eye 31
favorite 0
quote 0
and she's a follow federal laws doing our president served him well that brings me to the sarah sanders thanks sarah sanders sarah how could you sanders was asked to leave a restaurant this weekend because. the staffers were uncomfortable and owner gave them the choice do you want to serve and she politely asked her to leave and she laughed and of course she tweeted out from her press secretary account about this business and there's some been all that. with the sarah sanders incident also you know you have two major cabinet members and major members of the trumpet administration has spoken out and spoken pretty racist lee racist about the border crisis and they're going in a mexican restaurant some people are giving them a rough time there i mean it's just obedience but it's relatively so during things that it's called civil disobedience for reasons of time when it's really it's really hard for him and you go. my god we only have everything in power in the world but let's cry about it some more now what the washington post editorial board actually to let the trump team piece that down that road lie
eye 101
favorite 0
quote 0
sanders: everybody can figure that out. >> sarah sanders, thank you. sarah sanders: thank you for having me. , the conversation with the chief justice of the, john roberts, from the digital conference before circuit, live today at 3:30 p.m. eastern on c-span, c-span.org, or listen on the free c-span radio app. the c-span bus is traveling across the country, on our 50 capitals tour, it stopped in fairbanks, alaska, asking people what is the most important issue in alaska. >> i was born and raised in fairbanks, alaska and the most important issue to me is walls our society seems to be putting up. nation built on immigrants and diversity, we are finding it hard to embrace our differences. that is creating great divide. and more complex we need at the conflictscomplex -- we need at the moment. problem solving skills more important, not how we are different, because differences make us great. >> the most important issue to , we have ay misconception that we are falling behind. that is not the case. important for the public to understand we need to work harder to
eye 46
favorite 0
quote 0
sanders: everybody can figure that out. >> sarah sanders, thank you. sarah sanders: thank you for having me. >> >> that interview and many others are featured on our pod cast. you will find these bands the weekly and all podcast wherever they are able. -- wherever they are available. ♪ travelingpan bus is across the country on the 50 capitals tour. >> we are finding it hard to him race -- to embrace diversity is a good ring. it is creating a great divide. conflicts then we need at the moment. we should be focusing our problem-solving skills on , nothing more important how we are different. our differences make us great. >> the most important issues to me are at the policy. we have a misconception amongst a lot of the public that we are falling behind. and, it is important for me to inc. for the public to understand to work harder on making arctic policy a bigger issue than it is currently perceived. >> i'm a dentist here in fairbanks. i have been here since 1976. , where i from michigan went to school at the university of mexican. -- university of michigan.
eye 64
favorite 0
quote 0
it turned fiery at the white house briefing with sarah sanders. >> sarah, you're a parent, don't you have any empathy for what these people are going through? >> guy, settle down. >> seriously. >> i'm trying to be serious but i'm not going to have you yell out of turn. >> these people have nothing. >> i know you want to get some more tv time, but that's not what this is about. go ahead jill. >> the debate led to large protests yesterday. abc's melanie woodrow was in san jose where a big crowd gathered last night. >> reporter: hundreds of people gathered at san jose city hall to protest the separation of children from their parents along the u.s. border. people joined rallies across the country for the same purpose. >> i work with children, i work with adolescents, with kids in the foster care system. so i know what this kind of trauma can do to people and is doing to people. >> reporter: organizers heather valentine said when she learned just days ago that there wasn't a rally planned locally, she knew it was up to her. >> i felt, if i don't do it, who is going to do it. >> reporter:
eye 49
favorite 0
quote 0
sarah sanders: we will all leave, whether we like it or not. >> have you thought in terms of when? sarah sanders: no. i was asked this before. i wake up every day and part of my daily routine is to pray and ask for clarity, at some point i will get it, and when i do, i will make that decision. >> cbs news said you were leaving and you said they never contacted you. sarah sanders: i did not say they never contacted me, i said they never talked to me. i had an email with a deadline i missed because i was on a program for my daughter, so they never spoke to me and put the story before they spoke to me. >> what does that say about the media? sarah sanders: i think there is a real race often to be first instead of to be right. that is a dangerous place. we used to have a 24 hour cylce, but now we are running on a 24 second cycle, that is a dangerous place. now there is not the same editorial process as stories go through before they go live. i think often times people -- reporters will use twitter to comment on a story and they do not realize it can be taken as news because they are a reporte
eye 64
favorite 0
quote 0
new york, new jersey, where sarah sarah huckabee sanders works in the district of columbia. you can't in a public accommodation like a restaurant discriminate against a customer on the basis of their political beliefs or with whom they associate. virginia has no such law, so as reprehensible morally as was this restaurant owner, acidotic as was the restaurant owner because he's hurting his own business he was within his legal rights in the state of virginia. trish: and we heard governor huckabee talk about how the owner came out and then continues to heckle sarah and her family as they went across the street trying to get dinner somewhere else and in fact sarah left. and they still went after the family. >> that creates another issue. trish: because this morning we've seen, do we have that video again? i'm shocked every time i see it this mob effectively going after kristen nielsen trying to shame her into leaving the restaurant. can we hear that sound? >> not in the u.s.. not in d.c. trish: shouting at her, so that happened. you think about the woman heckeling sarah and her
eye 68
favorite 0
quote 0
sarah sanders school -- sarah sanders shortly. it was scheduled for two, then 2:15, so pushed back a little bit. expecting it to get underway shortly. it should be a fairly full week for the president, as later this week friday and saturday the president attends the g-7 summit in quebec. president trump meeting with the executive founder and chairman of the world economic forum. later this afternoon president trump and melania trump will be hosting old star families for a reception at the white house. ,ou're watching live coverage should get underway momentarily here on c-span. >> live at the white house, expecting the briefing from sarah sanders to get underway in just a little bit. also in washington today, a ruling from my supreme court on a notable case, the masterpiece cake shop. the court ruling today was the seventh two decision. freedom rights were violated by the colorado civil rights commission. the decision is 7-2 by the supreme court. the argument could be found on the website. d reporters that reporters are were grading -- and reporters are waiting. >> joining us from new york, she writes on personal finance a other wealth issues for the publication, thanks for joining us. a recent piece of yours, i will show you the headlines, the world isn't prepared retirement, how did you come to that conclusion? was a pretty large study of 16,000 people across 15 countries. it showed by and large we are way under saved. china, hungary, poland. global dearth of savings that will be adequate enough. are their common reasons you find these trends not only the united states but worldwide? >> part of it is tied to longevit
eye 94
favorite 0
quote 0
sarah sanders. evidence as completely exonerating sarah sanders and making sure that the restaurant had discriminated against her. even if you go to the point where the old virginia statute allows places not to discriminate places based on religion and, religion has come into this over and over again. people on both sides citing bible starches. and >> you can respond to that. i will give you the next point. i find it interesting when we talk about the cause of action, we see these laws come through several states where the laws are prohibited based on race, religion or orientation and conservatives try very hard to say it's okay for someone to express their personal beliefs for religious freedoms. it will not fly in those case, it will not fly here. >> this is maxine waters on saturday versus maxine waters today. let's watch. >> if you see anybody from that cabinet in a restaurant, and a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you pull a crowd. and you push back on them, and you tell them they are not welcome. >> i have not called for the harm of anybody. this president has lied agai
eye 62
favorite 0
quote 0
sarah sanders, sarah sanders, has stopped defending him and just started to telling jokes at his expence. i'm speaking of course about e.p.a. administrator scott pruitt. give you an example. he tried to use his office to get his wife a chick-fil-a franchise. and when he was questioned about it, the e.p.a. chief said it's one of the best restaurants in the country. we need more of them in tulsa and need more of them across the country. anyway, it's an exciting time. mr. speaker, don't get me wrong. i enjoy a chicken sandwich as much as any other person but scott pruitt talks about chick-fil-a like they're a social service or a group that hands out food to the homeless. he think it's an organization that's setting up soup kitchens and homeless shelters. frankly this is probably one of the weakest excuses i have ever heard from any administration, but this administration seems to specialize in weak excuses. scott also runs a washington, d.c. apartment -- rents a washington, d.c. from a lobbyist with matters before the e.p.a. and it won't surprise you at all that he got a sweetheart deal. he was paying $50 a night and only charged the day he is slept there. everybody back in arizona may not understand this but the rental market is hot here. what he did was not normal and probably illegal. i'm not a lawyer. or a law enforcement officer. but this arrangement definitely looks like a bribe to me. that's not all. this week we learned that pruitt ordered his government bodyguards to seek out a mist risers offered exclusively to patrons of the ritz carlton hotel. time to to give congressman lue about this. -- lieu about this. mr. lieu: both mr. gayay grow and i are veterans. scott pruitt has made a joke of federal service. he's under 12 investigations. he's wasted taxpayers money. he's used taxpayer money to enrich himself. he's used taxpayer money to help his wife. and based on what congressman gallego said about the lotion thing he had his personal security detail paid for at taxpayer expense drive around to ritz carltons to try to find lotion. that's why we have a picture here of the ritz carlton lotion there is also this thing known as the internet. you can go on the internet, search for ritz carlton lotion, first link will take you to ritz carlton shops and he could have ordered it without using his taxpayer funded staff to drive around to find this lotion. this is an example of the joke he's made of federal service. so we're going to break down to the american people today the top 10 scandals of e.p. administrator scott pruitt. with that, i yield back to congressman gallego to start it. mr. gallego: before we go to the top 10 i think one of the scandalous other abuse of taxpayers is the fact that he had his personal detail asking and searching for used trump mattresses. now this is not a joke. this is not in an episode of a tv show. your e.p.a. administrator. supposed adult in the room, is using taxpayer dollars to ask for and try to find used trump mattresses. now, right now, all i can think of is two things. number one this person is egregiously using our taxpayer dollars in the worst possible manner and number two, he's trying to set up one of the weirdest bed and breakfasts in the history of washington, d.c. but this is real. this is not tv, this is actually happening in your government. with that, let's go to the top 0 things that secretary -- i'm sorry e.p.a. administrator pruitt has done to embarrass this country and possible corruption. 10 is what we have, there's more than that, but we have to keep this somewhat bideable for everyone else. let me start with number 10 as recently report the mess hall. pruitt has overused his privileges a at the swanky but affordable white house messal. the mess hall is a -- basically a cafeteria for the top officers of the white house. i've been in there, i was there under the obama administration. it's an honor to be invited to go. and it's great food at a very low price. pruitt has misused this privilege so much so that he has been asked to not come back. you are that egregious that as a sitting member of the cabinet you have been told by white house staff to not come back to the cafeteria. that tells you a lot. ted, why don't you take number nine? mr. lieu: number nine is the dinner vezzer vation. it was publicly reported that administration -- dinner reservation. it was publicly reported that administrator pruitt asked the security detail to turn on lights and sirens to get him down the crowded streets of washington, d.c. to get him to a dinner reservation. that's an abuse of taxpayer funds and that's not what sirens are for, they're for emergencies not to make sure a cabinet official can make his dinner reservationen time. mr. gallego: i recommend taking he metro, much faster. number eight, $130 fountain pen. he's spent thousands on -- he's spent money on the $130 fountain pen. i recommend a bic pen, it does the job well. but it seems like in one hand he doesn't seem to mind spending taxpayer dollars on really expensive things such as these fancy pens and then personally his own personal life he is really cheap by looking for cheap used trump mattresses. so he's using tax mayer dollar as his personal piggy bank so he can live the lifestyle he wants. on to the mattress. pruitt uses e.p.a. staff to help him look for a discount trump home luxury plush pillowtop mattress, apparently his favorite. he also inappropriately used aides to look for apartments and help arrange family vacations to the rose bowl. ted and i are lucky to have some smart, young staff and they work hard. but they are not here to be your personal valets. they are here to make sure you do your job well and get to your meetings and have the resources you need to make the right decisions. they aren't there to help you find the right type of trump home luxury plus euro pillow top mattress. don't recommend that. or as ted said, there's the internet, you can find it there also. mr. lieu: number six is the lotion which we've already talked about. but what we didn't talk about is, using his security detail, you should know, this is a really expensive security detail, 24-7. they've already spent $3.5 million on that security detail. in 2017. and this is again just a waste of taxpayer funds. no other cabinet official has this kind of security. and it's something that we really should look at if we had a functioning g.o.p. house oversight structure. unfortunately, the majority here in the house has refused to look at e.p.a. scott pruitt scandals and i don't know how they can be at this point. number five, back to congressman allego. mr. gallego: he cited security concerns and not concerned with the $3.5 million spent on security escorts. let me tell you, number one, i think for many americans nobody knows who scott pruitt is. you don't need to be flying first class and shouldn't be making the american public be paying for your first class tickets. mr. lieu: number four, the $43 sound proof booth. he is so paranoid that he wasted $4 ,000 of your money to build a sound proof phone booth for him to make phone calls. so if the president doesn't want to fire e.p.a. administrator scott pruitt for his corruption, think the president should be firing him for being superweird. to have a staff to try and find used trump mattresses and build this private phone booth, that is just creepy and strange. mr. gallego: unsanctioned raises. in a time in america where every american is hoping to get a pay raise, he was told, you are not allowed to give your employees a pay raise. he was specifically told they do not deserve that pay raise. o instead, used an obscure provision of the safe drinking water act to find the pay raises inspite of the white house saying you will not give them a pay raise. this would be actually somewhat ok in my opinion because he was trying to protect safe drinking water, but he is not doing that but using the funds to pay for these increases for his well-connected friends and get them higher pay. mr. lieu: number two is the sweetheart condo deal with lobbyists. so scott pruitt got this deal with lobbyists that no ordinary american could have gotten. it was a $50 a night deal on a condo near the capitol and market rates are much higher. but in addition, he structured a lease so he only had to pay for the nights he was there. many nights he wasn't there, the landlord had to eat those costs. that's not any ordinary american could have gotten. he was dealing with lobbyists who were lobbying before him. this is what most would call corruption. and before we go to the last one, which is about the chick-fil-a restaurant. -- i t that chick-fil-a can't say this without laughing and maybe you can talk about this in a straight face. mr. gallego: you have an e.p.a. administrator who is using his staff to go track down and try to speak to the president of chick-fil-a to try to get a hard to get franchise using his public office to put pressure on em to get a very, very hard-to-get franchise. and you know, in i any world, if we had just told you this was being done by one or two or even 10 people, this all would not be really weird, but really corrupt. the fact that there is one person that is doing this and consistently doing this and has not been fired by the man who said he enjoys firing people, by the man who had a show for so many years about firing people and for some reason, he cannot find a reason to find fire this weird, corrupt e.p.a. administrator. that is the problem here. you have a corrupt cabinet