sandy cortez, of course, jumped in. she came to the defense of men giving birth.y major, too. in the process, she got so confused that she seemed to take the pro-life position. watch the spirit >> if we want to talk about planned parenthood, let's talk about how many lives planned parenthood has saved. and how many babies have been born because of the prenatal care provided by planned parenthood. and if you don't -- if you don't believe it and if you've never met a planned parenthood baby, i'm happy to let you know that i am one. >> tucker: uh-huh. so america's biggest abortion providers actually all about child birth. but what is amazing is planned parenthood of course is a huge supporter of sandy cortez's, and there she is, cutting an ad for them. it's almost like a radio show host reading an endorsement on the air. "i wear ray-ban sunglasses because they protect my eyes." there is sandy cortez telling us how great planned parenthood is. shamelessness. well, a new bill working its way through the legislature and the state of texas with van castration, chemical a

weight, weight -- wait, wait, i mean sandy cortez. she wrote something cold the green new deal. --called the green new deal. i am a successful business owner, but sandy has worked in the restaurant industry. that is a hard job. i waited tables in college. i commend her for that. i have a big problem with the green new deal. it will destroy our economy. it will hand over our energy needs to china, so by the way, china has no interest in bowing to the climate gods. president xi jinping said he will increase production and output to 2035, of joe biden said we are cutting hours in half by 2030. i don't think that is a good strategy, did you? social media seems to be the only way to talk to her poochie did not tweet back. i don't know what that is about. i have been saying i want to debate about the green new deal. [cheers and applause] because we owe it to the american people to debate the green new deal, from the opposite side, because it is the american people that it would truly affect, and so we were hanging out in the chamber watching the insanity that goes on every day, i think

he's doing a lot to help but not enough according to sandy cortez.se democrats was sent a letter to the dhs secretary urging the government to deport fewer violent gang members and other felons. "we urge the biden administration to pursue humane and just immigration policies aimed to end mass incarceration, criminals asian and deportation of immigrants." it went on to suggest anyone against this is, needless to say, wait for it, a racist. jonathan fahey is the more director of ice, we are happy to have him tonight. thanks so much for coming on. more violent gang members. i hate to ask a philosophical question but other than destroying the united states, why would someone before this? >> other than just simply trying to get as many illegal aliens in the country as possible and to encourage more to come by saying there is no scenario you will get thrown out, i can't think of anything whatsoever. it clearly will harm public safety and this is so remarkable because if you think about it, it wasn't that long ago when democratic politicians might be on a s

now sandy cortez of queens we only have 10-12 years to live. how much of this is true?f science is admitting what we don't know, why is someone pretending that they don't. former obama administration official who spent his life working on climate change, studying it. here's what he said. >> even the globe has warmed by 2 degrees fahrenheit over the last century, the incidence of heat waves across the 48 statesi is no greater now than it was in 1900. the highest temperatures haven't gone up in 60 years. we have been able to find no detectable influence on hurricanes from humans. and the models that we used to predict future climates have become more uncertain even as they become more sophisticated. so all of these things suggests that people who say that we would face certain doom unless we take drastic action are just misinformed about what the official reports actually are saying. >> tucker: michael shellenberger is the author "a pop clicks ""apocalypse never" appear the question that comes up to me is considering we have and we know for a fact had throughout the last

now, sandy cortez of queens says we have only ten to 12 years to live. how much of this is true?basis of science is admitting what you don't know, why are so many pretending to know what they don't. recently spoke to a former energy official who spent his life working on climate change studying it. here's what he said. >> even though it's warmed by about 2 degrees fahrenheit over the past century, the incidence of heat waves across the 48 states is no greater now than it was in 1900 and the highest temperatures haven't gone up in 60 years. we have been able to find no detectable influence on hurricanes from humans. emma models that we used to predict future climates have become more uncertain even as they've become more sophisticated. so all of these things suggested that people who say they face certain doom unless they face drastic action are just misinformed about what the official reports actually say. >> tucker: the author of apocalypse never, why environmental alarmism hurts us all. the question that occurs to me is considering we have and we know for a fact have throughout

sandy cortez. a little 14-page piece of legislation called the green new deal. is anyone familiar? little sandy has a degree in economics. i have a business degree and i'm a successful business owner. but sandy has worked in the restaurant industry. that's a hard job. i waited tables in college. i commend her for that, i'm serious. but i have a real big problem with the green new deal. it's going to destroy our economy. and it's going to hand over our energy needs to china. so by the -- who by the way has no interest in bowing to the climate gods. as a matter of fact, president xi has said he's going to increase production and increase carbon output to 2035 when joe biden says he's cutting ours in half by 2030. i don't think that's a very smart strategy, do you? so i've been tweeting at a.o.c. because social media seems to be the only way to talk to her. and she didn't tweet back. so i don't know what that's all about. but i've been say, i want a debate about the green new deal. because we owe it to