other initiatives going forward are the sanctuary cities. the profiling of african- american -- arab, african, middle eastern people at the airport. also our anti-building programs of which we will generate the first anti-bullying video produce with the department of public health. as a training video for all city departments. job creation for summer use. this year we have one person -- one per semester of d.c. if -- dcyf. this is between eight and 12 entrance. people in interns from law school and also from public policy university. -- university. we have between six and eight insurance. our premier policy we're proud of is we created a lot clinic. -- a law clinic. they provided us to full time and turns out of one of their law classes. the professor coordinated the class and it culminated in a public hearing which will have a report generated. if you have questions about the of transition which is the primary thing we're talking about, i would be happy to answer. we think it is good. we is -- a think is good as an agency. it is about time.

number one eliminate sanctuary cities. there are a lot of cities in the state of texas where immigration laws are not enforced. we need to enforce the law and i'll point out this is an area where my opponent and i disagree. he was responsible for killing the bill that would have prohibited sanctuary cities. number two, what we need to do is end the benefits for those who are here illegally. i oppose in-state tuition for illegal aliens. this is an area of disagreement wean me and my opponent. >> mr. dewhurst? >> neither statement is true. i passed out of the senate an anti-sanctuary city bill and i've always opposed benefits in state tuition for illegals. what we've got to do is address -- the federal government is incapable of doing two things at once. we're going to have to secure our border by tripling the size of our border patrol and then, and only then can, should congress address these issues. >> you want to ask -- would you like to respond any further to peggy's question about deportation? >> america is a country of

we are one of two sanctuary cities in the world for medical cannabis. yes, the district columbia is ahead of us in legislation and has made provisions for low- income patients which i assume would include low-income veterans. we all need to get up to speed on that issue. i did reach out to my district supervisor, supervisor kim in helping us navigate some of the issue for veterans and making a match with the veterans commission and finding out how we can address some of the more serious issues like denying psychiatric medicine at to medicinal cannabis patients and i also one to state that i will be putting forth a motion to condemn the current administration's memorial day slap in the face to the united states canada's veterans and i hope most of the supervisors here would sign on to this letter. thank you for your time. [applause] president chiu: thank you. next speaker. >> good afternoon. i'm a member of the immigrants' rights commission. i'm here today because the commission sent you each a letter about our language access report and i'm sure you hav

such sanctuary cities directly challenge the federal government's authority to enforce immigration laws. the administration's unwillingness to uphold immigration laws led to injuries and even death. the administration refuses to defend the defense of marriage act, a law enacting by congress and signed by then president bill clinton. this was a significant piece of legislation that was approved by a vote of 342-67 in the house and 85-14 in the senate. regardless of how one feels about the substance of the bill, the department of justice has an obligation to defend the laws of the land. efforts by the administration to override election laws enacted by states also raises concerns. the department of justice has challenged common sense voter i.d. laws that require voters to identify themselves before they are allowed to vote. the department of justice recently moved to block implementation of voter i.d. laws enacted by legislators in texas and south carolina. the proposal was based on a similar law passed by the ann legislature which was upheld by the supreme court in 2008. the justice depa

>> chuck, i passed sanctuary cities out of the texas senate. i passed it.d every important piece of conservative legislation that we have brought up over the last eight years. i passed more pro-life legislation than ever in the history of the state of texas. i think it's just strictly a, my opponent met the club for growth six to nine months before i even got into the race. they've misquoted. different statements in the newspaper. i know i'm the most conservative lieutenant governor in the history of the state. i know that my record is exactly what mr. cruz is talking about wanting to do. i've done all the things that my opponents talking about. that's why i want to go to washington and repeal obamacare and reduce work with other conservatives and dramatically reduce our federal spending. cut our federal tax rates. balance our budget. take the texas success model to washington and create millions of new jobs. >> as you know, the u.s. senate, if you get there, you're going to have to be tackling the big giant issues of tax reform, having to do some things th

