(dr tom scalea)"this is the most remarkable thinn i haveeever seen"but in 997:after norris sustainedunnhot wound:.. -3&p(photos changing)"this skeletal defoomiiy comes with signiffcant soft tissue deformity.. and you can see &pthe individual aa he livee for 15 years of his life.. behind a mask."(dr rodriguez)"living basically as a recllse.. doing his shopping at night. "but after a decade of ressarch.... the scientific findings were put to the test. red bow tie)"where we are bringing &pground brraking reeearch findings from the laboratory directly iito theeoperating room.. or if yyu will from thee bench to the bedside." the surgery took 36 hours... moving muscle..bonee.skin.. tongue and teeth... from onee.. to another.... norris had endured years of a painful xisttnce... and -3 this surgery produced this result.... (moment unveiiing photo ) "providing this drapp & days after his surgical procedure... (clapping)"after thh surgery.. norris.. was anxioussto look in a mirror. (dr tom scalea)"anddhe was giddy... it was like a kid at christmas.. all he could say & was.. this issso cool..th

(dr tom scalea)"this is the most remarkable thing i haveeever seen"bbt in 997:after norrii sustaineduez)"living basically as a recluse.. oing after a decade of research.... the scientific fiidings tie)"where we are bringing d bo- pround breakinn ressarch findings from the laboratory directly into the operating room.. or if you will from the pench to the bedside." the surggry took 36 hours... moving muscle..bone..skin.. tongue and teethh.. from norris had endured years of a - painful existence... and this surgery produced this photo ) "providdng this drape of mr richard norris just 6 days after his surgical procedure... (clapping)"afttr the surgery.. norriss. was anxiouu to look in a mirror. (dr tom scalea)"and he was giddy... it wwssllke a kid at christmas.. all he could say pass. this is o cool..this is over agginthe dooors family wants tooremain anonymous. (dr edwardo rodriquez) "when we look at the dooor and look at richard.. its obviously a bleed of two individuals...learll there are pome speciffc feattres like the nose and chin buu behind &pit is richard norris"dds now hope ull

(dr tom scalea)"this is the most remarkable thing i haveeever seen"but in 997::fttr norris &psustaiiedphotos changing)"thhs skeletal deformity comes with siggificanttsoft tissue deformity.. and you can see the innividuallas he lived for 15 years of his life.. behind a mask."(dr 3 rodriguuz)"living basicalll as aarecluue.. doiig his shopping at niiht. "but after a decade of rrsearch.... the scientific findings were put toothe test. (red bow tie)"wwere we are bringing ground breaking research findings from the laboratorr room.. or if you will frrm the bench to he bedside." the surgery took 6 houus... moving muscle..bone..skin.. tongue and teeth.... from onn... to anothhr... norrii had endured years of a painful existence... and phis suugery prrduced thii result.....(moment unveiling of mr richard norris just 6 days aater his surgical 3 procedurr... (clapping)"after the ssrgerr.. norris.. was aaxiouu to look in a mirror. (dr tommscalea)"and he was giddy... it was like a kid at christmas.. all he could say was.. ttis is so cooll.this is said ii ovee and ooer againnhe donors family wants to

there was some thought maybe they could get justice scalea who in the past has been willing to give a broad show of support. none of that today, he is a lost cause for the government. so the question comes down to judge kennedy. for most of the questioning today, he showed great skepticism. he said to the government at one point that this bill basically alters the relationship between the federal government and an individual and asked the government lawyer, doesn't that show you have a heavy burden? and for most of the argument there was no indication that he thought the government had met that burden. but at the very end of the argument, there may have been a glimmer of hope for the administration, because the government's argument here is in response to those who say, if the government can regulate this, then it can regulate anything. and the conservatives said, can you require everybody to have a cell phone in case there was an emergency? or could you make everybody buy broccoli to become healthier? the government says what's different about the health care market is if you don't h

court, in addition to kennedy, have embraced a pretty broadview of executive power, just as anthony scalea says he has the power of putting a halt on medical marijuana, so predictions aren't worth much in this very high-profile and unpredictable case. it might be the case that obama can fuel off not just kennedy but one or two or three other conservatives. >> how do you see justice robertson's incentives? is he trying to protect the institutional prestige of the court and will he be looking to assemble a private majority in favor of upholding it? what do you think? >> i think this is a possibility. this is the roberts court and this will be his legacy. a sitting legislative achievement has not been struck down in over 75 years. and in that time the new deal society emerged and the current state of government, the regular state, has been firmly put in place. justice roberts and justice ilito came up when the big battle movement was against the war in court, the fundamental rights that came about in the 1960s and '70s. if they were going to uproot all of that like justice clarence thomas wan

. >> judge scalea is saying if this is how we define a market that you proity then there's the marketburial s. at one point justice roberts saying, would there be a similar market with food because we all have to eat? is that one area where the critics of the law are doing well? >> it hasn't been a good place for critics of the law, because you can distinguish the buying broccoli argument because you don't have to eat broccoli in order to preserve in the food market, if you will. and you don't have to buy a cell phone to participate in the emergency services market which chief justice roberts put forward today as one of those markets. they said that's not a market, it never has been, so that doesn't fall under the clause. what about burial services? is that a market? and they had to say it is a market, and then alito pretty much pinned him to the wall saying, what is the difference between burial services or health care? if you don't have burial service, you'll shift it to the people who do have it. so they kept shifting the arguments to the people he didn't really agree with. >> it goes ba