to ascertain any portion of the drafted ordinance that's outside the jurisdiction of the san francisco ethingtonics commission? -- ethingtcs commission? >> by when? >> by the next meeting. >> logically, you should have it before so staff can then revise the draft. we don't have to try to work through it. i request through the chair that that opinion be rendered a week before, by february 19th. >> and by working through the proposed ordinance actually meant to include -- i should have been more clear -- should have meant that i was going to include staff in discussion of the review. as with all projects, i work closely with the staff to get their views as well. >> okay. so we have, then, to make the decision as to whether or not we want to adopt the staff's recommendation that we go with the 2017 version as opposed to the 2016 version. do we have a motion to that effect? >> so moved. >> i will second it, but i have a couple of questions. >> sure. >> friends of ethics has pointed out some things that they would like changed in the 2017 version. one is the substantive motivating factor to contributing