there was no action on the part to move the law of the sea. the obama administration's 2009 treaty priority list listed no emphasis on the law of the sea, listing it among 17 treaties among which action was supported. to my knowledge, the only mention of law of the sea by the president in the first two years was one like in his executive order covering policies which was issued on july 19, 2010. clearly, however, now the enthusiasm for law of the sea has increased within the administration during this congress. the presence of the distinguished panel before us today surely underscores this. the substantial case for law of the sea is even stronger today than it was in 2004 which i brought it up as chairman of the committee at that time. every year that's goes by, without the united states joining the convention, resulted in deepening our country's submission to ocean laws and practices determined by foreign governments without united states input. our navy and our ocean industries operate every day in a maritime environment that is increasing l

accession to the law of the sea and lobbied in favor of it. during the more than four months of consideration of this treaty, the committee received only one negative communication related to the treaty. and that was from a private individual. none of the 19 members of the committee requested additional witnesses or hearings. and the resolution of ratification passed on february 25, 2004, without a dissenting vote. now, despite the families vote in the foreign relations committee, senator bill frist, then majority leader, declined to bring the convention up in the senate. so in 2012, we tried again. and the committee undertook an even lengthier process. resulting in a 17-4 vote to refer the convention to the full senate. by that time, senator harry reid had become majority leader, and he toodee clined to bring law of the sea before the full senate. . 2009 and 2010, there were discussions occurred on the law of the sea within the obama administration. passing the convention was apparently not accorded a high priority. there was no concerted eff

so, the law of the sea protects u.s. it brings me to my question for you, secretary clinton, and it has to do with china. we have a little map here, if people will bear with me, items the story. china has made aggressive claims to a massive portion of the south china sea. one of the world's busiest shipping lanes. the blue lines show the maritime area that each country, vietnam, the philippines, is entitled to. it's called, as was referred to the exclusive economic zone. the red line shows what china is claiming for itself. as you see, it goes far beyond china's own 200 mile exclusive economic zone. it reaches far into other nation's zones. a significant territorial grab that comes very close to the land borders of countries in the region. now, this dispute has already led to confrontation on more than one occasion. in fact, just last month, the chinese navy sent surveillance ships to block the efforts of a philippine coast guard cutter that was trying to stop activities of chinese fishermen who were within 200 miles of

and it's true on, above, and below the seas. by joining the convention, we would help lock in rules that are favorable to our freedom of navigation and our global mobility. third, accession would help secure a truly massive increase in our country's resource and economic jurisdiction. not only to 00 nautical miles off our coasts, but to a broad extended continental shelf beyond that zone. adding almost another third to our nation in terms of jurisdiction. fourth, accession would ensure our ability to reap the benefits again as the secretary has pointed out, of the opening of the arctic. joining the convention would maximize international recognition and acceptance of our substantial extended continental shelf claims in the arctic. and as again pointed out, we're the only arctic nation that is not a party to this convention. more importantly from our navigation and military point of view, accession wogs secure our freedom of navigation p, our freedom of overflight rights throughout the arctic, and it would strengthen the freedom

international sea base authority. now, the way we arrive at this and the way to put this in context i would say between 12 and 18 % of royalties is about as much as they are going to allow and still continue to develop those resources. 7 so the united states would receive in that area, according to this task force, somewhere between 12.5 and 18.75% in royalties. now, the problem with this is, that under article 82, the law of the sea treaty, would require the u.s. to give up after a period of time between seven and 12 years about 7% of this. so if we take the conservative side of what the task force has said and say just $1 trillion, $1 trillion would equate to $70 billion that would be royalties that would be paid to the isa as "pos opposed to the united states and of course go to the organization in kingston, jamaica for redistribution to the developing world. and this is the first time in history that an international organization, the u.n. in this case, would possess taxing authority over this country. now, i've h

exception to the law of the sea in favor of it. during the more than four months of consideration of the treaty the committee received only one of - communication related to the treaty. none of the 19 members of the committee requested additional witnesses or hearings and the resolution of ratification past on february 25th, 2004 without a dissenting vote when he which was issued on july 19th, 2010. however, now, for the law of the sea has increased in the administration during this congress the distinguished panel before us today surely underscores this for the substantial case of talal of the sea has been stronger today than it was in 2004 when my brother that was the chairman of the committee of that time. every year that goes by without the united states joining the convention results and a deepening our country's submission to the ocean law and practice is determined by foreign governments without united states and put. our navy and ocean industries offered rate every day in a maritime environment that is increasingly dominate