official and you have a presidency that will not keep him in check. i'm going to let my friend close. mr. lieu: congressman gallego served in active duty and we are veterans and believe in this country. that's why we are up here. some of the things we said today may have sounded funny because we are trying to point out the absurdity. he has wasted taxpayer funds. he has abused taxpayer funds for his personal profit. he has abused his relationship with lobbyists to personally profit and abused his relationships to help his family profit. scott pruitt at the end of the day is not just an embarrassment to us, he is an embarrass mnlt to the republicans in this house and democrats in this house, to the trump cabinet and to the united states of america. scott pruitt has to go. mr. gallego: thank you, representative liu. we had a president who was going to come and drain the swamp. scott few it is the biggest swamp monster when it comes to the culture of corruption here in washington, d.c., i yield back my time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman yields back the balance of his time. under the speaker's announced the of january 3, 2017, gentlewoman from district of columbia, ms. norton is recognized for the remainder of the hour as the designee of the minority leader. ms. norton: thank you, mr. speaker. i appreciate this time on the floor to speak about making the district of columbia the 51st state and i'm not going to simply glow about how important that would be for my district, because we have found that most americans believe we have the same rights they do. and i want to describe what one of the oldest cities in the united states, a city that is . gger than two states that is to say it has more residents than two states. more residents than vermont, more residents than wyoming and about as many residents as seven states of the union. the people i represent, 700,000 of them are number one in taxes paid to support the government of the united states. yet they have no representation whatsoever in that body down the hall, the senate of the united states. in fact, i'm grateful that the house understands that i should vote in committee where most of the work is done. but when a bill comes to the use floor, even if that bill singularly affects the residents of the district of columbia, every member of this body except for the member who represents the district of columbia, can vote on that bill. that is not justice. that is un-american, and it gives, i think the underlying reasons why the district of columbia should become the 51st state of the union. we are making progress. we have almost all the democrats on the bill. and if, in fact, there is democratic control, i will seek disstate hood and i got a vote when i first came to the congress. it's time to have another vote on disd.c. state hood. i will get all the democrats in the house and all the democrats the senate before the 115th congress. most members of the house come to this place knowing little about the capital city. i don't plame them. i don't see why they should know much about it except it is the tourist mecca of our country, that 30 million of people from around the world, including from their state come to see the extraordinary monuments in our city. so they shouldn't know any more i know district than about their district. and yet, members come to this floor to not only vote on matters affecting my district, but on laws that would take away or overturn laws passed by the legitimate government of the district of columbia. when members come, i greet them, offer them help in finding housing and the rest. and that's about the end of it. so if they come to the house to vote, they don't know anything more about the city except if they happen to live here and we welcome them, than they did when they walked in the door. but every member needs to know that 700,000 americans host them and they need to know when they are called upon to interfere with the local laws of the district of columbia, they should see the local laws the way they would have their local laws treated. and imagine, and i particularly speak to my republican colleagues who are the chief proponents of local control and don't want the federal government into not only their business but sometimes they try to get the federal government out of federal business. and yet, it is my republican colleagues who are the chief abusers of what we call district home rule, what americans call he right to self-government. , i need to give you examples of what i mean when i say members try to overturn our laws. and i need to say that i am able to keep them from doing so even without a vote on this house floor because of the way i think through what my role is. so i've got to think of a way to keep people who overwhelmingly outnumber me, obviously and the majority of this house overturning my own local laws. we have succeeded in doing so, but this will give you an idea of what i'm talking about. i should begin by saying that because this is a big city, that it's laws will be more progressive than in many other parts of the united states. for example, the district of columbia government has passed something called the death with dignity act. this is a controversial bill. six states have passed it, represented by the leadership, the republican leadership of this house. a it is a bill that allows person to take his own life with minimal help from a physician. very controversial. six states have passed it, so has the district of columbia. it's nobody's business but theirs. i have kept this law from being overturned, but i have had to fight to do so for at least three terms. let me give you another example. the local budget autonomy act. why would there be a local budget autonomy. everybody knows if you have your own taxes, nobody should have anything to do with that. but the district of columbia does not have the right to have the final say on its own budget because any member of the congress can try to overturn the district's budget. are they interesteded in the budget? do they try to overturn the budget? no. but when the budget comes here, they use it as a vehicle to overturn laws that they don't agree with. that is how our budget gets here in the first place. this budget that was raised by the residents of the district of columbia, this local budget. so in order to keep the budget from coming here at all, what's it doing here? a referendum overwhelmingly passed by residents called the local budget autonomy act erblely said, it shouldn't come -- essentially said it shouldn't come here. the house has tried to repeal that at least three times. . have saved it being repealed talking about our local funds. . . the attempt to wipe out the district's gun safety laws. just a big city. and, yes, big cities are where you have most of the gun violence. so the district has a tough gun safety law. and yet every single year i have to protect our gun safety laws from members of congress who are not answerable, in no ways responsive to the people of the district of columbia. they can't vote them out of office. they can vote me out of office. they can't touch them. if that isn't, if that doesn't fly in the face of american democracy, i can't tell you what oes. senator marco rubio in the senate has put in a bill to wipe out all of our gun safety laws, since 2015. i have saved it from being eliminated. but this is senator marco rubio from the state of florida, where , who d youngsters are ave taken nationwide their own campaign. to get this congress to pass sensible gun laws. nd yet senator rubio, aided by representative tom garrett of this body, would eliminate all of the district's gun safety laws. including the district's ban on guns in schools. including making the district of columbia a unique exception to a ederal law called gun-free school zones act. which means you cannot have a gun within a zone of a school. everybody can have that except the district of columbia. senator rubio and representative garrett would repeal the district's ban on assault weapons and large capacity magazines. assault weapons? in the nation's capital? can you imagine who would be in dange -- endangered if there were assault weapons here? and i do not refer to the residents of the district of olumbia. anyone from any state who goes, comes into our city, will often find traffic stopped while caravans of high-level officials go by. sometimes they will be members of congress. often they will be world figures. imagine if anybody could have an assault weapon in the nation's capital. particularly today. yes, i've been able to stop them. but why should i have been put to that effort? when i represent 700,000 tax paying citizens of the united states? i do have to show you how low or laughable these efforts can become. i've stopped a bill that prohibited my city from using its own funds to keep certain kinds of flushable products from being sold in the district of columbia. you know, they stop up toilets. the member who proposed this, representative andy harris of maryland, perhaps because it's so laughable ultimately withdrew it. we came on the house to expose it. but i do indicate that this district of ng the columbia into your own orbit knows no bounds. even when it comes to flushable wipes. you might ask, well, why would he want to do this? i don't know, for sure. except that there is a manufacturer of those wipes that has surfaced. and as you may know, many members get campaign funds from place ho ask them to matters onto the house floor. they don't ask them to put them in our appropriation. but that's what happened. and i had to get that on out. and i thank representative harris for withdrawing that one. to give you some sense, though, of how the district of columbia has to pay attention, not only to its own local laws and preserving them, but has to ask its members to do what every other member does. every member has to bring home national matters. so, while i am working on those national laws, in the first year of the trump presidency, i had to defeat 15 attempts to either -- to overturn the district's gun laws. had to block bills that would gut the public school system laws, by making d.c. use its own local funds for private schools. this congress has defeated an that had bill amendmented, has defeat amendments to an education bill, pardon me, amendments to an education bill that would have allowed school districts to spend its own money on private schools. well, they took that out of the national bill. but a member tried to put it on the district, defeated that one. and there are others. but i won't go down the list of them all. understand that that work is important to my district, but it is work that no other member has to pursue, because you cannot interfere with the local laws of any other member. at the same time, however, for example, had and did get full funding to rehabilitate the memorial bridge. that happens to be important. because millions of americans use that bridge. they come to arlington memorial cemetery and they use that bridge. they come to the nation's capital to see our iconic sites and they use that bridge. that is a national bill. that's the kind of bill, federal bill, that most members work on, that they're proud of. but i bring it up so that you which ow that that work, as a member of congress i must do for the nation, as well as my city, is quite apart from protecting the local laws of my city. let's take the affordable health care act. we just had virginia sign on belatedly to the affordable health care act. well, i am in the fight with most members, certainly on my side of the aisle, to maintain that law. and we have maintained that law in spite of president trump's attempt to overturn it, in spite of more than 40 attempts by my republican colleagues to overturn it. 96% ded it because with it of d.c. residents are now covered by health care. that means virtually everybody. but in that i am in league with other members on a national law. that is what i should be paying attention to first and foremost. another example of a national law which is important to the of n and to me is passage the dream act. to protect these children who were brought to the united states as infants or small children by their parents, who know no other country, and now face deportation. because technically they of course are not citizens, even though they don't noel salvador or mexico -- know el salvador or mexico or any other of the countries they would have come from. now, of the 800,000 dreamers, i have 800 of them in the district of columbia. so i'm like many members who come to the floor. but that's a national bill. that's what i'm supposed to do in the congress. in our city, if somehow we could not save the dreamers, that would be $50 million annually gone from our economy. that's how productive they are. i've had a town meeting to have them come. these are the most impressive young people i've ever seen, peak to our residents. could i ask how much time i have remaining, mr. speaker? mr. speaker, how much time do i have remaining, please? the speaker pro tempore: the entlewoman has 27 minutes. ms. norton: so after you've heard all of these abuses of american democracy, you may have some understanding why i believe that the district of columbia should become a state. and why statehood is the only remedy for the abuses that i ave laid out by example. do not think that there are no republicans who understand some of the issues i have described. i regret that my good friend, a conservative republican, representative darrell issa, and i say i regret, because i don't think that every republican should be put in the same category. and i thank darrell issa because he was chair of a committee on which i serve and decided to have a hearing on the local jurisdiction. and he asked the mayor to come and the chair of the city council and those who handled the budget. and he must have listened. because he indicated his urprise to know that the district's financial condition and reserves and its growth as a local economy were among the best in the nation. , learning, earing wasexample, that our budget the envy of the states, representative issa himself endorsed budget autonomy and worked tirelessly with me and with local officials as well as republican interest groups to try to secure at least the autonomy over our budget. at least over our budget. these are what we call the components of statehood. so even if my republican friends are not for statehood, there is o reason not to be or to stand against the elements of statehood. and we certainly may well get those before we get statehood itself. for example, clemsy -- clemency. the president has the authority of clemency over the district of columbia. well, he doesn't know a thing about the district. and as a result when clemency comes out, normally the district inmates are not even included. that's classic -- a classic matter for local government. yes, budget autonomy is one of them. even the district's local laws 60 to come here and sit for days, or criminal laws, 30 days, or for criminal laws 60 days, to see if anybody wants to overturn these laws. this is a remnant of more than 200 years ago when the district had no home rule, as we called it. or self-government. and of course the congress doesn't choose to use that section. so they could get rid of this legislative autonomy. because they reserve their energy for the budget, with a budget over here, they use that as the vehicle to overturn the district's laws. what i think most residents and certainly most members of congress do not know is that the district's local economy is one of the strongest in the nation. let me prove that. .t's got a $12.5 billion budget that's larger than the budget of 12 states. billion ct has a $1.75 surplus. that kind of surplus, that large surplus, almost $2 billion, is the envy of the states. . my district has a per capita income higher, higher than that of any state, higher than that of california, of massachusetts, of new york. that is one of the reasons why the people i represent pay the highest taxes per capita in the united states. the total income of the residents of the district of columbia is higher than the income of seven states. its per capita consumption given its income are higher than those of any state. and of course, what we're seeing is a city that is flourishing. it's growth rate is among the highest since the 2010 crens us. in fact, the district has a larger population, i indicated, than two states, who have representation. they vote on this house floor. we would qualify for one vote nd they have vermont and wyoming have two senators as well. that's with fewer residents than the number who live in the ation's capital. ne way to understand why the residents of the district of columbia resent being treated as second-class citizen is to understand that that federal tax rate, i remind you, highest in the nation, amounts to $12,000 er resident, more per capita than any residents of any state. and yet, no matter what the bill how impacted the district is, i will not vote on that bill. what hurts more than the failure to allow the district to vote on most bills is the failure to allow the district to vote on ills to go to war. the residents of this city have fought and died in every war, including the war that created the united states of america. lease remember the slogan that he framers and the residents flew up to win their freedom. it wasn't freedom in the large -- it was no taxation without representation. we ask the statehood based on the original understanding of the founders of our nation, who were willing and indeed, did go war for the principle of no taxation without representation. well, the people i represent . ve gone to war without a vote to go to war? and without having a vote to return from war. the sacrifices should be clear to see. we are i, and here's talking about casualties. more than three states. world war ii, more casualties from the district of columbia than four states. and then it only goes up, korean than eight sualties tates. , of course the vietnam war ore casualties than 10 states. that ought to be reason enough for the district of columbia to be made the 51st state more important than paying the highest federal taxes per capita, more important than being excluded from a vote on the floor of the senate. it is a sacrifice our residents have made for our country that speaks loudest, most pro hetically about the right of residents to be treated equally. -- inquire of the number of the time left, please? the speaker pro tempore: 15 1/2 minutes. ms. norton: it is not as if the congress of the united states has never understood the injustices i have before you. the reason i come to the house floor there is turnover all the time and most members haven't turned of it until now. to listen to somebody else's district, you are too busy dealing with your own district. that's how we like it and that's how we would like to make it for every