go ahead, you're on with our sarah pierce. caller: yes, hi. good morning.elieve they should put a freeze on the sileum law. i'm hispanic american, but i think we are promoting for young by themselves e and i think we're promoting for responsible parents to send by themselves, little children. they don't think that should separate the children from the parents. because we top this -- we we already have don't need any more parents sending children by themselves. we are not helping. promoting a disaster in the future. thank you. guest: sure. you bring up a good point, again, about how this can be factor, the pull fact the children are being permitted to enter the united sponsors released to throughout the country. maybe that sends more children. is ink pausing asylum dangerous because these people are coming to the united states, conditions gerous and we certainly want to be receptive to those applications, considering we have international legal obligations asylum seekers. what might be the best policy is the cases really quickly so that individuals with clai

migration policy institute sarah pierce on current u.s. policy towards immigrant children who into united states from the border. sure to watch c-span's washington journal live at 7:00 eastern this morning. join the discussion. live, wednesday, on the c-span networks. andoon, on c-span, discussion on countering violent extremism and the role of the state department of the husband is to. at 2:00 p.m., the wilson center looks at transatlantic relations after the u.s. withdraw from the run nuclear agreement. on c-span2 at 9:00 a.m., the national league of cities releases the state of cities report. at noon on c-span2, the cato congress'sonsiders war powers and how it can reassert itself in the decision process. p.m., the state of climate action in the u.s. and globally that the u.s. world resources institute. president trump plan to attend a summit with north korean singapore on june 12 of that meeting has been canceled. next, a discussion about u.s. and north korea diplomacy as negotiations continue. the stenson center hosted this event. and

instituteation policy fellow sarah pierce on policy for immigrant children who enter the united states from the border. watch live at 7:00 eastern wednesday morning. join the discussion. sunday on "q&a," patricia o'toole discusses her book "the moralist: woodrow wilson and the war he made." is a huge psychological literature about olson. -- wilson. i have read it, but i sense that it just reduced him to edible tangles and things like that that i did not think i could deal with on the strength of my own knowledge of the theory. people have said that his stubbornness in later life was to his a reaction father's strictness, and they can point to one story where his father made him revise anything he wrote a bunch of times. wilsonpositions are that resented this, that he was a good boy and put up with it. but if you read every mention of are worshipful. never had an unkind word to say about his father. announcer: sunday night at 8:00 eastern. republicans mitt romney and utah state lawmaker mike kennedy held a debate.

the migration policy institute, sarah pierce, on current u.s. policy towards immigrant children enter the u.s. from the border. the sure to watch c-span's washington journal, live at 7 am eastern wednesday morning. join the discussion. >>> 30 years ago the supreme court announced a decision in hustler magazine versus falwell, the court ruled unanimously for hustler which published a cartoon parody of jerry falwell who sued to recover damages for libel, invasive of privacy and emotional distress. next on american history tv, a discussion on the free-speech case with the editorial cartoonist and a legal expert. this is part of a symposium on satire held at the university of minnesota. >>> i want to welcome you to the state of our satirical union, this is the 30th anniversary of the hustler magazine versus falwell decision by the supreme court, i want to thank james curley, networker, and ann thomas for pulling this together. what is the purpose of the symposium? why are we here? why do we persist? after all, they have all the money, they have all