romney sending jobs over seas, bad?white house sending green jobs over seas. good? that is a double standard. >> gigantic double standard and one thing i will say with the stolar projects. if you go to the web site they admit we'll take 900 million and they are nervy. >> soon as i find them. >> you know they talk like we'll take 900 million and create 10 permanent jobs. they tell us this kind of stuff and listen. the bottom line. trillion and half sitting off shore and money comes in the country if the president will call a cease fire. >> and he would have to cut the taxes. >> and it would create a lot of american jobs. >> job growth and 8 percent unemployment. this is like don't look over here. look at that guy who used to have siss bank account. it is the instances of jobs going over seas. look at the electric car company, half billion loan and got less than 200 million and the company is falling apart and now thinking about a new car overseas they have calls for investigation as to what happened with the loan. >> it

sea walls were built to hold the sea, they were breached and washed away. tragically at least 101 designated evacuation sites were flooded and people followed the evacuation orders and thought they reached safety still perish. the devastation resulting from this demonstrates we can always do better to prepare. the high breaking job of rebuilding from this tsunami still continues in japan and is estimated to cost more than $3 tour billion making this the most costly natural disaster in history. with some communities gone it's not always clear how the rebuilding should begin. 5 million tons of debris were swept into the ocean. much of this sank offshore but some of it as much as 1.5 million tons continue to float and was carried out to sea by the winds and currents. this debris includes boats, household goods, toys, everything from infrastructure to personal possessions. the first items to arrive in our water were high windage items, those that float high enough in the water to be primarily blown by the wind. recently updated model from noaa includes wind and

south china sea, but also true in the arctic. being part of a convention that would help manage that, as another instrument for our use, recognizing, we always have sovereign interest in the military, and the navy in particular that will protect those. i do think this is wise at this point. >> i know we heard objections from some of our colleagues and i'm sure we're all getting letters reflecting different perspectives on the treaty. but i want to read to you something from a letter that i got from a constituent and ask you if you could respond to it. it says, and i'm quoting from the letters, even the freedom of navigation provisions add nothing to the existing customary law of the sea that sea faring nations, including the united states, have observed for centuries. given that we haven't, to date, had any major disruptions at sea, can you respond to that and talk about why it's -- why the sense now is that it's imperative to ratify the treaty? >> i can. the customary international law evolves and i can give you an example of so

sea. we are not there. and as a result, they're the ones that are developing the interpretation of this very important treaty. in that way, we would ensure that our rights are not whittled away by the excessive claims and erroneous interpretations of others. it would give us the power and authority to support and promote the peaceful resolution of disputes within a rules-based order. second, we would secure our navigational freedoms and global access for military and commercial ships, aircraft and undersea fiberoptic cables. treaty law remains the firmest legal foundation upon which to base our global presence as the secretary has pointed out. and it's true on, above, and below the seas. by joining the convention, we would help lock in rules that are favorable to our freedom of navigation and our global mobility. third, accession would help secure a truly massive increase in our country's resource and economic jurisdiction. not only to 00 nautical miles off our coasts, but to a broad extended continental sh

and crown thy good with brotherhood from sea to shining sea. oh beautiful for spacious skies for amber waves of grain. for purple mountain majesties, above the fruit and plains, america, america, america god shed his grace on thee. and crown the thy good with brotherhood from sea to shining sea. [singing]. >> at the beginning of every event we sing the philippino and national anthem. we shall have some [inaudible], that is company and dancers group, they are going to sing the philippine national anthem.

companies to mine the deep sea bed for valuable metals and rare earth elements. we cannot count on what's called customary international law, that it won't change or be subject to either being ignored or undermined overtime, that we cannot control because we're not taking our seat at the table. we only get future stability and what the legal framework is if we are party to the convention. and, you know, many of the provisions in trying the convention are very favorable to us. and, you know, finally -- to your point directly, chairman kerry, we do find -- and i certainly personally find that when i am, for example, working on claims to the south china sea that affect our treaty allies, like the philippines or japan or others, the fact that we are not a party really undermines our position. and i would bet that there are many in the world who hope we never are a party. and they can go on and, you know, plot the way forward, set the rules, enforce them as they choose, putting us further and further at a disadvantage. >> thank you very much. senator lugar? >> thank y

