so sarah peters from our outreach team has been one of the team members working on the range of programs that we're doing to get kids to school. so with that, i will let sarah take it away and talk about safe routes to school. thanks, sarah. >> good evening, commissioners. my name is sarah peters outreach assistant for department of environment and some of this beginning stuff might sound like a broken record but it's just to give some contextual background and information on why we're talking about carpooling. so with that, i have your 80 updated slide here, 0-80-100 route. san francisco has goals of 0% waste, 80% trips, and 100% renewable energy. with that, a little bit deeper dive on that 80% of sustainable trips. so for that climate action goal as president bermejo already stated, sustainable trips are everything aside from pretty much a single occupancy trip so things like walking, biking, taking public transit or in our case for this presentation, carpooling. so one of the ways that sf environment does this outreach is through our safe routes to school partnership. as you can see h

peter? >> sarah, to follow up on the turkey question if i may.ssess whether the liquidity situation in turkey's financial sector is a risk in light of the fall of the lira? it's falling line a quarter in the last three or four days. >> certainly we are monitoring the situation with respect to the turkish economy and the decline of the lira. turkey's economic problems, those are a part of a long-term trend. something of its own making and not the result of any actions the united states has taken. >> sarah? >> thank you, sarah. one of the individuals that you listed on that list -- of clearance that is under review is bruce ohr. is he a current employee of the department of justice. sign stead of putting him under the review, does the president believe he should be fired. >> i don't have any personnel announcement on that front. >> why would you put a security clearance under review which would render him unable to do his job and not just fire him. >> once again i don't have any personnel announcements on that front. we are looking into that specif

. >> sarah sanders was also asked by our peter alexander about paul manafort and she said, well, the president is not arguing about his innocence or guilt, but rather saying he is being treated unfairly. thank you for your time today. that wraps up this hour of msnbc live. my friend katy tur joins us now to take over. hey, katy. >> hey there. one other fact check for sarah huckabee sanders. she said that the russia probe was started by the dossier. it was not started by the dossier. the trump administration keeps trying to say this, or the white house keeps trying to say this and donald trump's supporters keep trying to say this. as far as we know, the trump investigation -- or the russia investigation and the investigation into the trump campaign started when george papadopoulos told an australian diplomat that russia had dirt on hillary clinton. that came before the dossier. that came in april, if i'm correct. >> absolutely right. >> thank you very much. it is 11:00 a.m. out west and 2:00 p.m. in washington where today the president's lawyers are scrambling to clarify his tweets. i

peter. >> reporter: thank you, sarah.people who criticize the president publicly on tv, are they at greater risk of losing their security clearances than people who stay silent. >> once again, we will do an individual review and make that determination. kevin. >> reporter: thank you, sarah. a question about the return of lawmakers on capitol hill and then a follow-up very quickly. now that they are back, can you sort of lay out the white house strategy for moving forward with this agenda? we talked about wall funding. obviously, people are curious about the kavanaugh nomination moving forward. daca and other issues. is there a strategy in place to begin the work with lawmakers now that they are back? >> certainly. we have continued ongoing conversations on a a number of fronts with lawmakers even while they were not here in washington. we are happy that hearing dates have been set for justice kavanaugh, and we look forward to seeing him get confirmed. >> my very quick follow-up was, first of all, you didn't mention anythi

peter. >> thank you, sarah.people who criticize the president publicly on tv -- are they at greater risk of losing their security clearances than people who stay silent? >> once again, this is looked at on a case-by-case basis and we'll do an individual review and make that determination. kevin. >> a question about the lawmakers on capitol hill and then i'll follow up very quickly. now that they're back, can you sort of lay out the white house strategy for moving forward with this agenda? we've talked about wall funding. obviously a lot of people are curious about the kavanaugh nomination moving forward. daca and other issues. is there a strategy in place to begin to work with lawmakers now that they're back? >> certainly. we have continued ongoing conversations on a number of fronts with lawmakers, even while they were not here in washington. we are happy that hearing dates have been set for justice kavanaugh, and we look forward to seeing him get confirmed. >> my very quick followup was, first of all, you didn

