secondly one of the persons is deemed by the nsa to be a u.s. person. means heap is a citizen or gre card holder which entitles him to increase protections under

invented cells so that's quite different to what it was twenty thirty forty years ago that's one factor secondly although social media is. the the treasurer and facebook and all that if you were to rely on those factual basis. and without checking it would be very misleading but nonetheless that's the social media can direct you in in various ways to where major stories are occurring so that it is easy for anonymous is a factual basis but as. an indicator of important things happening that sound legal or over outreach you think is ations have because arguably you know your name your visibility is something that is very important in the media that's why people ultimately trust you and if again we have made sharing media figures like yourself dedicating your time and your life your efforts your passion. opinionated programs more than again that. job of just reporting that some would argue that it's not having much of an impact well first of all you . greatly exaggerated my role in our journalism and i'm not saying that how to different localities as ireland and say has a fight but but secondly. th

our journalism and i'm not saying that how to definitely as ireland and say has a fight but but secondly does the focus that we have on the progress i do on now on the journalist and the right to do is is an equality of focus and look at things from the perspective of equality and look at things and ask questions from the perspective identify stories that are important from that perspective or those who don't have that perspective and have another perspective identify different stories and have different interpretations interested now since but this isn't something new this was always the case and we were we were we were insufficiently aware of how subjective news reporting was all along and props being more aware of it now is is a good thing i can point out what matters does a you know relatively minor incident involving a celebrity matter or draws something in africa for instance in the democratic republic of congo and. huge war five million people killed in the war between one thousand nine hundred eighty and two thousand and one for hardly got any media attention around the world to

secondly you have a lot of people who are shying away from signing up for coverage because the premiums are really high. the deductibles are high. it's not gotten off the ground yet. but, when it does, we are going to start running into the problems that you have been talking about on the show. particularly the doctor reimbursement issue. availability as well. all of these things sort of a rolling system of problems associated with the healthcare law. we are going to start finding out more in the new year if people sign up. well, i guess former house speaker nancy pelosi was right. we have to pass it to-to-see what's in it apparently interest v. to live with it for a while to see what's in it too. susan in terms the messaging coming out of the white house. i ask why isn't the white house -- i see this as bad news. in a way the bad news about the white house is keeping us from focusing on the bad news about everybody else. >> >> the issue with obamacare two major issues, the first one, of course, the web site is not working. people can't get on it to sign up. that's a technical problem.

secondly, a greater concern. i have two stories here from the washington post about ten days ago and one from cbs news a couple days later. and they say the administration knew 3 1/2 years in advance that the problems were going to occur. larry summers, director of the white house's national economic council had just received a m o memo. they said no one was under instruction of translating the 2,000 page statute into reality. how much is this going to cost? and secondly, how long is it going to take when the administration and you all have had three and a half years warning that this was going to happen? how much longer is it going to take to straighten all of this out. >> mr. powder, you seem to be giving the best answers. >> i can comment on the cost figure what we know to date. if you look at omb documentation, there are exhibits where you report spending by fiscal year. so by the end of september, it was north of $600 million spent. now,i will caveat that by saying that did include irs costs associated with

secondly, if it is such a disaster. did they november hhs, sebelius, saying, you know, let's put the breaks on it because we have the state exchange and we prom missed the people of oregon and it's an abject failure. >> they -- the exchange had a risk consultant that issued monthly reports and, you know, going back at least a year of the consultant was saying that it's a real danger that october 1st isn't going to happen. and they stuck with it. you know, they said that if -- it will be worth the extra headaches i guess to get this extra functionality. they want to, you know, they think that in the end if they -- it will be worth the wait. >> you say they stuck with it. who is the they, number one? who is the one behind that and secondly, you are running up against a deadline in terms of insurance. so, you know, i don't know why they didn't listen to their risk consultant. i don't know why they bothered to pay risk consultant if they are not going to pay attention to them. >> they being the leaders of the health insuran

