. >> charles sauer, what is the profit motive and how do you define it? >> it is a way to look at the world around you. people are motivated by acts of different motivations in their life and idea that as profit and redefine it right away. profit is feeling good, giving back to the community. more time with your family. they are driven by profit. just a general fact we all understand that in the book i take it a step down further and show that managers are driven by profit and that is different than what the company's motivations are and employees under them are driven by profit. i move from there because most of us understand business. i move that into other sectors. i look at government and show a 28-year-old bureaucrat sitting at a desk may not always have the best intentions of the country on his mind when sitting at the desk. sometimes he wants to get off work and go on a date, maybe he wants to move up in the bureaucracy himself, he has motivations and they don't go with the program he is working for and this works in media and applies to family lif

. >> charles sauer, what is the profit motive and how do you define it? >> the profit motive is a way to look at the world around you.people are motivated. they act because of different motivations in their life and i deem that as profit and in the book i redefine it almost right away and say profit isn't just money. profit is maybe feeling good. profit is getting back to your community. maybe profit is more time with your family but when people make a decision, when they make an action they are driven by profit. we all know businesses are driven by profit. that's a fact that we all understand but in the book i take it step further and show that managers are driven by profit and that is often different than what the companies motivations are. and the employees under them are also driven by profit and i move it from there because most of us understand business but as we take down the profit motive and i move that into other sectors so i look at government and show that a 20-year-old bureaucrat sitting on the desk may not always have the best intentions of

cam release from the incident, sacramento police shared these images.on the left, the replica sig sauerhey say they found ne richard's body, sitting on top of a knife they say he was also carrying. on the right, a picture of a real sig sauer p225.natsot/reporter"i don't see any shot where you can actually see him behind the stairs holding it, pointing it at the officers. is that correct?sgt. vance chandler/sacramento police "in the video footage? that's correct."and with this killing causing so much pain for richards' family...natsot (crying)and such intense outrage...natsot"i'm not afraid of you! i'm not! (bleep) you!"for a community demanding justice for the third young black man they way was killed by city officers in just the last 9 months.still not having a clear picture of what happened in this case is unacceptable. (justine) a devastated texas family is demanding answers-- after one of their own was shot by a dallas police officer, who says she was in the wrong place at the wrong time. this is newley released video of inside the inside of botham jean's apartment. the family's att

cam release from the incident, sacramento police shared these images.on the left, the replica sig sauer pellet gun they say they found near richard's body, sitting on top of a knife they say he was also carrying. on the right, a picture of a real sig sauer p225.natsot/reporter"i don't see any shot where you can actually see him behind the stairs holding it, pointing it at the officers. is that correct?sgt. vance chandler/sacramento police "in the video footage? that's correct."and with this killing causing so much pain for richards' family...natsot (crying)and such intense outrage...natsot"i'm not afraid of you! i'm not! (bleep) you!"for a community demanding justice for the third young black man they way was killed by city officers in just the last 9 months.still not having a clear picture of what happened in this case is unacceptable.tanya faison/black lives matter"in maryland, officers got in trouble for carrying pellet guns around and placing them on bodies after they killed them. i don't trust our police. for the last couple times that they've killed people, they've always put out

we have discovered that we purchased firearms made by colt manufacturing and sig sauer for our law enforcement agents through a variety of distributes, all state police equipment, and adams unlimited. throughout the time we have done this research, we have realized that it's actually quite difficult to find how the city and county of san francisco procures its arms, with who we do them for, and we also learn it had none of these contracts come before any oversight body, including the board of supervisors, and the fact that we purchase guns not that differently from how we purchase post-it notes. the unfortunate reality is as we purchase the very arms that are causing harm and danger on our streets, the reality is that we as a nation are facing an unprecedented epidemic of gun violence, shootings that claim tens of thousands of lives every year, and so our office is joining local, state and other governmental bodies in the united states from colorado, connecticut, florida, maryland, massachusetts, nevada, new jersey, north carolina, ohio, new york new york, pennsylvania, virginia, washington, a

. >> what's the biggest difference between the independent counsel statute which now a dines sauer and the special counsel regulations which are still in effect. >> there are a whole host of differences. the appointment mechanism was different. the removal mechanism was different. the jurisdictional mechanism was different. how justice department policies were different. there were so many different features of that old, independent counsel statute that combined to convince congress that that statute was a mistake, worse than a mistake. really and also showed i think why the statute was inconsistent with our constitutional traditions. >> and the reason for that is because when you create an entity within the federal government, within the executive branch, it is not accountable to anyone. it sounds be a advertising, it sounds appealing to some at the outset to say we're insulating it from political forces. but what that really means is that it's not accountable to anyone. it's not accountable to anyone who is in turn elected. wasn't that the problem that justice scalia was pointing out