i think in this, we see this in the iowa map da knox -- amanda knox case, we see this in the sam shepard case. there's a tendency -- i don't know if you agree -- but to basically take the person closest to the crime which requires the least imagination. >> i would put it slightly differently. i think often there's a tendency to take that explanation which involves the least amount of thought. and up an explanation that sets in early on and persists despite any countervailing evidence. it persists despite everything. you mentioned, someone should do, at some point, a taxonomy of murder cases, because there are all these different kinds and maybe, in fact, you have done just that sort of thing. >> no be, i mean, i've tried, and i was greatly inspired to continue trying when i read your book. but, you know, i think you're right. you have cases where they find a shooter, and then they have to decide whether someone paid him or someone was behind him or he was a loner. this goes back to the abraham lincoln/john wilkes boopt. yes, he shot lincoln. there were two other assassination attempts th