finally from vienna, david sanger from the "new york times." i am pleased to have all of them on this program. tell me the significance of this as you reported in the "new york times." >> well, i think the letter that was written by the five-- and it was a bipartisan letter that had many more signatories, including a number of republicans, including steve hadley the national security varies to president bush, of-- was an effort to lay out some parameters for the administration about what kind of deal they could all support. and so the positive news for that, i think, for the administration, is that since most of what they laid out were talking point you would hear from the obama administration at various points over the past year or two, i think it means that there's an opportunity there to bring both republicans and democrats together. on the other hand, if secretary kerry at the end of the process that's going on behind me here-- and he'll be here tomorrow night-- if at the end of that he has something that is significantly less specific on i

we turn to david sanger national security correspondent for the "new york times." david, let me begin with the basic question how serious is this, how much damage does it do? >> well, charlie, as with the first reports of all big cyberattacks, we don't know yet how much damage it did. there is good reason to believe since the office of personnel management, which is the office that handles security clearances and all other personnel matters for the federal government, told 4 million current and former government employees they would get free credit reporting subsidized by the united states government, that they think they lost a lot of what's called personally identifiable information, which at its most benign would be social security numbers and addresses and at its worst, might be informations and answers people gave as they were going through the security clearance process. of course, that has an echo of earlier attack on the office of personnel management last summer which seemed directed mostly at those elements of the department that focused on the security c

in a series of twitter blasts tagging sanger marie harf wrote "the overall increase in iran's stockpile poses a major diplomatic and political challenge. not true. and in doing something it's not supposed to do under the jpoa or in violation of it is obligations, not true." this is acceptable as long as it's at the time period which is june 30th it's back below the correct amount. we fully expect they will do so in this case. >> reporter: sanger cited information from the atomic energy agency and never alleged or insinuated that iran was cheating. >> the iranians committed to building a facility that would take their newly enriched uranium and convert it into a reactor fuel that you couldn't convert back into a weapon. the problem is they can't get that facility to work and yet they continue to enrich uranium. >> reporter: this means that absent a dramatic change of course by iran between now and june 30th the regime will to satisfy the terms, have to shrink its use of stockpile by 96%. >> are they going to ship their 26% out? are they going to downblend the 5% enriched uranium that the

in a series of twitter blasts tagging sanger marie harf wrote "the overall increase in iran's stockpile poses a major diplomatic and political challenge. not true. and in doing something it's not supposed to do under the jpoa or in violation of it is obligations, not true." this is acceptable as long as it's at the time period which is june 30th it's back below the correct amount. we fully expect they will do so in this case. >> reporter: sanger cited information from the atomic energy agency and never alleged or insinuated that iran was cheating. >> the iranians committed to building a facility that would take their newly enriched uranium and convert it into a reactor fuel that you couldn't convert back into a weapon. the problem is they can't get that facility to work and yet they continue to enrich uranium. >> reporter: this means that absent a dramatic change of course by iran between now and june 30th the regime will to satisfy the terms, have to shrink its use of stockpile by 96%. >> are they going to ship their 26% out? are they going to downblend the 5% enriched uranium that the

we turn to david sanger, let me begin with the basic question. how serious is this? how much damage does it do react go? david: as with all big cyberattacks, we don't know yet how much damage it did. there is good reason to believe since the office of personnel management, which is the office that handles security clearances and all other personnel matters for the federal government, told 4 million current and former government employees that they were going to get free credit reporting at a subsidized -- subsidized by the u.s. government. they think they lost a lot of personally identifiable information, which, at its most benign, would be so so security numbers and addresses. at its worst, information and answers people gave as they went through the security clearance process. that has a knack oh -- that has an echo of last summer, which was directed at elements of the department that focused on these security clearances. the big question here is, what was the motive of the hackers? was this about espionage? about getting the data that would give them an insight in

we turn to david sanger, let me begin with the basic question. how serious is this?uch damage does it do react go? david:

. >> "new york times" national security correspondent david sanger joins me thousand. in your reporting, this is a big deal. personal data stolen from the office of personal management. this is the agency that clears and hires and fires 90% of federal workers. so we're talk about at least 4.2 million workers now are told to check their bank accounts. they'll get free credit insurance from federal government. these are current and former government employees. >> that's right andrea. what's interesting in our reporting, it looks like the group involved in this which does appear to trace back to china, may or may not be a state sponsored group. it's entirely possible when the chinese government comes out and says we don't know about this group, they don't know how the u.s. may not know about the group of private hackers in the u.s. i recognize that's a harder case to make. the group signature, the way they went into this the kind of cyber tools they used seem very similar to what was used to go into at least two major american health care insurance cases. those involved a

davidn this, we turn to sanger, the national security correspondent for the "new york times."start with the basic question, how serious is this? how much damage does it do? david:

