as it applies to sealia? mary?that makes the assumption that the woman in question has will in fact. i know that as a slave, no such world exists and that's why the court did not recognize her self defense claim. >> good. it is any woman against her will. one of the key questions that the court must resolve for itself before it instructs the jury is is sealia a woman with will as an enslaved woman such that she can resist? >> i think that's incompatible with the idea of slavery at the time. it's okay for the slave owner to order something to thehu but that upon conviction there of said had to those two things are incompatible. >> every person including newsom upon conviction. could newsom have been convicted? could he have been convicted in the same local court for the defilement of sealia? yeah? >> and more about the unlawfully part? it's more like -- i know they had dehumanization of this point. as a slave she didn't have the protection under the law. that's against her will. that was counted as rape because she