on that, did you think of the decision in the quill case this past term, unusual, in unusual san unusualstices -- divide of justices. does that tell us anything about where the chief justice is going in the future? the chief justice frequently was the harder-to-predict swing vote, and maybe some of that is from his own judicial philosophy. he said in his conversation -- and is confirmation hearings, that he is not an originalist. and it makes it difficult to predict because you don't know what type of analysis he is going to use and it specific case. so it's not surprising in this case that he doesn't fall along the traditional lines, because he is not going with an philosophy exclusively. it's hard to predict him. that's why it's a distraction to focus on one case, because we can't predict that case y and chief justice roberts takes an incrementalist approach and he doesn't want to make these big, overwhelming decisions if he can help it host: -- if he can help it. conservatives used to talk about judicial restraint, letting the people's elected representatives make those decisions rather tha