john riggens, sandra day o'connor, john g. marshall.t was it like to coach that team in the 80's. >> it was the greatest experiences. it's the greatest town because of him. i think it's the greatest sports franchise in the world. >> three super bowl victories. huge deal. >> i think it's probably the greatest thing that man could create in a super bowl. >> moveable print. the pyramid of gee sa geaz gizae super goal. not necessarily in that order. [applause] i have a dream, all right. i've already got my emmy, i've got my grammy and my time 100 award. i got the coveted webby award. what i really want is the super bowl ring. you have three super bowl rings. can i see one of them. >> yes, grab one here. take a look. >> tell you what, you let me keep this ring and we're kind of done. i got what i wanted. >> it takes a lot of hard work to get that. >> not really. i asked you for this and you gave it to me. [laughter] [applause] wow that's nice. might be a little big. hold on. >> that one got away. >> all right, we're fine. [laughter] >> let's

i follow sandra o'connor, who is always talking about this, as is justice kennedy. we talk about it all the time. ask anyone in public life, members of congress. they would not be in public life if, at some level, they thought the government was important. i do not have to tell you that, because you are here. but of course, generally, i cannot tell people your age what to do. i cannot. they would not do it anyway. i cannot tell them what to do. i hope they will find someone to love, i hope that they have a career that they can practice, and i hope they will devote some of their life to civic affairs, which at any level -- library commissioner -- many different levels to participate in political life. of course, i believe that strongly. i cannot tell you what to do but i have become more familiar with this document, and i can fill you, if you do not, the document will not work. it assumes a basic knowledge and understanding of how the government works. it assumes knowledge of the fact that the document itself --i mean, we are like the border patrol. it creates border

i follow sandra o'connor, who is always talking about this, as is justice kennedy. we talk about it all the time. ask anyone in public life, members of congress. they would not be in public life if, at some level, they thought the government was important. i do not have to tell you that because you are here. but of course, generally, i cannot tell people your age what to do. i cannot. they would not do it anyway. i cannot tell them what to do. i hope they will find someone to love, i hope that they have a career that they can practice, and i hope they will devote some of their life to civic affairs which at any level -- library commissioner -- many different levels to participate in political life. of course, i believe that strongly. i cannot tell you what to do but i have become more familiar with this document, and i can fill you, if you do not, the document will not work. it assumes a basic knowledge and understanding of how the government works. it assumes knowledge of the fact that the document itself -- we are looked the border patrol. it creates borders, but

i follow sandra o'connor, who is always talking about this, as is justice kennedy.talk about it all the time. ask anyone in public life, members of congress. they would not be in public life if, at some level, they thought the government was important. i do not have to tell you that, because you are here. but of course, generally, i cannot tell people your age what to do. i cannot. they would not do it anyway. i cannot tell them what to do. i hope they will find someone to ave, i hope that they have career that they can practice, and i hope they will devote some of their life to civic affairs, which at any level -- library commissioner -- many different levels to participate in political life. of course, i believe that strongly. i cannot tell you what to do but i have become more familiar with this document, and i can fill you, if you do not, the document will not work. it assumes a basic knowledge and understanding of how the government works. it assumes knowledge of the fact that the document itself -- we are looked the border patrol. but thees borders, decisions

heroine, i was able to talk about women in an interview madeleine albright, condoleezza rice, and sandra day o'connor, who were breaking barriers in states and politics. after my first two books of my wonderful publisher, harpercollins, they said well, would you like to write another book. and then i came in to the great state that i represent. texas. the role of women in history generally has been less on the market then our great nation than the state of texas. so i thought i would do something on 19th century texas women. it was for a couple of reason. number one, i love my state. number two, there is something special about texas. and i believe that the spirit of texas was created in the 19th century. there has been a lot of talk about it, as i came into the national scene in the senate. i would see people roll their eyes and we would talk about how great texas was or how big we were or how important we work, so i got used to that as well. and so i thought, you know, there is something different about us. some people like it, some people really do not. but there is a spark in the spirit. i wanted

women and prior to the filming there was a sort of cocktail reception and i was able to meet sandra day o'connor and i also met devotee for them to the trustee six -- betty they said that mia hamm because the women had won the world cup and i was delighted that she had advocated greater attention to women's sports. there was a thrilling occasion and i was one of the less famous people in the world of the achievers but my role was to sort of represent the women's history person and in part of the film i took my students around d.c. and we pointed out how easy it is to imagine women as justice and liberty as the statue of liberty and holding up scales at the supreme court, the but we don't have that many actual women and there was a whole controversy over how the statue of the suffragist who was actually in the basement of the capitol for many years until the complaint was its heavy and a dusty so yes, women's history, bring it out in the open. >> host: what you think about the sculpture? >> guest: i think it's a great and i support those that think that she should be part of it. i think a lot of

supreme court and now that is progress said one is retired with sandra day o'connor. that is progress. but talk about asking the next question, we can say that is great to be on the supreme court to make in -- decisions to impact women's lives but we cannot be satisfied until we are able to say we can sustain that. how are we going to be able to sustain that? looked at the time line what the courts looked like. women getting to that of leadership position that is the next question. not whether or not we made progress but if we can build on that. what is the structure that keeps us from being able to do that? that is the next move if we have to make. if you don't think we did would make a difference difference, think about justice ginsburg and elite -- leave the better. had she not read that i am absolutely certain they're not would have been so much momentum for congress to actually act to rectify the supreme court's decision. she did not change your decision of the court but that impacted decision we need to be there and to interpret the of law that affect women's li

one very active retired justice,, justice sandra day o'connor, that's progress but when i talk about asking the next question, we can say yes, it's great to have women on the supreme court and making decisions that will impact women's lives, but we can't be satisfied until we are able to say we are going to be able to sustain that. and how are we going to be able to sustain it and to do that we have got to sort of look at what the pipeline for women in the courts looks like. women getting to those leadership positions and that is what i think is sort of the next question. not whether we have made progress but are we going to be able to sustain and told on its? and what are the kinds of structures and the kinds of social, social and political structures that keep us from being able to do that? so that is sort of the next move i think we have to make. and for those of you who don't think that women are going to make a difference in the court, i would just say to you think about justice ginsburg's dissent in lilly ledbetter versus goodyear. had she not read that dissent from the bench i