member of the house. ago, the t 45 years house understood the injustice of what was then the case. the district had no self-government. t had had some self-government in the 19th century. and may i add that the height of that self-government was about the same as the district has now, a delegate, member of the house, and the right to local government. and who gave them that? it was the post-civil war congress, which was a republican congress. the republicans lost their way and they are chiefly responsible now for the district's not having what their own party understood should happen after the civil war. they had tout a civil war for democracy for everyone and they begin the home rule process that was lost after reconstruction and renewed again almost 45 act, go with the 1974 home rule act. and here again, it wasn't the democrats who were solely responsible. yes, it was a democratic congress. but it was a republican richard president nixon. he said in signing the bill, as a long-time supporter of self-government for the district of columbia, i am pleased to sign into law a measure which is of historic significance for the citizens of the nation's capital. remember, this is president nixon talking, saying i first voted for home rule as a member of the house of representatives in 1948. and i have endorsed the enactment of home rule legislation during both my terms as president. then he went on to say, it is particularly appropriate to assure those persons who live in r capital city, rights and privileges, which have long been joyed by most of their countrymen. . that was a republican president, a democratic house acting in a partisan way to give the district self-government, a self government which it has handled etter than most of the state and city governments since. and that is not the only example of republicans working with us to do what surely will take some bipartisanship, representative tom davis of virginia worked with me on a bill that in fact got a vote and indeed we would now have in the district a house vote if that bill hadn't passed. i was in the minority. representative tom davis was in the majority as a republican. resigned tot he has congress to go to better things. he worked with me. had hearings. what he discovered was that the state of utah, a very republican state, had missed getting a vote it thought due that state. and representative davis discussed with me the possibility of pairing the district of columbia with with utah so there could be one democratic vote and one republican vote and nobody would gain if the district got a house vote. now representative tom davis was not for statehood, but he did not believe that we could call it the people's house without giving the residents of the district of columbia a vote in that house. the governor of utah came to estify for it. the republican members from the house and the senate voted for it. it was a one-to-one and it was perhaps the best chance for voting rights certainly that we have had since the creation of the republic. well, if you got that kind -- if we got that kind of bipartisan support, at least the house district oesn't the of columbia have a house vote as we speak? well, the answer is national rifle association succeeded in to ing a member to attach the bill in the house an amendment that in exchange for the house vote, the district would have had to give up all of its gun safety laws. well, i have just indicated to you the kinds of sacrifice that would have meant. assault weapon ban would be gone , just to name perhaps the worst of them. that was an offer we could not refuse. was an offer that we had to refuse. and it is the closest we have come to equal rights as was an we a federal district. but it's not the closest we'll ever come. we will give priority during the ext congress to budget autonomy, autonomy over our own budget, legislative autonomy from keeping legislation having to come to the floor, a local prosecutor and the d.a. that everyone associates with your cal jurisdiction and not who manages criminal law, it is the u.s. attorney for the district of columbia who does local criminal law and of course federal law, mayoral control over the national guard. your governor can call out your national guard because only he knows the ins and outs of safety when there are issues affecting the national guard. the national guard is usually used for things that are local in nature, such as hurricanes and flooding. the president almost knows nothing about that, the authority to grant clemency as i mentioned earlier in these remarks, and of course control over the appointment of local judges and the operations of the local courts. yes, they are title 1 courts. what that means is these judges which handle only local matters, local criminal and civil matters are appointed by the president of the united states and have to stand in line to get approved by the senate of the united states. . i've simply talked about not getting treated as an equal jurisdiction of the united states and some of the benefits of citizenship that the district would obtain if such equality granted. granted. it is true that the district has never achieved this equality, it is outot fret that the neck congress resumes -- next congress rureges i've indicated any number of things -- resumes, i've indicated any number of things i will pursue. but if my party controls this chamber, i will ask for a vote on the house floor. and i will ask for that vote even though i am not certain by any means that that vote would result in statehood. i will ask for that vote because this body ut it to exactly what it means not to have the same rights they have. when my party controlled this house, i did not get statehood. but i was able to get what is called the vote in the committee of the whole. and that is a vote on some business on the house floor. my republican friends actually sued the house for allowing the district of columbia, whose residents are number one per capita in federal taxes, this vote on at least some business on the house floor. they went to the federal district court, then to the court of appeals, but they did not have the gumption to go to the supreme court. so i voted for my district at least on some matters in the committee of the whole and i will seek that vote even short of statehood. i represent one of the nation's oldest cities. residents 700,000 who have overpaid their dues, have overpaid them in war, have verpaid them in taxes. we are way overdue. as pe pursue democracy for other -- as we pursue democracy for other people around the world, and assuring that there is democracy for everyone in our country, everyone should begin with the residents of our own proud nation's capital. ask the house to think deeply about what lies in your hands. and that is not only the ability to make the tion 700,000 residents of the district of columbia whole, by making the district of columbia the 51st state of the united states of america. mr. speaker, i yield back the balance of my time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlelady yields back the balance of her time. the chair lays before the house the following message. the clerk: to the congress of the united states. section 202-d of the national emergencies act, 50 u.s.c. 1622-d provides for the automatic termination of a national emergency unless, within 90 days before the anniversary date of its declaration, the president publishes in the federal register and transmits to the congress a notice stating that the emergency is to continue in effect beyond the anniversary date. in accordance with this provision, i have sent to the federal register for publication the enclosed notice stating that the national emergency with respect to the actions and policies of certain members of the government of belarus and other persons to undermine democratic processes or institutions of belarus that was declared in executive order 13405 of june 16, 2006, is to continue in effect beyond june 16, 2018. the actions and policies of certain members of the government of belarus and other persons to undermine belarus' democratic processes or institutions, to commit human rights abuses related to political repression, and to engage in public corruption continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the united states. for this reason i have determined that it is necessary to continue the national emergency declared in executive order 13405, with respect to belarus. signed, sincerely, donald john trump, the white house, june 8, 2018. the speaker pro tempore: referred to the committee on foreign affairs and ordered printed. under the speaker's announced policy of january 3, 2017, the chair now recognizes the gentleman from iowa, mr. king, for 30 minutes. mr. king: thank you, mr. speaker. mr. speaker, it's a privilege to address you here on the floor of the united states house of representatives. i'd say, first of all, i want to compliment you on your selection of ties. nice washington capitals red tie that you have on. everybody behind me here that's dressed in red and up there dressed in red as well, mr. speaker, has to be celebrating the jinx being broken and the washington capitals winning the stanley cup last night. the streets were full of people celebrating and, by the way, it was a fairly -- it was fairly calm considering the exhilaration that drove all of that. a few people came here a little tired today but with a big smile on their face. a lot of happy, tired people in washington, d.c. my congratulations goes out to them. i came here to speak about a topic that has been essentially consuming a lot of our time here in these debates, mr. speaker. and that is this topic of immigration. and we had a two-hour conference on thursday morning, 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. may have gone even a little after that a little ways. to try to reach a resolution. seemed as though we got about the same kind of conclusion with our effort to reach a resolution as they did in the united states senate when they debated on the floor of the senate for four days immigration issues, trying to get a consensus to bring any single bill out of the senate that could get enough votes to pass. and they fell short and nothing passed. that was february. we have, i think some people have a sense of a consensus from the meeting yesterday. but i do not believe that we have anything that gets to 218 votes. and so generally, mr. speaker, conservatives and republicans would agree with four of the five pillars that president trump has laid out. and i don't know if i will get them exactly right in definition from memory. but one of them is build a wall. another one is to secure the border. another one is to end chain migration. another one is to establish merit-based immigration instead of having it be the chain migration that we've experienced. i recall witnesses before the immigration committee years ago who testified that between seven and 11 -- 7% and 11% of our illegal immigration in america, the legal immigration in america, only between 7% and 11% is based upon anything that we have control over, which presumably would be merit. the balance of the legal immigration then is really not in the control of the american people or in the control of the united states congress. it's in the control of the people who are, i'll say, utilizing the current policy that we have, that we can't find the consensus to reverse. and those who are coming in the country sometimes by hook, by crook and shenanigan and sometimes just simply exploiting the laws that we have. so, it's always been very simple for me, mr. speaker. and that is that we need to secure the border, without a border you don't have a nation. any sovereign nation has to secure its borders and has to control those borders. that goes for any sovereign nation. all over the world. including the vatican. i look at that big, tall wall, 30-foot-tall wall around the vatican and understand that they don't have an open borders policy there. neither do the other countries around the world. except for the united states of america, who has, under the eight years of barack obama, watched the rule of law be so badly eroded that it's clouded the minds of a lot of republicans here in the house of representatives. but there was a question asked yesterday that i wrote down here, that i think is really important to contemplate. and i hadn't put it in those kind of words before. although i'd thought about it and i did a number of research on it. the question was this. they put it this way. this discussion, by the way, on immigration, the sticking point is about daca. deferred action for childhood arrivals. and so that question was posed was this, we stopped the entire political world for these people. daca recipients. so the question was posed, who are they? who are they? we hear continually they're valedictorians, they came across the border on their mother's arm when they were 3 years old. they know no country about this one. they only speak one language, english. they don't have a memory of any other country. and that they study hard and they work hard and they get good grades and some of them even say that they are as fine a group of people as we can select out of american citizens. and so i began asking some of those questions of our bureaucracy and i began asking those questions as far back as september, intensified their request in january, and focused on it very hard. with a lot of work to try to get to the bottom it, i found out a number of things about who are the daca recipients. it would be, first i want to characterize them just a little bit. but how they got here -- how we got here. barack obama made daca, the deferred action for childhood arrivals, made it his tool for an unconstitutional amnesty. we should not forget barack obama at least 22 different locations and times said on video tape that he didn't have the constitutional authority to create this daca policy. and he said, at a school here in washington, d.c., not that long ago, before he left office, before he implemented the daca policy, he said, that, you're smart students here, you understand this. he said, i can't write the laws, congress writes laws. the president and the executive branch carry out those laws, execute those laws. and the court interprets the laws. and so it's up to congress to change the policy. but just a couple of months after that statement, president obama implemented by executive edict a daca policy that no thinking constitutionalist can really take the position that it's anything other than utterly and blatantly and self-confessed by barack obama-ly unconstitutional. and yet we've had a couple of federal judges that say that president trump, who was elected to end the daca policy, and we all expected that january 20, 2017, at noon, when president trump took his oath of office, he would already have had the order ready to go, that would have ended the daca policy and stopped any new permits from being issued and stopped any renewals of existing permits. and perhaps even canceled the existing ones that were there. but that didn't happen. and five to six weeks later, mr. speaker, we learned that the trump administration was still as ing new daca permits and just as unconstitutional as barack obama was, president trump wasn't the creator of it, he was the continuer of the unconstitutional daca policy created and established by barack obama. and there was -- so there were extensions, renewals of existing, and there were creations and new permits handed out for daca. we all knew it was unconstitutional. then, as we went along, i want to really thank a number of states, but in particular texas put together a lawsuit to file a lawsuit on the unconstitutional policy of daca, which is costing texas taxpayers money. and opportunity. and every other state in the union, as far as i know, money and opportunity. ken paxton, the attorney general of texas, prepared a lawsuit that he had -- i believe the number were 12 states that agreed to join with that suit. and they were prepared to file that suit last september 5. was the date. and yet they negotiated with the white house and so president trump agreed to end the daca policy, and he took this action last september 5, and part of that negotiation was so that the lawsuit would not be filed by texas and other states. because clearly they would prevail. daca is unconstitutional. so, president trump conceded apparently that point and ended the daca policy, effective in six months. which would be the 5th of march this year. then he challenged congress to pass legislation that would resolve the daca issue and resolve the balance of the immigration issues that we have. now, -- so that deadline presumably was march 5. however, there were a couple of federal judges that decided that they were legislators and they came to a decision, an order, that said that president trump couldn't cancel the daca policy, that he's compelled to continue it, to issue new permits and to extend existing permits for no constitutional reason that i'm aware of, and no statutory reason i'm aware of, just activist judges that are seeking to legislate from the bench and impose their personal policy preference on the rest of america. . well, that can't stand, mr. speaker. that has got to get to the supreme court and the supreme court, in nobody's imagination, will come down with a decision that says a preceding president can implement a blatantly and clearly, and i said self-confessedly -- i hope that's a word -- self-confessedly illegal policy, unconstitutional policy. barack obama established that policy. no supreme court will say, and by the way, every succeeding president has to accept the actions of his predecessor no matter how unconstitutional they are, he can't end by executive action something that was unconstitutionally implemented by the executive action of his predecessor barack obama but that's the decision we have before the courts. and thankfully, attorney general ken paxson of texas ramped this back up again and they are going back to court w and this goes before judge hasenin who has been a stellar constitutionalist, a contexualist. i appreciate the work he's done in the past. i can't speak to his decision before this except this, we have the rule of law sitting here hanging in the balance. that's what's been pushed into the middle of the table. that's the bat, the rule of law, up or down. and if the courts allowed to resolve this issue, whether it's before judge hannin's circuit court or whether it goes on to the supreme court, which i expect it would, the supreme court will come down with a decision that allows and recognizes that the chief executive officer of the united states of america, right now president donald trump, has the authority to reverse any executive action of any of his predecessors. that's how our constitution is structured. and if it's any other way, if a president can by executive a horrible policy on the american people and we don't have a way to undo it, our founding fathers didn't serve up a document like that. they gave us a document with checks and balances and set up in a proportional way. so daca, if it's allowed to continue through the litigation process, will be thrown out by the supreme court. let's let that happen. let's find out. i'm willing to take a supreme court decision on this because if it goes the other way, our republic is essentially lost anyway. so who are these people? who are they? well, barack obama made this a tool -- a tool for his unconstitutional method of getting people, quote -- i'll say qausi-legalized, but when that happened it went out the window. when you read through these documents, and i finally got my hands on the documents, mr. speaker, there are -- each one of the applications is a seven-page application. so those seven pages, altogether there are about two million applications, roughly happen of them are renewals. that means there are 14 million pieces of paper, a lot of them filled out by hand. in fact, most of them filled out by hand. they only went electronic in 2015. i believe november 1, 2015. and so it's hard to pull the data out. that's why we had to work so hard to get it. but some other things that came along that we're learning from reading through the press is that we're finding more and more daca recipients that are ms-13. now, we shouldn't be surprised at that. lot of them came in as un accompanied alien minors and they get recruited in gangs or came in as a member of a gang. they weren't all 3-year-old girls that were brought across the rio grande river by their mothers. a lot were unaccompanied minors. and a lot went into the highest gang areas in the country, ms-13 gang areas. there's a large percentage of them that are also prime gang age recruitment. out of 817,000 daca recipients, that universe that are currently under daca, there's about 135,000 that were prime gang age recruitment from that 13, 14, 15-year-old age. there's also, to remind folks, mr. speaker, we had the drug enforcement administration chief administrator there, robert paterson, before the judiciary committee a couple weeks ago and i asked him a series of questions. here's one of the things that he concurred on. that 80% to 90% of the illegal drugs consumed in america come from or through mexico. 