bulk of the organizations that signed that letter are either located in san francisco or have members in san francisco. today, the p.u.c. is the leading voice opposing protections for the bay delta over the state board. we're on the brink of extinctions, and right now, the p.u.c. is the leading voice in slowing down that crisis. the p.u.c.'s position is giving cover to antienvironmental voices in the central valley and the trump administration. it's not news that the central valley farmers and the trump administration oppose this, but it's sure news and sure persuasion when your staff does that. your staff is painting a doomsday nair joe. there's a dramatically different picture if you look at demand today, and just the tools you presented today, there is no shortage if the state board standards entered into it today. as mr. sklar just approximated the out, your organization is a decade or two behind most other organizations in the state when it comes to planning water supplies, and frankly, the p.u.c. is relying on lousy coins rather than peer reviewed science. we would step in and urge you to go in three directions:

san francisco p.u.c. partnered with 16 bayview community organizations. knocked on 2,400 doors and attended 20 community events and 13 focus groups as well. they engaged with our community on social media, online. we want and we request and want in our heart to make sure we have this community center, the new one at 1550 evans. i appreciate your time. and we just want to move forward. and we really appreciate you listening to us and taking us into consideration. >> good afternoon, we welcome the new facility at 1550 evans. time and time ago we have seen family picnics and lifting voices together in praise are subject to noise complaints and policy. the new center will be a place we can safely and publicly have our cultural celebrations while also honoring historic mitigation between bayview and the city. thank you. >> good afternoon, supervisors. i happen to be one of the ones who sat on a couple commissioner or p.u.c. meetings when they came into the bayview district. i myself am a resident of the city. i've been here all my life. but ten years i've been

san francisco. i am a resident in san francisco supervisor peskin, thank you for working with us and the p.u.c. on this resolution. it is incredibly necessary. it will bring about the survival of this industry which is weathering on the vine. it is without question a disaster for us. we have faced to federally declared fisheries disasters for the previous two years and this year was severely curtailed. if you want to see this industry thrive we must support the state water board strong action in this regard. we will lose pier 45 if we do not act. thank you for your leadership. i appreciate it. >> hello. my name is. and i am president of the golden gate chapter of travel limited. i represents -- represent thousands of recreational anglers and conservationist friends in the bay area. we support the resolution. if supported, in supporting the state water board proposal, it is stepping up and acknowledging the importance of decades of scientific research that has been done. without enough flow, the water will get too warm and it will not have enough dissolved oxygen the floodplains will be insuffic

p.u.c. has found itself in the unfortunate position of not being in a position to advocate for the highest standards for bay protection. and, frankly, this has put san francisco behind much of the rest of the state in investing in water supply alternatives, though i believe the p.u.c. and the san francisco chronicle for that matter recognize the need to innovate in this regard. but as it stands, while we dither, other cities have recognized the need for stronger environmental protections. east bay mud has built their freeport project, giving them a new water supply if a disastrous drought hits. orange county is now the world leader in water recycling. contra costa built an offstream reservoir for water during droughts. now they are planning to expand that reservoir in a way that can help the environment and cities. santa monica's cleaning up the groundwater and storm water and is planning to be completely independent, eliminating their use of water from the bay-delta. san francisco, i think, should be leaders in this area, but, frankly, we have not been, and this resolution, pun intended, endeavors to turn the tide. the resolution before you reflects conversa

p.u.c. owns property outside of san francisco, all of those things should be brought into this plan also. is there a plan? >> we have participated in the plan as drafted. >> how long ago was the study? >> january 2015. >> it might be time for another one. >> we also have a integrated resource plan. i'm happy to bring that forward as well. and i'm happy to do a powerpoint presentation if that is helpful on what the thinking is. i would like to schedule that after we complete enrolment in april so that we can get through the polish. i'm hoping to bring to you more information about our communications plan associated with that. i believe mike and brian have been talking about that. >> but you do have a plan already, as you said, is there something that you can bring before us for the next meeting so we can at least see what you have done so far? i appreciate it but i don't want to interrupt the questioning. it just came to my mind that i'd not seen a plan. we had not been briefed on any plan. i think this is really important that we tackle this and if we want our, all of san francisco to be

p.u.c. standards. >> director lai: is the lighting going to be standard, whatever we use in san francisco or are we designing specialized lighting for treasure island? >> we're using p.u.c.-approved mix -- fixtures for the streets. there are other areas that are a little more special with retail. in the park spaces, they're primarily more pedestrian-scaled as well. so those are unique. that's another layer of added character between them. >> i'm not sure how this works, but i would think that the lighting is a good opportunity to celebrate the unique environment of treasure island. if cost is not an issue, i would think we should explore the specialty lights around the promenade or something. i notice there are allocated space for swings. are there any play structures? >> there will be in future phases of eastside commons. >> director lai: and you mentioned sports fields. are there any other sport courts, tennis courts, basketball courts? >> it's a possibility in the sports area. that's a future phase, so we have not designed or laid them out. we'll want to coordinate with community members and see what peop

