secondarily, it has that inflation hedge element to it, but we're not seeing any inflation despite what the central bankers think they're seeing, we're not see iing that so there's not a lot of reason to own silver in this environment and it's going to get hurt >> why would it come back today? >> because it wasn't really any sign of wage growth or exploding inflation at all but it would suggest the economy is not weakening yes, but doesn't necessarily suggest the economy is ripping into the upside. >> jackie touched on this. we did see above options activity one of the interesting things happens in commodities if you see this technical weakness, it's a dangerous thing to sit there and pick bottoms. catch the falling 950. but with commodities, when they start going lower like this, unlike with stocks where options premiums shoot up, the options have been getting cheaper at the underlying commodities have, so if any of you are out there, i'm not, but if you are, you try to make a bullish bet, you're better off buying calls here than the underlying in my view >> this is happening with the

secondarily, it has the inflation hedge element to it. we're not seeing any inflation we're not seeing a lot of reason to own silver in this environment. >> why didn't it come back after the jobs report today? >> why didn't it >> yeah. >> there wasn't any sign of wage growth or exploding inflation. no reason to come back. >> it would suggest theeconomy isn't weakening. >> yes, but it doesn't necessarily suggest the economy is ripping. >> jackie touched on this, we did see above average options activity one of the interesting things happens in commodities technical weakness, it's very difficult to pick bottoms. with commodities, what very often happens is when they start going lower, unlike with stocks, when options premiums tend to shoot up, sometimes the commodities go the other way the options actually have been getting cheaper even as the underlying commodities have. if any of you were out there, you're trying to make a bullish bet you're way better buying falls. >> this is specific to precious metals, we've generally had a weakened en

secondarily it has the inflation hedge element to it but we're not seeing any inflation despite what the central bankers think they are seeing, there's not a lot of reason to own silver in this environment. >> why didn't it come back after the jobs report? >> there wasn't any sign of wage growth or exploding inflation at all. there's no reason for it to come back. >> but it would suggest the economy is not weakening as some might have feared, right >> yes, but it doesn't necessarily suggest it's ripping to the upside. >> we did see above average options activity one of the interesting things that happens in commodities, if you see this kind of technical weakness, it's a dangerous thing to sit there and pick bottoms but with commodities often what happens when they start going lower like this, unlike with stocks where options premiums tend to shoot up and volatility tends to shoot up. sometimes it goes the other waxt the options have been getting cheaper even as the underlying commodities have so if any of you are out there -- i'm not but if you are, inclined to be a gold bug and way

trunk should not have fired a general flynn i think he rushed to judgment and it was unfortunate secondarily for senator sessions a member of the senate foreign relations committee to have a conversation with the russian ambassador is proper legal and there's nothing wrong with it there's no evidence of of that anything inappropriate was discussed so yes i don't disagree i think it's time for the trump administration to push back in they begin doing so this weekend. candidate trunk was indeed wiretapped by the deep state now mr stone i don't know if that that is a exaggeration but i heard a number of people in russia compared the session situation to the experience many people had been so if you times when you were applying for a job or university you had to fill in a certain a form breech asked you whether you had anime's of the people within your family and if you said yes that meant that you wouldn't get the job but if you said no you would be later prosecuted for lying i don't know if the parallels are. appropriate here but it's it seems to me that there are certain situations to which y

demand prices are being set first by goldman sachs and others and then they fill in the tray and secondarily to get to that price that they have pre-determined as the price they want so price settle becomes a behavior all carrot to move people in a certain direction and their ability to have influence in the economy and the political economy is there oh people have no influence them no agency in this economy whatsoever they're being led by the nose by prices that are being manipulated through what you describe as a spy nationalization process and we see this continuing now as company after company abandoned their suppose it interests and manufacturing of the car companies make more money lending money to buy cars and they do making cars pharmaceutical companies are you know making money on their p. and l. on the wall street more than they are doing the business so we have this kind of rock technology as out of the box it's a raw technology that's out of control but people love it because it's tied to money and i think tied to money must be great america because they were so many in america s

