we're here in full support of the sanchez. i won thing that's occurred along the corridor and will be happening a lot more is that there's a lot of businesses because the rents is going high we have another one that moved into together they doing the same thing their operating in the daylight as one business and at night as another. the permit process gets xufg but it's something you'll be seeing a lot more. the pop ups are here for a week or two or maybe a day. we're seeing more that are long-term. i know there's several cafes that are able to sell margaritas and other liquor store to create like other liquor store so people can serve is alcohol not specifically for one drink by it has to be a certain amount. i grew up on 12th and hamming sure my appearance live right around is corner and their 82 years old. they're very up standing individuals. another business habsz has been operating on 12th street and another thing i want to bring up we've seen an increase in calls to a lot of our businesses to the health department to th

>> the alcohol license was under sanchez. that expired on march 15th when the absence absent went over there and said, you know, who's running it your alcohol license has to be put under the owner of the popcorn owning that restaurants. martha said she would take care of that. i talked to a her on the telephone i toddler to take care of that >> the sanchez is no longer running the alcohol part. >> the food part is being leased by marketing. >> they're still returning the alcohol? >> i understand that the new permitted on august 6th shows that sanchez still holds the alcohol license and the other lady is leasing is food part of it so it's kind of a partnership. >> let's clarify this. with staff and with you darcy. so am i given to understand the business changed hands. the business the whole business did the business get sold? the business has changed hands >> the business has changed hands and the business is food and beverage correct? to the business when i changed hands a real estate transaction also bought the liquor licen

sanchez? >> thank you, scott sanchez, planning department, the subject property at 225 clipper street, it's subject to planning code sections 132 and 141, so in this case, planning code section 132 would prohibit -- the setback requirement for the property and also prohibits parking within that front setback, the planning code section 142 establishes a screening requirement for off street parking and the proposal would provide no off street parking screening so we'd be having parking within the front setback that doesn't provide the required screening, this is being done voluntarily, so in seeking to have parking in the front setback, not meeting the planning code requirement, they can do so if they seek and justify variance, you have to meet all of the five findings, it's meant to be a challenge, it's meant to be a burden, it's meant to be used only in exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and in reviewing this case, i didn't see any exceptional and extraordinary circumstances, i had co

sanchez.>> why don't we go to your office? >> well, my office is too small for the two of us. why don't we sit here. >> you know what? do what you want. whatever the [ bleep ] you want. i don't give a [ bleep ]. i say you're wrong. >> mr. sanchez, you know me. i've been here for 15 years. you know me. why are you talking to me -- >> do what you've got to do. >> okay? >> do what you've got to do. >> i'll tell you what i'm going i'm gonna sit over here, right next to you. together. we're going to go over this together. on august 20th of '06, you were placed interim level vi. in the policy, when you're placed interim level vi. >> what was i placed there for? >> this is the one where you assaulted that guy. were you in med-line or something like that? yeah, med-line. >> he had it coming. so this one has to be consecutive to the seg time you were doing here. it was, wasn't it? >> no. it's concurrent. >> no. policy says segregation is consecutive. this is my biggest concern, is this right here. is y

sanchez? >> thank you, scott sanchez, planning department, this is another jurisdiction request for a letter of determination that was issued for the property on 3166-16th street, it is in the commercial district t letter of determination made a determination at the time in september of 2012 that jack spade, the subject use, was not considered a formula retail use. now, i would like to provide a little bit of perspective about a letter of determination, what it is, what it means, what it doesn't do, under planning code 307, the zoning administrator is responsible for interpreting the planning code and also is responsible for responding to requests for determinations about planning code requirements. so, in this case, they sought a letter of determination, they wanted to get the department's official position about whether or not the subject use was considered a formula retail use. it is not a permit, it does not vest, it does not entitlement, so what is really the important, the key thing for

two women during two routine traffic stops three years ago twenty eight year old jose rijo barito sanchez is a seven year veteran of the police force he said he was taken into custody on monday and now faces a lesson in felony counts he is charged with two counts of soliciting a bribe and one count of each of the following kidnapping to commit another crime rate by fear of duress or under the color of authority sexual penetration by a foreign object sexual penetration under the color of authority sodomy by fear or directs sodomy under the color of authority oral copulation by fear and oral copulation under the color of authority correspondent or mcglynn doe is in los angeles with the latest and ramona obviously these allegations are terrible they're very very disturbing do you have more information about what exactly the victims say this they were going back to sanchez did. that's exactly right very disturbing allegations well according to an attorney for one of the victim's deputies sanchez is initially stopped or same day he was investigating some sort of warrant and according to the sa