and secondly more broadly this is your signature on domestic legs. legislation. you hear on the hill that--is that how this mess came to be? >> i think thi there is going te a lot of there is going to be a lot of evaluation of how we got to this point. and i'm assuring you i have been asking a lot of questions about that. the truth is that this is number one, very complicated. and the website itself is doing a lot of stuff. there are not a lot of website out there that have to help people compare their possible insurance options. verify income to find out what kind of tax credits they may get. and communicate with the insurance companies so they can purchase. and make sure that all of it is verified. there are a bunch of pieces to it that made it challenging. and you combine that with the fact that the federal government does a lot of things really well, one things it does not do well is information technology procurement. >> this is kind of a system attiatticproblem we have acrosse board. and it's not surprising then that there are going to be some problems. i t

strangulated his girlfriend, the claim she made but didn't file any complaint about at the time and secondly, that he's not allowed to have any firearms or ammunition during the period of bond, which is a huge relief to me, not if anybody else. what is your reaction? >> the allegation of choking a week ago she didn't report at the time is extremely common for domestic violence victims, if she is one. to endure a certain amount of abuse before they ult myly come forward, the straw that breaks the camel's back that doesn't surprise me. with regard to the guns, is there anybody out there that thinks it's a good idea of george zimmerman to have guns? how many people have to come forward and accuse him on being reckless with a gun? he's again free in florida tonight. >> let's play devil's advocate and remove my vail of my say space session of what he does and cut to the facts. we don't know at the moment what happened here, do we? >> not at all. this charge has been made, but it may not even proceed to a trial. what the police have to do now is do an investigation. we have two 911 calls that pres

and secondly, there is the issue of sovereignty. when it comes to defense, sovereignty is the issue that ultimately comes home. and it may be okay for the dains to give up the submarine fleet saying they should rely on uk or dutch. it may be okay for the dutch to decide to get out of the mechanic -- mechaniced army business but not okay for france or uk or germany to likewise truly pool and share. the real problem that i see in the proposal tabled just a few weeks ago by the german government is that pooling and sharing based on key strong allies is that those allies may not be willing to pool and share their capabilities. so, if we have a national industry in the way we have, if we have sovereignty views in the way we have, i see a bleak future unless something changes. a future that frankly hurts the united states. it is not in america's interest to have a weak europe. it is fundamentally in america's interest to have the strongest and most capable allies in europe that we can. we do need to find a way ultimately for this alliance

secondly, i believe we need to incorporate cyber operations in nato's planning. we talk about cyber, but it is to me at least almost inconceivable that there will be a future military conflict in which cyber doesn't play a prominent role, and i don't think we have really incorporated that into the planning mechanism in nato. my third point is, i think we should establish a general framework for contingency planning in nato so that national defense plans can be attached to and linked to the vital nato operational planning. i'm sorry to say that there is no common policy for contingency or operational planning in nato today. we had it during the cold war, after that, we had some aspects of contingency planning, but we don't have a general policy covering it. and as we do our national planning in norway, we really do need something to attach it to. one of the unique features of nato is its command structure. we all believe, at least the small countries in nato believe, that in case of a serious crisis, we would ask nato to take the lead and take the command of opera

secondly they also think having looked at the figures themselves that it may not be five hundred million but it may be one in the hof billion. and that's a bit worried about that greece will not stay on the course that it has speed and has agreed to go on and which is peering into percent free yeah those numbers are causing concern job but what about your real and what's a sentiment to politicians here sink. greece's of the woods i didn't anyone think the creases out of the woods but as the times when nothing was saying and as the figures themselves there is an astonishing progress that has been made when we think of what the situation was even a year and it seems extraordinary that the increase is expected to weigh in on any come out of recession the show modest growth next year. don burke is ever john thanks for the when tending to the gem economy now and business confidence rebounded more strongly than expected in november often dipping in october. munich based economic institute says that its multiple of seven thousand german companies showed that manages feel good about it. for the

