do you think sam woodward has too many clients and may be conflicted here?> you know, that is a relatively standard motion in multi-defendant cases. in the second circuit it's a motion where it's not necessarily used to conflict an attorney out but rather to make sure if there are conflicts that the defendants fully understand those conflicts and knowingly waive them. for example, in this case walt will be asked by the federal judge do you understand that any confidential information that mr. woodward got from mr. taveras, he'll not be able to use that to cross examine it, and do you still want to be represented by somebody who is essentially handcuffed from doing that portion of the cross-examination, and then it'll be up to walt to make a decision on that. so, you know, the more people you represent, the more risk that there are -- that there is of conflicts like that. but ultimately it is the kind of thing the judge can go through and decide is this something that's waivable and up to the defendant you want to waive it. >> what would you do? >> if i were