san francisco. there are -- there is pg&e, there is san francisco public utilities commission, and there is the m.t.a. so many of the m.t.a.'s poles are also p.u.c. poles because the m.t.a. strings its infrastructure off those poles, but there are poles that the m.t.a. has, and it contracts those with the carriers. >> vice president swig: but this is beyond that. somebody can comment on this so i'm not hung out to dry too badly, but we had another one on fulton street, and i recall this. they look at a building, not a pole, a building down the street because there was furious disagreement from the community. there always is. they looked at a building down the street, they looked at a pole down the street, and again, the same consensus from verizon, this is the only place we could put it. it wasn't an m.t.a. decision, it wasn't a p.u.c. decision -- >> commissioner honda: commissioner swig, can i interrupt for a second? >> vice president swig: what am i missing? >> commissioner honda: no, no. is it required to look for alternative sites? so that's the thing. i think prior, because verizon and at&t had so many cases before us so that they did not -

san francisco committed to begin the service in 2015. that's a pretty steep incline over a short period of time. california p.u.c. staff and pg&e will need to prepare information to implement this decision. at this time, we expect that the decision will be implemented starting january 1st. what are we expecting to happen as a result of the decision? we anticipate that january 1st, 2019, the pcia rate will increase for clean power sf customers and pg&e generation rate, what they charge bundled customers will decrease relative to our current levels. based on the best available information we have today, we estimate that clean power sf customers could pay 40 to $50 million more per year to pg&e. if we take no action to absorb that change. that is 25% of our forecasted revenue from the clean power sf program. these figures that i'm giving to you are based on pg&e's most recent rate forecast, which is scheduled to be updated in early november. we're anticipating that the outlook will improve with the november updates. again, based on best available information of what that update will likely show, we estimate that the

san francisco. and feedback from the stakeholders. the pilot project was a joint project that was funded by the s.f. p.u.c. and delivered by the school district. this project was critical at setting up this grant program for success in demonstrating how we can effectively deliver these types of projects. we also conducted stakeholder outreach. we met with the internal departments at the p.u.c., and our city family they'll be interested in participating, a trust for public land and other organizations i'll be interested in participating in the program. so as greg said, the program will be open to all parcels, public and private that can meet the five eligibility criteria. in order to qualify for grants, projects must be located on a parcel within an s.f. p.u.c. sewer system service area, combined or separate. projects also must be able to manage runoff from half an acre of service using green infrastructure and they have to design that green infrastructure to manage the 90th percentile storm for the first .75 inches of rain. teams will also have to demonstrate previous experience, with designing and buildin

san francisco public utilities commission. and joined on my left by the project manager for this project at the p.u.c.as well as greta jones who is a senior design manager at d.p.w. she will speak shortly on the specifics. i like to provide you with some context. provide you with context for this project. the southeast plant is our agency's oldest and largest wastewater treatment plant. is located in the heart of bayview and responsible for treating 80% of our combined rainwater and sewage flow. as i mentioned, it is located in the heart of bayview's hunters point and encompassing a ten block area between oakdale avenue and evans avenue, one block west of the third street corridor or. the plant was expanded to the current footprint in 1982 to comply with the 1972 federal community water act. next line, please. during this time, community members self organized to ensure that the city and the state would address social, economic and environmental impact of the treatment plant expansion. led by the big six,. the community successfully security mitigation agreement with the city in 1982. this agreement r

the san francisco public utilities commission to build a new and improved southeast community facility. 1550 evans is a 5-acre site along the third street corridor in the bayview, owned by the p.u.c. commission. first and foremost i want to acknowledge and express my undivided support for the community plan. i'm excited and want to see it move forward as quickly as possible. this facility which sup plants the existing facility on oak dale will fulfill the p.u.c.'s long standing promise to the bayview community bringing benefits like child care space, public art, conference room space, meeting room space, cafe and of course the highly coveted and much needed parking. i'm excited to note that this s.u.d. also allows for affordable housing in the future, while nothing is currently planned, no current future housing plans are on the books but should it be led by future supervisor it must ensure it's built to reflect the support of the existing bayview hunters point community. one thing i want to notice is the bayview hunters point is notably the backbone of the city. and it is bearing a disproportionate share of our industrial and freeway transit infrastructure. i think we need proje