the city of san francisco, for example, officially declared itself an illegal alien sanctuary city by the board of supervisors in 1989 -- in 1999. mr. culberson: now they're granting illegal aliens official city identification cards. this is thed of the public information office of the national association of chiefs of police reports that in california, illegal aliens in san francisco are being assured through costly spanish language advertising campaigns that they will never be reported to federal law enforcement agents such as i.c.e., immigrations and customs enforcement, or u.s. border patrol, or any other federal agency that could initiate the deportation process. that's a direct violation of the federal law that the gentleman from pennsylvania just read. i'm proud to co-author this amendment with my friend from pennsylvania because he's exactly right this amendment will save lives. if a local law enforcement agency refuses to follow federal law, they should not expect to be rewarded with federal grant money. that's what this amendment would do. cut off federal grant money to sanc

i'm very appalled at the fact that city hall is becoming a sanctuary for hypocrisy. this is not france -- this is not san francisco. this is san francisco politics. as i said before, there will not be a host city role for san francisco. i cannot understand why i send messages and get no return phone calls when i'm making sense. you don't give somebody a break who turned their back on it. but you might as well to be saying to me shut up you crippled nigger faggot. >> next speaker please. >> let me address the point the previous speaker made. what he said he very clearly was he is a citizen of that this united states of america, a good constituent of san francisco and knows what he's talking about, but you so-called representative, when he reaches out to you, you do not reach out to him. i am saying that because you need to understand that here in san francisco, we have reached a point that politics is not the politics that was before, where there was some good representation and when constituents came to city hall they were respected. having said that, i saw something

lets talk about the sanctuary cities. these are areas in which the city council, chicago is a good example. tucson was a good example, wherethey have decided that they are going to treat the undocumented population if you come forward with tips, they will not actively go after the undocumented. it is a little bit dicey. local law-enforcement, their job is to protect the street not asking about whether and not somebody is in the country illegally. sometimes they happen upon this. some of the law enforcement i have spoken with, especially ones that support the law, sanctuary cities really do get in the way. they feel like they cannot go forward and ask all the questions they want to ask because of the way that the local city officials have decided that they will run the city. this creates a bizarre patchwork of the way the country works. some are considered friendly and others not friendly. that will direct the different traffic of where these immigrants might go. it makes the country look a little strange. there are a lot o

there are cities and jurisdictions in the state that have had de facto sanctuary policies and some evener, on further reflection, after that statement i made about the sanctuary policies, it clearly put on notice to those jurisdictions that if they choose to follow that kind of a suit or program, they are going to be in conflict with the authority, their officers, to make those kinds of inquiries and should have some kind of limiting factor on sanctuary policies. >> sheriff larry dever of cochise, arizona. thank you for your time this morning. we appreciate it. >> my pleasure. thanks for having me. >>> another big story this news hour we are following for you tropical storm debby it is continuing its slow crawl across florida this morning, the storm inching eastward at really a snail's pace after drenching part of the gulf coast with more than a foot of rain, packing heavy winds and leaving residents with quite a mess to clean up. >> we have been pumping for six hours and we are still pumping, hoping to get ahead of the storm surge. >> thank god it didn't happen while we were here. but

put its money where if is needed for youth passes, better housing programs and we need to be a sanctuary city that doesn't have homelessness. a city that has easy food access and a city that supports gay marriage. thank you. >> good morning, everybody. i'm nicole agbiana i'm twith th excelsior action group. i would like to recognize two of our steering committee members. thank you for being here today. i have two brief asks, both predicated on the fact that you are commercial corridor is really the economic heartbeat of the neighborhood hear in excelsior. first is the commercial corridor be included as one of the participants in the upcoming invest in neighborhoods program. i think that will have a tremendous impact on creating local jobs and providing the goods and services we need in the community. the second is on behalf of the excelsior public safety committee i would like to express our support for the multi-year plan for the police department, particularly in regard to the academy classes that he would like to increase. we don't want to see our beat officers completely disappear from ou

guest: sanctuary cities first of all. there is a little bit of debate about this. ey are areas in which the city council's, and the city council is a good example. they have decided they are going to treat the undocumented population boat or the hispanic population. there will not actively go after undocumented population. the local law enforcement, their job is to protect the street. their job is not necessarily to ask about whether or not someone is in the country illegally. sometimes they happened upon that information on their own, then they need to turn those people over to federal authorities. some of the law enforcement i have spoken with down and arizona, richard really wants the really enforce the law, a sanctuary cities really do get in the way, because they feel they cannot ask questions they want to ask because of the way the local city officials have asked -- have decided how they are going to run the city. this creates of those are patchwork of the way the country works. you have some places that are considered friendly and others that are on friendly.

