we'll be live in washington shortly — but first let's get some analysis from scott lucas — who's professor studies at the university of birmingham. thank you very much indeed for joining us. the people here in the uk who have not followed all the twists and turns of this very complex affair, just tell us exactly what is memo says, what have we learned from? well, put simply, there is a political attempts, through this memo to discredit the fbi, and to hold the trump russian investigation before it reaches donald trump, which could be quite soon. now, to do that, it's claimed the fbi was biased in getting surveillance of a tramp campaign adviser, a man named carter page, in 0ctober adviser, a man named carter page, in october 2000 adviser, a man named carter page, in 0ctober200016. the problem for the memo, and for the trump cab, is that it rests on a flawed assumption, it argues that the fbi can appealed to the top secret government courts to get the word, resting on a private intelligence dossier, and collected bya intelligence dossier, and collected by a former mi6 agent, christopher ste