secondly i'd like to mention that the two parties that you mentioned the so-called opposition parties each holding eight percent and will not have that much of a major impact apart from the fact that the new government isn't being formed right now on the top of the agenda only views that is whether or not we will get a government in the first place and then secondly will come some of the committees that may look into this by actions yes or no right and actually actually there have been so many reports that different european intelligence agencies actually collaborate with the n.s.a. what's really going on there do you think that these governments are really concerned as they claim to be. i don't believe so even though i'd like to add that obviously what is technically possible is not always what is politically wanted i believe that as much as ms merkel and mr obama both have been probably taken by surprise how much technical knowledge their own spying agencies had to listen in on anybody else and most likely there will have to be some political. agencies should go only as far as a.b.c

the number six and secondly i just wanted to safety checks by the government's nuclear regulation authority. this is the procedures for restarting nuclear plants. has it that i did date for next july the cats will take at least six months. utility needs to be there she was the plants has communities of august well with cactus plant utility is estimated to post a pre tax profit of more than one billion dollars in the business see if i start next april. i descended say if the yankees cannot return online until january twenty fifteen it will host a pre tax loss of one hundred and thirty million dollars loss is projected to grow to eight hundred million dollars if the bee started to leave that until march twenty fifteen the us trained to restock the number one and five reactors in the spring of twenty fifty. i knew. south korean officials have been some pages on their past these are detailed books containing the list of koreans who died who were subjected to forced labor during japanese colonial rule from nineteen ten to nineteen forty five. staff at the south korean and that the interrogator d

we have to look at number one yes, we have to look at gun laws but secondly, most importantly, we have to fix the mental health system in this country because too many people are falling through the cracks. piers, i can tell you i work with parents who have youngsters, young people, 18, 19 who are having problems with severe mental health issues and the way the laws are written, even if there are beds available, unless at the time they were a danger to themself or others, they cannot be hospitalized and then we see what happens, later on they decompensate and do commit a murder suicide or in this case, try to commit a murder and then end up killing themselves. it's got to be fixed. we got to do more. >> why is there so little money put into mental health research? why in many states is it being reduced? >> part of it is because a lot of people see mental health care being a luxury. a lot of insurance plans for many years didn't have a mental health component and seeing more of that and there will be more under the affordable care act whether you love it or hate it. the bottom line is i

but secondly, if we stop and take a look at what has happened in the u.s. since 9/11, we have had over 50 terrorist -- according to fbi reporting -- over 50 terrorist attempts defeated. we have also had a number of terrorist associated persons arrested. of those who had some link of al qaeda or al qaeda-type philosophy, more than half were u.s. citizens. 35% were born in the u.s. 60% have a college degree. 60% were either working or in school. these were not the people that we were looking at right after 9/11. these were not the discontented arabs who were going to camps in afghanistan to try and learn how to make an explosive. to try and learn tactics or go learn to shoot a gun. basically, we are looking at today an entirely different cadre of people than we thought about many years ago. what bothers me about it is i don't think we are looking at it hard enough. i don't think we are focused enough on the lone wolf, who might have no affiliation with anybody. who might not even be an ideologue. who might just want to blow something up because he is a discon

secondly i am a critic of this move to say the two days out of the year that the entire nation comes together and acknowledges that it's family time and it's increased creator time that time that ought not to be commercial to say you know i think government to all these companies you know we should have a law but i will say i don't like wal-mart for doing it and it may be here unless i only have one is appalling that all the companies now are feeling they have to stay open on thanksgiving to compete with each other however it is a free market system i think the american shoppers to buckle down to make a demonstration stay home a lot of the black fridays are now black thursdays and it's really i mean one of my friends is looking online she goes i have to leave my house on thanksgiving to get these sales and there are certain items he wants to get that she only specifically gets. so the reality is i don't want the government regulating it it is a free market but the american consumer controls whether this will work or not and if wal-mart has blockbuster sales and they go off the roof g

secondly, it's -- i got to build joint force 2020. by the time i leave this job, we will have submitted four budgets, the last of which will cover the period fiscal years '16 to '20. so we're either going to back into '20 -- 2020 -- or we're going to shape it. and i'd rather shape it than back into it. and we can talk about what that force might need to look -- to look like. third, a recommitment to the profession: after 10 years of being extraordinarily busy and fighting two wars, it's time for us to be introspective about who we are as a -- and how do we connect with the american people and how do we see ourselves? and then the third -- fourth one is keeping faith with american military -- the military family active, guard, reserve, families, veterans, gold star families and so forth. now, just one last -- one point about keeping faith, people sometimes think it's about making sure that i continue to argue for better pay, better compensation, better health care, better retirement. that's part of it, or at least adequate pay, compens