luis alberto sÁnchez y el colombiano. cristian m. apertura Ángel reina con el regreso del panameÑo luis tejada. >> la primera falta del encuentro, la cometiÓ leyton jimÉnez el Árbitro central la seÑalÓ, vemos el acercamiento con hernÁndez, quiÉn le pega a la pelota por parte de los diablos rojos del toluca tienen a varios que pueden impactar desde esa zona bastante bien por lo pronto veo a zinha cerca del balÓn, ahÍ tenemos justamente antonio zinha, irÁ directo o no, es demasiada la distancia persona sabemos del to quedo zinha es el solitario cobrador de los diablos, zinha, el Árbitro colocÓ la barrera de distancia, aquÍ estÁ el silbatazo, aquÍ estÁ el impacto de zinha, la toca. lo que estÁ fabricada. lo que pierde. lo que es el arranque. lo que es la jugada. lo que allÍ en lo tardÓ. lo que pasÓ. uch lo que es no es colombiano.lo que es no es colombiano. lo que estÁ en chivas en jugar en la forma de decir. hubo muy pocos apenas 3 partidos es el lateral izquierdo. br la izquierda lo que luego. confundirse y emanuel hill. >> lo que son

. >>> jets quarterback mark sanchez cannot catch a break. first, coach rex ryan asked fans to be nice earlier this week. and now sanchez is getting flack because he will be starting for the jets preseason opener against the detroit lions on friday. sanchez takes the high road after getting this very rude tweet which reads f you. hope you tear your acl on friday. that is disgusting. sanchez responded with a tweet saying, thanks for your support, man. #classy. yeah, that's how you do it. kill them with kindness. >>> in pittsburgh, a very special night for center fielder andrew mccutchen. not only did his mother, you see her right there, sing the national anthem. he got his 16th home run of the season. and the pirates went on to beat miami, 4-2. and you can tell mama looked very proud. >>> to big plays in the little league. jacob garza and his corpus christi texas team win a spot in the little league world series. garza was pitch perfect and did not give up a single hit during the game. then hit a home run that give his team a 6-0 lead over new

sanchez? >> thank you, scott sanchez, planning department, there was inaccurate testimony in the last hearing, i want to apologize to the board and to the parties because i did misstate facts tat last hearing regarding the density and i think this board knows in my years, i've tried to be accurate and responsive to the questions that i receive from the board, however, i did misstate the density issue at the last hearing, so the subject property the proposal could be built without a need for a subdivision, the density would allow up to 22 dwelling units on the property i think they're currently at 14, so the subdivision issue is really a secondary matter and again i apologize and i really try to hold myself to a high standard coming before this board, you need accurate information before making your decisions and aapologize to everyone for misstating that, it was something i had reviewed from the staff report and so after receiving the rehearing request, we ran it through the process again and

sanchez? >> thank you, scott sanchez planning department. the case was reviewed in 2012. it was not issued until april 18th of this year. there was a block notations request submitted by the requesters and that was received by june 4. th. at the time we reviewed and approved this permit it was before the cbn was permitted. it requires no notification under the planning code. the jury's requester. when that i would turn it over to chief inspector. >> before you leave, mr. sanchez, the definition of a structural addition that triggers a planning code notification requirement, this does not conform to that in your opinion? >> that's correct. the work that is being done under this permitted is what we would view and repair or maintenance does not expand the building envelope. most building expansion are triggers of use on notice of section 311. it was sent to the planning department because the building given it's age there was resource and exterior changes because of the changes to the bay side windows. >> mr. greko. >> good evening. anthony greko. this building was applied

sanchez? >> thank you, scott san she was planning department. as it was noted at the last hearing there were some inaccuracies by the appellant and i appreciate the board going back to view the accurate height requirements. they did a new survey and noted this is a project that has been around for several years and i think some of these inconsistencies in the plans maybe accounted for i think had different architect the last time of the board of appeals. they have revised the plan and submitted those to the board and those we believe the board should grant the appeal and adopt the revised plans if the board feels that is appropriate. the revisions do not have a different project, they just have more accurate dimension. it has very clear depiction on how the measurement is under the planning code and we have determined that it does comply with the provisions for height. i know that one cannot obtain a variance for height, it's never been allowed in the san francisco planning code. but that is s

sanchez? >> thank you, good evening, scott sanchez planning department, the reasons in the brief for supporting the executive director's determination not to appeal the filing of appeals 295 determinations and planning code 295 does not contain any appeal language in it that will allow an appeal to the board and it is not a permit it is not a license, it does not allow construction, and so, having a determination and section 295, does not allow one to go out and construct a building of this height, of course a building application needs to be sought and received in order to have that happen, there will be a subsequent building permit application on this and also a 309 application that will be up for appeal shortly after this item. with that i am available for any reasons, questions. >> i believe that the appellant referred to the determination as the equivalent as an entitlement. >> that is not the case, it will not allow someone to construct the project, to a license or a permit that dates ba