doesn't mean it holds up in court. >> sarah sanders was also asked by our peter alexander about pauland she said, well, the president is not arguing about his innocence or guilt, but rather saying he is being treated unfairly. thank you for your time today. that wraps up this hour of msnbc live. my friend katy tur joins us now to take over. hey, katy. >> hey there. one other fact check for sarah huckabee sanders. she said that the russia probe was started by the dossier. it was not started by the dossier. the trump administration keeps trying to say this, or the white house keeps trying to say this and donald trump's supporters keep trying to say this. as far as we know, the trump investigation -- or the russia investigation and the investigation into the trump campaign started when george papadopoulos told an australian diplomat that russia had dirt on hillary clinton. that came before the dossier. that came in april, if i'm correct. >> absolutely right. >> thank you ver

peter alexander reporting that sarah sanders said this was done at the request of the president of the united states who go out a few hours later says hoax, hoax, hoax. maybe if you did a search of everything he said as president, hoax might come up in the top ten. why did the president ask for this? >> two things are happening. according to my reporting there's pressure from below on these officials. people in the intelligence services were really thrown by helsinki. there was a lot of pressure from veteran republicans and people in security said do something. we have to make a statement. >> you think it was their idea, their pressure, not the president's idea? >> i'm not sure i take that at face value. he went out hours later and understo undercut the idea it was a hoax. i think what we're seeing is as the election approaches, we're seeing more and more activity from trolls and bot nets. some linked to russia. this is response to an actual problem happening. >> what did you make of what you saw yesterday and this complete and total disconnect between what every sing member of the int

. >> i want to bring in peter bon effort and sarah.emocratic platform to the nazi platform. can i read you real quick the nazi platform? the national socialist german workers' party which was commonly referred to as the nazi party was built on dictator adolf hitler's belief that arian germans were superior to nonarian, particularly jewish people. ideology was built on the premise jewish people were responsible for the problems facing germany following world war i. and that belief eventually spiralled into the government-run genocide against the jews known as the holocaust. >>> so, democratic party platform, is that what it is? >> what you said captures it, right? the essence of nazism is dee humanization. the dee humanization of vulnerable groups. which political party in this era is doing more dee humanization of vulnerable groups? is it the democrats comparing mexican immigrants as insects who are infesting the country? is it they who are basically involved in a large scale campaign making people hate and associate latinos with crimi

institutions, that is a play book directly out of the path to fascism. >> peter, what does it say about these times when sarah house press secretary that has to have secret service protection? >> i don't know if that's true or not but what about the journalists who get escorted in and out of rallies for their own personal safety by the secret service or private security because donald trump is calling for basically killing them or assaulting them. and that's happening over and over again in america. he has blood on his hands. >> it was deplorable what we witnessed thursday in pennsylvania and i remember thinking thank heavens for that pen separating all of those people attending the trump rally from the journalists there for the journalists' safety sake. joe, you have the president who tweets about ivanka's comments saying it is the fake news which is a large percentage of the media that is the enemy of the people. what's the message he is sending there? >> of course he's trying to cast d dispersions on folks that disagree with him. it is good when presidents have criticism. it is good for the country and the

sarah: it is based off of a dossier paid for by an opposing campaign and had a lot of corruption within the entity that was overseeing it, peter struck, james comey, andrew mccabe. we have laid without a number of times. we don't have to go through it every single time you're in here. reporter: why doesn't the president use the powers he has to end it? sarah: the president has allowed this process to play out but he thinks it is time for it to come to an end. reporter: can you clarify this tweet from this morning. is it his desire for jeff sessions student not recuse himself? sarah: i have clarified this about 10 times. i don't have anything further. reporter: last night at the tampa rally the president pushed for creation of a space force, a new military ranch. the defense department missed its deadline to submit a report to congress about how this was to be structured. we are told the white house has now twice rejected drafts because the defense department does not want a space force. it would create a space command under the existing military structure. how is the president going to force the creation of a space force? sara