federal law actually tried to discourage these so-called sanctuary cities. what he means that city's that established policy saying they will not walk right with immigration officials and they are not going to ask immigration status. so, the federal government has saw to discourage that. they want local officials to help them and not interfere with them. but washington cannot commandeer local police forces. in other words, they cannot force a city like los angeles or new york to begin enforcing federal law because both local officers cannot report directly to washington. what they can do, however, is stop a state or city from enforcing the -- enforcing a law that interferes with federal agencies. let's say city passes an ordinance that says our police officers will protect illegal immigrants from federal officers, that illegal immigrants can come to the police station and we will concealed them from the u.s. authorities, that kind of organs would probably be in trouble before the supreme court. however, the decision simply to not seek to find out in the crisi

. >> we need to eliminate sanctuary cities where immigration laws are not enforced.need to enforce the law, and this is an area where my opponent and i disagree. he was responsible for killing the bill that would have prohibited sanctuary cities. number two, what we need to do is end the benefits for those who are here illegally. i oppose in-state tuition for illegal aliens. this, again, is a point of disagreement between me and my opponent. >> neither statement is true. i've always opposed in-state tuition for illegals. the federal government is incapable of doing two things at once. we're going to have to triple the size of our border patrol, and then and only then can, should congress address these issues. >> [inaudible] >> would you like to respond any further to peggy's question about deportation? >> america is a country of laws, and we need to enforce all of our laws. >> okay. thank you very much. our second question comes from ross ramsey to lieutenant governor dewhurst. >> should the federal government have bailed out general motors? >> absolutely not. absolu

federal law actually tried to discourage these so-called sanctuary cities. what he means that city's that established policy saying they will not walk right with immigration officials and they are not going to ask immigration status. so, the federal government has saw to discourage that. they want local officials to help them and not interfere with them. but washington cannot commandeer local police forces. in other words, they cannot force a city like los angeles or new york to begin enforcing federal law because both local officers cannot report directly to washington. what they can do, however, is stop a state or city from enforcing a law that interferes with federal agencies. an's say city passes ordinance that says our police officers will protect illegal immigrants from federal officers, that illegal immigrants can come to the police station and we will concealed them from the u.s. authorities, that kind of organs would probably be in trouble before the supreme court. however, the decision simply to not seek to find out in the crisis that is the people

some of the law enforcement i have spoken with, especially ones that support the law, sanctuary cities really do get in the way. they feel like they cannot go forward and ask all the questions they want to ask because of the way that the local city officials have decided that they will run the city. this creates a bizarre patchwork of the way the country works. some are considered friendly and others not friendly. that will direct the different traffic of where these immigrants might go. it makes the country look a little strange. there are a lot of networks. with the administration, the administration is prosecuting arizona for its law, and not based on sanctuary cities. this is solely a question of whether and not the state is imposing on the federal government's right to enforce laws. it is around a really hot and volatile issue. sometimes i think people forget that. that was very clear during the oral arguments. they're making it clear that it is about preemption. can the federal government prevent the state government from doing its own thing? >> this story, that it is no accident

such sanctuary cities directly challenge the federal government's authority to enforce immigration laws the administration's unwillingness to uphold immigration laws has led to industries and even death. the administration refuses to defend the defense of marriage act, a law enacted by congress and a signed by then president, bill clinton. this is a significant piece of legislation that is approved by a vote of 342 to 67 in the house and 85 to 14 in the senate. regardless of how one feels about the substance of the bill, the department of justice has an obligation to defend the lives of the land. efforts by the administration to override election laws enacted by state also raised constitutional concerns. instead of acting to prevent voter fraud, the department of justice has challenge, and voter i.d. laws that require voters to identify themselves before they are allowed to vote. the department of justice recently moved to block implementation of voter i.d. laws enacted to legislators in texas and south carolina. the texas proposal was based on a similar law passed by the indiana legisl

selective prosecutions of sanctuary cities. megyn: he may or may not.his messaging. what's behind it. >> preemptive narrative, thursday when you have the vote potentially. we have the decision on obama-care. so they need a change. you want to see the race narrative ramped up? wait until thursday when the decisions come down. both of them. megyn: even though i yell at you, you know i love. >> i'll yell at him. megyn: don't send me any emails about alan. imagine your neighborhood is being overrun by giant rodents and there is nothing you can do about it because the federal government is standing in your way. that's not good. you will have to hear this story to believe tonight three minutes. a little league catcher is being sued for half a million dollars after he accidentally hit a woman in the face with a ball. that's in "kelly's court" next. p. >> my son is not the responsible party. he was under the coach's supervision. he was on the field. if you are asking every 11-year-old ball player to be perfect, it's absurd. ♪ i'm making my money do more. ♪ i'm