80% to 90% of those illegal drugs. we had 64,000 americans die because of drug overdose primarily opioid abuse, and at least 2/3 is illegal opioid. the physicians are getting this under control, tightening down their prescriptions. they addressed this some time ago, but the illegal drugs are killing americans, and those illegal drugs are coming from r through mexico, 80% to 90% of them. it's a matter of note -- i will find this along a way, but over the period of about three years -- here it is. from 2013 until 2016 -- and that's the first year. 2013 was the first year after the daca announcement, the mexican poppy fields tripled in acres. they tripled in size. we wonder why we have a heroin problem and an opioid problem in the united states and where it comes from, from or through mexico by the testimony of robert patterson, and we also have the drug crisis that's directly related to the -- to -13.growth of ms that's from the commissioner of suffolk county, that's long island, new york. so who are they? who are the daca recipients, mr. speaker? so as i dug through those records and finally got my hands on the data, one of the hardest pieces of information i ever had to work for in this town and the nature of this town makes you work for information that politically they don't want you to have. well, i have it now in my hands and i'll say no other member of congress has this information and it's not been shared outside of a very tight circle in my own shop. but here are some things. the overall number of daca recipients, 817,798 is the overall number. 817,798. looking through those records and of those who even filled out the form that they came in too early, that they would be disqualified because they came in too early, or they would be disqualified because they turned in -- came in too late, e initial entry dates of the 817,798, 8,9064 disqualified 8,964 they didn't -- disqualified. 2,100 records are not available. they simply don't have those records. so if we're going to make sure that they are getting an education and learning english and working and that whole list of meritorious things that you always hear about when people talk about daca, at least they can fill out the form. least they can do is let us know. there are 2,100 records not available. they transferred the application form into form n-400 about that time in the winter, late winter of 2015, early winter, 2016. they transferred it over to form n-400. what that is is a foundational document that can be transferred into citizenship. they set up the bookwork to turn them into citizens clear back then. it was always the unconstitutional, lawless plan of base realignment and closure to push -- barack obama to push this all on us and i thought republicans were stronger than they seemed to be. he must have had them judged just about right because he thought he could feed this to us but also thought that hillary clinton would be president of the united states. how many of them traveled out of the united states? they don't know any other country, we heard this over again, but 775 confessed on the form that they had gone back to their home country. that should disqualify. those reported that they were too old to qualify, over age 31 by the closing date, there were 2,464 that were too old to qualify. here's a number of those prime gang age, 135,250 of them. that also includes boys and girls. of the boys and girls, more boys get recruited, of course, by far, but the girls are being recruited too. and we know how bad that can be. and that's just to age 16. the legislation that they want to bring to this floor takes it to age 18. that adds about another 33,000 or 34,000 for each year. so that number then would go to 100 -- let's see. 66,000 to 68,000 more on top of that so just round that up. it would be 200,000 would be the universe from which ms-13 and other gangs would recruit from while they wait the younger kids to grow older this growing up in these ms-13 neighborhoods. they are being delivered to ms-13 neighborhoods. we're eroding the civilization of america with this policy and people are afraid to say who they are. nobody is asking the question. hey're just saying, value dick are -- 3r-year-old girls. they are better represented than i expect they would be but that's only my judgment, not the data. so an education, they're supposed to be getting an education. here's what i found out from looking at the education. so no data available. those, he universe of there re 564,103 -- was no data available at all in their application on education, where they had gone to school. did they? did they have any education? what grade did it take them too, sixth grade, seventh grade? no data available. that's 68.9% of the daca recipients we don't have even a record that they ever went to school. i have to believe a good number of them went to school. but long enough apparently to write that down on this form. most of them had help filling out the applications. that's where those records were not available. then they have this mushy question in there that's designed -- this whole thing is designed to grant amnesty. so the questions are asked in such a way when you read through there, it was never designed to understand and get an honest reporting that came out. but regardless, there's -- there are those that have no diploma and may or may not be in school, that's another 179,717 or 21.9% they say, well, they don't have a degree, they don't have a diploma, they may or may not be in school. by the way the question was asked. in any case, if you add together those with no data available, those with no verification of any kind of educational experience, that comes to 90.8% of all of the daca recipients without a validation of their education. but of those who attest they qualify -- remember, there's no verification here. it's all this stuff on this seven-page document they attest to but the verification is almost nonexistent although there is a little bit. of those that attested they are qualified by education, that's 9.2% is all. so i found myself adding up these things. seeing what's the worst-case scenario. i didn't really get -- the best-case scenario is believe everything and suspect there is an excuse for 564,000 not even putting out a number on the form. so i began to add this up. i think i left some things out, mr. speaker. you would subtract from that the 564,103 that they had no data on for education at all because they would have been disqualified by the requirements of the program. second group, you can't tell whether they went to school or not. that's 179,719. subtract that. they're disqualified also because you can't tell. oh, here's a really interesting one. of those who confessed to be criminals, 66% of those who self-reported that they are criminals, they received their daca permit. 2/3 of those who said, i'm a criminal, got their daca permit anyway. now, that's the initial applications. then, once their status was up for renewal, of that group that said they had -- that was a much bigger group then. those up for renewal. 94% 4 of them were granted of the roughly 33,000 or so altogether, 94% of them got renewed even though they said, i'm a criminal. we're not really cleaning out the folks we wouldn't want in this group and it's getting harder and harder to find those we want in this group. then of those based on data entry, i remembered 8,964, they would be out, disqualified. 2,100 who no data available, they would be disqualified. and of those that went back home, disqualifies them also. because they know when they came in that they were violating the law. it wasn't through no fault of their own. that's 775. so, mr. speaker, i'm sure that you added this up in your head as i've run through these numbers and the conclusion you would have drawn is of the 817,798 daca recipients on record at the time we pulled there ta off last month, were 789,851 who would be disqualified on the records because they didn't meet the standards that were put down by barack obama that were designed to get amnesty in the first place. that's how bad these records are. i can't believe these people are this bad, but the records are certainly horrible and we are here pontificating as if we know what we're doing, sage states men and women here deciding, oh, yeah, i can give amnesty to daca recipients because it's the humane thing to do, it's the right thing to do for the country, don't call it amnesty because it hurts my feelings and by the way, we need to do this because if we don't give amnesty to daca recipients we can't get the money for the wall and we can't pass the border security and we can't end chain migration and we can't pass kate's law and we can't pass sarah's law and we can't end sanctuary cities. really? this united states of america, this shining city on a hill, this stellar country that eclipsed anything any country has ever done before, we can't restore the essential pillar of american exceptionalism called the rule of law? . . in fact, mr. speaker, when ronald reagan spoke of the shining city on the hill. i was always inspired by the image that he drew. but america is, he said a shining city built upon pillars and those pillars are the pillars of american exceptionalism. and most of them are in the bill of rights. you have a pillar for freedom of speech. a pillar of freedom of religion. a pillar for freedom of the press. a pillar for freedom of assembly. we have a pillar for second amendment rights to keep and bear arms. and we have a pillar for property rights and one for no double jeopardy and a jury of your peers and the enumerated powers in the constitution. the framework of the intergenerational contractual guarantee which is our
eye 114
favorite 0
quote 0
sarah sanders. >> come on, sarah. you're a parent.'t you have any empathy for what these people are going through? they have less than you do. >> guys, settle down. >> seriously. >> i'm trying to be serious but i'm not going to have you yell out of turn. jill. >> know you want to get more tv time. that's not what this is about. i want to recognize you. go ahead, jill. protests yesterday. >> hundreds of people demonstrated in front of san jose city hall. organizer heather valentine says she planned the rally days ago after she learned there wasn't a local planned rally. >> i work with children, i work with adolescents, i work with kids in the foster care system, so i know what this kind of trauma can do to people and is doing to people. >> i do come from a family that came here undocumented. i had those fears when i was younger, if we spoke up, we'd be risking deportation. if it wasn't our parents, it could be our uncles. >> the group families belong together hosted a virtual event for people to sign petitions if they couldn't attend i
eye 86
favorite 0
quote 0
sarah sanders i can -- their second -- it -- sarah sanders a good the president. president i is saying enough is enough. we want to work with the european union to work on a level playing field. >> it is not clear where harley davidson will increase production. it is more news for its american employees. the company year, closed a factory. sent harley that davidson shares down 6% on trading on monday. we will be watching how they fare on wall street in a couple of hours. in europe, trade issues dominating again. the trading day -- we are seeing a slight recovery on the markets today. they have seen huge falls. germany's dax was down two and a half percent. investor still not convinced the trade dispute is over. >> the brains it law -- the brexit law may have passed, but the car industry is beginning to suffer. it fell by some three-on-two million pounds. period lastthe same year. the society of motor mamanufacturers and tradersrs he called on the british government to rethink its position on membership of the customs union. >> the board of air france meeting today
eye 244
favorite 0
quote 0
sarah sanders. >> the red hen restaurant is not very welcoming to sarah huckabee sanders but look at this tweet her, probably posted, shows a sign outside new york restaurant that says open breakfast, sarah sanders welcome anytime. with the caption kips restaurant in south wales new york like my kind of place. that tweet receiving 48,000 likes. >> going down a dangerous road when we start banning people from being able to eat in places they want to with their families. thank you so much. time is 20 minutes until the top of the hour and the second-in-command normally has a lot to say but can't seem to find the words when confronted about louis farrakhan. >> that is not true. >> the cringe worthy interview that you have to see. our cyber criminals targeting your baby, the hack attack all parents need to know about, this is scary stuff. a look at the weather across the country. ♪ man: i got scar tissue there. same thing with any dent or dings on this truck. they all got a story about what happened to 'em. man 2: it was raining, there was only one way out. i could feel the barb wire was just digging in
eye 101
favorite 0
quote 0
sarah sanders yesterday? that's the reporter who was asked sarah sanders, the press secretary for the president of the united tates to answer the question about whether this is the right thing to do. answer the question about what does this mean? not only for her as a mother but who we are as a country. it's mind boggling to me that more reporters in that briefing room and more americans and particularly the members on the hill are not demanding answers to this same question. >> i was struck by the fact that there should have been silence in that briefing room until the question was answered or the briefing was over. >> it's interesting. you and i have spent some time in that briefing room. i'm struck sometimes. sarah sanders is a kind of effective job in controlling that room, moving on, cutting people off, not giving them follow ups. saying that time is tight and there's not a lot of solidarity that i often see among members saying you didn't answer her question and we're going to keep asking this question until you answer it. i think the notion of using selected biblical verses and selected biblical verses
eye 132
favorite 0
quote 1
sarah sanders either she lied or she wasn't informed just like the night comey was fired. >> it all comes from the client, it comes from the president. poor sarah sanders used the word dictate. i don't think sarah sanders went out there so she would be embarrassed months later. i think she was lied to and she is now stuck in an embarrassing position. >> i think the president overstated it today when he said the appointment of special counsel is clearly unconstitutional. i don't see any basis. it may be constitutionally permissible for the president to fire somebody but he overstates it when he says the appointment itself of the special counsel is unconstitutional. i think he was right the first time during the debate saying he would appoint a special counsel. unconstitutional again is a little bit stretched. >> that is gentle alan. >> steven calabresi thinks that. >> i appreciate it. both staying on the subject of pardons, dinesh d'souza, pardoned, his interview is next. also philadelphia eagles were invited to the white house tomorrow. we'll tell you why the president changed his mind. >>> president trump made news this morning with the claim that he could pardon himself. (woman) so beautiful.
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
way rhetoric of maxine waters, folks coming to pam bondi and sarah huckabee sanders, the rhetoric is hitting fever pitch and we know that sarah sanders is getting secret service at her house, what's your reaction? >> my reaction is difference, ainsley, between rhetoric and social media muscle and cable news and people inciting for crime and violins. the case of actor -- who i forgot about in california, he has a new movie coming out. it's a great fanfare, he's actually had tweeted out that someone should go to her house and take her children, god for bid. this is not insulting all the stuff that we are u to around here, insulting what somebody said or how they look, where they work or what they wear, this is calling for something much deeper and that's very, very concerning to many people. i also hope, a number of these executives in the media who are on top floors of building are paying very close attention to what's being said by some of their commentators and some of their writers, people who are -- reporters have cable news contracts, are obviously on social media all day, they get away with seeing things there that you w
eye 190
favorite 0
quote 0
sarah sanders to leave. sanders says negative discourse must end.