detective sanchez! you never ask a lady how -- oh, excuse us, lauren. [ chuckles ] we kid a lot around here. you know, always teasing each other. you know, cops. uh, detective sanchez, what can you tell me about austin blair? uh, i ran the registration on his mercedes s.u.v., and his name pops up with dope. brought in twice for questioning but never arrested. yeah, well, his credit card's been active all over the place -- new york city, miami, new orleans, fort lauderdale -- all within the last year. but since he went missing a month ago, nothing. checked his address. nice place in silver lake. no liens, current on his mortgage. okay. all right, well, good news -- i mean, depending on how you look at it. that was dr. morales. he says he has four matches in the morgue. oh, good. all right, then. uh, sergeant gabriel, why don't you and i pop over to the burrito room, and the rest of y'all keep poking around about austin blair, but on tippy-toe, please. thank you. shall we? it's funny you're here. missing

i've got to say we've got to keep sanchez going. it's a valuable asset of the community and we just got to do what we got to do. thank you >> i'll try to keep it short. i'm really sad to see the officers of the law and giving half truth without giving any other facts of whether or not this was a citation and the fact they go into is a business and shut it down because they say there's not supposed to be any papers serviced from the health department or whatever. you've got to take into consideration they want you to follow our rules. this is not a hearing on the health department it's a hearing on a permit to play music for people to be happy. now i'm thinking i might not be able to celebrate my mothers 88 birthday. when you can't have the music on the patio you're stuck inside the restaurants people are happy they go from the patio to the restaurants and have someone come up and give half truths about a business a that's part of the community. you've got people running around with tattoos. it breaks my heart that those are officers

. >> mark sanchez cannot catch a break.st coach rex ryan asked fans to be nice earlier this week. if only our bosses would all say just be nice, right? and now sanchez is getting flack because he'll be starting for the jets preseason opener against detroit lions on friday. so sanchez takes a high road after getting this very rude tweet which reads f-you, hope you tear your acl on friday. my goodness. what people say on twitter really just shocks me. sanchez responded with a tweet saying, thanks for your support, man, #classy. >>> to pittsburgh now, a very special night for andrew mccutchen. not only did his mother sing the national anthem, yes, he got his 16th home run of the season. >> did it more mom. >> he did. >> you know it, momma looked very proud. >> great. >>> now to big plays in the little league. jacob garza and his corpus christi team won a spot on the little league world series. garza was pitch perfect and did not give up a hit during the game. then get this, mara, he hit a home run that gave his corpus christi

sanchez? >> thank you, scott sanchez, planning department, the subject property is located at 435-437 potrero, this is an urban mixed use zoning district, which is in the neighbors planning area, i want you to know a little bit about this process, this might be the first letter of legitimization that's been brought before you, when the eastern neighbor's area was rezoned there was a lot of down zoning in some cases, so uses that were once permitted under the previous zoning were no longer permitted. this program allows those uses which establish prior to the effective date of the ordinance to legitimize, so these are for uses that did not obtain the proper permits at that time, so maybe an office use is one example, then 2005, it was allowed in the zoning but they didn't obtain proper permit, the zoning changed in 2008, they can consider a letter of legitimization to allow for legalization, it is not an entitlement, it just says that they can avail themselves of this procaesz and go through th

sanchez. >> scott sanchez planning department and i will be brief and i want to address a bit about the history of the 1970 cfc and why that and how we came upon that and so we had received a complaint in early june that they had illegal emerged to a single family dwelling and i don't know who made that complaint but we received that complaint. at the end of june, i received an e-mail from mr. hansen who said that he had evidence that is was legally a three unit building and initially i took this with a grain of salt because i did not see anything in the records that indicated that this was a three unit building and i was expecting to receive something from pg&e saying that there were three meters here which we would say conclusive of the legality of the unit. but what i received and early july was this cfc and the permit of occupancy and i was quite frankly shocked to see that because that is the gold standard. i mean that is essentially the birth certificate of a building and that is the most important document to have and so the fact that this existed was that i was shocked and didn'

sanchez. i want to be perfectly clear here because something one of the public comments stated confused me and the statement was along the lines was, if the letter of determination -- let's just say hypothetically we grant the request, we have a hearing and we push back the other hearings on the merits of the permits. if in the end after hearing on the merits on the lod we determine that the lod was improperly issued and that was an error on your part, then what are the implications, and would they need to go through -- would those permits that have been issued be undone or how does that work? >> so, assuming that we would have a hearing on all three items together, if the board found the letter of determination was improperly issued, that jack spade is a formula retail use, i would suggest to you at that hearing you also deny those building permit applications that establish the use and you would allow them to refile within one year if they were to receive a conditional use authorization beca