we've seen a dramatic rate of acceleration in sea level rise, relative sea level rise. >> the sea levelise that's an insidious thing. people can't really see it happening. but i think a lot of times what they don't get is it's not just the rising sea levels, it's that in combination with the weather, the tides and everything else -- paint that scenario for us. >> well, it's actually not the rate of local sea level rise per se that is the concern. it is the degree to which that amount of water on top of the volume that we have been knowing is going to contribute to increased, more frequent episodes of flooding and more extensive flooding. and we're already seeing that in certain portions of the bay area. and then if you also combine this with changes in winter precipitation patterns and early snow melt, it's now happening a month to two months earlier than it used to. and that's going to be a confounding problem under a variety of conditions. some of which are distinctly related to local sea level and some of which are related to changing patterns in rainfall. >> and we do have one of th

meaning the international sea bed authority based in kingston, jamaica. then we move to article 162, which describes the purpose of the council. this is the body, the 36-member body, not to be confused with the 160-plus member body that is the assembly. the council, as i understand it, is empowered to do a number of things, including to exercise the power outlined in section 2 of article 162, subsection "o" 1. which is to recommend to the assembly rooms, regulations and procedures on the equitable sharing of financial and other equitable financial areas and payment and contributions made pursuant to article 82. these are the royalties. the escalating royalties that begin at 1% five years into the operation of the treaty, escalate gradually up until they get to 7% where they remain thereafter, once they achieve that level. it appears to me based and my reading of article 162, that the power of the council, this body in which the united states has a seat and has what you've described as veto power, is a recommending body. and it appears also to me as i look

it took 3 trips actually before we got to the sea. and all over at the edges of the dunes and sometimes even out in the middle of the dunes where you get into a deep hole, you will find a broken ceramic ojalla, you will find a sea shell that somebody carried in there, you will pick up the shell going what were you doing out here, why were you walking in this place, were you seeing it the same way i'm seeing it? were you floating like a ghost or were you trudging and swimming and dragging yourself? what were you doing out here? on the last trip out, we did a lot of night walking. and we walked barefoot for the most part because it's much easier than walking in boots and it's just nice to walk barefoot for days and days at a time. on that trip in particular there were a lot of sidewinders out in the dunes which made for an interesting element because the previous trip there had been snakes but not so many. you would wake up in the morning and there would be these elegant sidewinder tracks everywhere. the guy who dropped us off has the p

. >> algÚn dÍa tendrÁn que enterarse de esto, amo a miranda honestamente y, o sea sea lo que sea voyuchar por seguir con ella. >> hay que echar menos crema entre las que estamos arriba. >> la pareja se ha ido ganando el respeto de sus rivales dentro y fuera de la cancha. >> pues hay que estar luchando por lo que ella quiso ser, quiso ser mujer y estÁ luchando y que lo ha conseguido. >> y su ejemplo no es el Único, recientemente el festejo entre dos jugadores del amÉrica y el llamado de atenciÓn detono que la comunidad gay pidiera libertad de expresiÓn y desato la polÉmica. >> es un claro ejemplo de homofobia y que mÁs bien lo que tendrÍa que llamarse es a que los jugadores de la primera liga salieran del clÓset. >> yo te pudiera decir sin decirte nombres que en el fÚtbol de primera divisiÓn por lo menos con nÚmeros conservadores 40 jugadores que no son

4. 4 millones de empleos. >> o sea, nos dieron una economÍa casi muerta, la estamos reviviendo.er pero va en camino a la correcciÓn. >> congresista y ileana r, serÍ convenient cambiar. >> es una excusa muy falsa por parte dei amigo luÍs gutiÉrrez que quiero y admiro mucho, pero el desastre.w busch para tener >> pero seguir diciendo que es culpa de george busch que todavÍa estamos en esta re ves, que es casi una depresiÓn, es una excusa y nadie estÁ comprando esa idea. >> la ley de estimulo de obama no es culpa de george sc >> dijo que el desempleo no iba alzar mÁs de 8%. >> se mal puntounivision@@al pn quedarse o legalizar a algunos estudiantes ¿le gusta?. >> irnÚmero uno quiero ponerlo dentro de este segmeo dentro este contexto. >> la razÓn por la cual yo y otros estamos sentados dialogando con el senador rubio es porque no hay apetito dentro del partido republicano para una reforma abarcadora mÁs grande. >> y quiero hablar en tÉrminos de hechos. >> nosotros aprobamo el aÑo pasado el dream act, lo aprobamos en noviembree 20- 10. >> cuÁnto eran 216 votos a 198. >> de ese 216 vot

