>> good afternoon, sarah jones with the planning department. we do need to take into consideration the environmental review cumulative projects, which the america's cup is a reasonably foreseeable project at this time, because we have all of our applications in and we are reviewing it. we did, and you'll see in your packet, add some language to the text of the negative declaration regarding the america's cup. clearly, the america's cup will result in some significant environmental impacts, but this project is not a sufficient size to contribute in any considerable way to many cumulative impacts from that. commissioner antonini: maybe you can answer my first question regarding the noticing period. it seems to me that being on highway 101 would require a longer noticing period. it was only 20 days, apparently. >> yes, that is correct. it was a 20-date noticing period. that was the proper -- it was a 20-day noticing period. we went over the issues. we can address it in detail. but on the highway 101 issue, that is triggered when there is ingress o