we have a motion by commissioner schmeltzer: -- supervisor mirkarimi. >> approval of the budget for fiscal year 2011-2012. >> this is the second and final vote on the budget. there are no changes to the draft budget. we are asking for the full amount that we are obligated to ask for under state statute which is $334,000. that is back at the general fund, but be allowed to use it. we have enough in the reserve fund to operate for another year. >> any commissioners have questions on item 9? any member of the public that would like to speak on item nine? public comment is closed. this is the second vote if we could have a motion by supervisor mirkarimi, seconded by commissioner pimentel. without objection. we now have the joint regular business for these advances go public utilities commission. o item #3. >> opening remarks in discussion for the joint meeting. >> and i don't know if you would like to say a few words at this point. president vietor: i particularly want to welcome and thank supervisor campos for assuming the chair of the lafco. we really look forward to moving the process forwa

. >> commissioner schmeltzer? >> i had a couple questions about the survey. how long did the survey take per customer? >> on average between 15 and 20 minutes. >> you said at the beginning you completed -- >> 823 interviews. >> were there a number of people who got halfway through and in the start of losing them? did you do anything with that data? >> no, that data is excluded. in any telephone survey, there are some respondents who get three or four questions in or the need to go for some reason or another. we do not include the data. the data is only for the fully completed surveys. the rate at which phone service participants terminated in the middle of the interview is no different from what we have seen in surveys in the past. it falls right in the middle of the range. >> that is good. i think others covered my other questions. >> if i may follow up on the survey itself, how did you decide how many people to include in the survey? was that based on what is typical for this kind of a survey? >> typically most surveys we do in the city of san francisco, we

we a motion by commissioner mirkarimi, seconded by commissioner schmeltzer. can we cake that without action? call item number three. >> report on the status of cca activities, san francisco pratch, legislative update and continuing status. supervisor campos: and mr. campbell, good afternoon. >> thank you, mr. chair and commissioners. my name is mike campbell, director of the city's cca program, which is commonly referred to as clean power sf. i see you have a full house. i am assuming they are not here for me. i will try to be brief. supervisor campos: you don't know that. [laughter] >> i don't, but i am guessing. three broad areas that i will be reporting out on. the status of negotiations, what is going on. a key decision made in the cp are uc? regulatory matters and efforts under way in the legislature. first off, not a long part of the report, but i do want to let you all know that we continue to make very good progress with our negotiations with shell. we expect to further the energy supply. they are very excited about it out in the ro tunch un -- row to