40
40
tv
eye 40
favorite 0
quote 0
year while now buzz feed has revealed more details that could make this story much more serious scott shane the author of the new york times piece that shed light on what the democrats were at an alabama last year it turns out spoke at an off the record event of that very same group behind project birmingham none of that was mentioned in his article though mr shane explained he thought that wasn't necessary i don't think there's any kind of disclosure that's relevant so i'm happy to be corrected if you've been to meet with intelligence or defense official of an off the record meeting it's always a tradeoff as to what the ground rules of whether you get something useful for your readers and in this case i did get something useful well what's even more important is the question why the event the new york times journalists took part in happened back in september however the article only came out ten days ago there will be people wondering why it took mr shane three months to write about this plus buzz feed is now citing a report with assessments and conclusions of how well project birmingham w
year while now buzz feed has revealed more details that could make this story much more serious scott shane the author of the new york times piece that shed light on what the democrats were at an alabama last year it turns out spoke at an off the record event of that very same group behind project birmingham none of that was mentioned in his article though mr shane explained he thought that wasn't necessary i don't think there's any kind of disclosure that's relevant so i'm happy to be...
28
28
tv
eye 28
favorite 0
quote 0
scott shane started the domino effect by writing about the whole false like scheme in the new york times a week later another outlet reveals his scoop was from way back in september when he was invited to speak at an off the record event for the group behind the project but the journalist didn't see it thing about that in his article i don't think there's any kind of disclosure that's relevant so i'm happy to be corrected it's always a tradeoff as to what the ground rules of whether you get something useful for your readers journalists also eventually got hold of a report assessing how well the scheme worked and it the experts don't call it an experiment like scott shane did the journalists also wrote that the whole thing was likely too small to have a significant effect on the race compare that to these words enormous effect on the turnout that's the phrasing from the report from. the venture cost one hundred thousand bucks pennies compared to the money usually splashed out on campaigns but that doesn't take responsibility of the man who stumped up the bill reid hoffman billionaire co-f
scott shane started the domino effect by writing about the whole false like scheme in the new york times a week later another outlet reveals his scoop was from way back in september when he was invited to speak at an off the record event for the group behind the project but the journalist didn't see it thing about that in his article i don't think there's any kind of disclosure that's relevant so i'm happy to be corrected it's always a tradeoff as to what the ground rules of whether you get...
37
37
tv
eye 37
favorite 0
quote 0
while now bus is revealing some other details which could make this story much more serious because scott shane the author of the new york times article which originally shed light on what the democrats were up to and alabama last year he actually turned out to speak out an event for the very same group that was behind it and that happened back in september however none of this was disclosed in his own new york times article while mr sheen says he thought it wasn't necessary to do that i don't think there's any kind of disclosure that's relevant so i'm happy to be corrected if you've been to meet with intelligence or defense officials i've been off the record meeting it's always a tradeoff as to what the ground rules of whether you get something useful for your readers and in this case i did get something useful. well what's even more important here is the question why that very event happened in september but as we know the new york times article came out ten days ago only so why this kind of times that's more than three months plus bus feeders also sign some kind of report they say that they'
while now bus is revealing some other details which could make this story much more serious because scott shane the author of the new york times article which originally shed light on what the democrats were up to and alabama last year he actually turned out to speak out an event for the very same group that was behind it and that happened back in september however none of this was disclosed in his own new york times article while mr sheen says he thought it wasn't necessary to do that i don't...