she >> tonight, the law of the sea treaty. after that, general john allen briefs reporters at the pentagon. and later, thomas mann and norm ornstein discuss their new book, called "it's even worse than it looks" about partisan and extremism in washington. >> welcome to wichita, kansas. we are here in the city of wichita. waking up the city for 22 years. we think we have a heck of a start. today he's going to be talking about the problem we are having in the city with taxicabs. 9:20 a.m., hang onto that if he will. >> june 2 and 3rd, "book tv" explores the heritage and literary culture of wichita, kansas. >> we have a modest looking paper wrapped binding. what it contains is an alphabetical list of the members of senate and house of representatives done in 1831. i believe this was issued for members immediate use only. we are not supposed along the south, because, as you can see, it would tell you exactly where everybody lives, so you could go and buttonholed him and punch them if you didn't like it. >> watch for "book tv" on j

and a sea breeze, which will start to pick up this afternoon.ht now it is just a southwest breeze at 8 through fairfield turning strongerment and if you go to kris' facebook page, think about what she says with the allergy forecast. oak, grass and pollen are high around the bay area. notice temperatures by lunchtime. watch the orange already in the 80s inland. then briefly right there around the tri-valley, livermore and out to inland fairfield. we may see the upper 80s and close to 90 for one more day. then the sea breeze is going to kick in to cool us off as we keep a closer eye on the forecast for the start of the amgon tomorrow. >>> traffic was shut down on a major road in san francisco because of a scare under the bay bridge. police went to investigate a suspicious package found around 11:00 last night on beale street near harrison. it was some sort of metal suitcase. the embarcadero was shut down near harrison to all traffic in both directions for about three hours while the bomb squad investigated. they opened up the package with the help

the lion and the ramparts, the anchors to symbolize his sea going. and of course the islands, the indies. the indies. christopher columbus, admiral of the ocean sea. he goes on a third voyage. getting a little frus vating now. takes his young son with him. he's setting foot on other islands. by this time he has set foot roughly on the coast of venezuela. so columbus has set foot in the western hemisphere. not just the islands of cuba and hispaniola. but again, the results are very disappointing. very, very disappointing. he'll make a fourth voyage. and then return with more charts and more islands, but no evidence, no evidence. what is this, people ask? what is this that columbus has found? they're not sure. at this point they are simply not sure. they still want to believe it's the islands off of coast of japan and china. the evidence is getting pretty thin. columbus returns home, he does not make any fourth voyage, his last voyage. he retires to a monastery. he is a man, really, in disgrace. great hopes, great plans. but at this point nothing. very

the high seas.re's not much they haven't seen, and there's almost nothing they're afraid of. but a dive in the cold waters of british columbia would put that fearlessness to the test. it begins as routine as any other dive. >> it was a relatively uneventful dive. there wasn't anything spectacular about it. but we stumbled on a couple of octopus and things got really interesting. >> danny and doug were in an area teeming with fish when they stumble upon an octopus den. >> i looked down and i thought, great, let's go down and see if there's somebody home. >> doug's eager to get up close and personal with the normally shy but intensely curious sea animal. >> so i took my hand and i put it at the entrance to the den, and sure enough, one of the arms came up and started feeling up my hand. i put my other hand down and another arm came up and started feeling up my hand. and i thought, this is going to be good. >> doug, having experience with these guys, knew instinctively to put his hand out in front of t

i heard this talk about a great deal being in asia, their designs on the south china sea. there is a tendency, in asia, to name waterways of countries -- the indian ocean, and those countries tend to think they own those waterways. >> the south china sea is a fair test of the issue i am putting before us. if indeed they are pushing it aggressively and relentlessly and are going to use their military might and new power to capture the south china sea, including the pieces which many people consider maybe belongs to malaysia, the philippines, then i would indeed sound the alarm and say we cannot stand by and about any nation to push everybody around and capture their land. but this is not happening, at least not yet. >> there have been some territorial disputes. >> they have done what every american lawyer dozen on the go to court, they make extraordinary claims verbally, and thenta s start the negotiat. if you put the other piece i brought with me, it shows one of our most distinguished legal scholars at nyu law school, that when you examine the many, many territorial dispu

