san francisco for 23 years but here more in my capacity as a beekeeper. i have been a beekeeper since 2006 and a past president of the san francisco beekeepers association and last year i founded a new nonprofit called san francisco bee cause and we are a member of the san francisco urban agricultural alliance. i am in support, we are in support of the ordinance with some exceptions. specifically request changes to the words used in the ordinance. there is a basic rules that courts apply when interpreting statutes and when of them is that no word is superfluous. each word has an intended meaning and also if the word is not specifically defined by the statue it, it is given a common sense meaning. when i looked at the ordinance from the ice of a beekeeper, i saw certain words that didn't seem to jive with my understanding of the commission's intent to have this ordinance to governor plant. based foods as opposed to anything derived from or is an animal as is governed by the article one of the san francisco health code. specifically there are words such as food, fresh food, farms, and products. those words are not defined. and when you compare them to horticu