sarah sanders is getting set to take the podium and she is expected to face questions about omarosa, and peterrank. sup! this is frank's favorite record. this is frank's dog. and this is frank's record shop. frank knowns northern soul, but how to set up a limited liability company... what's that mean? not so much. so he turned to his friends at legalzoom. yup! they hooked me up. we helped with his llc, contracts, and some other stuff that's part of running a business. so frank can focus on the beat. you hear that? this is frank's record shop. and this is where life meets legal. but he has plans today. so he took aleve this morning. hey dad. if he'd taken tylenol, he'd be stopping for more pills right now. only aleve has the strength stop tough pain for up to 12 hours with just one pill. tylenol can't do that. aleve. all day strong. all day long. now introducing aleve back and muscle pain, for up to 12 hours of pain relief with just one pill. >> thank you for joining us. i'll see you at 4:00 p.m. with david asman on fox business. here's dana. >> dana: sarah sanders set to brief reporters at the

sarah and rain. oh, there he is. this is peter deutch. >> ted deutch. >> congressman ted deutch who i know well. >> peter deutch is in a band i think. >> tom petri. hi, ted. >> hi. >> ted is the congressman for sarah and rain, and we we are going to hear hair stories and now that you're here we're delighted you're here and what we want you to talk about is activism. where does it come, from and how do we do it effectively? we are addressing the gun safety issue but we're not debating the gun safety issue. we're discussing activism, and as eleanor was saying before you got here it was an astonishingly impressive performance -- performance is not fair. astonishingly impressive act from the heart of students and teachers who went through an absolutely horrific experience, not the first and not the last in our country. but the most recent horrific experience. so i don't know which one of you wants to start, but, please, talk about not just the incident and what you did, but, you know, how you personally -- well, let's start with you,

sarah sanders there. for more on this i've been speaking to our north america correspondent peter bowes. quarters, a very angry response to this. john kerry, for example, the former secretary of state in the last administration said mr trump was behaving like the ruler of a banana republic. mr brennan himself sending out a tweet very quickly after hearing this news with his own views, suggesting that donald trump is trying to stifle free speech. he says the move was part of president trump's broader efforts to suppress freedom of speech and punish critics. it goes on, he says "it should gravely worry all americans, including intelligence professionals about the cost of speaking out. "my principles," he says, "are worth far more than clearances." i will not relent." it is true that he has been strong critic of the president, describing him as treasonous after his meeting with president putin. as we have heard, there are other names on the list. this may not be the end. james comey, for example, who has described the president as "morally unfit to lead." he is one of the president's harshe

director, andrew mccabe and the former fbi agent, peter strzok along with his one-time lover and former fbi lawyer, lisa page. each and every one mentioned by sarah sanders a critic of the president. so what is the big picture here. with news breaking now, let's go to caitlin owens, a reporter for axios who jumps in to speak on this at the last minute without any prior notice. we didn't know this was coming. historically it's been a professional courtesy, i guess, maybe the right way to say it, to allow the security clearance of people from previous administrations to continue with their security clearance. how unusual is it to revoke such a thing? >> this is highly unusual. you know, i think that that's why this is such big news. the former director of the cia here. so yes, this is not an unprecedented thing. let's go back to why the press secretary just told us why the president revoked his clearance. because of his erratic behavior -- >> shepard: that was the line. >> that was the line. so this is quickly unfolding. the debate will be what behavior was it and was he contradictory and did he behave in a way to have his security clearance revoke

sarah: i'm evaluating action with respect to the foowing individuals -- james clapper, james comey, michael hayden, sally yates, susan rice, andrewa , peter strzok, lisa page. security clearances for those who still have them may be revoked, and those who have already lost the security clearance may not be able to have it reinstated. rajini: now if those names sound familiar, is because they ossed swords with mr. trump over a variety of issues and have drawn his scorn online. for more on all that, i spoke a brietime ago with shelby holiday, a video reporter at "the wall street journal." shelby holiday, great to have you with us. we saw sarahanders saying that the president is revoking the security clearance of one official and is thatening to do it with a number of others now. why now? now the well, we do official whose security clearance he was been very critical of the president. it might have to do with timing. the president obviously does not like any sort of criticism in the press, whether it is on social media, television. that is one thing. but he also in revoking the g clearance cited someth do with russia, the dossier.s thatrt of