secondarily, we have to rethink this idea that we make our society safer and better by putting human being in cages. there is no evidence that it works and there is abundant evidence that it doesn't work. why we might tinker around those edges and might improve the conditions inside for people -- and i'm all for that --hows i ultimately, what atticus shows in any trip inside a prison shows is that there is better ways of dealing with social problems and putting people in cages makes guards less safe, prisoners less safe, communities less safe, people it destroysfos families -- i hope we're headed for is not a discussion on howve we improve prisons more although that is part of it. i hope you have a discussion about how we imagine dealing with social problems differently other than putting people in cages. [applause] >> heather, i knew one of the survivors of attica from detroit. his name was shingle. his mother was rosie smith. they and the attica rising inspired a generation of revolutionaries like me and people all over the world. first off, thank you for this book. today we face -

much greater attention to law, if we are going to have a justice system, it needs to be just and secondarilywe have to rethink this idea that we make our society safer, better by putting human beings in cages. there's no evidence that it works, there is abundance evidence that it doesn't work and so while we might tinker around those edges and might improve the conditions inside for people and i'm all for that, ultimately, i think what attica shows and any trip inside a prison shows is that there are better ways of dealing with social problems and putting people in cages makes guards less safe, prisoners less safe, communities less safe, people, destroys families. i hope that where we are headed for is not a discussion of how do we improve prisons more, although that's part of it, i hope we have a discussion of how do we imagine dealing with social problems differently other than putting people in cages. thank you. [applause] >> heather, i knew one of the survivors of attica from detroit. his name was shango and his mother rosie smith and they and the attica uprising empowered people like me

secondarily, as i understand it, there's a chalkboard in his office that lays out all the campaign processes that are made and they are checking those off so the campaign promises are made at a rally and conflict within out, over here so that is where some of the dissidence is taking place today. i do everything i can in most cases i like what they are doing. most cases i like what they are doing and i do what i can as the chairman of the foreign relations committee to try to be a collateral support for that when i can. there is no doubt the president listens to lots of places and he's on the phone nonstop. but there are many that are coming in from all over the place. he is a prolific phone caller and so that input that he is getting sometimes conflicts with a wood called the three principles and in addition to that there are voices in the white house but he seems very first thing in the morning. they are working towards a different and so yes it exists we see it and it plays out in many ways publicly sometimes in conflict with efforts that are underway and sometimes in ways that can in fac

eli stoeckles, what we haven't done yet is talk about the story in chief, very serious if true, secondarily confirms the russia obsession early on in the campaign. and the third area here is if this is, indeed, a hit. >> well, right. the irony if it is or even if it isn't is that what trump was mad about was that he recused himself in the first place. this story, even if it weakens session's position or stature atop the justice department, this story basically, you know, lace bear anew the reasons why he basically had to recuse himself, because of these conversations and because of the kind of constant amnesia and for getting that we've seen from sessions, from kushner, from all of these people that want remember their interactions until they're reported by the media. this is the case. sessions did speak about specifically -- he answered this question. what his answer was we heard on the tape was i didn't have any conversations about interference in the campaign. that's not what is now at issue. what is at issue here is did he speak with kislyak as the reports based on this information that

or secondarily, if it can't be the parents, or if the parents aren't present, then the courts of yourwn system, your own society. but to rely on some convention nobody's ever heard of drawn up by bureaucrats who lived on a different planet is absurd. i think that's an absurdity introduced here. the british are serious about how to deal with this, but this is the one sign of unseriousness. >> tucker: i've got a key decision to make about my chilton, one a lot bureaucrats in zimbabwe way in? charles, thank you. >> my pleasure. >> tucker: we will be right what if we pull customer insights from the data in real time? wait, our data center and our clouds can't connect? michael, can we get this data to...? look at me...look at me... look at me... you used to be the "yes" guy. what happened to that guy? legacy technology can handcuff any company. but "yes" is here. so, you're saying we can cut delivery time? yeah. with help from hpe, we can finally work the way we want to. with the right mix of hybrid it, everything computes. >> tucker: this is a fox news alert. a murder confession in the ca

