for more on the effects of a global more warming we're joined by climate researcher carl friedrich schweizer from climate analytics at the nonprofit climate policy institute and he is in bonn for the u.n. meeting mr slicer thank you very much for joining us we saw in that report how a lot of americans believe that climate change is a hoax and that scientific findings haven't really been able to convince everyone that it is manmade so how clear is the evidence really. the evidence and climate change that it's manmade is absolutely clear is on every vocal that humans are causing this chain change and we see it all over the globe we see ice sheets melting the sea marine heat of a sea of unprecedented scale you see extreme events occurring that we have never had before the evidence is the evidence base for this statement is absolutely clear and there's no doubt from a scientific perspective on that so it's unequivocal you're saying and the u.n. is also reporting that two thousand and seventeen is on course to be one of the three hottest years on record it's also been a year of extreme weather as

lou: the man who started it owl, peter schweizer.sed on his best-selling book, clinton cash. great to have you with us. let's start with the mueller probe. did you ever in your wildest imagination consider that nierl would be going after the justice department documents, the very same people he reports to who will oversight over the special counsel? this is becoming a farce. >> lou, we talked about this several times before. i was in favor of the russia probe in the beginning to clear the record. but this thing has clearly gone well beyond the scope. lou: i believed fbi charges would ensue just based on your accounting and reports in "clinton cash." >> i agree. all i asked for in the "clinton cash" situation was an fbi investigation. the fbi the field offices went to the obama department of justice asking for subpoenas and powers to investigate first and they were blocked. and that's where it has been stuck since then. the if fbi field offices are eager it's been blocked by headquarters. now that congress has committees looking into

lou: we're over, but, in talking with peter schweizer author of clinton cash. >> a great guy. lou: one of the most successful and productive and important investigative reporters that involved in any of this, setting much in motion. >> absolutely. lou: last week i asked him, are the following people dirty and crooked. i will ask you if i may. is jeff sessions crooked? >> i don't believe show, i believe he is a man of integrity, i think he is overwhelmed and neutralized by justice department deep state. lou: robert mueller? >> i are reason to suspect and question his integritiy and also his honesty, particularly in light of the events and activities going on back to uranium one, 2009 and there after. lou: james comey. >> he is a man who absconded with u.s. record and willfully leaked them, he is a criminal in my opinion. lou: andrew mccabe. >> a man wildly conflicted. there is evidence -- we just got 79 pages more new pages just in last day with respect to mr. mccabe, he is wildly conflicted, you know his wife was a political operative. lou: and andrew weisman, as well? >> yeah

"clinton cash" author peter schweizer joins us next to tell us what he thinks of the doings to this pointd whether or not they are going to lock her up. we'll be right ♪ dad: we walk inside... and it's raining... our home was ruined... we couldn't live there. mom: our first concern was the kids. this was going to be hard on them. chubb got us a place to stay in the same school district. otherwise it could have been a nightmare. dad... chubb turned a disaster into an adventure for our kids. mom... and no one missed a day of school. ♪ (♪light musical cords) lou: the man who started it owl, peter schweizer. executive producer of the documentary, "clinton cash" which is based on his best-selling book, clinton cash. great to have you with us. let's start with the mueller probe. did you ever in your wildest imagination consider that nierl would be going after the justice department documents, the very same people he reports to who will oversight over the special counsel? this is becoming a farce. >> lou, we talked about this several times before. i was in favor of the russia probe in the beginn

have you know official schweizer. is. only. going to describe. that the case for ever. commit sort of putin. today after staring. at them what. you. said i think is you think me sitting in. so. was. it. when you teach people. to. live. and if we need. to see the world. and particularly the. ministry be this is it. the first. time where you. only. did it. still feel. sort of physical and if you do. need. business. everything. started doing less and then close the show after like a couple of months so. that's not easy. because. i've been living like washing my hands doing. learning from them and. doing other big. hours not a word like i didn't have that. in me but i was very wrong because i'm doing very well. finished. hope possible to needed to build. the took at one after he took a whole ton of done by. a fifty five kid from a local negotiate in a strong. family values. roughly you have a good measure of stability or is he just was do the feel of the knowledge that you yourself are the british people don't think i'm going to come to that it is also because it is what i

from the government accountability institute peter schweizer. good evening, peter. >> hey, judge.reat to see you. >> judge: good to see you as well. when your book first came out in 2015, you know, did you ever wonder why in 2015 there wasn't an automatic investigation, you know, by congress, by the fbi, by the justice department and because, peter, when i read that book, we covered it here. i covered it on justice. i mean, it was explosive. your facts were uncontroverted. and, yet, hillary clinton says, you know, it was a false charge. it was, you know, it was controverted by, you know, press reports. i mean, what was -- what is she talking about? >> yeah. it's certainly not the way that i recall it. look, you know, the book came out in april of 2015. the uranium one story we shared before the book became public with the investigative unit at the "new york times." they ran a 4,000 word front page piece confirming the findings, the hidden donations, the cfius approval, the clinton's connection to this drama. really after the book came out, judge, the fbi did launch an investigatio

peter schweizer brought up great points. we have evidence already.is just more evidence, and if they don't call for an investigation, i think a lot of americans will be asking why. >> jeanine: you know what? and i feel -- i really fee feel -- it's not the prosecutor in me, i just think the american people have had it. it's not right. if there is something to -- and you've got these pieces that need to be looked at, the fact that no one is looking at them, i mean, congress could look at it, but congress doesn't have a grand jury. and any way, i have to say thanks so much for being with us air isa and charlie and coming -- sara and charlie, and coming up, hillary clinton is still whining about last year's election. she just can't seem to accept president donald trump beat her fair and square. we're going to play you her remarks. that and more when this special edition of "hannity" continues. you're going to love it. stay with us. >> jeanine: between -- >> between the republicans and the depression you talked about and russian interference, do you think