sarah, but omarosa. >>> new reaction pouring in over the firing of anti-trump agent peter strzok. this is another official prepares to testify on capitol hill. what all of this could mean for the russia investigation. >>> the fbi is now sounding the alarm, warning about an imminent and coordinated cyberattack on atms all over the word. what you need to know coming up. melissa: back to the markets and the dow snapping a four-day losing streak, led higher by shares of mcdonald's, walmart, microsoft. nicole petallides on the floor of the new york stock exchange. nicole, talk to me about today's trade. >> right the bulls like a day like this. they will take it after the recent selling they have been seeing. unitedhealth actually hit an all-time high on the dow. we were up over 150 points. we held on to most of the gains. we're up half a percent on the dow jones industrial average and we saw the nasdaq and the s&p also gaining today. concerns about the turkish lira, the economy, contagion that could happen going across europe. we got somewhat of a spike today. but for three weeks it ha

references to it later on but today sarah huckabee sanders elaborated on that a bit saying that the administration could also revoke other acts officials including james comey as peter struck who has just fired from the f.b.i. recently so immediate reaction so far have been pretty predictable so we'll just have to see. if that affects trump's future decisions now as some of those names sound familiar is because they've crossed swords with mr trump over a variety of issues and have often drawn his scorn online this is an extraordinary move the white house saying that this had to do with security issues but this is really one of vengeance william binney a former u.s. national security agency technical director and whistleblower thinks the media supporting brennan has lost credibility. they shut down anybody who has a different opinion so their voice is discredited totally i mean they're basically not the only their first amendment duty to political figure who's doing the questioning and also looking at all kinds of options and investigating all they're not doing and they're only doing one side if the truth exists because that's the way of the case so they have no cred

out in many of the stories that you've been able to break, sarah, there are still legal issues out there. we still have comey and mccabe and peterk and paige and sally yates in this deep state. we do have fisa court judges lies two. we did have a fix in the with hillary clinton and the evidence was overwhelming and incontrovertible. the biggest obstruction case we've ever seen. so all of this is still percolating as the media is getting all giddy here and i know for a fact there's a lot more information coming out probably sooner than later. >> absolutely. let me just go to one point about mueller. this is the most important point. as he's targeting everyone in prompt campaign, previous officials, its attorney general jeff sessions that was with him for some point in time. it rod rosenstein wrote the letter that asked president trump to basically fire comey delisted out a number of reasons. let's think about this. jeff sessions could be a potential witness. if that leads me to suspect that he may himself resign from the position of attorney general eventually. if he is called by mueller. he can't serve as the attorney general an

later on but today sarah huckabee sanders a lab aerated on that a bit saying that the administration has also revoked clearances of other acts officials including james comey and peter struck who was just fired from the f.b.i. at least at least so immediate reaction so far has been pretty predictable so. if. that affects trunks future decisions. so it's come the u.n. peacekeepers are returning to the disputed gotten heights after the area's liberation from terrorist groups we'll have a look at the details on maps of the stories to just tough to break. on saturday irresponsible lobbyist accessing unlimited credit from an irresponsible federal reserve bank the infinite regress that you saw with money starting in the one nine hundred seventy s. and now insurance companies selling insurance on insurance contracts i'm sure as contracts i'm sure it's contract with another bureaucrat another bureaucrat is infinite regress. turkish president spokes person has said that washington is almost completely halted relations it comes amid rising standoff over tariffs turkey is high to write some key american products including cars and alcohol. the u.s. has brought relations with t

later on but today sarah huckabee sanders a lab aerated on that a bit saying that the administration could also revoke clearances of other acts officials including james comey and peter struck who was just fired from the f.b.i. at least at least so a media reaction so far have been pretty predictable so it was have to see. if that affects trucks future decisions. cross live to william binney for me u.s. national security agency technical director and n.s.a. whistleblower william welcome to the program festival what does this move by trump mean for brandon and others he's considering revoking clarence from how will it affect them. well it simply means that he can't go in or talk to people who are involved in intelligence operations currently i mean he can't hear he can't be exposed to a classified material anymore i mean that's pretty standard i mean if the only reason you have a clear example you leave government our. work is to have if you were involved in contracts or other making other contributions to government efforts in the case of brennan then all those people you just listed they're not making you know your credit card positive contribution anything pres the

