who there at this moment i wrote something about the ukrainian air defense, but immediately to the sbbu, let them deal with them, because i do not believe in the coincidence of these things, i do not believe that these posts appeared just like that, so massively, it does not happen like that , this is participation in a russian information company. second, these are the conversations that a whole bunch of non-dobloggers came out of here literally at once, with conversations about how it is necessary to immediately run and give everything, surrender everything to the russians, because look at this, how many more will die. i will remind you, we had already agreed with the russians when we passed the nuclear test weapons, this agreement was called the entire budapest memorandum, where it was written that those countries, signatories of the budapest memorandum, guarantee us the inviolability of our borders and that they and no one else will attack us, and the signatory there was russia, so after that there are no... . other signed documents, agreements, they do not guarantee anything to any

a corresponding statement was made to the sbbu on july 9.this is confirmed by analysts and experts of the bellingkat website. the analysis was carried out by bellingket using personnel and social networks, as well as a 3d model of the missile, shows that the ammunition is russian. this conclusion coincides with the opinion of experts, including faibian hoffmann, phd at the university of oslo, who specializes in missile technology, and dr. jeffrey lewis, an expert on nuclear weapons and missiles at the miltbury institute for international studies in manteria, california. in an email to bellingket, he made a similar conclusion that the kha-101 missile can be seen in footage of the attack published on social networks. in spite of statements and evidence. experts from different parts of the world that it was a russian missile, other versions are being spread in the russian federation. initially , the ministry of foreign affairs of russia began to claim on the x social network that the missile was american-made and that it was launched from a ukr

accordingly, a statement was made to the sbbu on july 9. it analysts and experts of the bellinghet site confirm. an analysis by belling using footage and social media, as well as a 3d model of the missile, shows that the ammunition is... a russian x101 cruise missile. this conclusion coincides with the opinion of experts, including faibian hoffmann, phd at the university of oslo, who specializes in rocket technology. dr. jeffrey lewis, a nuclear weapons and missile expert at the mildbury institute for international studies in monteria, california. in an email to bellingkett did a similar conclusion is that the kha-101 missile can be seen in the footage of the attack published on social networks. despite the statement and. the evidence of experts from different parts of the world that it was a russian missile, the vrf spread other versions. initially, social networks and the ministry of foreign affairs of russia began to claim that the missile was american-made and that it was launched from a ukrainian anti-aircraft missile system. later , r