you bring up a very good point about the quang tri a sanctuary cities and predicaments, they say that they're sovereign. they don't say that the state of arizona is sovereign in its application. if the state can try an illegal for crimes and execute them, that was one of the scalia argument, that the state does have some autonomy and sovereignty in which to enact its size. i think this is going to be one of those things that arizona's leader and thank god they're hundred years old this year celebrating. they kicked and screamed coming into this union and now they're asking questions again and i applaud that because that is what leadership is about, pursuing an answer for an unratified question. >> host: are caller from wisconsin product tracking people who have been pulled over, let's say knops or post them over and identifies the fact they are here illegally, and but then how do you keep track of repeat offenders? >> guest: that is part of the problem, when you see the break down, kind of like highlighted with the department of homeland security reneging on pulling the 287 g program

eliminate sanctuary cities. there are cities where these laws are not enforced.s an area of my opponent and i disagree. he was responsible for killing the bill that would have prohibited century cities. we need to and the benefits for those here illegally. i opposed in-state tuition for illegal aliens. this again is an area of disagreement. >> neither statement is true. i passed an anti century city bill and i have always opposed benefits in-state tuition for illegals. we have to address -- the federal government is incapable of doing two things at once. we will have to triple the size of our border control. then and only then should congress address these issues. >> would you like to respond any further to the question about deportation? >> america is a country of laws. we need to enforce all of our laws. >> thank you very much. the second question comes from ross ramsey. >> should the federal government have bailed out general motors? >> absolutely not. the government should be staying out of picking winners and losers. when they do get involved we end up with

such sanctuary cities directly challenge the federal government's authority to enforce immigration laws. the administration's unwillingness to uphold immigration laws has led to injuries and even death. the administration refuses to defend the defense of marriage act, a law enacted by congress and then -- and signed by then-president bill clinton. this was a significant piece of legislation that was approved by a vote of 342-67 in the house, and 85-14 in the senate. regardless of how one feels about the substance of the bill, the department of justice has an obligation to defend the loss of the land. efforts by the administration to override election laws enacted by states also raised constitutional concerns. instead of acting to prevent voter fraud, the department of justice has challenged commonsense voter id laws that require voters to identify themselves before they are allowed to vote. the department of justice recently moved to block implementation of voter id laws enacted by legislatures in texas and south carolina. the texas proposal was based on a similar law passed by the indi

eliminate sanctuary cities. there are cities where these laws are not enforced. i will point out this is an area of my opponent and i disagree. he was responsible for killing the bill that would have prohibited century cities. we need to and the benefits for those here illegally. i opposed in-state tuition for illegal aliens. this again is an area of disagreement. >> neither statement is true. i passed an anti century city bill and i have always opposed benefits in-state tuition for illegals. we have to address -- the federal government is incapable of doing two things at once. we will have to triple the size of our border control. then and only then should congress address these issues. >> would you like to respond any further to the question about deportation? >> america is a country of laws. we need to enforce all of our laws. >> thank you very much. the second question comes from ross ramsey. >> should the federal government have bailed out general motors? >> absolutely not. the government should be staying out of picking winners and losers. when they do get

such as important provisions such as prohibiting sanctuary in certain cities. >> as we speak, now that the court has ruled, as we speak now, our arizona state and local police officers now enforcing that provision as of today? >> well, i think they will, they will as of today or tomorrow, they will today, but certainly by tomorrow, we'll know that this law has been upheld and that they're able to do that. and they have been trained, as i said, to avoid racial profiling. even if it was a legal concern, it's a moral concern, we think it's important to treat people as individuals, and not limit anything they can do. so we want to do everything we can to make sure that nobody engagings in any racial profiling. >> tom horn is the republican attorney general, an attorney day for your time, i'm sure you know the country and perhaps the world will be watching as you implement this law going forward. we start the 11:00 hour here on the east coast. several important decisions from the united states supreme court today. this headline, the big health care decision will not come until thursday, tha