sea breeze in santa cruz today. more day with the low 80s tomorrow but the numbers taking definitely a hit with marine air. >> low to mid-70s for wednesday and thursday. will it be kind of chilly leading into the holiday weekend next weekend. >> looter l are the. we are warned. >> let's check out sports. as you know the 101st bay to breakers is under way. a man from ethiopia crossed the line first. one of the women runners, from kenya with a time of 34 minutes, 42 seconds. this afternoon, giants will go for another sweep of the a's at at&t park. yesterday ryan was nearly flawless against oakland. here is shu with the highlights in this morning's sports. >> good morning. giants won their 11th straight against the ees at at&t park but there was some controversy. check out this bare-handed grab. g-men showing love with the glove. catch of the day, shoestring catch. checking out five shutout innings and then allowing only one hit and he gets hit. or did he? they are arguing. after a cabrera sack fly, posey comes through

his house still stands on the high ground overlooking the sea. visiting the place where homer lived and worked is john wilmerding, deputy director of the national gallery of art. homer's studio was a remodeled stable set about 200 yards from a large summerhouse that his older brother bought in 1883. although homer was close to his family, he enjoyed the solitude his studio provided, but mo of all, it was the ocean outside which reall made this place so important to him. the love of nature was very much a part of homer's time. his family joined the growing number of americans in the late 19th century who could afford to escape the city heat and spend summers at the shore. homer's relatives on both sides had been engaged in shipping and trading for generations. his father, charles savage homer, carried on an import business. his mother, henrietta benson homer, was a watercolorist whose flower pictures were occasionally shown in professional exhibitions. winslow was born in bosn in 1836. at t age of 21, after two years of drudgery apprenticed to a c

there are territorial disputes in the south china sea. top foreign and defense officials from u.s. and philippines have their first ever meeting in washington on monday. u.s. defense secretary leon panetta and secretary of state hillary clinton met with philippine foreign affairs secretary and the secretary of national defense. clinton spoke about the ongoing standoff between the philippines and china over the shar burrow shoal in the south china sea. she said they have an interest in maintaining open seas. >> as a pacific power, we have a interest in freedom of navigation, the maintenance of peace and stability, respect for international law. >> dell rosario said he hopes the u.s. will increase they are presence in the region. >> we underscored the necessity of ensuring that our alliance remains robust, agile and responsive. >> the two countries adopted a statement calling for large scale joint military exercises. the leaders of japan and the united states have vowed to continue working together to deal with north korea, its military development and nuclear ambitions. the prime mi

both east china sea and the south china sea are believed to harbor reserves of oil and natural gas but lie in waters of overlapping claims between china on one hand, japan on the other, in the east china sea, and the south china sea, the philippines, vietnam, malaysia, and indonesia, and in pursuing its claims, china has deployed its navy, has clashed with vessels belonging to the other countries, and this has led to naval violence and clashes at sea, and the loss of lives. i worry that these kinds of clashes at sea will intensify and lead some day to a far more dangerous event in which the initial episode escalates into something far more dangerous, including full-scale war. and because the united states is allied with japan, with the philippines, and with other countries in the region, there's a strong risk of u.s. involvement in any such clash, and if you have been following developments in washington, you'll know that president obama and secretary of state hillary clinton have said that with the war in iraq and afghanistan over, the center of gravity of american military policy fro

the law of the sea is changing because of the treaty. and there is now discussions as to what should be the appropriate use of sea lanes and where should the mineral rights in the future go or what should be the international regime for dealing with some of these issues? and the united states, of course, is perhaps the most significant player in these issues. and yet our interests are not being represented as these types of changes are being debated. could you elaborate a little bit more as to what type of discussions are currently taking place that we truly are not part of? not involved as far as having our representative at the table during these discussions that very much could affect -- u.s. companies could affect the commercial operations, could affect all the interests that e interests that you have mentioned. >> well, senator, you're absolutely right. with respect to demarcating, claiming and asserting sovereign jurisdiction over continental shelf, that is ongoing. countries are doing that, as has been already said, we stand to ga

