what you see on the screen, is a letter that is september to the san francisco bay guardian. i'm here to talk about the letter. after it was found to violate the law the statement of economic interest, the library commission wanted to help. so what they decided to do is hold a series of discussions outside the public. these were to formulate and revise and statement which demonstrated for release. this was all done illegally. violation of the sunshine ordinance and the brown act. they then next directed a city employee to release the letter on official stationery to the san francisco bay guardian and to the public. after we raised these questions, they said we'll track it after it had been used legally. today i will discuss specifics about this letter. today i just want to ask this. did mr. herrera learn to act illegally from the library commission or vice versa. personally, i think they have been colluding so long to e evade the law it's simply second nature for now. this was done completely unlawfully violation of the brown act all of this was done with private conversation

and note that san francisco bay guardian contacted both dbi and the plan and published two stories regarding the 1049 market street situation is. and prior to the meeting and process to legalize the current illegal residential units and the steps to be taken to address the essential life safety systems in the building, formally requested on october 28th a suspension of the building permit issued in august and which they have given to the board of appeals and this is schedule for december 18th which we will keep a close update on that. and fellow commissioners please check your cal lers and hold a space on december 13, from 5:00 to 7:00 p.m. for the annual dbi staff holiday party that will be held on the second floor of 1660 mission, and your children will be warmly welcomed and we will unwrap presents to be handed out on this merry occasion i hope that my kid behalfs himself better than last year. >> we are accepting nominations for the employee for the quarter, for quarter four which ends at the end of this calendar year and so send in your nomination to william no later than december 13 an

what you see on the screen, is a letter that is september to the san francisco bay guardian. i'm here to talk about the letter. after it was found to violate the law the statement of economic interest, the library commission wanted to help. so what they decided to do is hold

they directed a city employee to commit an illegal act by issuing this statement to the san francisco bay guardianfull well and then that they had the gal to say yeah, even though, we didn't realize what we were doing was illegal and restrakt the statement and after it had been printed in the press. and now either you have a bunch of morons who take this training and have not got the faintest idea of what is going on or you get the people who take it and don't give a... what it says. >> may i ask you a question. you provided the staff with some language that you wanted to include in the annual report? that they failed to include? >> yes. in my public testimony, regarding the report at the last meeting, i gave a number of suggests as far as what it is but i heard the suggestions from the other members of the public and i looked to see if any of those were included. and this is where they would do the minutes and what you wrote about what i said is wrong. and it they will change everything, but would not change a single thing what we said and even though what we said was incorrectly represented. >>