if i had behaved that way or colonel schafer and undermined a commander, we would be relieved. the president needs to send a signal to the troops on the ground that insubordination from within the uniformed military is not tolerated. >> larry: colonel, when's your side? >> i agree with the captain's assessment of the situation but there's i think mitigating issues. look at world war ii. general patton survived two incidents of slapping troops and saying outlandish things to the press, as well. precedence is there. i don't want to defend general mcchrystal's bad actions but i'm here to say the president has to consider when's best for his strategy and, larry, let me be painfully clear here. for the strategy, break, break, if you go with the strategy the way it is, you have to pick the very best guy with the shot of making it work. now, general mcchrystal is part of the review process that established it last year and from all accounts he's been able to really bring back a lot of internal focus within the forces in afghanistan. yes, he's riled some of the state department folks.