an opponent of the sea level rise strategy requires that these projects agree to form a facilities district that will contribute to future reap sources for sea level-rise mitigation. like pier 70, india basin and all future bay projects will be required to create districts that establish a site-specific tax. it ensures that future dollars are captured for protection of the areas beyond the borders of the projects. additional benefits include the project will make $10 million contribution to offsite transportation and sustainability fee. the sponsor will construct neighborhood transit, including a bike lane connecting the sites, with existing bike lanes on hunter point boulevard. build will pail school facilities fee of $4 million. there will be a 3,000-square-foot shell for a childcare provider. there will be a fund to be used for rental improvements or subsidy for neighborhood families for the first eight years of occupancy. there will be an open-air community market grocery store. first source job opportunities and 18% local enterprise businesses established by contract monditorinmonitoring. there will be a possible future community facilities use. this conclud

sea level rise issue and how you might have covered this. just quick sea level rise issue and how we're going to try to mitigate that. >> sure, i can also s.o.m. can answer the question. what the site itself is doing to mitigate sea level rise. how the landscape will deputy overtime. in addition, you were asking me about is the community facility which will be on the site itself. it net present value of $43 million. the city will be able to takeout years and put toward all my allegation an -- mitigation and surrounding areas. it will be applied to outside >> commissioner richards: thanks s.o.m., anything you want to comment on on the sea level rise? please. >> we do have a graphic in the presentation on the sea level riess. one of the things to start with, this ground, because it is landfill is different than others. the existing grade is approximately on average about 10 feet higher than existing high tide. by its nature it is already well above most areas which are going to be safe sea level rise. if you can put the diagram up, what we've done -- we don't have an issue with any of the current sea level rise projections. what we have done is

one effort across the country is baltimore and to expand climate change and sea level rise and heat and other types of mitigation measures. and this is a requirement by the state legislature and edition to the climate tour and that needs to incorporate this effort to pull this together. and provide more background on this effort. and a principle resilience analyst of capital planning and calling the hazards and resilience plan. and hazard mittation plan and the key fema funding. and brian said we are approaching this update differently due to the station. and must develop the climate adaptation plan and if the hazard mitigation plan includes climate adaptation and the hazard and climate changes are closely related and some are getting worse due to clue mat change like the extreme heat events and flooding last fall and flooding will be in the rise and the precipitation patterns change. we are doing combined hazard mitigation plan and calling it the hazard and climate resilience plan. we are building on the great work plan and including some important updates. including assessing how hazards are changing in freque

sea level and near the sea. rising sea levels are a concern for us. my question to them is how are we going to invest in our countries in the structure, mitigate climate and build a more equitable tax code? kevin: you are talking about how climate change is arsenal to your constituents and your district that has felt the impact real-time. you know this. some folks in your party do not agree with that in my the question the validity of climate change. what sort of conservatism are you espousing? rep. curbelo: this is a new conservative movement. if you ask a young republican voter, 80% or 90% of them understand climate change is a real issue. because they are young they are more likely to see the impact. kevin: you are seeing the impact in your district. rep. curbelo: in south florida, it is a local issue. people are looking to members of congress to solve problems, to address major problems. we are seeing saltwater intrusion into the everglades. that is where our freshwater drinking supply is in south florida. it is a real threat to our ability to live in the most beautiful part of the country. it is a local issue. it is a generational issue. younger

authority to produce a bill that will leave most americans better off and start mitigating for the effects. we see sea level risea levels. not climate change. you're imposing a tax and i'm going to pay more for energy. there's no getting around that. >> this is tax reform in the fact that the gas tax and were also repealing and recognizing that there is a cost of carbon dioxide. somewhere along the line you're taxing the. >> no question. that's right. the modeling we've seen is the effect on gdp will be minimal and something else to do with the legislation as we reserve 10% of the revenues to offset higher energy cost and utility rates for lower income americans. train to how much support you have? >> it's very early. a new and pioneering con that. we are looking for the solution that can bridge the partisan gap that can help us invest in infrastructure. the administration has made a promise those and we know that our economy needs a thinly made properly. also address the serious environmental concerns many of us have come especially those of us in coastal areas. the cost of doing nothing, ignoring long-term cha