item 12, public hearing to consider and possible action to adopt the san francisco public utilities commission ten-year capital plan for fiscal year 2021-22 through fiscal year 2030-31, and item 13, public hearing to consider and possible action to adopt the san francisco public utilities commission ten-year financial plan for fiscal year 2021-22 through fiscal year 2030-31. mr. sandler? >> actually, madam president, this is michael, and if you would allow me, i want to provide a very brief overview. the budget proposal for our racial equity is influenced by two key drivers. the office for racial equity and this commission's initiative on racial justice. the first comes from the legal mandate of the city's office of racial equity. at the end of december, we submitted our plan to the city's office of racial equity. to implement this work, we detailed in our plan we must start by adding additional resources, developing a core racial equity team, and deploying new systems to support the delivery of the items in our plan. as you know, we have 2300 staff over seven counties with very different need

item 12, public hearing to consider and possible action to adopt the san francisco public utilities commissionten-year capital plan for fiscal year 2021-22 through fiscal year 2030-31, and item 13, public hearing to consider and possible action to adopt the san francisco public utilities commission ten-year financial plan for fiscal year 2021-22 through fiscal year 2030-31. mr. sandler? >> actually, madam president, this is michael, and if you would allow me, i want to provide a very brief overview. the budget proposal for our racial equity is influenced by two key drivers. the office for racial equity and this commission's initiative on racial justice. the first comes from the legal mandate of the city's office of racial equity. at the end of december, we submitted our plan to the city's office of racial equity. to implement this work, we detailed in our plan we must start by adding additional resources, developing a core racial equity team, and deploying new systems to support the delivery of the items in our plan. as you know, we have 2300 staff over seven counties with very different needs

close by is a pump that is operated by the san francisco public utilities commission. no mention is made of that. the land on which the school will be placed has been the center for operations at creo sole and other contaminates on the sight. month mention made of that. we have to be very careful. you are just employing the name of the ohlone. i represent the ramaytush ohlone. nobody has brought this to my attention. it is the name of the first people just so you can win brownie points. my meaning to talk to you all is not to put our children in harm's way. the abatement, mitigation should be done with very, very high standards. which have not been done recently by the san francisco unified school district. >> thank you very much. next caller. >> hi, this is sarah davis, member of mission creek harbor, resident of mission bay for 46 years now. it is exciting. a member of the mission bay cac. i am calling in support of this project. what you are looking at here is culmination of a lot of collaboration from the community and the members of s.f.u.s.d. and oci. i am callin

listed hereunder constitute a consent calendar, are considered to be routine by the san francisco public utilities commissionand will be acted upon by a single vote of the commission, there will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the commission or the public so requests, in which event the matter will be removed from the calendar and considered as a separate item. >> any items that you would like to see taken off the calendar? no? seeing none, madam secretary, please open this item up for public comment. >> clerk: members of the public who wish to comment on this matter, dial 415-655-0001, meeting i.d. 146-039-0630, pound, pound. mr. moderator, are there any callers? >> operator: madam secretary, there are two callers. first caller, your line is open. you have two minutes to speak to item 9. >> eileen [inaudible] san francisco coalition neighborhood, speaking on my own behalf. i am reqi

close by is a pump that is operated by the san francisco public utilities commission.no mention is made of that. the land on which the school will be placed has been the center for operations at creo sole and other contaminates on the sight. month mention made of that. we have to be very careful. you are just employing the name of the ohlone. i represent the ramaytush ohlone. nobody has brought this to my attention. it is the name of the first people just so you can win brownie points. my meaning to talk to you all is not to put our children in harm's way. the abatement, mitigation should be done with very, very high standards. which have not been done recently by the san francisco unified school district. >> thank you very much. next caller. >> hi, this is sarah davis, member of mission creek harbor, resident of mission bay for 46 years now. it is exciting. a member of the mission bay cac. i am calling in support of this project. what you are looking at here is culmination of a lot of collaboration from the community and the members of s.f.u.s.d. and oci. i am calling

