secondly, they're concerned about jobs.

secondly, this bill shows clearly a basic difference between many of us on this side and many on that side of the aisle.

secondly, i think this is something that is long overdue. basically, if you ask a private business how they are going to control over time, they have a simple answer. the call on the employee. they tell them this is a need to be done. is it the constraints. these are the time requirements. we would like you to do good job. and if you do not do a good job, then we will find someone else who can do a good job. i think the very real excuse to keep hearing around city hall that it is cheaper to pay

and secondly, the beacon program which, we have 8? >> yes >> we have 8 beacons around the city. they are really wonderful and lead the way to helping us with all of our kids. and i commend the mayor and margaret for help us out with those. >> mr. garcia? >> also, i need to add the wellness centers. >> around thing we need to build on is restored advocacy. we are pilots jane kimberly. she educated me. and then we are starting to get

secondly, with respect to square footage, possibly and misstated something. i am not sure. the point of which to communicate is that the square footage of the home as established by criteria lengths would be unaffected by the reconfiguration to address at the commission's concerns. let me back a second, if i could. one of the things that struck me during public comment was the tone of the commons. -- comments. it is refreshing to hear from a group of people that are enlightened about the character of their neighborhood and change to their neighborhood, the maturation of their neighborhood. i cannot begin to articulate how unusual that is. it is to be cherished. with that in mind, i need to address some of the things that are mentioned, to state what we are and are not talking about. at this point, we are not talking about building in the backyard. we are not talking about family housing reverses some other kind of housing. we are not even talking about size. what we are talking about is configuration, layout, interior space design. the commission ruled that this project had

secondly, the transcript, and i have handled director disagreements four years at the department. advisement does not come back for another hearing. when it turns to staff, generally, i have no problem with getting a transcript or looking at the whole tape to get the thing. if we have to continue for 30 days or something like that -- >> once again, i would like to have final rebuttal. never once was the word advisement used in our case. never once did use the word advisement. i addressed that very clearly in item #3. i object to what has been referred to as a lack of due process. we submitted this package to staff on september 13. in the staff report, none were noticed in terms of the violation or the order of abatement. the have extensive claims as to why the deck is too large. the building code does not apply? that was never said before. we had no opportunity to respond to the false charges about which was the applicable code. the original deck covered 25,000 square feet. when we renovated, it was reduced. based on the staff report now, which we just saw for the first time, that

secondly, we have in fact seriously weakened the taliban. we expected a greater offense than what took place. and think in large measure, the reason it didn't take place is because of our operations, because of the increased security. we have reduced the influence of the taliban, and as a result have given afghanistan back to the afghanistans to be able to control their own fate. thirdly, we have increased the number in the army and in the police significantly. we're on target. and they are doing the job. more importantly, they're doing the job. they're going out with our troops, they're putting themselves on the line. they're in battle. and they're doing a good job. so i'm feeling much better about the situation in terms of as we transition being able to turn more of this over to them. the fourth part is the ability to transition togoverning, and that's a larger question mark, the ability of the afghans to be able to exert the kind of governing that they have to do in order to provide stability for the futur >> charlie: are we making any pr

secondly, they looked inside. lang told wall street yesterday he didn't see anyone that was ready yet. >> well, there is another story that captured our attention this week, and that was with the nurses, the larger northern california area with this very large disruptive strike. >> northern california and central california. the strike affected 34 hospitals in total. the focus of the strike, it was two of the larger hospital chains in the state. the focus of the strike was on center health where there are these on going contract negotiations between the california nurses association, the nurses there and management. the issues there are, you know, concerns on the nurse's side. they claim that management has come to the table with a range of concessions that management is demanding that nurses take. among them would be increase in health care costs for the workers. cut in pay for new nurses who come on board, reduce retire health coverage. a lot of the nurses i talked to and the union officials say their main thing

secondly, mr.mentioned to me that the ethics commission has the ability to refuse to put its findings in writing using different loopholes as he told me over the phone, even joe live in that cannot stop him. of course i had nothing to do after he told me that. what i feel the ethics commission should be doing is to protect the citizens. in the case that i had mentioned earlier, there were two witnesses committed. i asked the enforcement officer at the ethics commission for a simple yes or no answer. number one, did you talk with the first witness? no answer. no. two, did you talk with the second witness, mr. phil ginsberg? no answer. to this day i still do not have a written answer whether they even talked to the witnesses. obviously if they are not want to tell me they even talk to the witnesses, i can see why the case is still unresolved. you were telling me the city has the money to support an agency like this? -- you are telling me the city has no money to support an agency like this? it the et

