back at the sta departme, sectary clinton i tryg he st. >> some our coury s china fell progress ahrea -- chi's proess as a teat tthe ited states. some in china worried at amic stis to constrain ina'srowt weejecboth those years. what secretary clint the. for the evolvg relationsp, i am joine by a correspondent fro atlantic monthly. great to see you. hillary clintotalkg about man ghts -- perhaps it is easier to talk about human rights than any dolr-yuan exchange rate. >> th u.s knows what thill st in the chise know wat they will y. we areeaving the country alo to their own intnal divisio that is less of a strain in e economic ratio. >> t fac that they are raising it now - iit bause th do t want to tell -alk about other issue it isot going anywhere. >> it yondispute. theast three or fouronth it has been the most rresse timen china for0 years. cents tea and a men's wear -- since tieammen square? >> cerinlyit is a dowown we have t se since then. itas bn raised. >> ther are worries about too many over-educatedbut und- employ men t there behaving as if they areorried. behaviorally, that is s

lots of us who follow this as you do have seen sectary clinton make the same statement a number of times in her speeches, including at a pac last year and the center for middle east peace speech. this is not a change from secretary clinton opposes beaches in the past, is it? speeches in the past, is it? >> most of the time, what the secretary says is that we can envision a solution that meets one side's demands for x with the other side's mands for why. it is in that context that she talks about 1967 borders with agreed swaps. the vast numb of times that she makes this type of reference, it is we ar working for a policy, for an outcome that meets the palestinian demand for the 1967 borders and agreed swaps, and the israeli demand for secure and whenever whenever. there may be exceptions to that, but 90% of the time that is how she phrases it. it is a very different statement, the policy of the united states is a resolution conflict based on this principle. it is no longer how we facilitate with the two parties -- what the two parties may be trying to achieve. it is now what we believe th