brown: me and samone have been together seven years. we love each other very much, but sometimes we just can't stand each other. topps: we have two beautiful children, a 4- and a 6-year-old and i'm currently pregnant with our third child, which is a concern for me being that darnell has a gambling addiction that has to stop and it's causing problems in our current relationship. brown: samone is always complaining about my gambling addiction, ddicted to her cellphone as i am to gambling. topps: i would like the judge to tell darnell that it's time for him to grow up and take responsibility for his actions. catalano: "divorce court" is now in session. judge lynn: good day ladies and gentlemen. i'm here with samone topps and darnell brown. the two of you have been together for seven years. you have two children together and one on the way? topps: one on the way. judge lynn: and one on the way.

we can reach out to samone and determine that. with regards to my questions having to do with documentation of the retention of the pure review panelist mr. hardy and professor jack, have you been able to find any documents that instructed those individuals, retained those individuals? >> from my knowledge, and discussion with staff, the answer is no. the letters that, right now are being circulated, actually came off the approved plans. >> right. those are the letters with the bubbles around them. >> those are apart of the larger format plan. those are not eight and a half by 11 pieces of paper retained. they're shots of -- apart of the plans that aren't -- that are available to the public. as opposed to an instrument design and a copy right plans, these are apart of the plans. speaker: they're hard to read and they're copies and they raise more questions than they answer, but there's one in particular dated october 30, 2005, which as you -- revised january 24th of 2006 in the middle brook and lewy structural engineering firm whi

we can reach out to samone and determine that. with regards to my questions having to do with documentation of the retention of the pure review panelist mr. hardy and professor jack, have you been able to find any documents that instructed those individuals, retained those individuals? >> from my knowledge, and discussion with staff, the answer is no. the letters that, right now are being circulated, actually came off the approved plans. >> right. those are the letters with the bubbles around them. >> those are apart of the larger format plan. those are not eight and a half by 11 pieces of paper retained. they're shots of -- apart of the plans that aren't -- that are available to the public. as opposed to an instrument design and a copy right plans, these are apart of the plans. speaker: they're hard to read and they're copies and they raise more questions than they answer, but there's one in particular dated october 30, 2005, which as you -- revised january 24th of 2006 in the middle brook and lewy structural engineering firm whi

we can reach out to samone and determine that. with regards to my questions having to do with documentation of the retention of the pure review panelist mr. hardy and professor jack, have you been able to find any documents that instructed those individuals, retained those individuals? >> from my knowledge, and discussion with staff, the answer is no. the letters that, right now are being circulated, actually came off the approved plans. >> right. those are the letters with the bubbles around them. >> those are apart of the larger format plan. those are not eight and a half by 11 pieces of paper retained. they're shots of -- apart of the plans that aren't -- that are available to the public. as opposed to an instrument design and a copy right plans, these are apart of the plans. speaker: they're hard to read and they're copies and they raise more questions than they answer, but there's one in particular dated october 30, 2005, which as you -- revised january 24th of 2006 in the middle brook and lewy structural engineering firm whi

we can reach out to samone and determine that. with regards to my questions having to do with documentation of the retention of the pure review panelist mr. hardy and professor jack, have you been able to find any documents that instructed those individuals, retained those individuals? >> from my knowledge, and discussion with staff, the answer is no. the letters that, right now are being circulated, actually came off the approved plans. >> right. those are the letters with the bubbles around them. >> those are apart of the larger format plan. those are not eight and a half by 11 pieces of paper retained. they're shots of -- apart of the plans that aren't -- that are available to the public. as opposed to an instrument design and a copy right plans, these are apart of the plans. speaker: they're hard to read and they're copies and they raise more questions than they answer, but there's one in particular dated october 30, 2005, which as you -- revised january 24th of 2006 in the middle brook and lewy structural engineering firm whi

we can reach out to samone and determine that. with regards to my questions having to do with documentation of the retention of the pure review panelist mr. hardy and professor jack, have you been able to find any documents that instructed those individuals, retained those individuals? >> from my knowledge, and discussion with staff, the answer is no. the letters that, right now are being circulated, actually came off the approved plans. >> right. those are the letters with the bubbles around them. >> those are apart of the larger format plan. those are not eight and a half by 11 pieces of paper retained. they're shots of -- apart of the plans that aren't -- that are available to the public. as opposed to an instrument design and a copy right plans, these are apart of the plans. speaker: they're hard to read and they're copies and they raise more questions than they answer, but there's one in particular dated october 30, 2005, which as you -- revised january 24th of 2006 in the middle brook and lewy structural engineering firm whi

we can reach out to samone and determine that. with regards to my questions having to do with documentation of the retention of the pure review panelist mr. hardy and professor jack, have you been able to find any documents that instructed those individuals, retained those individuals? >> from my knowledge, and discussion with staff, the answer is no. the letters that, right now are being circulated, actually came off the approved plans. >> right. those are the letters with the bubbles around them. >> those are apart of the larger format plan. those are not eight and a half by 11 pieces of paper retained. they're shots of -- apart of the plans that aren't -- that are available to the public. as opposed to an instrument design and a copy right plans, these are apart of the plans. speaker: they're hard to read and they're copies and they raise more questions than they answer, but there's one in particular dated october 30, 2005, which as you -- revised january 24th of 2006 in the middle brook and lewy structural engineering firm whi