so commissioner, sarkissian? >> i just want to confer. when you talk about property owners, are we talking the leased owner. you talked about the property owner as well as the business? >> it could be, it has to be the property owner, so the business owner could be just the renter. it would benefit the renter because it gives the property owner the incentive to apply for the grant. right now, if they have a residenter, -- renter. the business owner has to get the property owner to apply for the grant. but the property owner won't apply for the grant if they have to jump through as you of these hoops. >> the business owner cannot apply for these initiatives? >> not unless they make the improvements to the property. >> if the property owner was the business of the property. >> that's why it was confusing to me. >> that particular case it would also be the owner. >> that legislation refers to property owners. >> yes. >> thank you, any other questions or comments, commissioners? great. seeing none, we'll open to public comment. is there any a

so commissioner, sarkissian? >> i just want to confer. when you talk about property owners, are we talking the leased owner. you talked about the property owner as well as the business? >> it could be, it has to be the property owner, so the business owner could be just the renter. it would benefit the renter because it gives the property owner the incentive to apply for the grant. right now, if they have a residenter, -- renter. the business owner has to get the property owner to apply for the grant. but the property owner won't apply for the grant if they have to jump through as you of these hoops. >> the business owner cannot apply for these initiatives? >> not unless they make the improvements to the property. >> if the property owner was the business of the property. >> that's why it was confusing to me. >> that particular case it would also be the owner. >> that legislation refers to property owners. >> yes. >> thank you, any other questions or comments, commissioners? great. seeing none, we'll open to public comment. is there any a

commissioner steven adams, dooley, monetta white, paul tour sarkissian, commissioner irene riley. >> general public comment allows members of the public to comment generally on the matter of commission's purview and not on today's agenda and agenda items for future consideration. >> do we have any members of the general public today that would like to comment on any matters that are not on the agenda? is there any additional public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. >> we should give a shout out to all of our tv viewers. we've been getting fan mail all month and we want to let them know that we love them. >> we have no competition with land use. >> we are in an open time slot today. so for people out there watching us. >> let's move on. item no. 3 is approval of the august 10, 2015, regular meeting minutes. do we have a motion? >> i motion to approve. >> second. >> i second. >> commissioner adams made a motion, commissioner riley seconded. all in favor say, "aye". >> aye. >> any opposed? item no. 4. discussion and possible action to make recommendations to the board of s

sarkissian / statefarm insurance >>"there are additional living expenses support within policies" >> reporter:now online there are all kinds of resources and checklists for people who lost a home or car to the fire. >> reporter:the irs, fema, and the red cross have list out important information people need to know before they return to their property. >> reporter:we have layed out all this fire section" on kron 4 dot com and on our free mobile app. >> reporter:in calistoga gabe slate kron 4 news >> pam: san ramon police are looking for a man suspected of trying to pull a 13-year- old girl. into his van. it happened yesterday afternoon, near davona drive >> pam: police say, a man pulled up in a white minivan. and told the girl to get inside. when she refused. the man got out of the van and grabbed her wrist. >> pam: she was able to pull herself free. and ran away. he is described as a white 40-year-old man. around 5 - feet- 10 inches tall. >> pam: he has short blond hair. and was last seen wearing a blue shirt and black jeans. >> pam: ahead at eight. major changes could be coming to

commissioner steven adams, dooley, monetta white, paul tour sarkissian, commissioner irene riley. >> general public comment allows members of the public to comment generally on the matter of commission's purview and not on today's agenda and agenda items for future consideration. >> do we have any members of the general public today that would like to comment on any matters that are not on the agenda? is there any additional public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. >> we should give a shout out to all of our tv viewers. we've been getting fan mail all month and we want to let them know that we love them. >> we have no competition with land use. >> we are in an open time slot today. so for people out there watching us. >> let's move on. item no. 3 is approval of the august 10, 2015, regular meeting minutes. do we have a motion? >> i motion to approve. >> second. >> i second. >> commissioner adams made a motion, commissioner riley seconded. all in favor say, "aye". >> aye. >> any opposed? item no. 4. discussion and possible action to make recommendations to the board of s

so commissioner, sarkissian? >> i just want to confer. when you talk about property owners, are we talking the leased owner. you talked about the property owner as well as the business? >> it could be, it has to be the property owner, so the business owner could be just the renter. it would benefit the renter because it gives the property owner the incentive to apply for the grant. right now, if they have a residenter, -- renter. the business owner has to get the property owner to apply for the grant. but the property owner won't apply for the grant if they have to jump through as you of these hoops. >> the business owner cannot apply for these initiatives? >> not unless they make the improvements to the property. >> if the property owner was the business of the property. >> that's why it was confusing to me. >> that particular case it would also be the owner. >> that legislation refers to property owners. >> yes. >> thank you, any other questions or comments, commissioners? great. seeing none, we'll open to public comment. is there any a