we're collaborating with the san francisco public utilities commission. next slide. going to share briefly the kind of planning work that we're involved with now. what kinds of actions can we take to reduce seismic and flood risk. so we're looking at a range of seismic measures. we have a very strong engineering team that has started the concept design of different approaches. as you see in the seismic measures table, there's a top row, shoreline stabilization. if we want to eliminate the expanding, a new seawall. that would involve creating new land along the embarcadera. similar concept, a land side doing ground improvement in the embarcadera to create a stable shoreline. we're looking at targeted measures, retrofit as a way of reducing the seismic risk exposure. for each we have cost estimates, impact analysis and looking at adaptation for sea level rise. and this is going to be significantly disruptive work, it could end up in a position of having to close the northbound lanes of the embarcadera and reroute traffic. so in our -- minimizing seismic risk along the

but we couldn't make any progress with the san francisco public utilities commission on clean power. we now have clean power and an element that has not been discussed here by you supervisors is that we, the people, are paying into this clean power s.f., and we haven't been consulted. have you all bonded over what happened in texas? have you all thought about what will happen in california if we have a huge fire and the grid is compromised? you are not looking into this, but you all need the information. and you all presuppose that the public is going to follow whatever you all do. have you bonded over the marketing and the rate? have you bonded and found out what is clean in the clean power? have you reflected on specs and how specs contribute to dirty power, and i can go on and on. i watch you all, and you all simply rubber stamp. and i never saw this clown, and some other clowns, including barbara hill, who came from the public utilities commission -- [buzzer] >> the speaker's time has lapsed. >> clerk: thank you for your comments. mr. chair, there are no other callers in the cue.

resolution approving an emergency declaration of the san francisco public utilities commission pursuant to code section 6.60 to replace and repair fences onala needda watershed damaged by the s c.u. lighting complex fire with a total cost not to exceed $4.5 million. members who wish to comment on this item call 415-655-0001. id1463191053-pound pound if you have not done so please dial star 3 to speak. >> thank you, madam clerk. we have the p.u.c. here to present on this item. >> thank you, chair haney. good morning. tim ramirez division manager for land management. i have slides. i will share my screen. this is a shot taken on august 16th. one of our staff out on the east bay watershed lands in santa clara county. took this of a rainbow. i happened to simultaneously coincide with the lightning strike. this is how the fire started. it was a traumatic photograph. this is early morning august 16th looking over a reservoir. the result of what happened with the lightning strike and dry context. most of you know this fire started that day and the next two days as a very small series of fires

the public citizen report and and you can find this online and it's treated you the san francisco public utility commission so i note that you are mission statement is hyper focused on san francisco and benefits and san francisco residents have shown they're willing and able to reduce water usage and below to protect the levels. and the atlantic magazine now has a very good article and it says with the development of so many work from homeworking arrangements during the pandemic, experts predict that the coastal cities will continue to be depopulated rather than t- >> your time has extort fired. next caller. you have two minutes. >> commissioners, i've been listening to this and workshop and we should have had this workshop 20 years ago and this workshop now has given us all the details of a crime scene and we know who is responsible for the demise of the salmon and i often say, more respect for the salmon, so, conveniently and the for thousands of years and some came and screwed up everything and you all do have the decency to invite them at stable but not have the decency to invite so-called experts. and

commission, the recreation and park commission, m.t.a., as well as the p.u.c., public utilities commission of san francisco, and the trans bay joint power authority. i just wanted to highlight here some of the key take-aways from the survey we conducted, in comparison to what the airport processes are. we found that in terms of solicitation, none of the commissions reported having their commissioner being involved in the actual solicitation process or the actual evaluation panel's selection process. we also found in terms of the approval, all commissions approved contracts with different thresholds and parameters, but all are somewhat involved in the approval process, with the airport being involved on all concessions and leases. in terms of written policy prohibiting communication with bidders, we found that the airport and m.t.a. did have a written policy on this prohibition. we also found that in terms of the department's statement of incompatible activity, or s.i.a., that all commissions we surveyed had this s.i.a. prohibition on selection, except for the t.s.a., since they involve multiple jurisdictio