or secondarily, if it can't be the parents, or if the parents aren't present, then the courts of your your own society. but to rely on some convention nobody's ever heard of drawn up by bureaucrats who lived on a different planet is absurd. i think that's an absurdity introduced here. the british are serious about how to deal with this, but this is the one sign of unseriousness. >> tucker: i've got a key decision to make about my children, why don't i let bureaucrats in zimbabwe weigh in? charles, thank you. >> my pleasure. >> tucker: we will be right back. americans - 83% try to eat healthy. yet up 90% fall short in getting key nutrients from food alone. let's do more. add one a day men's complete with key nutrients we may need. plus heart-health support with b vitamins. one a day men's in gummies and tablets. i accept i take easier trails than i used to. i even accept i have a higher risk of stroke due to afib, a type of irregular heartbeat not caused by a heart valve problem. but no matter what path i take, i go for my best. so if there's something better than warfarin, i'll go for

or secondarily, if it can't be the parents, or if the parents aren't present, then the courts of your your own society. but to rely on some convention nobody's ever heard of drawn up by bureaucrats who lived on a different planet is absurd. i think that's an absurdity introduced here. the british are serious about how to deal with this, but this is the one sign of unseriousness. >> tucker: i've got a key decision to make about my chilton, one a lot bureaucrats in zimbabwe way in? charles, thank you. >> my pleasure. >> tucker: we will be right back. there's nothing more important to me than my vacation. so when i need to book a hotel, i want someone who makes it easy. booking.com gets it. and with their price match, i know i'm getting the best price every time. visit booking.com. booking.yeah! i realize that ah, that $100k is notwell, a 103fortune. yeah, 103. well, let me ask you guys. how long did it take you two to save that? a long time. then it's a fortune. well, i'm sure you talk to people all the time who think $100k is just pocket change. right now we're just talking to you. i t

second darel secondarily, it confirms the russia meddling with the campaign. >> the irony is, strutrump was that he recused himself and this story, even if it weakens his position or stature atop the justice department, this story basically, you know, lays bear akn anew the reason he had to recuse himself and all of these people that can't remember their interactions until they are reported by the media and this is a case, sessions did speak about specifically -- he answered this question but what his answer was, we just heard it on the tape was, i didn't have any conversations with interference in the campaign. that's not at what is at issue. what is at issue is did he speak with kislyak, as the reports based on this information that "the post" has tonight, did he speak with kislyak about a potential trump administration positions on issues related to russia. that's a question that i don't think sessions actually answered specifically on the record. >> shannon, how serious is this during a serious week for jeff sessions and i have a follow-up. is there anyone in the white house with a

secondarily kind of confirms the russia obsession early on in the campaign. the third area here is if this is indeed a hit. >> well, right and the irony if it is or even if it isn't is that what -- trump was mad about was he recused himself in the first place. this story even if it weakens sessions' position or stature atop the justice department, this story basically lays bear anew the reasons why we had to recuse himself, because of these conversations and because of the constant amnesia and forgetting that we've seen from sessions, from kushner, from all these people who can't remember their interactions with russian officials until they're reported by the media. and this is the case. you know sessions did speak about specifically -- he answer -- answered that question. but what his answer was we just heard was i didn't have any conversations about entertains -- interference in the campaign. that's not what is at issue. what is at issue here is did he speak with kislyak about, as the reports based on this information that the post has tonight, did he speak

secondarily, as i understand it, there's a chalkboard in bannon owes office that lays out the campaign promises which were made, which are many, and they're checking those off. and so sometimes those campaign promises are made at a rally in tampa, conflict with an outcome over here, right? so that's where some of the dissonance is taking place today and what i try to do because i have insight into what it is these guys are trying to accomplish, i do everything i can. in most cases i like what they're doing. in most cases i like what they're doing. i do what i can as a chairman of the foreign relations committee to try to be a collateral support for that when i can. but there's no doubt, i mean, the president listens to lots of voices. he is on the phone nonstop. there are many voices coming over the transome from all over the place. he's a prolific phone caller and receiver of phone calls. the input that he's getting sometimes conflicts with i would call the three principles. in addition to that, there are voices within the white house, sometimes as i understand it, they're the voices

secondarily, the taliban increased presence in the country beyond where they were at 9/11.e taliban is creeping back in as the united states has departed, it has regained strength. the third thing is we have to get tough on pack tan. there has to be an outside in strategy. they need to create a strategy that articulates why this is important, why the united states presence in afghanistan is important. if everything i said is not relevant to us going forward, i got it. then we need to leave. and we need to leave behind a presence in the u.s. embassy that allows us to increase on demand what needs to be there to help protect our own interest. we haven't heard that articulat articulated yet. i'm certain we will here it going forward. >> all we have heard from the president is what you see on the screen, as he got to the top of the steps, before he walked into that meeting, which is closed to the press, he said isis is falling fast. focusing on the successes that this administration has had fighting isis. >> those are successes built on the last two years in the anti-isis campa

