scott bolden -- >> scott came out swinging this morning. >> a little wisdom for you this morning. >>hank you for it. she is a fire brand, always has been, for a president who ran on unity and cooling the rhetoric, was she the wrong temperament, tone, choice, to start with? >> these are political tweets, if you will. and news flash, the other scott, they did, they did hack into our systems. they did attack our democracy. that's hardly a conspiracy. that's for real. >> are you suggesting they changed the vote totals? are you suggesting that russia changed the vote totals? >> i certainly know they attacked democracy. >> let me just for the purpose of fact, there is no evidence that they changed the vote totals. there is no evidence the vote totals were changed in twikts teen. scott bolden, continue. >> she certainly has a right to political tweets and let me just say this, it smacks of sexism. madison did support kavanaugh, the most controversial justices we have, and let's be real clear, donald trump attacked everyone and senators, a few democrats, including the senator from west virgi

democratic party and trial and white collar criminal defense attorney scott bolden welcome to the program what did you make of the opening salvos. well i thought the democrats did an incredible job it was an extraordinary presentation not only in words and defense of the constitution and the constitutionality of the appeasement trial but also with video you know jurors and he said there's a sin in his jurors as well as witnesses jurors light seen things touching things seen things on a whiteboard and this video was so powerful with the juxtaposition of donald trump's words and didn't literally watching that crowd that front problem january 6th go to the capital and attack it with 5 people were killed attack the least in the language that was used it was just a partial presentation compound bursley with the republican lawyers trump lawyers they simply were on matched or no match for this type of piece of trial work at the senate they were. just simply ineffectual if i say so and work prepare they didn't really hit the r. he meant which is the 1st amendment argument that his words did not c