roz de atÚn, todo lo que sea con pescado. >>> comerias menos sabiendo esto?Ón de oula fue condenada, decenas de niÑos fueron asesinados y nadie estÁ haciendo nada, como nos explica blanca rosa a menos que estados unidos intervenga es poco probable que la dictadura de asad sea derrotada. >>> tambiÉn llegÓ la indiacion a la sede deaciones unidas, el representante de ese paÍs dice que no tiene culpa de los asesinatos, 7 paÍses expulsaron a diplomÁticos como represali por la matanza de la semana pasada, es una nueva fe en el esfuerzo internacional para detener u levantamiento para forzarlo entregar el poder. >>> los responsables tendrÁn que responder dijo el ex secretario de naciones unidas. la onu confirmÓ que 108 personas incluidas 34 mujeres y 49 niÑos murieron en el ataque que comenzÓ el viernes y continuo toda la noche. una serie de aldeas humildes biucadas al noreste de la ciudad. los residentes locales ribuyeron esto a las milicias partidarias l rÉgimen. la casa blanca reitero quee oponen a una intervenciÓnporque conducirÍa a un mayor derramamiento de sang

china claims most of the south china sea as its own. several other countries made claims to sovereignty there. vietnam says production was suspended because they could not fix equipment to properly drill into the sea floor. vietnam hoped india's involvement would counter the presence of china. unless the project is restarted, the vietnam position may appear weakened. >>> myanmar admitted to trading arms with north korea over the past two decades. it confirms long ususpicions ha ties. we have more from yangong. >> reporter: the announcement seems designed to show li that this is not the arch rival. during the talks, the president admitted to secret arms deal with them in the past. he said his country would abide by the u.n. security council relations. they denied speculation he was walking with pyongyang with nuclear weapons. this will be followed closely by the united states. last year, while on an historic visit to myanmar, hillary clinton visited the country and asked to cut all ties with north korea. myanmar reforms brought about san

y que esta persona, esta mujer sea parte importante de mi vida y que yo sea parte importante de su vidas regresar. no. esperemos un momento. quiero aprovechar estos minutos contigo. ¿por qué no me contás bien lo que pasó en la excavación? no me has dicho nada, realmente. está bien, si quieres. angela y yo, ya sabíamos lo del accidente desde puerto rico. ¿pero cómo? estábamos a punto de salir para el aeropuerto cuando se presentó de repente uno de los tíos de angela. jaime: iangela! angela... me alegro mucho de encontrarte. ¿qué pasa, tío? estás muy preocupado. tienes que ir directamente a ver a tu hermano cuando llegues a méxico. ¿cómo? no comprendo. sucedió un accidente... en la excavación. ¿qué pasó? su hermano tuvo un accidente en la excavación. pronto podrás hablar con él. ( sirenas ) ha habido un accidente. no se puede pasar. ay, por favor, señor. el hermano de ella estaba en la excavación. no sabemos lo que le ha pasado. en ese caso, deben ir al pueblo. por allá, a no más de quince minutos. en el hospital, le dan información a todos los familiares. buenos días, ¿sabe ud. algo de l

convention on the law of the sea. here in the briefing room at 2:00 p.m., general john allen, commander isaf, will be here to brief you on afghanistan. with that, i'll open it up to your questions, comments, concerns, other thoughts. mike. >> i know that contrary panetta did not see president intra daughterry but did he have or any officials have any discussions with any of the pakistanis during the chicago summit to chat about you know what? >> the you know what? that calls for speculation. no, i understand the importance of the ground line of communication issue. the secretary did not have a formal meeting with the president intra dory but they did have a brief exchange on the sidelines of meetings in chicago. it was a friendly exchange. and secretary panetta knows the importance of resolving this issue in the near future. >> there weren't any other discussions between general dempsey, didn't see anyone or -- >> i'm not aware of any other discussions between general dempsey and his pakistani counterparts. >> can we

now the heat seek without the ability to remove heat from the sea. the only option left was to eject the heat to the atmosphere, which was done, but could not be done quickly enough and then the action sequence accelerated. we had the hydrogen build-ups in the secondary containment and then the hydrogen explosions and so forth. so, the lessons learned from this that i take away is that the flight hazard and risk of tsunami are that of the size mick earthquake. the periodic risk assessments should be considered data and methods obviously change with time, so we need to refresh our design basis. for the protection of national hazar hazards, at least every ten years and there can't be complacency about nuclear safety. this is the point i want to emphasize. i'm going to come back to it because i have a little vignette to share. the plant operator owner, not the government, is ultimately the primary entity that's responsible for safety. now i'd like to share an account print printed in the "wall street journal" and i'm on may way to wrap up here. on april

