clark just brought up which i think is really important. you talked about the toolbox. frank of this is something i teach a lot about at georgia tech samunn school. in america we tend to be sort of stove piped in our responses. to radical islam we use steel and treadmill, bombs and we try to eliminate those problems primarily via our military. when we deal with russia in the past it's almost all been in our economic cylinder of excellence. sanctions. additional sanctions, deeper sanctions, special sanctions, very special sanctions. but a nation has more in its toolkit, a very simple diagram i use for fighter college, we need simplicity and repetition is die. with diplomatic part, informational power, military power and economic power. anything we should be more balanced in our reply, all of nation, all of the government or all of alliance reply using all the tools rather than the stovepipes we have with radical islam, the stovepipes we have with russia, et cetera. sorry for -- >> if i could come in on what general breedlove said and give a a couple of examples. >> as long as you're not in violent agreement again. >> we are always in ag