david: i trust david sanger too. remember what he said about bush or bush said about him?at it on air. deirdre bolton joining us with a look what is coming up in the next hour. >> i don't know what is going on there, dave, but the nfl is coming to yahoo! in a new exclusive partnership. we'll be talking to the two men who made the deal, one from yahoo!, one from the nfl. that is coming your way. tim cook won the same award as edward snowden. we are going to tell you why. and forget, honey, i'm working late. more affairs happen on monday morning as hard as that is to believe. a lot of people in gloomy moods. i don't know how to explain it. we'll try. david: do your best, deirdre. a new report that millions of dollars flowing into the clinton foundation from sweden. what is up with that? we have details. duane johnson's blockbuster, not only bringing big bucks at the box office but you might be surprised who else is making money on this. stay tuned. the real question that needs to be asked is "what is it that we can do that is impactful?" what the cloud enables is computing t

van dorn street between ken more and and sanger, right lanes >> no no no no, no, no, no. no-no, hey, listen, you're in my house. [ applause ] >> my attitude is if you're eating the hors d'oeuvres -- you know what i'm saying? [ laughter ] and drinking the booze. >> president obama drew the line today when a heckler repeatedly interrupted him during his speech at the white house. and this was an invitation-only event, observing lgbt pride month. that heckler was apparently screaming about deportation and he was quickly removed. the president told the crowd there's an undeniable shift in attitude towards gay marriage no matter what the supreme court rules. the court will issue its latest ruling on gay marriage any day now. the court still has to issue opinions on seven cases it's heard during this term. and some of those rulings will come out tomorrow. some on friday. many believe the marriage ruling will be issued on the last day of the session, which is monday. >>> day 2 of the ntsb hearings about the deadly smoke incident reveal that metro employees say they're afraid to

. >> united nations reporter of children's rights leading to sanger and big questions. the military still struggles to take back mosul juan year after isil gained control. more trouble for the tsa. dozens were given security clearance even though they were on a terror watch list. the tsa has been approved contract workers with a list that was not as complete as the governments data base. it came up during a congressional hearing today. the vetting system could leaf the department vulnerable to rink. >> offer audit results show that tsa faces significant challenges. despite spending billions on security technology, our testing of certain systems has revealed no resulting improvement. >> now that hearing room was clear add short time ago these are live pictures police are investigating a suspicious package in the building the tsa hearing is suspended. fire crews say they are now in control of a huge blaze at a fuel storage depot in ukraine. a drone high above shows what it looked like, at least one person died three others are still missing. the owner suspected arson the

margaret sanger and katherine mccormick wrote each other sometimes several letters a day so this was a gold mine for me x. most of it was already archived and organized really nicely, so i was able to do a lot of my research at these libraries where the research, the archivists have already gone through these papers. >> was there any information that was really hard to get aside from the dutiful work of getting it? >> i worked really hard to find women and find the children of women who were some of those early guinea pigs in the mental asylums and in pert rio and that was tough because you say, hi, i want to talk to you about the fact that your mom was in an insane asylum and may have been one of the first women tested as an experiment for the birth control pill. well, you get a lot of hang-ups. [laughter] so it took a lot -- i had to get a lot were better at how i introduced myself before i got a few of them to stay on the phone and talk to me. those stories were really moving, but those were hard to come by. >> yeah. >> hi. i have a question about the science when they moved from

. >> so the story she's alluding to is written by david sanger at "the new york times."weeting back and forth. have you been following this twitter ping-pong? what do you make of this whole twitter spat? >> we're seeing the stories. we've not been following all of it back and forth. i will tell you this brooke. once iran has learned how to make a nuclear weapon you cannot for lack of a better term unlearn them untrain them. so they have the technology. they have the know how. with their stockpile of fuel growing, and nobody argues that with the stockpile of fuel growing, that puts them dangerously closer to a nuclear weapon on a time frame. how much longer

. >> so the story she's alluding to is written by david sanger at "the new york times." they've been tweeting back and forth. have you been following this twitter ping-pong? what do you make of this whole twitter spat? >> we're seeing the stories. we've not been following all of it back and forth. i will tell you this brooke. once iran has learned how to make a nuclear weapon you cannot for lack of a better term unlearn them untrain them. so they have the technology. they have the know how. with their stockpile of fuel growing, and nobody argues that with the stockpile of fuel growing, that puts them dangerously closer to a nuclear weapon on a time frame. how much longer do we want to give them to keep moving toward a nuclear weapon? we would argue none in fact especially when they're holding americans hostage. >> congressman randy weber, thank you so much for taking the time today. we're thinking about those families here at home. i know they want their loved ones back. thank you. >> our prayers are with them. thank you, brooke. >> yes, sir. >>> top of the hour. you're