secondly, obviously, the first call material is not the weapon. to get a device ticks time. to get a bomb takes more time. to get a deliberate war head on a missile takes time. there's various estimates. the present arrangement gets rid of the material that is most easily upgraded by the iranians. the 20% enriched material. >> it limits future enrichment to 5% under the deal. as i said is moment ago, it keeps the stockpile of low and enriched uranium below 5%, at the same level at the end as it goes in. >> why don't we start on the positive side. let's look at strengths of the deal. the most intrusive inspections, it stalls. the march towards nuclear capability with all the restrictions, and we are giving away small concessions on sanctions because it's really in the grand scheme of the sanction, it's really not that much that we are giving up. do you think it's a good deal? >> this was the final deal, it would not be a good deal. mr pickering said we are in an interim stage. my concern is we get the intruce i-in possessions which is a -- intrusive inspections by is a good t

secondly, this 60 minutes, they took the word of the fbi, that his accnt, morgan jones' account, his pseudonym varied from the account given in a debrief in the u.k., is that correct? >> yeah, and differed in some significant and striking ways from the account that this mr. jonesncludedn his book. ihink that fbi is right, there are des crep -- discrepe penceyn the acounted, it waslear laura logan had questions about his veracity. she was asking him about telling %-hall, and hting a jihadistot with the butt of his head. she stopped him, said did anody essee this, he said no, but, it means that she thought to ask him away little bit more about what -- whether what he was saying was true. lou: it is odd they went ahead with the report, with these concerns if there were initial concerns before talking with the fbi. secondly it odd that a news organizationwould take the word of the fbi and fbi that had not shown up at the scene in benghazi, that burned up consulat for three and a half weeks after, his incident report alleged it was not signed by moan jones, andal we have is the wordf a ag

and secondly, congress for much of its -- of much of our history entertained private bills, which would be the equivalent in terms of legislative or non-purely legislative functions you're talking about, with what the town of greece does here. >> well, if we had a -- if we had a series of cases, what -- what is a -- a utility rate- making board would come to the supreme court. we say, well, it's enough like a legislative that it's like marsh. but i don't think the public would understand that. >> well, your honor, whatever whatever line might be drawn between non-legislative bodies and legislative bodies, what we are talking about here is a legislative meeting of a legislative body, and it would be -- it would be incongruous, as this court said in marsh, if congress could have legislative prayers and the states couldn't. it would be equally incongruous >> well, the essence of the argument is we've always done it this way, which has some -- some force to it. but it seems to me that your argument begins and ends there. >> no, your honor. i mean, as we -- as we said in our brief, the princ

one we assume that everybody puts their homes to good use, and secondly our figures show that our loss of winter heat in the units four and five each is $90, so when they want to they take an average of the five unit in order to make the dollar amount smaller. the lower units are greater impacted in the winter. there is no impact from april to september. we know that. we don't need the heat that we do need in the winter. our loss is in the winter. we asked them for a 10-foot setback. we believe that if she chose she could get the space by the first floor and build out and the original plans didn't include the first floor but there is a way to get extra space and preserve our right to a active solar sun house. thank you. >> project sponsor you have a two minute rebuttal. >> cass smith again. i would like to clarify a couple of things and i am sure we're all in favor of uses of alternative energy and the number as described as 50% is not at all the case. if you average this out over the year and the units it's less than a 10% difference. it's quite minor and if you look at the documents