this skims over the impacts -- with the sea level rise, and the underground parking garage. a small price to could minimize the traffic, but they fell to consider any alternatives which sequea requires they must. so please, do not -- please do not make an informed decision that could harm the building in the waterfront. recognize that this does not meet the legal requirements of sequa. you should send this feir back to the planning commission and be certain that until the rights of the public to have complete and reliable information have been assured, that this board cannot legally considered the project. i thank you for your time. >> thank you. is there any question to the appellants? i will ask you, one question, based on the last slide, where you talk about the fact that the final e a i l r -- the final e.i.r. does not expand. this was simply a year and a half ago when we actually had a project that was being considered within 84-foot height limit, that did not destroy all of the recreation space, using about half of this. can you talk about how the of contents were anal

lo que conoce y se ha puesto a disposición del gobierno estadounidense para declarar cuantas veces seaque ocurrieron >>> un hombre y una mujer del servicio secreto, interrogaron durante dos horas al a trabajdora sexual >>> algo diferente a lo que han dicho a los mdsc dijiste >>> y si el gobierno stde lo considera necesario, tania se somete a esa prueba. >>> y segundo para desestimar lo que ha propuesto un abogadgo en colombia en torno a una denuncia señalandola como infiltrada >>> a propósito, hoy en washington, un vocero, dijo que se reunió en madrid >>> decimos que sí, reconocemos que la conocemos,que la entrevistamos >>> este encuentro. >>> en un poblado en las afueras uno de los agentes, recordando la frase de la joven, cuando dijo que los agentes habían sido unos bobos, la saludó irónico y le dijo, somos los bobos, y necesitamos hablar con usted >>> usted podrá ver la entrevista con dania londoño con más detalles de aquella noche en una presentación especial de aquí y ahora >>> la demanda cie que en la oficina de arpallo en el condado, prevalece una cultura de desprecio hacia los

lo que sea. >> cuando te refieres estas en disposiciÓn de i hablar ante el congreso?porqu si fuera una terrorista estarÍa esposada. >> las personas que estÁn viendo en este momento, hay persos que no te crean, ¿dice que les dirÍa a las personas que no te creen lo que eas diciendo? >> con las madres de menores de ed. >> ante quien juras lo que dices que es cierto o? >> ante colombia y ae dios que no soy terrorista. secreto llegaron la casa de la mamÁ en un poblado o en las afueras de madrid al ver a la ven uno de los agentes con mucha huir nironÍa le dijo, necesitamos hablar de usted rÉco recordÓ que los agentes haÍan sido unos bobos en cartagena, finalmente en la embajada de los estados unidos en madrid, la joven juo con su abogado entregÓ por primera vez al gobierno de las estados unidos su versiÓn de los hechos. >> ¿quÉ pasÓ en la embajada? >> di unas pequeÑas declaracnes con lo ocurrido con los agentes secretos y creo que queÓ bien claro. >> la idea es sclcolaborar, lo conoce y se ha puesto a disposiciÓn del gobierno americano para declarar lo que sea necesario y q

4. 4 millones de empleos. >> o sea, nos dieron una economÍa casi muerta, la estamos reviviendo.a en camino a la correcciÓn. >> congresista y ileana r, serÍ convenient cambiar. >> es una excusa muy falsa por parte dei amigo luÍs gutiÉrrez que quro y admiro mucho, pero eldesastre. w busch par tener >> pero seguir diciendo ques culpa de george busch que todavÍa estamos en esta re ves, que es casi una depresiÓn, es una excusa y nadie estÁ comprando esa idea. >> la ley de estimulo de obama no es culpa de george sc >> dijo que el desempleo no iba alzar mÁs dee 8%. >> se mal gastÓ miles de millones de dÓlares y estamos con una economÍa que estÁ estancada, no estamos creando empleos y estas cifras no estran la cantidad de personas que no estÁnuscando trabajo, porque simplente se han dicho ya no voy a seguir con esto. >> tiene que decir yo soy responsable, yo soy el pridente y ya basta de las excusas de ponerle laulpa a george w busch. >> no ahÍ acuerdo en este tema econÓmico. >> pero congresista gutiÉrrez. >> yo no di, pero es que yo nunca dije e el primer, en mi primera intervenciÓn, l