chairman, and welcome to you, secretary sebeilus. as you know, one area where there is significant bipartisan support is payment reform. and what i'm concerned about is the department seems to be moving ahead now with a rule for coding. the billing process which looks to me like it's moving in exactly the opposite direction that it's moving in effect to prop up fee for service. and i've heard from providers and a whole host of people that they are up in arms about it. their estimates, that this could cost 30 to $40 billion, and their argument is essentially that's it's like using world war ii military hardware for today's threat. now there are 150,000 of these codes that something called icd10, and i don't want to get in the all of the root-canal type discussions you are going to have to have. my question to you is why not junk this process that has generated so much hostility, save the money, and i gather from experts, it could be like 30 to $40 billion and move on to payment reform. which you are for and there are strong bipartisan