secondarily, president trump after elected said, i don't want my attorney general to go after hillary clinton, it's not something that's a priority for me. when i talked to him during the campaign, he said, well, whatever we would do with hillary clinton, it would be up to my attorney general. so there's a lot of mixed messages here. but the drip drip every day of the president attacking sessions, of anthony scaramucci saying -- you know, suggesting basically that the president doesn't want sessions to keep the job, and there is no substantive real argument here in terms of the key parts to have the trumpnda, whether it's immigration or cracking down on crime, those critiques are not being leveled at jeff sessions. it's all about, basically, the russia investigation or what he hasn't done about investigating hillary clinton or these side issues. it's worth remembering there niece more loyal member of the cabinet if you measure who's out there loud and proud for donald trump when there is political risk to it. >> rose: and first. and first. at a crucial time, ted cruz was challenging i

secondarily, when you say you want to look forward, that's kind of an interesting formulation as wellause many people would argue the best way to prevent this going forward is not so much further conversation. it's consequences for what they have already done, which you are essentially putting off of the table. so, even at its face value, the version that secretary tillerson offered, i think, does not go to the point of truly drawing a line in the sand and saying, look, we believe that -- we know that you did this, and there are going to be consequence for what you've already done as the best way of preventing you from doing it in the future. >> neither side, jeremy diamond, said there is a discussion of consequences which is interesting because donald trump this week has been attacking the obama administration for not being clear enough to russia during the election we're not going to tolerate this. >> and this also raises the question of how can you go and try and make the case to vladimir putin, listen, i know you interfered in the elections, when just the day earlier you were publ

geopolitical challenge right now, they're in a real time crisis, what to do about north korea and secondarily, what to do about, vis-a-vis, russia and syria and iran. it's not that he shouldn't discuss it other than the world is waping and they ear wondering if the president has something to hide. issue he doesn't want to elevate it. the reality is if he said something, a minute, he could check the box and sort of take the air out of the tension that the -- >> dan, we're looking at live pictures as they prepare to take the group photo. they say, listen, if you don't take the issue, one, it's a dereliction of duty. adam schiff says he's intimidated to stand up to the kremlin. >> i don't think he's intimidated. look at the speech he gave yesterday. it was a pretty sharp speech as it relates to russia. everybody thought there was going to this cozy relationship between president trump and -- i mean putin and president trump, they're wrong. he blamed russia's complicity in what was happening in syria. so i don't think the president is reluctant to take a hard stand against russia, buttet's the pe

and secondarily is the fact that there is such a tie between our popular culture and the witchcraft trials and that in popular culture, it always refreshes the general public's interest. and so there's a tremendous tie between the two, where we're never allowed to let the witchcraft trials slip totally into history, because it's always brought back to our attention through a variety of authors, television shows, plays. and so with that, i'd like to pass the baton. >> thank you. >> thanks, steve. >> thanks. as ted mentioned, i'm a little far afield here, as a 19th century historian. so i prepared my remarks so that i wouldn't sound unprepared. as steve has said, right, you know, thinking about the history of salem as a tourist destination, those of us who spend a lot of time in salem are reminded daily about the city's status as a tourist destination. we're reminded when we hit the brakes, as a distracted visitor wonders in the street to take a picture. we are reminded as we drive home and see numerous people in full costume. but we're also reminded, when we find ourselves at the national p

things that sara does in this report is not say that we look first at elected officials and then secondarily at those who influence them because to do that assumes that elected officials are those in power. you start with a default assumption that it's those who get i elected or depending on what kind of government system are the source and the issue. instead you look at who actually controls things. and that who actually controls things mattered. now, what she's doing then is harkening back to a nora wrist tillian way of understanding corruption. as you may recall or may not, it's okay if you don't, aristotle had a six-tier system of government. there were three ideal forms and three corrupted forms. the ideal forms were the monarch, the aristocracy and we will call it the democracy although at the time democracy had sort of a bad name, the polity. and the corrupted forms were the tyrant, the ol garky and, again, he would call it the democracy. >> mod rule. >> yeah. so what's the difference between these two, the corrupted and uncorrupted forms? it's not the number of people governing, it's

