emts got there and saved her life. >> okay, these bugs are giving me the creeps... even before sam johnsonts i try my hand at bug pinning. so, sam, pinning 101, and you had to pick locusts? you had to pick the locusts? >> [ laughs ] i just couldn't resist. >> luckily, sam is joking, and we move along to something more tolerable. if i see correctly, you picked something much more beautiful. >> yeah, yeah. this is weidemeyer's admiral. this is a butterfly. >> beautiful butterfly. >> so we can spread its wings like that. >> oh, my. >> and all we have to do then is take a pin. and i can put a pin, not through the wing but right next to the wing. see how you do here. put the pin just like i did through that paper. just right through there. that's good. real hard. good. you're like a lepidopterist. >> all right, at least i got through one. for decades the museum, with its quaint old-fashioned displays, continues to chug along, with an aging john in charge and various may family members working at it full time. but as the 21st century gets underway, interest in the museum and campground steadily

the former chairman sam johnson also had a plan. the book had a 75-your solution -- and oath actually they both actually get a number of these things. i think if you do them one of the time, it makes each of the other pieces harder. >> the only thing i would add to that, because mark is right, chairman sam johnson in texas chairman plan -- larson has a plan, for solvency, but they are on different scales. assumption, the three of us are under the assumption, any changes that happen in social security will be done in a bipartisan basis. i do not think we will pass anything in a one-party platform. if that's the case, having bills that are out that -- that are out there at one extreme or the it's designed in a way for the nuclear family. working spells, stay-at-home spouse, two kids. now it's much different. workers, toeconomy income workers. we need to modernize it were age, survivors. on ae've got to come along bipartisan basis. we've got to find solutions. we need to raise the pale wrote -- payroll tax cap, which republicans do not

the former chairman sam johnson also had a plan. they look different, one is up here and one is down here, but they both have a 75 year solution. i think if you do them one at a time, it makes each of the other pieces harder. >> the only thing i would add to that, because mark is right, chairman sam johnson in texas did put a plan in. congressman larson has a plan, for solvency, but they are on different scales. we are under the assumption, the three of us are under the assumption, any changes that happen in social security will be done in a bipartisan basis. i do not think we will pass anything in a one-party platform. if that's the case, having bills out there that are at one extreme or the other is not helpful. it does show what the stakes are, but we need to find a way to have a bipartisan approach. it was designed in a way for the nuclear family. working spouse, stay-at-home spouse, two kids. now it's much different. we have gig economy workers, to wo income workers. we need to modernize it were age, survivors. and we've got to

many ways, what i think the johnson story tells us is that impeachment as a weapon of politics is very, very hard to execute. but at least and i think this separates my guy from sam and peter, my guy, johnson was embroiled in a fundamental argument about the nature of the country. and nixon had a more, sometimes, nixon had committed crimes, peter's guy was more of a cultural clash in many ways. johnson was the most serious debate because he was someone from the defeated region at the cockpit of power, trying to undo the verdict. and in their frustration, the republicans struck out, lashed out, using the mechanics of impeachment. >> so he was impeached for violating the tenure of office act. what was that? >> it is hopeless. david stewart is a lawyer and a historian, that was the beginning of a joke, lawyer, historian, even he never figured it out. he had a whole book. it was basically an attempt to curtail johnson's capacity to remove lincoln's cabinet. so it was basically about edwin stanton and keeping the lincoln official in power. the congress worried that johnson was going to clean house and bring in people who support this reactionary vision of what the cou