secondly, uni and spike as well.t are the types of lone wolf terrorists, could allow to miss miss -- timothy mcveigh. begin a bomber could be criminal as well and idiosyncratic. when a state criminal, there could be, for example, the anthrax attacker in 2001, bruce ivins who passed away in 2009. he had a criminal intent. it has to be one or the other. it could be a mix match of the five categories. but fact your is going to be a of lone wolf terrorist on they could be documented psychological disorders as we discovered many, including the boston number and others. it could be affinity with their membership of terrorist organization or criminal gangs. then there could be a broadcasting of terrorist intentions, for example, in norway they had broadcast what he was going to do. so there are signals that the wood he lone wolf attacker would be doing something spectacular. then there is the role of enablers and radicalization, for example, for the internet or military experience. the "american idol" addict agents in the p

secondly, we'll civilization survive? and now we are dealing with the iranian challenge. thirdly, to come back to mike's i think concern, whether counterterrorism strategies and democracy can coexist. now, if we look at the various assassinations related to terrorism, we couldn't even agree universally after the terrorism, and let alone, what does this mean the lone wolf. i will submit that we are facing basically three sides of challenges by the perpetrators. one, that we call them the lone wolf but we can call them also the individuals who are involved. secondly, i think we have to look at the groups, some more organized groups, more sophisticated, less sophisticated, and other states sponsor of terrorism. so we can of individuals, some of them are mentally deranged. some of them wave the flag as to say they are martyrs with single issue politics extremism with ideologically-based groups come with ethnic, religious and separate actors and then we mention the criminal and the individual. in the united states again, we see all this variety, all the way from what we call t

secondly a more specific announcement we had the direct environmental report that ended in september. however, the mta board will hypothetical a meeting on tuesday the third. and lastly i want to report briefly on a recent conventions that occurred here. a natural green kwejs kwemgsz that brought experts from the green wall realm to san francisco. the conference had people to initiate a task force that resulted in a greener road map for san francisco. participating in that task force were a number of agencies as well as representatives from the trades and real estate and armed with that and the result of it the department it setting forth a plan to move forward to define some potential policy for the city. if there are no other questions that includes my report >> past events there is no board of appeals report. >> good afternoon there were no items at the plan use committee. i have a large report there was a lot of other planning things on the board. on it's full board meeting supervisor avalos was approved on first reading. to replace the parking with maximum controls prohibit uses

secondly, the core theological is the irrational covenant, secondly, this is part of the movement, sayingu can be a jew and a christian at the same time. that is deceptive practices, trying to manipulate people. you can't be a christian and jew at the same time. let's respect religions for what they are. and by throwing his stamp of approval to this group he is acting in a way that is both disrespectful to both christians and jews, as he has always done in the past, respect groups for who they are. >> you worked with president bush during his administration. the u.s. commission on international religious freedom. you were involved with the administration. from your experience working with him and seeing the way he worked as a politician, as a public figure, do you have any insight into why he would decide to speak to this group? i am essentially asking if you have an opinion about maybe -- whether or not he doesn't know what he is getting into here? >> well, perhaps he didn't in the beginning. you're right, even though i represent the larger section that tends to be quite liberal in their

i want to acknowledge all of them (clapping) secondly i know owe loves to be acknowledged. so much guidance i've got to tip my hat to dr. brian ma iron (clapping) dr. ma iron is enthusiastic and passionate about what he does. he's a first class public servant. thank you brian (clapping) to my friend steve and his colleague in crime from the toll authority. we've been partners on this project from the beginning. we worked well together over the years and today that work pays off. sieving and randy thank you. (clapping) >> it was men's again in the video that i spent time with state political leaders over the years and there's a few i want to acknowledge base at very crucial movements in the life of this project they came through for the bay area. i want to listen to the folks who helped influence me. (calling names). john burton and my former boss senator pro-item and mr. hancock, and, of course, former governor gray davis. there are others but your collective leadership made this possible. there are several heads of the department of transportation who have been sobered wit

secondly, president rouhani has really placed his political life on this. this is probably another defeat for him and he may not have much time to come to an agreement. so we have to be in the but careful about how long this can be relayed -- be delayed. difficult always be a process. but where do we go from here? >> as mentioned, they are meeting again on november 20. it would seem that an agreement can be reached because, not to reach an agreement would be basically catastrophic. this is the best possible time for an agreement in the last 10 years at least. all other efforts have failed. if it fails this time, what is the alternative? the alternative is probably some sort of military action against iranian nuclear and solutions. and i think that everyone would like to avoid that. >> sega summons for that. -- thank you so much for that. they have begun an investigation but no group has it to come forward and claimed response ability. staying in the region, palestinians in the west bank marked the anniversary of their leader yasser arafat. they continue to