but secondarily i think genuinely there is an issue with russia that the narrative and the democratsre pushing doesn't line up with president trump. he made his first trip to poland, a long-time competitor of russia and really at some point there has to be a recognition not just by the democrats but republican foreign policy community that donald trump might be a hawk on russia, not a dove. >> shannon: thank you for that your service. bill. >> bill: thanks, 22 before the hour now, tens of thousands forced to evacuate two main islands in the outer banks of north carolina. check this out. a construction company severed a pain power cable and damaged two others. officials say power will be out for at least two weeks. crews are working overtime to fix it but this has already turned some vacation planning that probably took a year to a bit of misery in the outer banks. a beautiful part of america and the world. hang in there. that's a bummer. >> shannon: as a kid you got all your beach supplies together and ready to go. hopefully they can wrap it up quickly. coming up despite losses in ir

secondarily, i think it is a preemptive move with the we know theho say, regulators have historicallys, facebook and google, and they are trying to forestall that by investing in local economies and the local market. jonathan: just in terms of the strategy around the content, is that the easy way of replicating things to do what you did in europe? >> i think so. they are in every market in the world with the exception of china and they are unlikely to do that unless they do a joint venture. now they have a kid ability to produce around the world and they have the checkbook to not only by the best movies and the best scripts in hollywood but also markets around the world because they have to program on a global basis. david: it is difficult enough to produce for a given market. when you go over and produce in lots of markets around the world, how do you put a value on the residual value of the library? you are investing a ton of money. do i know how that works in all those markets? >> typically, the residual markets outside the u.s. is lower than the u.s. because of the size of the mar

secondarily, i alluded to earlier, you have an administration that clearly does not want a strong dollar. what is interesting is that the lines of communication with the business community are very engaged. if they talk about dollar strength, putting pressure on their businesses, that will resonate with trump. i think you have a few to few -- forces to continue with the dollar weakening. really abouts is other currencies been stronger? >> two things i would add. i think that was well said. the one thing is that, if you are moving your policy the market will try to figure out the extent to which you have space to move. the economics and the data and growth, matters a lot more for the long-term sustainability. the u.s. cycle relative to the european cycle has started to converge quite swiftly. that is one thing. the second thing is that the u.s., not when you look at the next six months but the next are a lot more about normalization than other places like europe. go.h still have some way to the third thing is that, even if there was a bigger discussion -- remember when we talked about bor

secretary ondaril secondarily, think being ways to add efficiency and long-term progress, one is investingn the logistics network and the artificial intelligence. >> let's switch gears and talk about starbucks. we could talk about the earnings, the thing i found most fascinating yesterday was the 100% buyout of their partner in china, and what that means to own the entire business there. >> yeah. it's fascinating when you think about the chinese market it's a large opportunity they plan to double the store count over the next three years. even just the tevana brand, an interesting side business in the u.s., i would think that tea business in china might have significant potential. they see something that's worth sort of deepening that investment to take 100% ownership. >> having said that, investors did not applaud or applaud enough stock down almost 6% >> yeah. again, starbucks is a lblong-tem holding. long-term growth those margins cannot to grind higher gradually prior to this quarter it was 17.7%. if you look at it on a trailing full quarter basis, very healthy trends in tax. we look a

and secondarily, maybe he just gets angry, right? >> i think that's it. i'm sorry.u know, experienced, but i could feel in real time this guy -- because we were having fun with the "time" cover, which is hilarious. it's funny. we've made fun of lots of people for funny things. >> right. >> and as part of, you know, being a president of the united states, honestly, you know, fun humor as well as analysis. >> right. >> and i could feel his blood boiling, because i know him. i'm sorry. and the guy reacts. he can be played. it's scary. >> and people close to him will tell you that he feels betrayed sometimes when he thinks people are his friends. look at his comments today, nbc, i've made them a lot of money be they forget that. >> that's whooo i'm talking about sort of childlike mind is what i'm worried about, that there is this sort of almost 8-year-old temperament, i have to punch right now, or that was wrong, i need to say something when it was completely unimportant to the grand scheme of things. i mean -- >> you're sayingitis not thought out. >> maybe it's a combi