scott sanchez, planning department. the property at 521 los palmos is within the h1 zoning district and the subject application was committed in may of 2016 and underwent section 311 neighborhood notice between april and may 2017. during that time one discretionary review was fired at 517 los palmos. during this time the planning department residential design team reviewed the application and made suggested changes all of which the project sponsor adopt and implemented. the planning commission heard the d.r. earl yer this year on july 12 and unanimously denied the discretionary review and i a proved the permit. and the appeal that is before you is not by the same party that filed the discretionary review, but by property owner to the rear on melrose. the project is completely code compliant and that concludes my presentation. >> there is no variances or exceptions in this project? >> nope. >> and is the scope of the project the max build or could they have gone large sner >> they could have gone larger because there is

[laughter] >> scott sanchez, planning departments. so first in regards to the address, 125 vista is the address that is closest, the close doors close as property to this poll. when these applications go in, we go by the closest property. in this case, it is a through lot between turk and there is no address on turk that would correlate to the location of this poll. it further confuse people. if we gave an address on turk, it would be an address across the street. that i can see the confusion here. i cannot speak to the permit holder and the use of baker, but that is how it got to that convention. which is confusing. i was confused too. i was looking at all the questions at all the pictures. >> we just had an appeal on that block at our last hearing. >> so the planning department, they did properly review the subject application. the tier be noticing it is on an excellent street. i can put on the map on the overhead. could i have the overhead, please. there we go. so the subjects is located right about here. there is a small line whic

scott sanchez, planning department. one of the benefits of the a.d.u. process is the unit that is created out of that is rent controlled if the building itself is subject to rent control, and i believe this building would are subject to rent control, and the a.d.u. unit would be a rent controlled unit. there's no guarantee that a unit that is not built under the a.d.u. unit would be rent controlled. it's my understanding that in 2015, the appellant sought approval for condo conversion of the property as a three-unit condo conversion. i don't know that that has been completed or not, and how this would impact that. certainly, we look at this process, we created this process to create new housing. this is an opportunity to create new housing and to have new rent controlled housing if and when there's a future proposal, there's no guarantee there will be a future proposal for the front building, they can use whatever processes are available to them at that time. >> okay. i've got a question. so, you know, the a.d.u. is pretty new, and there's been a lot of

we expect scott sanchez representing the plot a department and planning commission, joseph duffy, senior building inspector, chris buck, urban -- urban forest or, and tricky, and the board meeting guidelines are as follows. we request you turn off or silence all phones and electronic devices so they will not disturb the proceedings. carry out proceedings in the hallway. the rules of presentation are as follows. appellants, permit holders, and department respondents are given seven minutes to present their case and three minutes for rebuttal. people affiliated with these parties must include their comments within the seven or three minute .-period-paragraph members of the public were not affiliated have up to three minutes each to address the board and no rebuttal. at the president's discussion, he can limit public comment to two minutes depending on the volume of speakers. please speak into the microphone to assist the board and accurate preparation, your aspen are required to submit a speaker card or business card to board staff when you come up to speak. speaker cards are available on

sanchez. >> good evening, deputy chief connolly. >> good evening, vice president mazzucco, members of the commission, chief scott. ke connolly from the bureau of investigations. with me is director john sanchez from the forensic services department. he's going to be reporting out semiannual reporting out of replies commission resolution 1648 and we report out semiannually. the data collection period for this report commenced on july 1, 2018 and concluded on december 31, 2018. the number of central assault evidence kits collected during this period was 162. there were 12 late submissions to the crime lab, and again, the resolution calls for the kits to be submitted within five days. the reason for these late notifications -- excuse me -- to the crime lab were primarily due to outside jurisdictions and federal holidays, so we had outside jurisdictions submitting evidence outside of chain of command, but that didn't impact the testing period. the number of sexual assault evidence kits processed by the lab was all of them, and they were within 120 days. the average turnaround time for the kits was 45 days. it was a si

sanchez, pelosi. arbanes, pelosi. scalise, mccarthy. scanlon, pelosi. chakowsky, pelosi. chiff, pelosi. schneider, pelosi. chroeder -- schrader, fudge. schreyer -- schrier, pelosi. chweikert, mccarthy. ustin scott, mccarthy. david scott, pelosi. scott of virginia, pelosi. sensenbrenner, mccarthy. serrano, pelosi. sewell of alabama, pelosi. shalala, pelosi. sherman, pelosi. herrill, bustos. shimkus, mccarthy. simpson, mccarthy. sires, pelosi. lotkin, present. smith of missouri, mccarthy. smith of nebraska, mccarthy. smith of new jersey, mccarthy. smith of washington, pelosi. .mucker, mccarthy oto, pelosi. panberger, bustos. spano, mccarthy. pelosi. stanton, pelosi. stauber, mccarthy. tefanik, mccarthy. steil, mccarthy. steube, mccarthy. stevens, pelosi. stewart, mccarthy. stivers, mccarthy. suozzi, pelosi. walwell of california, pelosi. pelosi. aylor, mccarthy. pelosi. of california, thompson of mississippi, pelosi. thompson of pennsylvania, mccarthy. hornberry, mccarthy. timmons, mccarthy. ipton, mccarthy. pelosi. pelosi. tlaib, tonko, pelosi. orres of california, pelosi. torres small of new mexico, pelosi. rahan, pelosi. trone, pelosi. urner, mccarthy. underwood, pelosi. upton, mccarthy. mr. v

sanchez, pelosi. arbanes, pelosi. scalise, mccarthy. scanlon, pelosi. chakowsky, pelosi. chiff, pelosi. schneider, pelosi. chroeder -- schrader, fudge. schreyer -- schrier, pelosi. chweikert, mccarthy. ustin scott, mccarthy. david scott, pelosi. scott of virginia, pelosi. sensenbrenner, mccarthy. serrano, pelosi. sewell of alabama, pelosi. shalala, pelosi. sherman, pelosi. herrill, bustos. shimkus, mccarthy. simpson, mccarthy. sires, pelosi. lotkin, present. smith of missouri, mccarthy. smith of nebraska, mccarthy. smith of new jersey, mccarthy. smith of washington, pelosi. .mucker, mccarthy oto, pelosi. panberger, bustos. spano, mccarthy. pelosi. stanton, pelosi. stauber, mccarthy. tefanik, mccarthy. steil, mccarthy. steube, mccarthy. stevens, pelosi. stewart, mccarthy. stivers, mccarthy. suozzi, pelosi. walwell of california, pelosi. pelosi. aylor, mccarthy. pelosi. of california, thompson of mississippi, pelosi. thompson of pennsylvania, mccarthy. hornberry, mccarthy. timmons, mccarthy. ipton, mccarthy. pelosi. pelosi. tlaib, tonko, pelosi. orres of california, pelosi. torres small of new mexico, pelosi. rahan, pelosi. trone, pelosi. urner, mccarthy. underwood, pelosi. upton, mccarthy. mr. v