it later on but today sarah huckabee sanders elaborated on that a bit saying that the administration could also revoke clearances of other ex officials including james komi and peter struck from the f.b.i. recently so the f.b.i. recently so what does have to see what happens and wait for the media reaction that will inevitably follow sure ok thanks to me that was american force that in washington. police in the u.k. say the man detained after tuesday's westminster car running incident is being held on suspicion of attempted before making an act of terror he has been identified as a british citizen the sudanese origin with more details to his. we do know that the press here are saying that this is a man who is twenty nine years old he is being named as sally kadir british citizen of sudanese origin it's been reported that this man came to britain back in twenty ten as a refugee and applied for asylum and was granted british citizenship within the last two years it's also being reported that this is a man who lived in birmingham and was actually according to some reports being made now in london to reportedly apply for sudanese visa to be able to visit his family ba

more on the free trade side, rather than robert lighthouse are or peter who are hawks on china -- navarro who are hawks on china? sarahthis is where the talks go deeper. the chinese are even confused sometimes about who to listen to. like you said, do them all pass works for steven mnuchin, who is more of a globalist. he in june was trying to put forth a deal where the country would agree to buy more u.s. goods, and it would alleviate the trade deficit, which has really been an issue for donald trump. that deal fell through because of, from what we heard, the more nationalist camps, the hawks like peter navarro, robert lighthizer, they said that is not good enough, we need bigger changes to the economy. i think that is a point in the talks this week, who has the ear of trump? is treasury negotiating something with the chinese, even if they came up with an agreement for the talks to progress again from this week, is it something the hawks are willing to accept and that donald trump will ultimately agreed to as well? caroline: fantastic reporting. a great summarization of those negotiations. thank you, sarah mcgregor. a

sarah huckabee sanders. >> he is expressing the frustration he has with the level of corruption we have seen from people like jim comey, peter strzok. >> reporter: asked about that fbi director chris wray pushed back with sanders in the room. >> ensure the american people that the men and women of the fbi starting with the director on down will follow ouro oaths and do our job. >> i have certainly received my fair share of reporting on me personally that i know not to be fully accurate. i do not feel that the media is the enemy of the people. >> reporter: given multiple opportunities to back ivanka and not president trump sanders refused to say the press is not the enemy. >> his daughter acknowledges that and all i'm asking you to do is to acknowledge that now and here. >> i appreciate your passion. i share it. i have addressed this question. i have addressed my personal feelings. i am here to speak on behalf of the president. he has made his comments clear. >> reporter: each of the top officials -- the big question is whether any of the efforts will be successful. we may not get that answer until well after the november ele

sarah huckabee sanders. >> he's certainly expressing the frustration he has with the level of corruption we've seen by people like james comey, petertrzok. >> reporter: fbi director chris wray pushed back with sanders in the room. >> i can assure the american people that the men and fwomen f the fbi are going to follow our oaths and do our job. >> reporter: the president's daughter ivanka trump told axios that members of the press are not the enemy of the american people as her father often says. >> i've certainly received my fair share of reporting on me personally i that know not to be fully accurate, but no, i do not feel that the press is the enemy of the american people. >> reporter: sanders refused to say the press is not the enemy. his own daughter acknowledges that. all i'm asking you to do is to acknowledge that right now and right here. >> i appreciate your passion. i share it. i've addressed this question. i've addressed my personal feelings. i'm here to speak on behalf of the president. he's made his comments clear. >> reporter: each of the top officials at the white house today laid out various task forces and initiati

sarah huckabesarah sanders. today cbs, nbc, they dedicated approximately 344% more time covering omarosa than they did covering the firing of fbi agent peterzok. that's more than triple the reporting for salacious rumors over what is serious news about what is a corrupt, high ranking fbi official fired because of his massive bias and corruption at the heart of everything from hillary to general flynn to the beginning of the russia-trump hoax and today as he often does, the president bypassed the partisan press in the country. he took his message right to you, the american people. he tweeted out, quote: fired fbi agent peter strzok is a fraud, as is the rigged investigation that he started. there was no collusion or obstruction with russia, and everybody, including the democrats, know it. the only collusion and obstruction was by crooked hillary, the democrats, the dnc. and tonight, a new report is now bolstering the president's claim. real clear investigation. they are shows serious questions now being raised about fusion gps founder glenn simpson and the shadowy russian figures who attended the now infamous 2016 trump tower meeting. by th