eye 46
favorite 0
quote 0
sarah huckabee sanders. should we keep going, sarah? we'll go. i don't care. just means we get home a little later in the evening, right? yeah, go ahead, sure. go ahead. >> hi, mr. president. >> how are you? >> welcome to the country. i hope you enjoyed our food. >> beautiful country. i did. >> i just wanted to find out, you describe this as a process. what is the next step. on-going dialogue? >> we're getting together next week to go into the details. secretary pompeo, next week with john bolton, the entire team to go over the details and get this stuff done. we want to get it done, he wants to get it done. we're also working very much with south korea, working with japan. we're working with china. to a lesser extent, but we're working with china. >> coming back to singapore? >> i would come back gladly. your prime minister was fantastic. we were with him yesterday, he has done a great job, very welcoming. probably made a difference actually. great place. thank you very much. yes, ma'am. >> thank you, mr. president. what was it about that first interaction wi
eye 146
favorite 0
quote 0
sarah huckabee sanders -- >> that was sarcasm. >> sarah huckabee sanders buried this lead yesterday saying it was inappropriate and no one defended it. this was a chance for the president to say it was wrong. you have to remember, if you point fingers, you got to point some back at yourself. this president has said things that people have been offended by. i'm thinking of several examples, the pochahontas thing. the charlottesville thing and then listening to david duke about how he should handle it. this president should not, as there is racial tension, we are not a post racial society, he needs to listen to america. not just his base, not just roseanne who wants to get the neighborhood right. what does her neighborhood look like? baltimore, chicago, l.a. i'm not talking about in indiana or iowa or north dakota. i'm talking about all america, we the people who are still forming an imperfect union. this president has a moment, it's still not too late to come out there and condemn what she said. he can said she's my friend, but i condemn it. >> not going to happen. you're wasting your breat
eye 97
favorite 0
quote 0
sarah sanders out. because the history of kicking people out of restaurants or not serving them is usually something done by people who have intolerance. she was trying, the owner, making it a progressive statement. kicking out sarah sanders because i don't like what is happening on the u.s./mexico border. in the end, she looks small and made sarahnders a bit of a martyr. >> and david, the president told sarah sanders to lead with this at the briefing today. and it definitely has the opposite impact that who ever these people are yelling shame or kicking her out of a restaurant. we should have a difference of opinion without attempting to accost people in public life. >> absolutely. nobody was happier about these developments than donald trump. he was gleeful it allowed him to depict his people as victims. even though he has encouraged crowds to attack reporters. and saying he wanted to punch a protester in the face. every single attack on an opponent is laced with some nasty personal incivility. so but this was an opportunity for him to turn the tables. and he seized it and he sent her out there to say it. despite the obvious point that he and she frankly are in no point to lecture on this, i make this point not because i am trying to defend the trump administration, but because i am trying to defend civility as a value in our
eye 90
favorite 0
quote 0
trish: completely unnecessary and disgusting what they're doing to the dhs employees or to sarah sarah huckabee sanders and people getting up and going to work every day and yes maybe they have a different set of beliefs they interpret policy different than the other side but they do not deserve to be treated as poorly as inhumanely as people are doing right now. >> well i believe that anyone whose willing to go to washington and work for the american people should live in the county, should live in the state, should appreciate the people and listen to what they have to say and that's what i've been doing. i listen to my farmers and listen to my latino communities and listen to my police officers and everyone involved in ventura county and doing exactly what they want me to do and i'll continue to do that but first and foremost put god first and i ask him for his guidance. listen, i was put here for a reason and it's an exciting journey in my life and i appreciate everything but it hasn't been easy but i think like i said i think we've got to keep fighting for our flag. trish: you really got black list
eye 42
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> sarah sanders, as you approach the one-year mark, what is the biggest challenge? sarahders: being away from my family, that is the hardest thing, the job is 24 hours a day, seven days a week, and never stops. that is tough, i have three young kids and a husband who still like me, which is a good thing. they want to be around me more often than i get to be there. for me, that is the hardest part of the job. >> in terms of how you get your information, how you prepare for the briefing, what is the process right now? sarah sanders: a number of things that play into the prep process. the most important is talking directly to the president and being able to do my best to
eye 23
favorite 0
quote 0
so i don't know it's up to the legendary sarah huckabee sanders should we keep going sarah ok we'll go well i don't care hey you know it just means we get home a little later in the evening right yeah go ahead sure but i'm at the present now we you and i sit and i society type of thing or welcome to the country thank you very much enjoyed beautiful country i did i just have a high about you describe it as a process what is the next ongoing dialogue yes oh we're getting together next week to go into the details at the secretary pompei oh yeah next week with john bolton and our entire team to go over the details and to get this stuff done we want to get it done he wants to get it done. we're also working very much with south korea we're working with japan we're working with china to a lesser extent but we're working with china. and. i would come back ledley your prime minister was fantastic we're with him yesterday he's done a great job it was very welcoming and really probably had it probably made a difference actually it's a great place thank you very much yes ma'am and thank you. what
eye 122
favorite 0
quote 0
sarah sanders not allowed to eat. the owner asked her to leave. we will discuss this. saraheemed prepared to send out her story on h heher owe -- her official white house twitter account. that is the answer to the situation? i don't want to lose sight. as far as we know, there are 2,000 children separated from parents living in shelters across the country this morning. when will they get home? do not lose sight of them. it is unclear what the timeline is to get them back to the parents. wherever you are on the immigration discussion and debate, everyone should want clarity on that. everyone should want clarity on your hair, dave briggs. >> i'll leave it this way, j.b. i think we have something. michelle gave me a new look. >> the carefully tussled look. >> john, the stories with sanders and fallon are the perfect stories for where we are as a society in 2018. probably not a positive reflection. >> next it will be kids cartoons. >> agree with everything dave says, but i cannot take him seriously. >> we will go to commercial break in a moment. i have a comb. thank you, john. t
eye 84
favorite 0
quote 0
sarah sanders. >> i think that sarah sanders is increasingly having a more and more difficult time in that role. i think that she has made clear to people outside the building that -- and inside the building that she doesn't know she's going to do it forever but i don't know if that means before the midterms or not. i think the midterms will be the demarcation point you'll see many people leaving. she may leave before, but time will tell. >> on north korea, one of the things we were thinking about during the summit while we were in singapore is would the president be surprised at some of the criticism of the agreement that was signed. does he think, does he really think that he got something new, new concessions from north korea, or is he just trying to make a big show of it? >> no, i think that he has told himself that this is actually something real and this will lead to something even further. when he feels like he is not getting proper praise, that's when you see the tweet that there's no more nuclear threat, which is obviously not true. but that is what he wants people to perceive it as. i believe it was very frustrating for him to get back to the u.s. and see the coverage of this summit and recognize it was not quite on par with what in his mind it should be. >> look, we have to go, but also, maggie, since you know i like to do a little arm chair analysis, when you talks about kim jong-un and how impressive he is and how much respect he has because of what he was able to take over from his father in his 20s and 1 in 10,000 -- >> actually it was 1 in 1. there was not a request for proposals to take over for the dictatorship, there was just one person. >> thank you for doing the math, for crunching the numbers on that for us. >>> much more on the justice department's inspector general report into hillary clinton e-mail situation. what does it mean for the mueller probe? one of the president's staunchest allies in congress who has called for the firing of robert mueller weighs in next. ♪ (daniel jacob) for every hour that you're idling in your car, you're sending about half a gallon of gasoline up in the air. that amounts to about 10 pounds of carbon dioxide every week (malo hutson) growth is good, but when it starts impacting our quality of air and quality of life, that's a problem. so forward-thinking cities like sacramento are investing in streets that are smarter and greener. the solution was right under our feet. asphalt. to be more precise, intelligent asphalt. by embedding sensors into the pavement, as well as installing cameras on traffic lights, we will be able to analyze the flow of traffic. then that data runs across our network, and we use it to optimize the timing of lights, so that travel times are shorter. who knew asphalt could help save the environment? ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ raindrops on roses and whiskers on kittens ♪ ♪ bright copper kettles and warm woolen mittens ♪ ♪ brown paper packages tied up with strings ♪ ♪ these are a few of my favorite things ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ these are a few of my favorite things ♪ can make you feel unstoppable. ♪ but mania, such as unusual changes in your mood, activity or energy levels, can leave you on shaky ground. help take control by talking to your doctor. ask about vraylar. vraylar is approved for the acute treatment of manic or mixed episodes of bipolar i disorder in adults. clinical studies showed that vraylar reduced overall manic symptoms. vraylar should not be used in elderly patients with dementia due to increased risk of death or stroke. call your doctor about fever, stiff muscles, or confusion, which may mean a life-threatening reaction, or uncontrollable muscle movements, which may be permanent. side effects may not appear for several weeks. high cholesterol and weight gain; high blood sugar, which can lead to coma or death; decreased white blood cells, which can be fatal; dizziness upon standing; falls; seizures; impaired judgment; heat sensitivity; and trouble swallowing may occur. you're more than just your bipolar i. ask about vraylar. our because of smoking.ital. but we still had to have a cigarette. had to. but then, we were like. what are we doing? the nicodermcq patch helps prevent your urge to smoke all day. nicodermcq. you know why, we know how. it wi called usaarst and the first thing they asked was 'are you ok?' they always thank you for your service, which is nice because as a spouse you serve too. we're the hayles and we're usaa members for life. >>> president trump's lawyer, rudy giuliani, says the special counsel's investigation should be suspended today in response to the inspector general's report about the fbi's handling of the hillary clinton e-mail probe. joining me now is republican congressman matt gates of florida. he has repeatedly criticized the special counsel's investigation and called for the firing of robert mueller. congressman, thanks for being with us. >> thank you. >> i know you're on the president's speed dial, so i have to ask, have you had a chance to speak with the president of the united states since the release of the i.g. report? >> i have not. i think he's been a little busy trying to make sure we frame up the sewing together of the korean peninsula so he hasn't had time to call me with his hot takes. >> i'm sure you'll get that call sooner or later, congressman. i'm sure that you've read the report. are you concerned that james comey, the fbi director, treated hillary clinton unfairly during the e-mail investigation? those decisions to give that news conference, the decision to release that letter to congress in the days before the election, do you feel that was unfair to hillary clinton? >> i think it was unfair to the american people that james comey repeatedly violated fbi procedures and that the protocols and processes that we rely upon for the most extraordinary of circumstances like the investigation of a presidential candidate weren't followed. look, i think that that was bad for all of us. hillary, trump, the entire campaign and the country. >> did that hurt the clinton campaign in the days before the election? >> you know, so many things happen in a presidential election, it's very difficult to engage in the histrionics but if peter strzok had not prioritized the russian investigation, the timetable seems to indicate anthony weiner's e-mail would have come out in september rather than october and maybe that could have worked its way through the political die jest i've system. >> so you think the fact that this was held back actually may have hurt hillary clinton when all it all comes out? >> i think what i said is there's so many alternate causalities in a presidential election, but that was not a good thing for hillary clinton, wasn't good for donald trump and wasn't good for the country. >> let me tell you what james comey said about the delay there. he said the fbi had all the information it needed on september 29th to obtain the search warrant and it did not seek until more than a month later. the neglect had far-reaching consequences. comey told the inspector general had he known about the laptop in the beginning of october and thought the e-mail review could have been completed before the election, it may have affected his decision to notify congress. in other words, he wouldn't have told congress, the public may never have known that the e-mail investigation was reopened, so perhaps that may have hurt hillary clinton. >> it may have. again, it's a presidential elecon and a loes on. but i that it's a bad thing when the inspector general says that the lead agent in the hillary clinton e-mail investigation, who then becomes the lead agent in the trump russia investigation when he is utilizing and accessing bias to pri prioritize one over the other. they said it wasn't political bias that led peter strzok but that threw off the entire timeline and began ann an illegitimate russia investigation. it was only six days before he was talking with his girlfriend about an insurance policy against the trump presidency. that was as good an evidence of bias that you could have in a case. >> to be completely fair, he said we did not have confidence that the decision to prioritize the russia investigation was free from bias. he doesn't say they found there was bias, he said we didn't have confidence that there was no bias. >> that's as bad as it gets in an i.g. report. >> i'm just saying out there what was said. >> yeah, but they don't have confidence that there wasn't bias, that necessarily means that bias was present. >> i'm just reading you the language the i.g. used so the american people can hear what it is and make that judgment for themselves. they also said, by the way, when it comes to the hillary clinton e-mail investigation, we found no evidence that the conclusions by the prosecutors were affected by bias. those are the two different ways that "bias" is used as a word in this. i keep asking about the hillary clinton e-mail probe in this case because it does seem that you are open to the possibility that the net impact of all these decisions were made, it's possible, you're leaving open the possibility that it did have a negative impact on the clinton campaign. >> i just don't know. i just don't know. >> you're not ruling it out. >> yeah. it's a presidential election. >> we agree that you're not ruling it out. yet you were out here every day saying that the hillary clinton e-mail investigation and those involved in it were out to get then candidate trump. it just doesn't seem as if those two things could be happening at the same time. >> no. look, if you look at the text messages between the people who were the senior folks on the hillary clinton e-mail investigation, they're doing everything they can to pave a yellow brick road for her. >> no, no, no, no. hang on, hang on. you don't know -- you say everything that they did. everything that they did. but they said, they said -- hang on. we're judging the things that they said. they absolutely said the things that they said and we now have that from this inspector general report. >> they were for hillary, they were against trump. >> in terms of the things that they did, what they could have done was leak the fact that president trump, the candidate, was under -- his campaign was being investigated, they were looking into the possibility of russian collusion. they did not do that. in terms of what they did, that was something that didn't happen, correct? >> i don't think that we give the fbi a gold star for not leaking. that's their job. you don't get extra credit for doing your job. here you saw persistent examples of the very people who should have been holding hillary clinton accountable demonstrating their bias in favor of hillary clinton. it's a different question whether or not -- >> where, where -- >> hold on. let me finish my answer. so whether or not they were effective in helping hillary clinton is a different question as to whether or not they wanted to help hillary clinton. i think that likely peter strzok believed that delaying on the weiner laptops was helping hillary and in the end it may have ended up hurting her. that's why the processes are so important and we should follow them in any circumstance so we don't have to monday morning quarterback those decisions. >> no argument here. that's clearly what this report says, that james comey had a choice whether or not to give that july 5th press conference. he chose to do it and that was the wrong choice. he had a choice whether to deliver the letter to congress, he did and that was the wrong choice. you keep on suggesting that there was some conspiracy to get donald trump and that's just not in this i.g. report. you say that these agents were trying to help hillary clinton. where's the evidence they were trying to help hillary clinton before james comey gave that july 5th news conference? >> well, the fact that they were texting one another repeatedly saying they thought hillary clinton should win the election 100 million to 0 is likely they didn't just hold that opinion at one time, that it was pervasive throughout the decision-making process these people were engaged in. >> look, you don't -- you don't know -- >> being dismissive of the trump movement to their peril. >> there's no argument that those texts are deeply troubling. the fact that there are five people is now being looked into, there is no question about that. but in terms of helping hillary clinton during the clinton e-mail probe, that's