secondly, i am joining, i am introducing an ordinance that amends the planning code to prohibit the use of customer operated checkout systems in stores where alcoholic beverages are sold. i would like to thank supervisor john avalos and david chiu for being co-sponsors as well. this is a common-sense measure that requires anyone to a new purchases alcohol to buy face- to-face. it is a simple step which is required of tobacco, spray paint, and some cold medicine. it will make it harder for miers' -- miners -- minors and intoxicated persons to get alcohol. this protects the public health. recent studies by ucla and san diego state show that self checkout machines make it easier for minors and intoxicated persons to get alcohol. a study showed machines used in stores that have self check out failed to stop one transaction in five. that is 20% failure rate. the machines are easily fooled by customers and i know young people can game the system. that is apparent. minors are sharing methods to beat checkout machines. scanning one item and bagging the alcohol or holding a non alcoholic item so

secondly, i think this is something that is long overdue. basically, if you ask a private business how they are going to control over time, they have a simple answer. the call on the employee. they tell them this is a need to be done. is it the constraints. these are the time requirements. we would like you to do good job. and if you do not do a good job, then we will find someone else who can do a good job. i think the very real excuse to keep hearing around city hall that it is cheaper to pay overtime then bring in new employees is a false idea. did it ever occur to anyone that may be those new employees will be better employees than the employees you currently have? because if you take that point of view and follow successful companies, like apple and google, companies like that do not tolerate or even keep employees that cannot meet budgets and goals. i think is pretty simple. if you ask a doughnut shop operator how he controls over time, he is basically going to say either the job gets done within the goals and requirements or else we'r

by the syrian a sort of is you know excessive use of force but secondly it calls on everybody to stop violence including the opposition and also it calls for dialogue in order to resolve the differences and visions of what should happen. in syria and very importantly it calls for on the government of syria to implement the reforms there for them and so this is exactly all line but more importantly our concern is that any sanctions resolution. on syria in the security council might be seen by destructive elements of syrian opposition as sort of encouragement looking at libya something similar to what happened in libya may be happening in syria and that could have extremely destructive consequences our western colleagues are swearing to us that this is not their intention to use military force well incidentally we have to remind them that with world statements and assurances from them of various sorts when we're working on that resolution in libya which them will very quickly forgotten in the heat of the bout that you needed in order to get out of the cycle of violence. we just don't se

and secondly, in a democracy individual voters have to have the freedom to make up their own minds on political issues. and the feeling was that irish catholics would look to their feast priests, to their archbishops and, ultimately, to the pope in rome for their marching orders on what to say and what to believe and who to vote for. and this was considered un-american. of course, it was totally false, but nebraska the less -- nevertheless, sometimes americans believe things regardless of facts. and that was the case. and this new party, the know-nothing party, was dedicated to limiting immigration, particularly from ireland, and secondly, to limiting the civil rights of immigrants once they were in the united states. they were called the know-nothing party because it was a secret organization, and be you had approached one of the know-nothings, they would have said, oh, i don't know anything about that, that political party. so, hence, they were called the know-nothings. the formal name was the american party. the american party was fairly successful in the early 1850s, but ultimatel

secondly, they supplied the horses for those mercenary. because central asian and afghan forces were very famous for their ability to withstand the pressures of warfare. and thirdly, they supported -- provided through, but it was a luxury item because kind of the maserati of the 19th century. in fact, the first founding emperor writes in his journal, about the fruits of the kabul tally and how he misses those. food was a status symbol. a status similar which becomes replaced as the british takeover british indie. instead of melons, he shows off his wealth with english flocks. instead using mercenaries, the east india company uses a professional trained horse that no longer uses cavalry, horses, but rather instead uses a trained infantry. so the three pillars upon which the afghan political economy rested and integrated into a vibrant regional economy are undercut by the entry of the east india company into the region. which means that afghanistan is effectively peripheral allies from the global economy. and i think we see that again today

secondly, the federal reserve has, unfortunately, a dual mission.ary stability and unemployment. that's like trying to hit two targets with one arrow. i would ask congress to take away one of the targets. get them back to what they were commissioned to do back in 1913 and it worked well until we got into this situation relative to the debt that we have. i believe that we can fix the fed by asking congress to relimit their authority to do those kinds of things. secondly, we have got to get back to sound money. our dollar is suffering. it's similar to when we wake up in the morning an hour is 60 minutes. we don't have to go look in the paper to see what it's worth. we've got to get back to a dollar is a dollar is a dollar. >> do you need a gold standard to do that? >> yes, we do need a gold standard to do that. we can work our way back to a standard. that's the only way we'll make our currency the dependence, the currency that people around the world depend upon. yes, i do support establishing standards and there are many ways to do it in addition to