that senior advisers, including sarah sanders herself, had advised the president to kind of deflect from the omarosa news by announcing the security clearance news. and as peter very astutely pointed earlier, that the president really loves looking like he's strong and in charge, and that's why earlier this year, he was so fixated on his pardon power and it seemed like he was going to dole out pardons left and right. we haven't actually heard much about that since. but with that in mind, i wouldn't be surprised that this continues as an issue in the coming weeks. >> i think it's an important point, particularly in terms of the strategy here. nancy, the political strategy that we're seeing, this is a white house that was, frankly, ungulfed in controversy for this entire week. they were very eager to turn the page. and now they've sparked a whole new controversy. the pushback has been fierce but they're digging in. is it your sense that they're not going to back down? they're just going to move forward with this? >> yes, i think they're not going to back down at all. unlike the omarosa tapes which really put them on the defensive, i think the white house views

by the time the story sarah sanders was apparently referring to ran in september of 1998, bin laden had apparently already stopped using his satellite phone. in fact, cnn's peter bergen, who has reported extensively on this as early as 1997 met with bin laden. bin laden's men were already concerned about electronic sr surveillance. filed the bin laden phone leak under urban myths. now we'll see if sarah sanders corrects herself in a few minutes or a few hours or in a few days or whenever she happens to have a next press conference. we doubt it. we'll see if she holds herself to the same standards we hold ourselves to. joining us is cnn political analyst david gergen. i always try to use the example if the president was a democrat and you had, you know, a democratic president encouraging people at rallies to scream at reporters. >> yes. >> reporters would be outraged about it. if they were screaming at a fox news, you know, get off the air and when anybody does that, that's abhorrent. >> yeah, i agree. there are some reporters of other networks who are coming to the defense of cnn on this and jim acosta in particular. you know, the publisher of the "new york ti

sarah sanders announced nine other current former official security clearances also under review, including the liar, the leaker known as james clapper, that would include james comey, andrew mccade, susan rice, peter strzok, and others. my advice? clean it up now. get rid of these clearances. we can easily make the case all night tonight, each of these disgraced or fired officials should lose their clearances permanently. but we would have to take all night. we do, once again, have other breaking news to talk about. one of the people on that list, according to an exclusive report from sara carter, we now have a smoking gun evidence of the very special relationship between demoted doj official bruce ohr and ex-foreign spy christopher steele who put the phony dossier together. uncovered another series of test tonight between ohr and steele. christopher steele expressing concern about james comey, 2017s congressional testimony writing two days before that testimony, hi, just wondering if you had any news. obviously we are a bit apprehensive giving the special appearance congress on monday, hoping that important firewalls will hold. many thanks. ohr writes back, "sorry, no new news. i believe my early

sarah huckabee sanders said other former executive branch officials who've been critical of trump could be next. >> james clapper, james comey, michael hayden, sally eight, susan rice, andrew mccabe, peter , and bruce or.e secured clearances for those who still have the may be r revokedd and those who o have already lot their security clearance may not be able to have it reinstated. amy: among former administration officials whose security trump is not reviewing -- michael l flynn,n, trump''s forr national security adviser who pleaded guilty to lying to the fbi over his conversations with russian officials. this all comes as a jury is deliberating over the fate of trump's former campaign chair, paul manafort, who faces 18 charges related to special counsel robert mueller's investigation, including tax fraud, bank fraud, and money laundering. and it comes after former white house aide omarosa manigault newman said that trump was recorded repeatedly using the n-wordrd. meanwhile, trump's legal team said wednesday it may fight all the way to the supreme court to quash a possible subpoena from robert mueller for an interview with the president. trump has so far refused to be questioned by r

