to attack the doubts about its funding, there has been a backlash from tory mps, in particular sarah wollastonespected and knows her health stuff. she described the claim that it will come from a brexit dividend as nonsense and treating the public as fool ‘s. brexit dividend as nonsense and treating the public as fool 's. she would say that, wouldn't she? treating the public as fool 's. she would say that, wouldn't sham treating the public as fool 's. she would say that, wouldn't she? it is a tough task to win over even some of mps, claiming on funding. i am also struck ivy i met at times picking up on the pm saying that the nhs is the number one priority, which is close to her saying it is her mission. i have been watching the pm when it comes to missions, she said that housing is a mission, mental health is a mission. she has taught —— had more missions than captain cook. route, you are the money person. take us through those figures are. the first thing to say that i do think there is a brexit dividend and i will explain in a minute. i know you and i don't agree but i am the economist and y

it's being supported by conservative mp dr sarah wollaston.oth expressed its view, and, if necessary at the end of the process, can intervene, because we will be facing a great national crisis. and there is a lords amendment that does that, but i accept that it's not completely satisfactory, and the government has tabled an amendment in lieu, as a replacement, which i also don't think is sufficient. so my own amendment is trying to bridge that gap, and it will provide a mechanism to ensure that the government will have to come to parliament by the end of november if there is no deal in order to get parliament's opinion on what it should do. and it also will have to come to parliament if any deal they present is rejected to get parliament's opinion. and finally, it says that if we have no deal by the 15th of february next year, which, let's face it, will only be a few weeks before the end of the 29th of march, any expression of the 29th of march, any expression of opinion of parliament of what we should do next is binding on the government. the

but not all tories feel the same. 0ne prominent backbencher, doctor sarah wollaston, said the idea ofas posh and claimed it was treating the public like fool is because we would still be paying into the eu budget for some time and there is an exit bill to settle. leading economist a certainly sceptical. the idea that there is a brexit dividend is pure fiction. it isa pure brexit dividend is pure fiction. it is a pure matter of arithmetic, they will be no extra money in four years time because of the financial arrangement we are come to with the eu in any case. and even more importantly, the government has already accepted that the public finances will be weakened to the choon of at least £15 billion per year, not strengthened. so, this contentious pledge from the referendum campaign is still causing controversy now. the prime minister suggested today that this promise will be exceeded, but has not yet spelt out how tax rises are expected, not traditional tory policy, and so far there is no detail. we don't know where it is coming from. we are told maybe a bit of borrowing, maybe a tax

let‘s speak to one of those mps, sarah wollaston. she‘s in our westminster studio.from that situation and rather than is being obliged to produce a written statement about what has happened, it would in that parliament would have a say and we would expect the government to come back with a motion that we could vote on as to whether we were happy for that to happen or not. and there is the parliamentary majority for us to crash out with no deal at all because of the consequences of that. have you been in duped a little bit here? officially, downing street is saying this morning they have promised no concessions, they have promised no concessions, they have promised nothing. so, were you given some words of reassuring that in the harsh light of day and away from the drama of yesterday, are completely meaningless? not at all. we don't feel that was a meaningless promise. the point is, if that doesn‘t translate now into an amendment that we are culpable with, the lords will be able to put back the amendment that was contentious yesterday and i think it is very likely th

your colleague sarah wollaston said teresa may will lose a future vote in the commons and she was oneel, if she does not, if theresa may does not stick to the deal hammered out, is theresa may not simply storing up problems for the future when time is actually very short? we have the trade bill coming back next month, that'll be interesting. everyone knows we're leaving and we need to get on and get these negotiations sorted. i acce pt get these negotiations sorted. i accept that but let's not underestimate the scale of the task presented to the prime minister with no parliamentary majority. we are doing ok and i think we will be ok and we will what people voted for. simon, more from easier soon but back to you now. thank you. dixons carphone has admitted a huge data breach. hackers tried to access 5.9 million credit and debit payment cards and 1.2 million personal data records. the company says details of 105,000 cards without chip—and—pin protection had been leaked, and says it has no evidence that any of the cards had been used fraudulently following the breach. our business corres

looking miserable but he may have been buoyed by some of the comments he got now from people like sarah wollastone for what you did, it was courageous. i really test the atmosphere in there today. what about labour, and particularly the problems they will be coming up against regarding the customs union and the eu? actually the vote on the customs union, there was was a fudge around anyway. the way in which the amendment was put together suggest the government would only have to make a statement about exploration of the customs union. we have seen over the coming days recently is that labour, even within themselves, do not think they have the numbers to push it all the way. again, it will be a testing time for the government. what we will find, as kate is saying, is actually in the trade bill that we will come back and return to these issues. that could potentially trip up issues. that could potentially trip up the government again, more so than the votes tomorrow. it is only a few weeks away. thank you for joining us. as i say, the votes continuing in the commons as i speak. so far the governmen

and even some conservative chair of the health select committee — sarah wollaston — said "the brexiton it tweeted his delight "fantastic news on nhs funding — a down payment on the cash we will soon get back from our eu payments. #ta kebackcontrol" let's introduce you to our guests them. norman smith at westminster, phil us in. we will have it cabinet meeting this morning, brought forward from tomorrow, specifically to thrash out this big spending splurge for the nhs and where the cash will come from. apart from knock—on for taxpayers, about what extra taxes we will have to pay, there is also a knock—on for other government departments, because we know the new home secretary sajid javid has been talking about more cash for the police, and we know the defence secretary gavin williamson has spoken about more cash for the ministry of defence going beyond the 296 ministry of defence going beyond the 2% increase. all their hopes now seemed to be going to the bottom of the chancellor's pile, because priority will be given to the nhs with this massive increase in spending, and actually it i