the commissioners public comment is essential, especially when it refers to the san francisco public utilities commission that has failed us all. now, regarding this audit, we need to put emphasis on the community benefits. one audit was done and relative to the information to the audit is missing. no mention has been made of that. so, rather this one audit, or partial audit was done, the documentation is missing. now the controller's office as well as the city attorney by the federal bureau of investigation because they can follow the money once another audit on the community benefits. some of the commissioners who have been there for a long time know i've been talking about this. those commissioners kept saying oh, it's all about, i mean, they don't care, it's all about money. whose money is it? it's the taxpayers' money. but basically improvement project starts at 6 billion and is now 12 billion and will end costing us 20 billion, something is fundamentally wrong. so we can have 1,000 audits. this is something that is quite simple and is linked to ethics, morals and standards. thank you very much. >>

light for illuminating our ideas and values starting in 2016 the san francisco public utilities commissionled with the did i audits for better light for streets and pedestrian and they're even better for this vitally lasting longer and consuming up to 50 percent less energy upgrading takes thirty minutes remove the old street light and repeat 18 thousand 5 hundred times while our street lights will be improving the clean energy will remain the same every san francisco street light is powder by 100 percent godfathers hetch hetchy power in one simple word serious as day turns >> welcome to the tuesday, february 2, 2021 virtual meeting of the san francisco entertainment commissioner. i am the commission's vice-president. due to the covid-19 health emergency and to protect entertainment commission members, city employees and the public, the meeting room is closed. however, members and the employees will be participating in the meeting remotely. this precaution is taken pursuant to the various local state and federal orders, declarations and directives. commission members and employees will att

the public citizen report and and you can find this online and it's treated you the san francisco public utility commissionte that you are mission statement is hyper focused on san francisco and benefits and san francisco residents have shown they're willing and able to reduce water usage and below to protect the levels. and the atlantic magazine now has a very good article and it says with the development of so many work from homeworking arrangements during the pandemic, experts predict that the coastal cities will continue to be depopulated rather than t- >> your time has extort fired. next caller. you have two minutes. >> commissioners, i've been listening to this and workshop and we should have had this workshop 20 years ago and this workshop now has given us all the details of a crime scene and we know who is responsible for the demise of the salmon and i often say, more respect for the salmon, so, conveniently and the for thousands of years and some came and screwed up everything and you all do have the decency to invite them at stable but not have the decency to invite so-called experts. and the cou

but we couldn't make any progress with the san francisco public utilities commission on clean power. we now have clean power and an element that has not been discussed here by you supervisors is that we, the people, are paying into this clean power s.f., and we haven't been consulted. have you all bonded over what happened in texas? have you all thought about what will happen in california if we have a huge fire and the grid is compromised? you are not looking into this, but you all need the information. and you all presuppose that the public is going to follow whatever you all do. have you bonded over the marketing and the rate? have you bonded and found out what is clean in the clean power? have you reflected on specs and how specs contribute to dirty power, and i can go on and on. i watch you all, and you all simply rubber stamp. and i never saw this clown, and some other clowns, including barbara hill, who came from the public utilities commission -- [buzzer] >> the speaker's time has lapsed. >> clerk: thank you for your comments. mr. chair, there are no other callers in the cue.

commission, the recreation and park commission, m.t.a., as well as the p.u.c., public utilities commission of san francisco the trans bay joint power authority. i just wanted to highlight here some of the key take-aways from the survey we conducted, in comparison to what the airport processes are. we found that in terms of solicitation, none of the commissions reported having their commissioner being involved in the actual solicitation process or the actual evaluation panel's selection process. we also found in terms of the approval, all commissions approved contracts with different thresholds and parameters, but all are somewhat involved in the approval process, with the airport being involved on all concessions and leases. in terms of written policy prohibiting communication with bidders, we found that the airport and m.t.a. did have a written policy on this prohibition. we also found that in terms of the department's statement of incompatible activity, or s.i.a., that all commissions we surveyed had this s.i.a. prohibition on selection, except for the t.s.a., since they involve multiple jurisdictions. w