not here. in fact it says the exact opposite. >> of course it is. >> it says the opposite. >> no. >> it says we found no evidence that the conclusions by the prosecutors were affected by bias or other improper considerations. >> so they acknowledge that bias existed, but they don't find the connection between the boyias a investigative decisions. i think that's a decision the american people can make and particularly the e-mail from andrew mccabe to the washington office is instructive. andrew mccabe rips this case away from the jurisdiction of the washington field office so a bunch of people at the head shed at the fbi can cook the investigation and that's precisely what happened. if we would have followed our normal processes, you would have had the front line prosecutors, investigators in the washington, d.c., field office and this is why so many retired fbi agents and current fbi agents were livid with james comey and were e-mailing him after his really bad announcement saying if they had done the very same things they would have been fired and possibly prosecuted for it and shows the double standard for it. if you don't think there's evidence of that, you need to reread chapter 12. it's pretty clear on the manifestation of that bias as it comes to opening up trump and russia. >> there's a separate i.g. investigation into that. >> well, it mentions russia too. >> it does come up, but it doesn't reach any conclusions about the russia investigation. >> it concludes that you can't exclude bias as a factor in prioritizing the russia investigation. that's one hell of a conclusion. [ overlapping speakers ] >> but at the same time it opens up the possibility that that actually helped donald trump. again, all i'm saying -- >> it helped donald trump to open up on russia and prioritize this. >> hang on, hang on, congressman. i let you make your case here. in this case where it talks about the fact it could not say with confidence that peter strzok did not act with bias when he delayed that aspect of the clinton investigation, it opens up the possibility that it helped candidate trump and not hillary clinton. all i'm saying is if there was a conspiracy, which you have suggested, to help hillary clinton, there is no evidence here. >> no. just because the conspiracy didn't work doesn't mean it didn't exist. again, the conspiracy is ongoing. >> do you feel -- last question, last question. do you feel the same way about the trump tower meeting between donald trump jr. and russians promising dirt on hillary clinton? just because the conspiracy didn't work, it doesn't mean it didn't exist? >> no, that's different. >> does the same logic apply there? >> no, because there was not an accepted offer. donald trump jr. did not accept the offer of assistance. >> he absolutely did. he said if that's true, that's great. >> no, no, no, he did not accept any assistance or collude. these are people making an offer that wasn't accepted and they were engaged on their own for their own purposes and own reasons. at the end of the day we should not have a russia investigation ongoing. it was only nine days before peter strzok said we'll stop him that he opened on papadopoulos and only six days after that that she's talking about his insurance policy against the trump presidency. it's one of the reasons why more than half the country believes this is a politically motivated investigation and that number is about to skyrocket. >> we'll have you on to talk about it as the days go on. great to have you with us, sir. >> thank you. >> good thing you read that report. there were a lot of citations in there. wow, good job. >>> attorney general jeff sessions is using the bible to justify separating children from parents at the border. as house republicans circulate a new draft of their new immigration bill that they claim could fix all this. what do democrats have to say about it? joaquin castro of texas joins us live. having it problems? ask a business advisor how to get on demand tech support for as little as $15 a month. this week get boise case paper for only $29.99 at office depot office max. you shouldn't be rushed into booking a hotel. with expedia's add-on advantage, booking a flight unlocks discounts on select hotels until the day you leave for your trip. add-on advantage. only when you book with expedia. add-on advantage. heartburn and gas? ♪ now fight both fast new tums chewy bites with gas relief all in one relief of heartburn and gas ♪ ♪ tum tum tum tums new tums chewy bites with gas relief i think, keep going, and make a difference. at some point, we are going to be able to beat als. because life is amazing. so i am hoping for a cure. i want this, to uh, to be a reality. um, yeah. (burke) so we know how to cover almost anything.en almost everything even "close claws." (driver) so, we took your shortcut, which was a bad idea. [cougar growling] (passenger) what are you doing? (driver) i can't believe that worked. i dropped the keys. (burke) and we covered it. talk to farmers, we know a thing or two because we've seen a thing or two. ♪ we are farmers. bum-pa-dum, bum-bum-bum-bum ♪ congressman, thank you for being here. i don't know if you could hear the president. >> it was tough. >> he was asked by one of the reporters why are you separating children from the parents within this zero tolerance policy at the border and he said that's the democrats doing that. that's the democrats' policy. that's the democrats' plan. your response? >> well, the president lies often and he's lying this time. it's not a democratic plan. his attorney general is making the decision, a choice to separate these young kids from their families. and the president is so ashamed of his policy, that he won't even own it. he's so embarrassed and ashamed about what he's doing, that he won't even accept that he's doing it. he's denying reality. and the fact is, he should be ashamed because this is a brutal policy of taking young kids, little kids that are crying, that are experiencing severe emotional trauma, and taking them from their families. >> congressman, i mean often, as you know, the president spins things to his own, you know, best benefit. >> well, i would say he doesn't just spin things, he lies. you guys should be clear about that, he lies. >> i appreciate your candor in this because this one is hard to figure out what he's saying. he's the president. the attorney general is his attorney general. the attorney general has announced this new zero tolerance policy. there wasn't a zero tolerance policy before they came to office. >> right. >> so how he can possibly say that this is up to the democrats, this one is a total head scratcher. you know, why are they doing it? if he's ashamed of his own policy and trying to claim that it's the democrats, why are they doing this? >> well, i'll give you one reason i think they're doing it. i think he does a lot of stuff for policy leverage later on. so, for example, here he's creating a humanitarian crisis so then paul ryan and the republicans in congress can -- and he can try to fix it and use fixing that crisis as leverage to get other concessions from folks in congress. and you see that with the bills that they have laid out for next week. >> okay, let's talk about that. so if this is just a tactic in order to get leverage, and i hear your theory on that, here's what the republicans have brought to the table in this draft bill on immigration, okay. so let me just lay it out. $25 billion for border security, including the border wall. we know that's long been one of the president's top priorities. ending the diversity visa lottery. cuts to family-based visas. path to citizenship for daca recipients, so i assume that you would be please wed that portion of it, and they will address this issue that is happening right now at the border of family separation, children from parents. so what do you see here? would you go along with this? >> well, it's a 300-page bill so i'm still going through it. all of us will go through it over the weekend and into next week. again, they're building the wall. $25 billion wall which is hugely unpopular with the american people, at least the majority of people don't support it. most texans don't support it. they're also using this humanitarian crisis they created as leverage to put in a bunch of other bad stuff while solving the crisis that they created. >> so you're saying that if you don't go along with it, help me understand the logic. if democrats don't go along with it, then can the president say, look, we had a fix. republicans suggested a fix. democrats won't go along with it. that's what's happening at the border. >> that's absolutely what he'll do. he did a similar thing with north korea, for example. he got credit -- he and kim jong-un got credit for taking us away from the brink of war. but the fact is, you all know that president trump was the one who was agitating on twitter and press releases and press conferences creating these hostilities, bringing us to the brink of war, and then going over to north korea and getting credit for taking us away from the brink of war. it's the same thing he does over and over. >> if you don't go along with this as democrats, then what happens to these families at the border? >> you're right. it puts us and people in congress in a very difficult position because i think this administration will continue to get more brutal. >> what does that mean? >> i think that they'll continue with this inhumane policy and i think that it will get worse. i can't tell you exactly how it gets worse, but my sense is with these guys, it will get worse. >> you're just saying that's your fear? >> yeah. and so far, you know, i think a lot of these fears have come true. >> so democrats are powerless to keep these families together or to stop babies and children being separated from their parents right now and being held. we've heard from some who have gone down to the border in pens. right now the government is trying to come up with better, less inhumane accommodations, but they're still going to separate the families. >> i wouldn't say that we're powerless. we're pushing legislation. there were -- people have been doing everything that they can to raise this issue. that's why you're seeing so much attention to it now. so we can never give up hope and we can never stop trying because if you do that, you really shouldn't be in this place. also the american people are not powerless. the american people can do something to change what this government and what their president is doing in their name. >> senator -- attorney general jeff sessions says that the bible dictates this. the bible suggests that we obey the laws of the government because god has ordained the government for his purposes. your response? >> that's a perversion of the bible that attorney general jeff sessions -- his interpretation. >> congressman joaquin castro, thank you very much for being here with your perspective on all of this. >> thank you. >>> president trump talking to the media just moments ago about immigration, about this very subject. also the inspector general report. we'll talk about all of this with van jones coming up next in our bottom line. >>> first, we have some incredible people who are changing the world for better. here is a preview of our special series "champions for change." >> all next week, a special cnn series. our anchors profile "champions for change." >> we travel the globe telling stories of change makers. >> this time we're joining their mission to make a difference. >> giving time to the causes that are dear to our hearts. >> and sharing the stories of the champions leading the charge. >> it was for a great cause. that's motivating. >> we had to help them in a way that lets them see this is not how your life has to be. >> this is an opportunity to pay it forward. >> to do something that is going to be meaningful. >> they are the kinds of students any community would be blessed to have. >> it just warms your heart that you could help someone with f d food. >> join the journalists of cnn as we work alongside champions for change, all next week. presented by charles schwab. hi.i just wanted to tell you that chevy won a j.d.power dependability award for its midsize car-the chevy malibu. i forgot. chevy also won a j.d. power dependability award for its light-duty truck the chevy silverado. oh, and since the chevy equinox and traverse also won chevy is the only brand to earn the j.d. power dependability award across cars, trucks and suvs-three years in a row. phew. third time's the charm... [ drum roll ] ...emily lapier from ames, iowa. this is emily's third nomination and first win. um...so, just...wow! um, first of all, to my fellow nominees, it is an honor sharing the road with you. and of course, to the progressive snapshot app for giving good drivers the discounts -- no, i have to say it -- for giving good drivers the discounts they deserve. safe driving! >>> we do have some breaking news. president trump talking to the press just moments ago outside the white house. he spoke about a range of topics, including the inspector general report about the fbi's handling of the clinton e-mail investigation. he also spoke about immigration. cnn's van jones here with the bottom line. i guess let's listen to just what he said because we were on tv. i want to get a take on this. >> i say that the i.g. blew it at the very end with that statement because when you read the report, it was almost like comey. he goes point after point about how guilty hillary is and then he said, but we're not going to do anything about it. the report, the i.g. report, was a horror show. i thought that one sentence of conclusion was ridiculous. >> what he's talking about there is the i.g. put out a report that said we found no evidence that the conclusions by the prosecutors were affected by bias or other improper consideration. so we have this 500-page i.g. report where there's a lot in it the president likes, but he decides to dispute the conclusion there, van. >> well, there's nothing there that nobody should like, let's just be honest. when you have people who are supposed to be doing a professional job and they're having side conversations. but you know what, that actually happens in real life. i've been in hospitals where, you know, doctors and nurses are having negative side conversations about patients or families. that doesn't mean they then go into the surgery and botch it on purpose. it doesn't mean the nurse is not giving the pills properly. people can have opinions. maybe they shouldn't have them. maybe they're catty or petty, but it doesn't mean they're not doing their job properly. at the end of the day it seems to be what they founding. people had catty, personal opinions but you can't find evidence that those opinions actually changed the outcome of these investigations. and both facts are important. both facts. >> we were just talking about immigration. as you know, there are children who are being separated from their parents under this new zero tolerance policy that's being implemented by attorney general jeff sessions. i think the president just addressed that. we think that what he said was that there is this immigration draft of a new bill from the republicans and it has, you know, various tenets, most of them pretty hard line or will assuage conservatives' feelings more than democrats. it does include a path for dreamers and says it will be a fix for this separating parents from children but it sounds like the president will not vote for this republican bill. >> he says that he will not sign what he calls the more moderate agreement. you can disagree about whether it is moderate or conservative, but he will not sign this agreement that the house speaker and others helped forge with the moderates in that. this essentially blows up the republican deal that they just made. van, there is urgency here to solve the problem of separating these parents from children. >> beyond urgency. i mean this is not a zero tolerance policy. this is a zero humanity policy, it's a zero dignity policy, it's a zero human rights policy. there is no country on planet earth that when refugees show up on the border fleeing violence, fleeing gang activity, running for their lives, that rip babies away from mothers and jail the mothers, incarcerate the mothers and the children too. that is -- it's unprecedented on the planet. has it happened in narrow cases in the u.s. befe? yes, with good cause. but a blank wholesale attack on every single person coming here, even people who say these people are breaking the law. some of these people are following the letter of our asylum laws. >> absolutely. >> to the letter and having their children ripped away. >> they must be protected when they show up on our shores seeking asylum. >> because of the human rights law the united states pioneered and brought the world into requires that. not only our own laws but global hum ranit human rights laws. by the way, if you're a conservative, if you're a republican, pro family, pro baby, pro choice, all these things about the innocent and so frustrated with the democratic party for not understanding your argument, that whatever the parents did or didn't do, that child in the womb is innocent and shouldn't be punished based on what the parents decide. apply that to the border. don't punish babies. don't punish children because of the choices of the parents. where is the republican party? where are my conservative friends? where are my fellow people of faith and christians on the abuse of children on our own borders? the silence has been appalling. i hope it breaks this weekend. >> where is the president? let's listen to the sound from the white house just moments ago. >> i certainly wouldn't sign the more moderate one. i need a bill that gives this country tremendous border security. i have to have that. >> i want to bring in david chalian. the president just said it, he would not sign the more moderate bill. david, and i say this with the utmost respect. i'm not sure he understands what he just said. i think what he was just saying is he's not going to accept the deal that was reached within the republican caucus. if that's the case, he just blew up the party's immigration plans again. >> and you're saying that, john, because the more moderate version, that deal, the goodlatte bill is what we would analyze as the more moderate version. but here's the thing. the other thing that the president said there was, yes, they need to fix this legislatively. he likes to blame the democrats, assayer a saraharate the children from their families. my ears perked up too when i heard him say that because it sounds like he's not willing to sign at this point the bill that the republican house majority is crafting as a compromise deal, yet he still says he wants a legislative fix. right now that seems to be the only one that potentially has the possibility of getting enough votes to actually be a legislative fix. >> van, you said where are my fellow -- my friends, the conservatives, where are the evangelicals. franklin graham arguably best known evangelical christian in the country, he said that this is unconscionable. i'm paraphrasing, but that was basically the message that he sent to the white house. and he said this is because of 20 or 30 years of bad policy and lack of leadership, which is also true. but we need sharper statements from our conservative christian friends. this is a no-brainer. this is not hard. you can say i want the most secure borders ever, but i don't want to scar child
eye 76
favorite 0
quote 0
sarah huckabee sanders. should we keep going, sarah? okay. we'll go. i don't care. hey, you know, just means we get home a little later in the evening, right? go ahead. sure, go ahead. go ahead. >> hi, mr. president. how are you? from the "times" of singapore, welcome to the country. >> thank you very much. >> i hope you enjoyed our food. >> beautiful country, i did. >> i wanted to find out, you describe this as a process. what is the immediate next step? is there some ongoing dialogue? >> yes, we're getting together next week to go into the details. secretary pompeo -- yeah, next week with john bolton and our entire team to go over the details and to get this stuff done. we want to get it done. he wants to get it done. we're also working very much with south korea. we're working with japan, we're working with china to a lesser extent, but we're working with china. >> you're coming back to singapore? >> i would come back gladly. your prime minister was fantastic. we were with him yesterday, he did a great job, very welcoming. it probablefence actually. a great place