from the government accountability institute peter schweizer. good evening, peter. >> hey, judge. to see you. >> judge: good to see you as well. when your book first came out in 2015, you know, did you ever wonder why in 2015 there wasn't an automatic investigation, you know, by congress, by the fbi, by the justice department and because, peter, when i read that book, we covered it here. i covered it on justice. i mean, it was explosive. your facts were uncontroverted. and, yet, hillary clinton says, you know, it was a false charge. it was, you know, it was controverted by, you know, press reports. i mean, what was -- what is she talking about? >> yeah. it's certainly not the way that i recall it. look, you know, the book came out in april of 2015. the uranium one story we shared before the book became public with the investigative unit at the "new york times." they ran a 4,000 word front page piece confirming the findings, the hidden donations, the cfius approval, the clinton's connection to this drama. really after the book came out, judge, the fbi did launch an investigation. a

where did the money peter schweizer talked about and what was the times as it relates to uranium one,us and clinton foundation? >> well, we certainly know, sean, there has been a number of concerns here. i mean, from the 145 million which came from members of the board that were connected to uranium one, and if i want to go back just really quick because the apko store is very important. they signed that contract in april of 2010. so that was before the cps process went through later that october so this was very important and the informant made this clear to his attorney. john is 100 percent right on that. this is something he is expected to testify to. let's go back to the money. look at the money trail, how did they move this money? where wars the money moved to? how did they get into the clinton foundation. special counsel or prosecutor meads to look into this. right now we know there are four different committees on the hill looking into this. the judicial committee, oversthit committee the house foreign affairs. it's going to require somebody with the know how and capability to

let's go back to peter schweizer's book clinton cash.fraid of. either a special counsel or a prosecutor looking into this can really follow the money. that's what they need to do over $140 million that went into the clinton foundation into those covers and there is other people coming out of the woodwork now who want to address this issue. ed: yeah. >> the leadership in kazakhstan. people who have direct evidence of what was happening during that i am too. i say let an investigation pursue and see where it leads. ed: sara, quick refresher and let's push forward on what's really new here. for our viewers, the fbi in the obama years was already investigating uranium one. there were allegations of racketeering and bribery as i recall it russians trying to buy influence here in the u.s. they were looking at whether there was influence with clinton foundation money speech money that went to former president bill clinton. they had an confidential informant and what's new is the justice department is letting congress in the weeks ahead talk to

brian: her defenders say nine other agencies had to sign off on it peter schweizer wrote about this at two years ago in his book clinton cash which was picked up and excerpted by the "new york times." listen how he answers hillary clinton. >> we know for a fact the fbi has in its possession another tape, an audiotape that was basically recorded by this fbi informant that's going to be coming forward. i have not heard the tape, but i have heard about the tape from people at the fbi. and that audiotape apparently is russian officials with this uranium company talking about making donations to the clinton foundation to gain favorable action. that tape was given to department of justice prosecutors. the fbi field office requesting the ability to wiretap and to survey the clinton foundation. the obama justice department came back and said nope, not enough evidence. brian: wow. when we find out who that fbi informant is, it's going to be key. that would change everything. i just cannot believe that hillary clinton is still on her book tour. steve: what else does she have to do? brian: i have

brian: you knew nothing about this until peter schweizer's book come out. >> schweizer did a great jobtry to get these documents. i'll telling you that deep state, they just lock down. they will not cough it up. even to this day, even with all the press and attention, you have people like ron dee dee san tis and trey gowdy trying to get these documents and they still won't cough them up. we are still fighting from getting documents from fast and furious, the irs. just because the administration changed does not mean that the bureaucracy changed. steve: this particular. >> we started this investigation a long time ago. even when i was back as chairman. steve: the deal was approved in 2010. >> um-huh. steve: this guy, the confidential fbi informant was telling the fbi what was going on at least a year earlier. there are a number of media outlets and john solomon calls them out and says there is misinformation out there that obviously has been put right in front of certain reporters to get a certain angle out on the story. >> and when the department of justice says oh, we gave congress th

could this be something we talked about a year and a half ago with the publishing of peter schweizer'swhen the first uranium one sales and state department okay with that? yes it is. ainsley: asked justice department for special counsel. they wanted to investigate hillary rodham clinton for uranium one and her foundation for allegedly breaking the law. well, the doj responded yesterday in a letter. steve: aapparently jeff sessions has directed his senior prosecutors to evaluate certain issues that have been raised by the republicans in congress. the republicans in congress sent the department of justice letters in july and in september. and they said hey, we think a bunch of laws have been zone here. we're talking about criminal referral from the department to the department of justice from the congress. representative jim jordan, who is on the house oversight committee, says this is why there is a potential for a special counsel which, by the way, the attorney general has left open that possibility. >> what we do know is what you brought up, laura, james comey called the investigation

. >> peter schweizer has been following the developments at the beginning and troy does now.r having me. pete: break this down for us. is this the type of thing where there is enough evidence despite the campaign may say to get this investigation going? >> absolutely. in very simple terms you have this uranian company that acquired uranium assets in kazakhstan with the help of the clintons and then acquired uranium assets in the united states, 20% of our known assets and then they wanted to sell themselves to the russian state atomic nuclear agency. in the midst of all of this the clinton foundation received $145 million in donations from nine to shareholders in that company and a lot of that money came why the deal was going down. the question is where those donations related to the federal approval of this deal and really the only word we have is hillary clinton saying i was not involved in this decision. let's be blunt about it. she has been known to lie about a lot of things in the past and that's why i say we need to have an independent investigation to look at this and