit. and some meetings with kamala harris as well. stuart: oh, that's interesting. lauren: she's being elevated. stuart: we have another round of layoffs coming at ford but that's not the big deal this morning. this news of layoffs comes just as the same day that ford got a $9 billion loan from the government and let me point this out to you. headline in the "wall street journal" editorial page today. at ford, government is now job one. government is taking over ford. lauren: it used to be quality is job one. that was the ford slogan. now, they aim to please the government and get some of our money. ford is looking to make 2 million ev's a year with the help of a record $9.2 billi