samuelson! >> trevor: didn't that produce some inadvertent negative ramifications?don't even understand the words you just said. ( laughter ) trevor, i'm deeply concerned about how people are getting taken advantage of, which is why i've decided to help resisters resist getting scammed. i've set up a fundraising side, cash for kosta.com, and i'm going to use the money people give me to stop all these drifters once for all, because if i can just raise $100,000, i will be able to increase my goal to $200,000, which is halfway to 4 h hundred thousand dollars, fighting trump, fighting trump, then i'll get to $500,000, and then, bam! >> trevor: bam what? >> i'll just need another $100,000 -- >> trevor: michael kosta, everyone! get out of here, man! we'll be right back! don't give him money! ( cheers and applause ) ♪ even the very serious ronda rousey, ♪ (laughing) can't be serious with twizzlers. ♪ (laughing) >> trevor: welcome back to "the daily show." today is a bittersweet day for us here at "the daily show" because today is the last day we get to see hasan minhaj. (

national intelligence, dan coats, fbi director stephen wray, secretary of homeland security here samuelson, director of the national security agency general called tony national security pfizer john bolton to make comments and questions on the . as you know we address during the election numerous times in rhetoric the purpose of today's briefing is about what we are doing now to protect the integrity of our elections and we ask that you stay on topic. in order to this run smoothly we ask you direct your attention and questions to ask for bolton and make comments. thank you very much sarah and what we like to address today is election security in the 2018 election and in the future. president has made it very clear i think his priority is. we've had obviously a number of inquiries from congress on this including a letter to me last couple days five senators by senator schumer and for others. i have responded to that letter today and we make copies to you and it's part of a framework for the briefing that the four operating the agency give you here today. they are the ones who are living and

the offer was not good enough >>> someone who knows a bit about these trade conflicts is hawkin samuelsonvolvo trade group. cars have been at center of these conversations involving mr. trump. do you think your industry enjoyed its time in the spotlight? >> no, i don't think so. but free trade is very important in that respect. it's a good discussion i believe there's other proposals from the european union, if we have a system with zero tariffs, i think that would be good for consumers and also would be good for the car industry, both in europe and in the u.s. >> president trump is threatening once again to impose a fresh set of tariffs, 200 billion on china i have to ask, i know that you already had to move production around a bit to deal with some of this in the recent months, do you expect this to be even more disruptive to your production going forward? >> absolutely. if the industry cannot produce and trade with each other, you have to invest much more and build every component of every car locally. that would end up being more expensive cars for kurs mcustom. that would be bad. the

but robert samuelson columnist at "the washington post" wrote today economic anxiety is increasinglilyc affliction. no one can increase it poor worries about staying poor. no one can escape i join the crowd own well-being being judged how well their children are doing. i wonder if it's the financial anxiety, stupid, might be a more apt description and do you think that anyone in the 2020 democratic field is thinking about this and able to sort of tap into that anxiety and address it. >> it's a great question, dana. i think they all are. especially when you see people appear at net roots last week very progressive group where a lot of potential 2020 candidates and took different cuts at that but the fact is when you look at life, and upward mobility it's always based on the same pillars. if you get a good education, you get a good job. then can you have good healthcare and benefits and affordable housing. those four pillars have been blown apart. how democrats and republicans answer that question, can you have affordable housing and can have you healthcare that people can afford and cov

samuelsonfessor paul is who you are looking for who is not related to robert samuelson. nobelamuelson is a prize-winning economist who passed away in the early 2000's. the paper you are looking for is from 2001. atch.org, to tradew there is a whole set of fact sheets that lay out what has happened, boiled down into accessible language. there is one about jobs in the economy. if you look in their, his paper is cited. there is a footnote and you can read it. on the issue with canada -- here's the thing to know. put down the hot coffee. we have a trade deficit with canada. everyone saw the president in a characteristic way, not reputable moment laughing about lying to the prime minister of canada. he thought that was amusing, when he said he told them we had a trade deficit, but he did not know if that is true and maybe it isn't. the president know when he was actually right, which he was. -- the president didn't know when he was actually right, which he was. a huge part of what became a trade deficit, before nafta, we had a trade deficit with canada not very big, less than

if you look at cheryl mills and samuelson. hillary clinton's lawyers. you remember this very well, that they got immunity in their deals and gave nothing in return. >> jason: five got immunity. the closest to hillary clinton and they got nothing out of it. chris, you get the last word. >> well, well, i think we all want to know what is in david pecker's safe. it could be interesting to the american people. >> it's like geraldo. >> i wish congress was half aggressive as figuring this out as you were when you were there. >> jason: gentlemen, thank you.an i appreciate the spirit of the debate. chris, i want you to stick around. i want everybody else on this broadcast to stick around, because this will shock you. a bombshell report put out by real clear investigations that says despite what james comey said, the fbi failed to look at the vast majority of the emailsi on anthony weiner's laptop, which had thousands of hillary clinton's state department emails on it. joining me now to explain further is the author of that report, investigative journalist for r

i didn't feel much different when i heard that cheryl mills and heather samuelson were offered immunityinvestigation, or cursory investigation, at least, of the hillary clinton e-mail scandal. >> that was you -- >> nobody expected cheryl -- >> that was a use immunity agreement for their laptops, so that anything we find on the laptops, this is an immunity deal we believe is different, which is you have exposure on what we're investigating. we'll give you a deal if you help us otherwise. distinction with a difference. >> well, i understand that. but we didn't know that then when we heard about cheryl and heather, and we don't know what the immunity is for now when we hear about allen. i'll wait and find out. your previous guest talked about how there are myriad different types of immunity. i'm not in the mood to panic. but i do think that michael cohen's implication of the president in this campaign finance violation, if you believe it, if you think that the -- that they can make this stick, i believe it brings the democrats closer to their fantasy of impeaching donald trump. i really be

>> i think it's going just where i thought it was going, when they gave cheryl mills and heather samuelsonmmunity in the clinton e-mail server scandal. we didn't know what that was about when we heard about it and later on we found out it was really limited immunity just about their devices. i don't know what these two gentlemen, mr. pecker and the cfo from the trump organization are cooperating with, but i don't think just because they have immunity we can expect that they're going to-- that they're rolling on the president and creating some kind of a wave of charges against him. i'm willing to sit back and wait. i'm not getting too excited about those immunities. >> neil: all right. pecker is the one that gets a lot of attention because apparently the national enquirer has a vault full of stories and issues that involve donald trump going back many, many years. what do you think of that and where they're going with the immunity deal for him? >> i don't know. it's very interesting to think that mr. pecker's vault would be totally and completely filled with donald trump material when natio