peter strzok, et cetera. and he makes this connection here with security clearance to the mueller investigation in saying, something had to be done. something. >> right, two things strike me on this. one, sarahreason, which itself was not really a good one, but a supposed justification for doing this, which was, national security grounds. and that one was ripped apart very quickly. but she got ahead of the president, and yet again, got undercut by the president with this interview. in my previous administration, when a press secretary goes out, says something, and the president goes out and undercuts them, they're gone. they resign in protest. in this case, she appears to say, you know, thank you, sir, may i have another? and on the mueller side of it, i cannot believe this interview with "the wall street journal," because the president is essentially dangling out there more and more evidence of, if not obstruction of justice, in this case, abuse of power, which was another impeachment article against someone like richard nixon. the president has the ability to control security clearances. that is almost universally acknowledged. but that doesn't mean that he cannot corruptly use that to abu

sarah sandersndated could be in danger of losing aveir clearance. i know you don'ta video monitor, but james clapper, comey, who doesn't have one, mic'd hayden, sally yates, andrew mccabe, peter strzok, why nge those the ten people they are signa out? >> because they have been critical of him or because he wants to use them as examples of the deep state or those that are trying to hurt him. in the case of bruce ohr, a current department of justice official, i think that is oneof the most outrageous steps that he could take to revoke the clearances o a current government official simply because he doesn't like either them or their spouse in terms of what they might have done. that is so antithetical to what has been the practice and th tradition and what needs to continue to be the basis for thn ng of the revoking of security clearances so you trust people with those secrets. >> i'm curiays. on fr night with rachel maddow you indicated that you have had lawyersontact you about possible legal action. it's 48 hours later. what would that look like? is that something you're serious about? >> well, iave beencontacted by a number of lawyers and they have already given me their thou

peter strozk, andrew mccabe. >> harris: the chief white house correspondent john roberts are more. you are there. we are getting ready for this. >> john: we are not sure when sarah huckabee sanders will show up. probably in the next half hour or so. we haven't got word of a delay. but here is where we are in terms of the mueller probe and whether or not the president might sit down and do an interview with robert mueller. sources tell fox news that the president's legal team may respond monday to the letter earlier this week from robert mueller outlining what he believes are the parameters for an interview with the president. the president's legal team want to limit questioning to russia, election and whether or not there was collusion between the trump campaign and the russian officials to throw the election in 2016. they did not want mueller asking any questions about potential obstruction of justice. in his response, mueller indicated yes, in fact he did want to ask some of the questions. mueller did compromise a little bit, though. you will remember in march, the president legal team was given that list of the 49 questions from the mueller team. he's agreed

press secretary, sarah sanders, said mr brennan had used his access to sensitive information to make unfounded allegations against the administration. our north america correspondent petert came out of the blue at a previously unscheduled media briefing at the white house. historically, top officials keep their security credentials once they have left the job, in case they are called upon to advise the current administration. but donald trump says advise the current administration. but donald trump sastohn brennan will no longer have access to classified information. any benefits that senior officials might glean from consultations with mr brennan are now outweighed by the risks posed by his erratic conduct and behaviour. second, that conduct and behaviour. second, that conduct and behaviour has tested and far exceeded the limits of any professional courtesy that may have been due to him. mr brennan has a history that calls into question his objectivity and credibility. john brennan has been a strong critic of donald trump, calling him treasonous after his meeting with russia's president putin. the former cia chief hit back at mr trump in a tweet. he said the move was p

peter baker, how is this playing in the white house. the president likes what he sees and is considering moving down that list that sarah huckabee sandersroom two days ago of former officials under review for their security clearances. >> exactly right. this is a president long before he became president you hit me i hit you back ten times as hard. when he was a businessman, he could yell at the tabloids or something. he's now vested with the ultimate power in our constitutional system, the power of the president. he's discovering ways to use it and enjoy it. he enjoys ways to take actions that don't require approval by anybody else, particularly congress. same thing as converse of his discovery of the pardon power, somebody can come to him gosh can you forgive somebody for something. he says yeah, apparently i can do that. nobody can question him. that's pretty cool. in effect, he's taking the opposite view of this. punish people that he doesn't like, people that he thinks crossing him or in some ways betraining him. this is what he likes the most about the presidency where he has unchecked, you know, power to help his friends and puni