listed hereunder constitute a consent calendar, are considered to be routine by the san francisco public utilities commissionand will be acted upon by a single vote of the commission, there will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the commission or the public so requests, in which event the matter will be removed from the calendar and considered as a separate item. >> any items that you would like to see taken off the calendar? no? seeing none, madam secretary, please open this item up for public comment. >> clerk: members of the public who wish to comment on this matter, dial 415-655-0001, meeting i.d. 146-039-0630, pound, pound. mr. moderator, are there any callers? >> operator: madam secretary, there are two callers. first caller, your line is open. you have two minutes to speak to item 9. >> eileen [inaudible] san francisco coalition neighborhood, speaking on my own behalf. i am requesting the commission separate item 9-e, as in edward. this is the lynn col way-48 avenue diversion project, contract number ww-694. >> operator: thank you. next caller, you have two minutes to speak,

there's no climate change not very well understood by the san francisco public utilityings commissionre they in favor of understanding the native american and the tuolumne river and we speak for the -- them. we should understand when i say that. we speak for the salmon. our heart has been to be in the right place to take ourselves and others to a better place. you will be hearing from me as you attend the meetings and as i try to attend the meetings. it's pretty difficult because of pandemic. advocates have to -- you have too many crooks, too many corrupt people. we are like a hawk watching them. thank you very much >> next speaker. >> thank you chair peskin and members of the committee. i'm barry nelson. i represent salmon and fish industry. i like to offer our support for ms. ajami for this position. p.u.c. is in desperate need of leadership as the chair pointed out. there's a need for hiring a new general manager. we think that should be an outside candidate in light of general manager departure. on the issues as well, p.u.c. needs new leadership and guidance. the p.u.c. has oppose

commission, the recreation and park commission, m.t.a., as well as the p.u.c., public utilities commission of san francisco, and the trans bay joint power authority. i just wanted to highlight here some of the key take-aways from the survey we conducted, in comparison to what the airport processes are. we found that in terms of solicitation, none of the commissions reported having their commissioner being involved in the actual solicitation process or the actual evaluation panel's selection process. we also found in terms of the approval, all commissions approved contracts with different thresholds and parameters, but all are somewhat involved in the approval process, with the airport being involved on all concessions and leases. in terms of written policy prohibiting communication with bidders, we found that the airport and m.t.a. did have a written policy on this prohibition. we also found that in terms of the department's statement of incompatible activity, or s.i.a., that all commissions we surveyed had this s.i.a. prohibition on selection, except for the t.s.a., since they involve multiple jurisdictio

such as airports, public utilities commission san francisco public works and rec and marks department. can someone give me a background why other agencies are being quoted in his legislation. >> i can do that. thank you for that question. i can see it's a little bit con 2350uzing. the portion of the legislation you're referring to has to do with the period of time after an appeal has been filed. but before it's heard by the board of supervisors and a decision is made. so what chapter 31 says now is that essentially once an appeal is filed. all further decisions and actions may stop until the appeal is solved. i will ask that the city attorney correct any inaccuracies i have in what the existing exceptions are. but it's essentially an exception for a -- an immediate hazard. we can go forward with things to remedy that. what we can't go forward with under the current legislation are changes that would not have any impact on the environment because they're temporary or they're really easy to reverse or something like that. or they're something that's necessary to remedy a threat to publi

>> i came to the san francisco public utilities commission as a san francisco fellow. as a sf fellow i was in financial planning where i had the joy of working for a me. >> part of the financial planning that sets rates. >> amy is just incredibly kind. one of the most generous and good-hearted people i have ever met. having her as as supervisor was very helpful. this was my first job out of college. amy supported me every step of the way. i felt like i can do this. >> i have a staff i manage. we have a complement that joins us once a year to help us. they give them the chance to learn financial matters. >> amy would it is for an hour or hour and a half going through these complicated financial things with you, patient. >> i find my strength in sitting down and walking through the project, how can i help you? they appreciate that. it means that you are giving time to them. i hope or interns will be the new leaders. >> amy made should be we were well trained. >> she gave me mangoes. i went home and ate them. the next day i said i like these. two days later there was a cr