scott sanchez. >> scott sanchez, this really is an item related to the previous case and it's been more than two months since the board has had santa can a and hopefully the board will be complete again and have a new commissioner to round out the board so we can assure that the permits are fairly and efficiently processed so i look forward to hopefully getting news of a new appointment some time soon. thank you. >> thank you. is there any general public comment, please, raise your hand. i don't see any other hands. so we will move on to item number 2. commissioner comments and questions. >> none here. >> we will move on to item number 3. for discussion and possible adoption are the minutes of the june 9th, 2021 meeting. >> motion to approve those minutes. >> is there any public comment on vice president swig's motion to adopt the minutes? please raise your hand. i don't see any public comment. on that motion, commissioner lazarus. >> aye. >> president honda. >> aye. >> commissioner chang. >> aye. >> so that motion carries 4-0 and the minutes are adopted so we're now moving on to item n

scott sanchez, planning department. the subject property at 1555 oak street, in this case, unit four in the building is located in an rn-2 zoning district, it's to change it from a two bedroom, one bathroom to a three bedroom-two bath with kitchen and dining area was submitted in november 2019. in june 2020, planning department reviewed the application. there was a b.b.n. notice request, which was performed. the b.b.n. requester was not the appellant in this matter. the planning department approved the project in november 2020. it's not a landmark building or -- but it was noted in a 1991 landmark survey. they're taking what is maybe an exit area that goes onto the firescape and replacing that with a proper window from the current condition. generally, when you have buildings that are historic buildings, you're looking at interior spaces that may be considered historic, they're generally areas that are publicly accessible, so city hall has landmark interior because it's publicly accessible. in some cases, you have movie

scott sanchez, planning department. so couple items in response to commissioner swig's question about the a.b.c. referral. i did look up the referral that he received, and really, it is -- it's one page with very little information on it, just that it was seeking a type 48 license. [inaudible]. >> in response to -- i think one of the appellants had a question about the b.b.n. because i was going to mention that. b.b.n. would be the process -- i think if anyone is interested about future permits on the property to sign up for b.b.n. because that would give you notice of permits that would not otherwise require notification such as the t.u.a., the temporary use authorization. there was one that expired on this property last year. if you had the b.b.n., you would have the ability to get notice of temporary use authorization, and one temporary use authorization is needed. it would cover the one-year period, and it would authorize one per month, and if we received complaints or it was being used more than once per month, we

just like i see on the 1979 map that scott sanchez finally ok'd it.obably incorporates our first rezoning, of course. the m.c.d. rezoning that was initiated by the planning department and also the van ness rezoning height, which were for 130 foot height out of california street, one lot along van ness. nowhere else. it does not incorporate -- [bell ringing] -- rezoning that were subsequently submitted by us and by north of market planning coalition. i should not see 130-foot height. i don't understand that. one of the supervisors eventually submitted a plan which i assume are reflected this the map to cover areas that were not incorporated in our 65 foot height limit for market planning coalition. maybe there were -- [bell ringing] -- mapping errors at the time, i don't know, but we need to follow up. >> jonas: thanks, ms. chapman. that is your time. i have heard from staff directly as you were making your comments that claude ina will reach out to you. samantha is no longer with the department which is why you were calling a number that may not have

scott sanchez, deputy zoning director and patrick duffy, senior building inspector.der, and developers are given seven minutes to present andee

scott sanchez with the planning department, jeff duffy, acting deputy dirr,

scott sanchez, deputy zoning director and patrick duffy, senior building inspector. permit holder, and developers are given seven minutes to present and t

scott sanchez with the planning

scott sanchez with the planning department, jeff duffy, acting deputy director, carla short, and stephen bureau of urban forestry. now, let me see. someone can go on mute please. the board meeting guidelines are as follows. turn off or silence all phones

now i am still communicating with scott sanchez and the director about the fact that i have not gottenr than 22 lots. we're talking about wide areas, and also reduced 65 feet period. other areas were reduced to 80 feet, so why am i seeing buildings 130 feet built, for example, or proposed, 80 or 90 feet? nob hill neighbors submitted 5,000 signatures to cover the entire area where you're building high-rises at 65 feet. now, with the covid situation, we have not been able to have a meeting again. is that my time? >> clerk: indeed, it is, miss chapman. >> thank you. >> clerk: thank you. >> hello. good afternoon, it's georgia schiutish. i sent a bunch of pictures up on the screen, and i think it shows what's going on in the local neighborhoods. first one was laurel, and the second and third slide are the project during the demo, and there are no democalcs for it, and the fourth slide shows it for sale basically at a monster asking price of 4.8 million with an expanded master plan, and i want to point out that it was a three-bedroom home on a single level before it was expanded. the fifth w

. >> senator scott has agreed to temporarily postpone his questions so that senator rosen can ask questions who has another meeting to get to right away. i want to thank mr. sanchezor being here today and i've really enjoyed speaking with both of you earlier this week share gonzalez i appreciated the chance to discuss the qualified and responsible agents over the last few years. it's important to maintain high standards for the personnel and during the hiring process to reduce the chance of corruption and misconduct which have plagued the agency in the past. worst case scenario, reporting revealed that the company's at the detention center were actively participating with interest in starting a white supremacist i group as well. this is unacceptable with the underrepresented minority and vulnerable undocumented communities. going forward how will you ensure they properly screen for individuals that have raised or are frankly other dangers and ideologies and what are your plans to conduct the needs assessment to identify those needed improvements in both recruiting and retention? >> thank you, senator. i think obviously maintaining a workforce that has the highest