also, i am with the sda. here's just a few things i need to say that i have come to you about several of these things, and i just want to give an overview of what i say. we have a housing crisis, and seniors and disabled have become a -- are becoming homeless for longer. we have a lack of beds for people with severe mental health challenges, we have a lack of service for people with severe drug use, we know that when police or the point of entry, escalations with mental health and crisis can go up. how does this bill improve all of these issues? until those questions are answered, we cannot move forward with s.b. 1045. i oppose this because we have not figured it out and i oppose it because at the end of the day , i know it is hard, and i know it is a hard decision, but we cannot approve this. we need to find a better solution. thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> hello i'm -- we stand in opposition to any expansion of conservatorship. thank you. >> thank you. next speaker. >> hi, i am with stop

>> that bailout was to the tune of up to $12 billion of the of the sda to farmers caught in the middle of a trade war. we're hearing a second relief package, a bail out if you wish coming the direction of farmers. pretty soon, in fact sources are telling me that this could potentially happen at some point this week from the trump administration. here is guidance we're getting from the spokesperson from the usda, details on the new trade mitigation program will be forthcoming shortly. we want to be clear that the problem is being designed to avoid excusing planting decisions one way or the other. the administration has yet to provide details though the president floated possibility of buying $15 billion of products for farmers, delivering it as aid to other countries in response to china's latest batch of retaliatory tariffs. >> we love our farmers. we take care of our farmers. our farmers have been incredible. no country can get in the way of our farmers. our farmers are great patriots. they have done a fantastic job. our farmers will be well-taken care of. reporter: breaking news out

my name is michael majors, i'm here for sda. no one here is arguing that there's not a great need here for some sort of mental evaluation, but this bill is not it. it'it's two steps back instead f one forward. the point being that 50% of the people who end up on the street in homelessness because of the financial situation here in san francisco, we'r were not crazy e they got there. they were driven crazy by going on the street. just getting them off the street will decrease the problem by itself. you're talking about the worst of the worst cases here, these people here. and that's a minority of the whole problem that we're facing here. as you pointed out yourself, at least i heard that in your text. i do appreciate your attention. basically, i'm opposed to the fellow that just spoke because i see this as just a bunch of confusing numbers and we need more than that for the homeless. we need some -- you talk about humanity. it's humane to widen the net so there's less support and you bring in more people that we already don't hav