scott miller though, complained of too much negativity.ge is typical, with grim warnings from unnamed think tanks that the nhs cannot survive without radical change". meanwhile, sam datta was a satisfied customer last week. "great to see all the bbc live coverage of the amazing things the nhs does on its 75th birthday". well, let's speak to the health editorfor bbc news, hugh pym. thank you for coming to the newswatch studio. the birthday cake, the singing, some viewers feel that that on the news a quasi—religious status for the nhs isn't right when there are really serious problems, and you should be examining them more. is that a fair criticism? well, that piece you used a clip from, which i did on the day. yes, we did start with the westminster abbey service. i should say it had 1500 nhs staff there, as well as all the main political parties, and there was royal representation as well. so it was quite an important moment to at least note. but i did say, pretty quickly, it comes at a time of intense strain on the service and services und

just before we came on your air, that nelson peltz is giving big to super pac supporting tim scott, and millernd a few other wall street executives are hosting tim scott in the hamptons this coming month in august. there's some similar names also getting behind chris christie and his super pac, a new filing that came out moments before i came on air. some of the bigger, wealthier players, some on wall street, and elsewhere are putting their money and positioning themselves with candidates not necessarily donald trump or ron desantis desantis has big money but some big money donors are moving away from him and he's struggling to gain traction against donald trump, as are other candidates. >> where, by contrast, does former president trump stand in terms of moneys raised >> donald trump's campaign at the end of the second quarter raised the most out of the other candidates i'm pretty confident of that most of that money was from small dollar donors. it was not from the wealthier financiers we see supporting the other candidates, the tim scotts of the world, the chris christies of the world this

quick service relate to plans plan a one is done by scott miller subordinate that central command owns it. the withdrawal of u.s. military forces that was done by july 3 and fourth was zero casualties all u.s. military quote was taken out the military equipment your reef it 7 billion according comment that was transferred over course of years that a 6 billion that is 20 years worth of military commitment trash transferred to the afghan not u.s. military leaving that equipment. that's a little bit of a mischaracterization out there. $7 billion worth of military climate that is transferred to the afghan security forces will apply because afghan security course was resolved. plan a was was u.s. military to parts or so they did. and that we had to secure the embassy at 700 personnel. you cannot secure with seven or personnel precursor take 8002 secure percussive due respect sir. the withdrawal plan. [inaudible] >> my point is they have been strategic mistakes made over 20 years and i can point every one of them there is a huge amount of mistakes it. >> of my question is how we held anybody

scott miller, though, complained of too much negativity: meanwhile, sam datta was a satisfied customerve difference to people's lives. reflecting on that, but certainly looking to the future with all the huge challenges that there are right now. equally, there are other viewers, you won't be surprised to hear, who feel the bbc is far too negative about the nhs. how would you answer them? well, i think the comments we've heard are we're not being critical enough or we're being too critical, and i think we need to reflect on those. but it shows there are differing views. there were two reports from think tanks in the run—up to the anniversary and on the day itself, the main health think tanks which broadly concluded that — and these think tanks are very much for the idea of an nhs — that it was in a critical situation, services were under extreme pressure, it was underperforming on outcomes like heart attacks and strokes, but that there was rock solid support for it. so what do we do from here? so i suppose we're just noting comment out there, and we hear a lot from staff on the front li

scott would react to any aggression against it's allied bella roost, and potent accused nato member, poland, of having territorial ambitions in the our soviet union. earlier today, paul, when it announced as miller tree is read a point more units closer to his border with bella, ruth, for having already done so earlier this month. and it was after reports of russia's wagner, mercenary group training, fellow russian soldiers, both russia and poland, share a border with sellers, and put in warrant that so called aggression against fellers would be considered an attack on russia. let's say it's a deal or not. so by the research that is part of the union state and a leasing aggression against batteries will be in aggression against the russian federation. we will respond to this even more the means at our disposal. earlier i asked me how barnowski managing director for the german marshall fund east. how big of a threat wagner mercenaries posed to poland, russia and belle. it was or creating a vocation by creating this exercise is by moving more on 5 year trips to dollars out. i'm, i'm normally placed anywhere in the worst of paula. and so i'm speaking to you from washington because i'm on a visit, b

scott of south carolina. the "financial times" reporting billionaires are rebacking their concerns over desantis' concerns that he's geared too far right. joining us, tim millerons director to jeb bush in 2016, and "usa today" susan paige. . eugene robinson. and what do they need to do to reimagine it and he was considered the trump alternative? >> he was. and with the elevator pitch last christmas after the midterms, saying i can be aware. i needs a maga policy, if you want, but actually effective in putting them through. that was a compelling elevator pitch for republican primary voters. but the devil has been in the details for them. and going to trump's right on the cultural issues and just pussyfoot around trump on the electability questions, on the questions of his legal challenges that he's going to face next year. that argument has been deflated, right? and if the republican primary voters, if they're looking at somebody and they're like i'm going to run to trump's right on cultural issues, not demonstrate that i can stand up to him on electability matters, on legal matters who is that primary for? it's very reminisce center of the ted cruz campaign f