eye 111
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> did the decision to ask sarah sanders to leave, do you feel as though it was appropriate? >> i feel sarahhas reaped what she has sowed. she has stood in front of that podium for months on end, support, the supreme court decision saying they didn't have to bake wedding cakes. i was sure this stings to feel what it's like to have someone say you can't come into my establishment. you can't have it both ways. you can't stand up there and support a president and policies that says it's okay for a baker to say this group, this protected class, can't get service from us and then you two in a restaurant and asked to leave and cry crocodile tears. this woman in the restaurant had to make a stand and did. sarah, look what you're doing every day. you have created this environment. you've planted these seeds. now you are responsible. >> ben? >> yeah. two things, one, she wasn't crying about it. secondly, the supreme court said the baker in an overwhelming decision hadded right to refuse service based on religious grounds. >> no. hang on, ben. i wanted to give you full time. just to be clear what the
eye 145
favorite 0
quote 0
sarah huckabee sanders got to do what conservative white women love most, speak with a manager ughter ] the white house press secretary sarah huckabee sanders was asked to leave a restaurant in ay virginia on frecause she works for the trump administration, which is weird because usually people who work for the trump administration are asked to leave the trump administration. [ laughter and applause ] president trump today attacked the restaurant that asked white house press secretary sarahkee sanders to leave over the weend and tweeted, quote, "i always had a rule, if a restaurant is dirty on the outside, it is dirty on the inside." "i have a similar rule," said e bert mueller. [ cheers and appla president trump criticized the media's coverage of his immigration policies, tweeting, quote, "we have done a far better job in that our facilities are cleaner and better run than were the facilities under obama." added trump, "plus, attendance is wer up!" [ laugnd applause ] first lady melania trump spoke at a conference yesterday and told kids that kindness, compassion, and positivity are very important traits in life. and then she put on w jacket and never looked back. [ laughter and alause ] officials in arizona are warning residents to use caution when handling pool noodles after a family found a rattlesnake inside one. [ audience oohs ] on the plus side, timmy was un crowned thsputed winner of the noodle fight. [ laughter and applause ] abc has announced that a spinoff of
eye 89
favorite 0
quote 0
think she's referring to sarah sanders. >> the president yesterday is attacking -- he started his campaign, calling mexicans rapists. he yesterday is attacking democrats. sarah attacks on n pelosi. ms-13 gang members. i think that's the challenge here, which is really this week has been a particularly tough week in that the trump administration has a policy which most americans don't think is a policy debate, but is frankly immoral. >> so i want to get reaction to that. because it's true, governor mike huckabee, former governor of arkansas, tweeted something that said, it's an -- it's an image of what appears to be a latino gang and says nancy pelosi introduces her campaign committee for the take back of the house. >> yes, disgusting, really, when you look at this mentality, and what -- how he tweeted that picture. and also just with regard to sarah. she used her government account for taking on this private restaurant, a private business. so i personally think she should be referred to the office of government ethics. >> you think that's unethical. >> yeah, if you use a government account to attack a private business on personal time, that's not right. >> y
eye 123
favorite 0
quote 0
republican side with the way that nielsen's getting treated, with the way sarah sanders is getting treated. republicans love sarahcrats may not like her. they may not be able to stand her. republicans think of her as a sweetheart. she's fighting for donald trump every day. the reason we're in this situation is because the policy beforehand was 20 days in a detention sender for a family, -- center for a family, you're released. this can't stand. whether or not the republicans get something passed, it's not going to change the fact that the republicans will win in the midterms. >> leland: garland, you get the final word. >> if we recall back to 2010, under obama, the democrats had a majority in both houses and they weren't able to produce as much as most people who hav would ha. they kind of have taken a beating. the republicans are talking a lot. they've got the majority. if they don't produce, they'll pay. >> leland: do you worry the kind of rhetoric we're seeing now pushes sort of moderate or undecided republicans back to being hard core republicans when they see how people are being treated? >> i do believe tha
eye 152
favorite 0
quote 0
sarah huckabee sanders. and said this. >> sarah huckabee sanders, your press secretary. >> yeah. >> she -- she took a lot of heat yesterday from the people behind you. there were some suggestion that maybe she'd be leaving the white house. >> i don't think so. you know, look, at a certain point everyone sort of leaves. you have to leave. i'm sort of just staying like a ship, just keep going, bing bing.>> sh: that analogy doesn' mean what you think it means. if people are jumping off a ship, that means the ship is sinking.hinkg of a bus. "i'm like a ship and everyone is jumping off the side of the ship which is a shame because this ship is headed for the most beautiful place, ice mountain." now, yesterday was father's day. and on father's day trump did what all dads do on father's day. he got up bright and early to tweet unhinged things about the ongoing criminal investigation of his presidential campaign. >> the president sunday on the attack tweeting, "witch hunt! there was no russian collusion. oh, i see there was no russian collusion, so now they look for obstruction on the no russian collusion. the phony russian collusion was a made up hoax.o bad they didn' crooked hillary like this. double standard!" >> seth: why does trump write his tweets like a thought occurred to him in the middle of it? [ laughter ] we're like a week away from trump tweeting every single thought that occurs to him. "there was no russian collusion. oh, i see, there was no russian collusion, so now they look for obstruction. send tweet. oh, i'm so hungry. i want a cheeseburger so badly, but i can't have one because of the democrats' witch hunt. ooh, tummy rumbling, hungry, i hate this job so much. i am so bad at it. someone get me a cheeseburger, golf. cheeseburger, golf. cheeseburger, have no more thoughts brain empty. must watch fox news and refill." [ cheers and applause ] trump's outburst came amid a major development in the russia investigation. his former campaign chairman paul manafort who is awaiting trial on 23 different counts was sent to jail on friday for allegedly attempting to interfere in the investigation by contacting witnesses. >> paul manafort is going to jail. the judge, amy berman jackson, said that manafort's repeated attempts to contact witnesses constituted a danger to the integrity of the court. >> manafort called person d1. on person d1's cellular phone. person d1 sought to avoid manafort. so person d1 ended the call. manafort also sent person d1 a text message on an encrypted application stating, "this is paul." [ laughter ] >> seth: paul manafort tried to contact witnesses, which is a crime, to lie about his other alleged crimes. and he literally wrote in a text message, "this is paul." [ laughter ] even your weed dealer knows enough not to text the word, "weed." also, did you think robert mueller wouldn't be watching? look at him. the man doesn't even blink. he won a staring contest with the lincoln memorial. [ laughter ] in a tweet, trump says sending manafort to jail was a tough sentence and called it very unfair. so trump has sympathy for his former campaign chairman accused of conspiracy against the united states and sent to jail for alleged witness tampering. buviolce and seeking asywiyou. trump has much less sympathy for them. >> your numbers today from the department of homeland security show the impact of the administration's new crackdown on illegal immigti over a six-week period nearly separated from nearly as many adults. >> seth: now, if this policy strikes you as monstrous, an inhumane, and cruel then, you're a decent person. in other words, you are not attorney general jeff sessions. last week sessions defended the policy by citing the bible. >> illegal entry into the united states is a crime. it should be and must be if you're going to have a legal system and have any limits whatsoever. persons who violate the law of our nation are subject to prosecution. if you violate the law, you subject yourself to prosecution. i would cite you the apostle paul and his clear and wise companion romans 13 to obey the laws of the government because god has ordained the government for his purposes. >> seth: oh, look at sessions' face. have you seen a creepier smile? he cites the bible like a guy challenging someone else's word in scrabble. "well, i'm sorry, but mr. dictionary doesn't see your word. it's just not in here." also, you know who's gotta be really pissed right now? the apostle paul. you never hear anything about that dude, and then all of a sudden he gets blamed for this i know he is an apostle so he doesn't swear, but seriously. it's hard not to believe he's up there right now saying, "dude, leave me the [ bleep ] out of this, i don't --" [ light laughter ] white house press secretary sarahee sanders was asked how the white house could possibly defend that comment and she immediately doubled down in a tense exchange with a reporter. >> i'm not aware of the attorney general's comments or what he would be referencing. i can say that it is very biblical to enforce the law. >> seth: i should note, it's also very biblical to stone people to death, to sleep with 600 concubines, to have conversations with flaming bushes and to believe a 500 yeard old man built a giant boat and put giraffes on it. [ laughter ] and it got even worse from there. >> that is actually repeated a number of times throughout the bible. however -- [ inaudible ] hold on, jim. if you'll let me finish. again, i'm not going to comment on the attorney's specific comments that i haven't seen. >> you just said it's in the bible to follow the law. >> that's not what i said. and i know it's hard for you to understand even short sentences, i guess. [ audience ohs ] >> seth: he can't understand short sentences? tru
eye 202
favorite 0
quote 0
sarah sanders. and she did something that's well within her rights and politely asked sarah to leave. it depends on what you think about those policies. i think sarah' response to that i naught was very unusual, using her official white house twitter account, to talk about this woman, and talk about the restaurant. and i haven't seen press secretaries blast out a civilian who they had a run in with in a private space, sort of blast them using their official twitter account, i frankly found that somewhat -- as someone who covers government officials i found that curious and somewhat objectionable. >> sarah sanders seemed to have gotten the brunt of some of this anti-white house sentiment. and now she's kicked out of this restaurant in front of her family is this taking a personal toll on white house staff? >> i do think it's taking a personaling toll on a lot of white house staffers, but i would say folk's forcing them to be there, they're there of their own volition, but i do think it raises a broader question, this restaurant owner is perfectly within their rights to ask sarah to leave, and sarah did so peaceably, it doesn't seem like it was a par
eye 126
favorite 0
quote 0
sarah huckabee sanders will soon get secret virginia restaurant ownering a asking sarah to leave the red had hen in lexington becausesant trump. protesters are gathering outsidthe restaurant and some gather signs surprise are poing and others arrested him for civility. it foe owes wave of criticism and support and plans to reopenen jewel 5.es >> we're awaitingults in local primary race too close to call. last check a few hundred votesmo separate ntgomery county executive. markel judge ridge and david player are neck and neck. they've been keeping a close eye on it. they're 500 apart. david player has4777 and red ridge 3 with 477p 9. due to technical err up to 0,000 voteers statewide may have had to cast them tuesday and they won't be counted til next week. >> how a good samaritan took down an atcker with a move ut of the action poovry. >> new details about incipal and teacher who got in f on school ground, lindsay.ac >> ter at certainty of i s taking legal action. she's complainting thisas not just an argument she was arawlingte and students saw what happened. we have those details for you what happened. we have those details for you n. y a man decided to climb on overhead sign. wait until you t see hows one ended. >> coming up toneght on the app five details for upcomingetween president tr and vladimir put up and the trez is weighing in on the world cup. we can catch the final 5 world cup. we can catch the final 5 tonight:3t 110. >> sarah and shawn this happen two weeks ago. school officials don't say if this f whtas physical or if itas verbal. th teacher is claiming she was assaulted at ardmore elementary and that students witnessed what happened. and the teacher wraas gnted this restraining order againstp. pretty extomordinary shing like this would happen at el sentarychool. police and ambance were called out and and there was miscommunication for student that day that gregory g angry called her sxlitive and akawingtd her in achool parking lot. here's her attorney. >> blocked her path and attac attackeder several times preventing my client from leaving. what we now know is there were student doing cleanup duty who were in the window who witnessedncident. >>in thi let to parents the scol district acknowledged the student could have seen what happened he doesn't knowd what was cap on video but that was part of the investigation. crutch field and gregory remain an paid administrative lee. told the school ceo he wants da
eye 30
favorite 0
quote 0
sarah huckabee sanders. should we keep going, sarah? just means we get home a little later in the evening. >> i hope you enjoyed it. have one -- you describe the process. what is the next step? is there ongoing dialogue? >> yes. next week, with john bolton. our entire team to go over the details and get the stuff done. we are working with south korea, to a less extent. i would come back, gladly. your prime minister was fantastic. we were with him yesterday. he was very welcoming. it probably made a difference. a great place. >> thank you. what was it about the first interaction with chairman kim that made you decide not to walk away after you said that you would know within the first minute. >> i have said that about relationships, about people. i was generous, i said five seconds. in the first second, in some cases. sometimes. -- sometimes it doesn't work out, but sometimes it does. we did not just come in and start talking about these very complex subjects that been going on for 70 years. we have been discussing this for months. stops
eye 184
favorite 0
quote 0
white house press secretary sarah sanders has refused to correct her statement that donald trumpid not dictate a statement for don junior. he did that statement. and on tuesday, sarah for pushing the issue. >> i work every day to give you information. i'm going to continue to do that. frankly, i think my credibility is probably higher than the media's. and i think in large part, thatause you guys spend more of your time focused on attacking the president instead of reportingnews. >> back with our panel now. for more sarah sanders. people were laughing in the briefing room. we don't have polling on sarah s w comes to her credibility. but we have the numbersf the president's credibility, compared to the three cabndou t three news cable networks more than donald trump. at the end of the day, what does this have to do with sanders' refusal to set the record straight? >> she is the president's mouthpiece. that's her job. if people don't trust the president, they're not going to trust anything she says, either. that's where she gets in trouble. she's the voice of the president. >> w wouldn't correct the >> i don't think we can explain her mow titives at this point. it wa
eye 88
favorite 0
quote 0
initially her story removed from the restaurant was bubbled up and sarah sanders confirmed it on twitter. walter schwab is saying by having sarah call out the restaurant by name she is violating part of the ethics rules that government employees agreed to work by. he says it's the same as if an atf agent pulled out his badge when a restaurant tried to throw him or her out. this will be debated as well. i don't know how likely it is we are going to see an ethics violation on something like this but it is worth keep in mind when you're the press secretary or some other public official and you use your public government twitter account to call out a restaurant or to speak out about something, there certainly are ethics laws or ethics policy that could come into play. >> we have seen in the past when there have been violations of ethics laws. >> kellyanne conway, for example. >> yes. they have been counseling from the president so we will see if that happens here. >> right. >> thanks, stelter. >> thanks. >> stay tuned. he'll be back at 11:00 for "reliable sources" right here on cnn. >>> so you know for decades, women in saudi arabi
eye 116
favorite 0
quote 0
to your public day and a beginning to your private life because sarah sanders was out to dinner and you now know this morning that sarahders will get secret service detail for protection after this. how do you see it? >> it's interesting because i agree with errol that this has been going on for a long time and it's part of our kind of culture, but i think you have to point to the last few years, really and look at the way in which this president specifically has helpe to exacerbate tensions, and a lot of times intentionally, right? he has seen ways to stoke division as a way to rally up certain parts of his base, and so we're seeing that now especially in the context of a midterm election year. you're right. talking about policy, talking about press releases or, you know, messages. don't animate people the way that other types of -- >> especially in the age of social media. especially when clips like that go viral and these are people's instagram. i'm stunned at the amount of political press releases i still get in my inbox. errol, you probably get a ton. >> very true. ome on, there is another way to tell the story. l
eye 113
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> reporter: the red hen owner asked sarah huckabee sanders to leave because of her politics. sarah responded yesterday. >> we are allowed to disagree and should be allowed to do it freely and without fear of harm. this goes for all people regardless of politics. >> reporter: the resident -- restaurant has become the center of scorn from trump supporters. kristin nielsen was forced to leave a dc restaurant last week. protester showed up outside of her home. california representative maxine waters defended her call for more public confrontations. >> this is a democracy and you get the right to protest. peaceful protest is the simple way to do it. >> reporter: it is a tactic that some of her disavow. >> no one should call for the harassment of political opponents. that is not right and it is not american. >> reporter: immigrants have pointed to the president incendiary language. yesterday he tweeted about waters, calling her an extraordinarily low iq person. >> reporter: this is not a legal question most of the time. most people generally have the right to go and protest. it is really
