thank you very much for taking the time to hearing our points of view today, i'll be brief, i'm jose seaway, i run a website that's an entertainment website here in san francisco and i'm a native san franciscan, i remember 40 years ago when i went to the mission, 16th and valencia area, one of my experiences was seeing a man chasing another fellow down the middle of the meridian that valencia used to have a 4 by 4 and a spike that he was preparing to drive down the young man's head, it's changed much for the better and i think san francisco deserves some props for that, getting to this jack spade issue and the letter in question, i think we've got two problems here, one is that we've already seen jack spade is no different from kate spade, it's the same organization, different line of clothes, but the same principles, i think the more important thing that we ought to be taking a look at here is this notion that, well, they only have 10 stores, then they can't be a chain, i don't think that's important at all, i think that's completely mute, it's not a question of how many stores they have,

lot of the decisions by this body were totally absurd when i have seen a lot of the evidence which seaways to the issue that i think it's fair that members of the public who has some evidence, who has a permit because we pay, it says here we pay a fee to be able to participate in this process, well, refund the fees to everybody or the fact that use the fees properly by having the full utilization of this body that every other permit holder that has a permit, liquor permits, zoning permit, entertainment permit, conditional use permit, that has the ability to come before this body should have the same ability, it shouldn't be different, but things have changed, chris hayashi and her staff are doing a much better job and have better tools to come up with better records so i think it is important to maybe look at the hearing officer's decision, decide when you accept it or send it back rather than point blankly just saying that we're not going to accept it, and my only concern, if there's more evidence, it should be allowed and i think that's the one port that's the important part here is that

has to other major oil producing nations and also it's home to pipelines and some very important seawaysarry the crude we here in the united states use that could be disrupted. is it reality that we see 150? right now, that's in question, but if there is a strike and a significant disruption, certainly, that could be in play. neil: countries rich in oil, we remind people when it comes to crisis in egypt, syria, they are not big oil producers, nowhere on scene in that regard, but they get sympathetic reduction cuts from the neighbors, then that would be in the pileup, but it's unlikely. the obvious question now, to the folks you talked to, saying right now, sandra, we think this is over done, we think it's run up, already run too far? >> right, if we see 150, it's not going to last long, and the price target is $115 for our benchmark here, which is about at 110 as it stands, so what they are saying would happen is if we get a strike, a pop in oil prices, but, neil, as seen in the past with libya in 2011, you get spikes in the price of oil, and what happens? the saudis step in, ramp up pro