its leader it's not clear what part of the electorate the right course will be you are at all and secondly it's interesting what will happen with all the money which a process which it invested into these projects that we are talking about some thirty million dollars. today that he'll be doing all his best to pull the money out of the party now that he's left and he'll be forming a new political force well we'll wait and see what will be the future of yet another movement of this billionaire turned politician. katrina which over there where we've got more on this and all the other stories we're showing you here on screen all our web site at. the moment should you log on officials have ruled out gage handbrake as the cause of last week's plane crash that killed an entire national team you can read the story of many theories that have been put forward and dismissed by the experts. called to swallow a dog and were thousands of dollars is found in the stomach of a man suspected of theft and a spanish restaurant has gone up more on that story and plenty of others of. u.s. missile defense plans

secondly, on the national sales tax. >> chris: what about the 45% who don't pay any income tax now? >> a good economic growth plan should not be designed to help more people not pay taxes, chris. and let me give you the statistic as to why. 50% of the taxpayers pay 97% of the taxes. what are we supposed to do get that number to 50% paying 100%? no. and. >> chris: i'm not saying that is wrong. i'm saying they are going to end up paying more in taxes. >> they are going to end up paying some taxes but not necessarily more and here is why. the individual taxpayer will decide, you know, how they spend their money in terms of the percent sales tax, okay. now, their behavior will determine how much tax they pay. only if they spend every dime that they make will they pay the full 9%. le encourage sayings and encourage people to be more responsible for their own decision making. >> chris: it is one of the few new plans that has come out and we will have to explore it some more. >> we will have it officially scored and i will try to get my advisors to use their name. >> chris: would like to h

secondly, yes. i can't worry about humanitarian reasons inside mexico right now until we make sure that we deal with what's happening in this country and what's leaving this country. you've heard about some of the scandals in terms of weapons, you know, that were going from the united states that ended up in the hands of the drug cartels. we've got to get serious about defending the borders and defending our laws in the united states first. those are our two top priorities. then i'll deal with humanitarian issues that might be happening in mexico. >> mr. cain, thanks for joining us. there are a lot of issues. i hope you'll come back. it's going to be a long race. >> it's a marathon, greta. thanks for having me on. >> indeed it is. thank you, sir. okay. donald trump is sure one of the a kind, isn't he? the guy all g.o.p. presidential candidates want to talk to. a few hours ago his latest visitor, governor mitt romney, making the pilgrimage to trump tower to speak with donald trump. of course, we spok

but secondly if the international community so-called was involved in bosnia from that gets koala have eyewitness testimonies from people who were there when the american ambassador told the muslim leaders and beg if you don't like it don't sign it this was march one thousand nine hundred two this was before the war started so it's just not makes things up here again popularity has nothing to do with this i personally think russia made a mistake in approving one nine hundred seventy three because in one thousand nine hundred seventy three he said let's establish an authorized by any means necessary so the us and nato took by any means necessary toss the wrestler solution like they did with twelve forty four b. which they selectively apply because when they have to apply something that obligates them to produce resolution malaysian close friends or doesn't because it's all relation he and i had jump and this was crossed. there are literally no defense of the civilian population i'm glad i know said i you don't taser. this did not go past unnoticed they use the consequences and the hope

secondly, the principal difference is the program is self-directed. it goes back to things we were talking about earlier. these low income folks contribute to a low percentage of the income that they do have and the state puts the rest in an account. we trust them to make smart decisions for themselves. if they run through it all because of a bad health experience, they are completely covered on the other and. it is their money. guess what? they turned out to be very discerning consumers like anyone else. they use the emergency room far less because it is expensive. they are more likely to use preventive care and are more likely to ask for second opinions from physicians. the money that is left, and it is accumulating, is theirs. they can use it to pay down the next year premiums or use it for the future. we believe is a better way of doing health care as it has been done in this country. i think it demonstrates something i believe fervently, that americans, all stations of life, are fully capable and which should help and encourage them to make their

but secondly. the international community so-called was involved in bosnia from the get go i have eyewitness testimonies from people who were there when the american ambassador told muslim leaders that bag of h. if you don't like it don't sign it this was march one thousand nine hundred two this was before the war started so let's just not mix things up here again popularity has nothing to do with this i personally think russia made a mistake in approving one nine hundred seventy three because in one thousand nine hundred seventy three he said let's establish a no fly zone by any means necessary so the u.s. and nato to it by any means necessary toss the wrestler solution like they did with twelve forty four b. we should selectively apply because when they have to apply something that obligates them to put a reservation for example doesn't exist. i had jump and this was crosstalk. there are. no defense of the civilian population i'm glad i know say you don't say this did not go past unnoticed they u

secondly, could those great results of the civil war have been achieved by other means? in 1888, the great african-american leader, frederick douglass, gave a speech stating the emancipation proclamation was a fraud. now, maybe this was an overstatement 25 years after the emancipation proclamation, but as he looked around and saw the status of african-americans, particularly in the south, picking the same cotton they had picked under slavery and living similar lives as they had lived under slavery, he wond w