secondly, our cooperation with the russian federation has so far been strong. we will continue to expect the russian government to press the syrian government for full compliance with its obligations. this will be essential as we move ahead. third, we continue this process with our eyes wide open. we are about to enter what could be the most complicated phase in terms of both logistics and security, that is, there are mobile of chemical precursors and large oddities from several sites within syria, to the coast, for removal on a ship to another country. that has both big logistical problems to think through and certain security risks. the same time, while the record so far is acceptable, we do not assume or take for granted that the syrian government will continue full compliance with its obligations. we have the tools we need opcw executive commission and the united nations security council. we intend to do so. that is why our statement here reflects the cautious optimism that we have at this point. thank you, and i look forward to your questions. >> thank you

secondly, i think it is a really good point, and i do not know if this analogy works or not, but walmart tolerates a certain , becausee of shrinkage if they absolutely prevented shoplifting from everyone of their stores they would frisk you coming and goings, and it is not worth the stores -- not worth the cost. we had to get to the point that we are willing to accept some amount of risk that someone will do something they should not do, but at the same time we have to have the transparency and accountability that goes with that. but thegement accountability for decisions that were made. you probably recover, the lady in the army that work and said she was astounded at how little decision-making power that the program managers in the services actually have versus outside. so we have to empower them. and understand there is some risk that someone will not take a good decision. give them more power, but hold .hem accountable i think that is a least an approach we need to move for. >> you mentioned the hearing that the committee held three weeks ago looking back at the past 25 years, essent

secondly, do we have the legal right to do it? thirdly, if we do have a legal right, why? where i thinktry most americans like their privacy. the concern i have had since the first patriot act since this has evolved, more and more the privacy of americans is disappearing. that is going to hurt us as a country. it will not make us safer. some will be successful, as much as we hate to think about that. if we take away all of our privacy rates we will become our own terrorist. >> you have a sense of how many of these programs are being used at this point? all of them presumably would be affected by the legislation. >> i have held public hearings on these things in the judiciary committee. we have another when coming up in a few days. questions we ask. we will get the answers. there are a lot of collections and implications that we have had in open sessions. what do we get from it? you mentioned the cia. i completely understand the difference. nsa, we will talk about all the abilities to collect everything, enormous abilities. they were not competent enough to keep a subcontra

secondly there's never been any meaningful discussions with the develop developer. the developer we talked about our objections and we actually proposed a modification to it and as far as i know that was rejected. and, in fact, all 3 different options that were talked about in this period are actually in our police station for design reviews this was not something new or something we didn't do. basically, we're saying is that the size of the project is really impacting the light and openness on our house. it's not specifically in conflict with anything in the design guidelines but i'm going back to the general plan and saying this is important to us. it's mentioned in the planning code as something that's important. will what i'm going to do is give you a quick visual overview. this is the view of our property. i'm taking an example of the window from this view from the dining room the eastern most window in the dining room. it's the one that has the least impact on the lower floor of this project. the upper floor windows are not a problem because no one is looking

secondly, there is an interesting head line that i think is far more important. chronicle has 26 people get 59.7 million over sandusky. i would like to propose how prevalent is homosexual crime especially child molestation. i think that's an important subject that is a lot more important that sugary drinks. the next head line from the chronicle as prosecutor. secret formula used for corruption. it mentioned the los angeles times received the pulitzer prize for the bell corruption case especially all the ugly details. i would like to suggest that chronicle and examiner do the same here in san francisco and they would probably win a pulitzer prize. the other head lines as jury finds -- what a real shame the city would stab it's own firefighters on these promotional task. if you treat the firemen that way, shame on you. >> good evening. kids are still being shot in this culture of ours. all we do is talk about shooting and killing. recent ly in chicago, a submit -- summit to talk about violence and imprisonment that will talk about the solutions but the problem will