eye 34
favorite 0
quote 0
sarah sanders. we're going to play it. >> i actually really like sarah. i think she's very resourceful. like, she burns facts and then she uses that ash to create a perfect smoky eye. like maybe she's born with it. maybe it's lies. it's probably lies. >> do you think that was a look-ous thing? >> i think that was one of those jokes that tricks you into exposing how you feel about the subject matter. which is one of the most dangerous jokes in comedy, because it's a joke that relies on you to define it in many ways, and so if you read the words of that joke, and you don't know who sarah huckabee sanders is, all the joke is saying is, somebody knows how to turn facts into lies. and applies them as makeup. and that can be used -- >> i agree. i thought it was really unfair, this criticism she got, because i read the whole thing. >> right. >> i saw interviews of her. but i was there when stephen colbert did his in 2006. again, the people in the room had no idea how to laugh at themselves. what does that tell you? >> here's something with comedy that's different and difficult. the white house correspondents' association is an interesting room in that in many ways in my opinion it has become too close to the people that it covers. so sometimes you blow the lines. i actually think it's good donald trump doesn't attend. i don't think it's supposed to be that type of event. i think it's strange for the press to become chummy with the people that they're reporting on. i think it's strange for people to build relationships. as a journalist, you don't require access to do your j
eye 188
favorite 0
quote 0
visible member of the administration outside of the president himself is press secretary sarah sanders and she is here. sarah, it's good to see you. >> good to see you. >> i respect you taking the opportunity. >> thank you. thanks for being in d.c. >> well, i came for you. what do you think about this as a positive pivot? let's take a look at this situation and see if we can get to a place, mutual respect, both sides think credibility counts, and we move forward. what do you say? >> all right. we'll give it a shot. >> all right. where's the sticking point? this meeting matters, you know it does. i understand the reference to counsel. i get it. not just because i'm an attorney, but you don't want to answer for the lawyers, you done want to answer for an operation that you're not a part of. i get it. but you can answer for what you said. you don't have to refer to counsel for that. sekulow is not your lawyer, he's the president's lawyer. you're saying, he didn't dictate this, he did what any father would do. that turns out not to be true. you agree with that? >> once again, i know i answered this question on m
eye 146
favorite 0
quote 0
sarah sanders a bit of a martyr. >> and david, the president told sarah sanders to lead with this at the briefing today. and it definitely has the opposite impact that who ever these people are yelling shame or kicking her out of a restaurant. we should have a difference of opinion without attempting to accost people in public life. >> absolutely. nobody was happier than donald trump. it allowed him to depict his people as victims. even though he has encouraged crowds to attack reporters. and saying he wanted to punch a protester in the face. laced with some nasty personal incivility. so but this was an opportunity for him to turn the tables. and he seized it and he sent her out there to say it. despite the obvious point that he and she frankly are in no point to lecture on this, i make this point not because i am trying to defend the trump administration, but because i am trying to defend civility as a value in our democracy. and i think those who opposed president, have an obligation no the to try to follow him down in this race to the bottom, down the rabbit hole. >> we have seen gay people refused service at a baker, because of religious beliefs, i suppose the restaurant owner could say it is my religious belief that i oppose sarahdoesn't have the impact. >> it was a gauche move. if she had slow service for a while, sarah sanders could have walked out on her own. but by giving her the boot, she lost the moral high ground. what both david and i are saying, you need to keep the high ground. >> you historians are so cunning, i never thought of that. >> up next, president trump tweets again, his claim that president obama ordered wiretaps on his phone during the election. never proven of course. i will talk with judge mccasey next. you always get the lowest price on our rooms, guaranteed? let's get someone to say it with a really low voice. carl? lowest price guaranteed. what about the world's lowest limbo stick? how low can you go? nice one, carl. hey i've got an idea. just say, badda book. badda boom. badda book. badda boom. nice. always the lowest price, guaranteed. book now at choicehotels.com i saw my leg did not look right. i landed. i was just finishing a ride. i felt this awful pain in my chest. i had a pe b
eye 154
favorite 0
quote 0
sarah huckabee sanders and the "late night" press corps are here in our studio and ready to go. so without further ado it's time for the "late night white house press briefing." [ cheers and applause ] ♪ >> seth: sarah, sarahs, over here. sarah, sarah, sarah, over here, yes, thank you. seth meyers with "late night with seth meyers." secretary sanders, when are you going to start telling us the truth? >> not today or tomorrow or at any point ever. [ light laughter ] >> seth: great. can you tell us a little bit about eric trump's birthday party? >> no one from the white house staff will attend. [ laughter ] >> seth: what did jared kushner say to donald trump during the election? >> i wish i could vote for you but i'm only 11. [ laughter ] >> seth: sarah, where do you see yourself in five years? >> further from the truth. [ audience ohs ] [ light laughter ] >> seth: president trump seems to be fairly unfriendly to angela merkel. was there ever a time when trump liked germany? >> from 1942 to 1945. [ audience ohs ] [ cheers and applause ] >> seth: why does president trump want to meet with vladimir putin? >> to accept the check. [ laughter ] >> seth: what did president trump tell his kids to do on mother's day
eye 120
favorite 0
quote 0
sarah huckabee sanders. fo howie: the vitriol being unleashed against sarah huckabee sanders is stung and sad. she and her family were kicked out of a restaurant called the red hen for moral reasons and so she left. she tweeted that her actions say more about her than me. the reaction by some trump-bashing pundits, yeah, right, she deserved it. >> you make choices in life. and there is a cost to being an accomplice to this cruel, deceitful administration. howie: msnbc contributor in the "washington post," it's natural and appropriate for decent human beings to shame and shun the practitioners of such a policy. if a barack obama spokesman had been booted from a restaurant. what's next. is it okay to picket people's houses like what happened friday at kirstjen nielsen's townhouse in virginia. should fedex not deliver packages? rachel maddow apologized at the end of her show when she had difficultyw about infants and toddlers being moved to new shelters. >> at least three -- put up the graphic of this. thank you. do we have it? no. three tender age shelters in texas. lawyers and medical providers -- i'm going have to hand this off. sorry. howie: whether or not you like rachel ma dough, i don't think she has anything to apologize for. we all struggle as broadcasters and sometimes we choke up. a banner flashed on the screen. man for the rrp pleads guilty to five charges of manslaughter. he hasn't pled guilty to anything. abc apologized saying there is no excuse for the mistake and i agree. anthony scaramucci on the immigration uproar and the president calling media outlets the country's biggest enemy. camping with my daughters was more than just a weekend. it was our time to unplug and be together. with my bladder leakage, i'm not doing that anymore. when i went hiking with the other product, it just didn't fit right and i was always readjusting it. so, now our camping trips are their camping trips. but with the new sizes of depend fit-flex, it feels like it was made for me. i'm ready to get back our time together. introducing more sizes for better comfort. new depend fit-flex underwear is guaranteed to be your best fit. get a free sample at depend.com howie: anthony scaramucci publicly broke with his former boss over the child separation issue. you say this administration policy of separating children from families at the border is inhumane. why did you speak out? anthony: i'm trying to be helpful to the president. the optics of this situation and the feeling it gives thage mayor canes not the feeling people want to feel. howie: he disagrees. you are criticizing his policy. anthony: it's not a difficult decision for me. i'm not taking on the president. i'm saying to the president, i wish other advisors would say this. and don't sit in the circle and just yes everybody. look at the optics of the situation, let's look at the spirit of the situation. let's stop arguing about it being legal. because we have had many laws that have not been right. we were segregating children 50 short years ago. we had jim crow laws. this law is inhumane. howie: you say the president is poorly advised. but isn't that a copout? he's making the decisions. and you are trying to tear him toward ways a more humane approach and one that won't be as damage. at the end of the day the president has to own his decision. but i'm basically saying this is a moment when you have a food fight going on among your advisors, a food fight going on among the parties. but you are a ceo, you are a business person. you have got great common sense. i know him personally, he's a great guy. howie: this is emotional and there has been criticism from both parties. i'm told the white house is not pleased with your position. have you had a chance to explain your thoughts to the president personally? anthony: i explained it. i'm explaining it here. and i have no problem with them being not pleased with me. but they should not be pleased with themselves. at the end of the day, you have got so many great things going on, the president is doing a great job. why do you need this in the news when we could be talking about the inspector general's report that comes out great for the president. the denuclearization of north korea. why make this the lead news story. i don't agree with it. i don't care if they are pleased with me or not. i have supported the guy for three years. i put hard money into his campaign. when they threw me out of the white house i stayed loyal to the president. so i'm here saying wake up. if you don't wake up on his issue why would you have an issue like this blind side so many of the good things going on in our administration. howie: when the president said he can't do anything unilaterally. the conflicting messages coming out of the white house -- anthony: read the tweet again. am i wrong about that? you can't have five or six different arguments going on at the same time. it's a black and white issue. there is a lot of gray in our society. this is a black and white issue for moms and dad. you want to look back on this thing in 10 years and say what were we doing? do you think the americans look back on the japanese interment camps and say it was a great idea? tell the truth to the president, tell the truth to the american people. this is very bad policy. and let's knock it off. it's just that simple. howie: the president's detractors are obviously piling on. but they are saying he launched a trade war, he picked a fight with canada. are there elements of truth to his or is this the media piling on and not giving the president the benefit of the doubt. >> there is a bell couldity of rhetoric related to the fact the trading system has been uneven for 7 years. and the president is trying to find a way to create a trade parody system and it hasn't been that way. the bellicosity of rhetoric is used as a twice. on the north korea situation, he has done a great job. you have to give him credit where credit is due. howie: the president tweeted the main real media is our country's biggest enemy. would you advise him not to use that kind of language. anthony: he hasser right to push back against unfair language. he's a natural counter puncher. but we have to deescalate the war with the press. you are sitting in a seat now where you are serving the american people. you are a temporary office holder and temporary hess dent in the white house. the system was designed so the free press could be in there to rigorously review what you are doing. howie: you want de-escalation? anthony: i do. but i want it on both side. why don't we knock off the nonsense on both side, take it down a notch. i think the president should get out of the corner he's in, go on your show. i was delighted to see him on george stephanopoulos. he's a television star. there is no need for him to be sticking to one network for a few anchors. let's go the full spectrum of people. there are a lot of moderates and independent who love what the president is doing in the country. and he need those people if he wins an electoral landslide. if he gets an electoral landslide in 2020. he'll have a larger mandate the next four years. he's totally capable of doing it. howie: i interviewed donald trump during the campaign. he has a standing invitation to come on this program. coming up, a look at our angry media culture from peter fonda's reprehensible comments about the first f howie: peter fonda may be a legendary actor, but his tweets about barron trump were unhinged. he said sarah sanders should have her children taken away, and kirstjen nielsen should be put in a cage naked and be whipped by passersby. these peter fonda tweets are so vulgar could it permanently mar his reputation? >> i think it could. and it's ammunition for people on the right, roseanne barr's show was canceled but this guys movie just came out despite the fact he tweets these things. howie: sony pictures called the remarks abhorrent and dangerous and they are still putting the movie out. >> you can imagine could this affect box office results? it could. half the country knows looking at the political landscape and you are isolating them with these tweets. howie: 21st century fox is planning to sell ets assets to disney. the creator of modern family says he's disgusted to work for a company that's associated with fox news. if every fox star and show runner said this show was evil and protested to the murdoch family, it would make a huge difference in this national debate. >> here, as you ment
eye 296
favorite 0
quote 1
sarah huckabee sanders. ( applause ) because on friday night, sarah huckabee sanders was kicked out of the red hen restaurant in virginia on "moral grounds." ( applause ) applaud all you want but my heart really goes out to her. she was separated from her appetizer. she doesn't even know where it's being held! what if it's getting cold? ( laughter ) ( applause ) ( cheering ) >> stephen: here's what happened -- >> jon: you don't know. >> stephen: here's what happened -- huckasands went to out for dinner with husband and friends. the staff recognized her and called the owner, who gathered everyone in the back and allowed employees to vote on whether to boot huckabee sanders out of restaurant. oh, good, someone's getting due process. ( laughter ) ( applause ) it's nice. >> jon: oh! >> stephen: it's heart warming! when the owner quietly informed sanders that she made the staff uncomfortable, sanders left immediately and her group even offered to pay for their appetizers. but the owner did not charge sanders for the food the group had ordered and the cheese plates they had eaten. so, sweet new way for trump officials to get a free meal. ( laughter ) you know you're gonna get kicked out eventually, so go hog wild on the app order. "hi, we'll have an order of jalepeno poppers, the hummus plate, the twice-baked potato skins, and a filet mignon as a starter. you just recognized us? we'll take that to go." ( laughter ) ( piano riff ) ( applause ) but free cheese! free cheese! free cheese! yes! ( laughter ) but free cheese or no, sanders wasn't going to let this slide. the next day, from her official white house twitter account, she twote: "last night i was told by the owner of red hen in lexington, virginia to leave because i work for @potus and i politely left. her actions say far more about her than about me. i always do my best to treat people, including those i disagree with, respectfully and will continue to do so." "for the record: i have always lied to the american public with nothing but respect." ( laughter ) ( applause ) totally. and what do you mean "you treat everybody with respect?" you work for donald trump-- you're not even treating yourself with respect. ( laughter ) i believe everyone should follow their own conscience, and i understand why some people might celebrate this restaurant owner, but denying service to people you don't agree with is a slippery slope. because pretty soon we would just have liberal-only restaurants, and conservative restaurants, and it'll be a nightmare finding a place where your whole family can eat ( laughter ) "honey, i found a moderate taco bell out by the airport that we can take your mother to. they promise me the chalupas have no position on import tariffs." ( laughter ) ( applause ) but there is a middle road. people love import tariff jokes. ( laughter ) but i believe there's a middle road. restaurant workers, you don't have to kick out sarah huckabee sanders. just treat her the same way she treats her customers: only take the order of the two people at the table that you like, then tell sanders "i'm not going to comment on whether this dish contains peanuts." and then when the food never arrives, just say, "i haven't talked to the chef about that yet, so i can't give you any new information, i'll be back at 2:45 tomorrow with a completely different menu you can't order from." ( cheers and applause ) we've got a great show for you tonight. jessica chastain is here. but when we come back, trump puts some new coins into circulation. they're very shiny! ( cheers and applause ) ( band playing ) (music) [glass squeaking] [marker squeaking] (music) ♪ hershey's cookie layer crunch get layered ♪ ♪ don't juggle your home life and work life without it. business financing to help grow your business. another way we have your back. the powerful backing of american express. don't do business without it. ♪ charmin ultra soft! it's softer
eye 133
favorite 0
quote 0
sarah sanders did the right thing, and she left. host: so again, the back and forth that took place between the restaurant's owner, stephanie wilkinson and sarah sanders, goes as such, according to "the washington post," the restaurant owner saying at first i'm the owner, she goes on to say that i like you to come out to the patio with me for a word. again, they stepped outside into another small enclosure, at least out of the clouded restaurant. she went to say in telling "the washington post," i was babbling a little, but i got my point across in a polite and direct fashion. i explained the restaurant had certain standards that i felt it had to uphold, such ads honesty and compassion and cooperation. i said i'd like to ask to you leave. she also said that her response was immediate, telling the owner that's fine, i'll go. steven in kentucky, democrats line. hi. caller: yes, hello, pedro. i came to the conversation late, so i don't know if this was mentioned at all, so i'd like to say. i'd like to invoke the golden rule. do unto others as you want them to do unto you. it seems to me that ms. sanders is getting a dose of her own medicine. aren
Fetching more results