peter: but the sesta legislation changes section 230. section 230ave alone? mr. szabo: correct. and it's because the change is unnecessary. section 230 specifically carves federal criminal code, right. so the department of justice, can enforce 18 1551, -- 1591, the section criminal code sesta seeks to address. federalt a bar on criminal law. it's not a bar on federal criminal prosecutions. and by amending 18 u.s.c., the federal criminal code, and this new sex trafficking on the internet law right in the heart of 18 u.s.c., you don't need to touch section 230. you can leave that where it is for federalve-out federal government to enforce.g.'s federal law. peter: but that's not under that's not being considered. mr. szabo: in the senate. it is being considered in the house. a lot of legislation starts in andchamber or the other sometimes conflicting legislation but in this case it's not necessarily conflicting, but it's another alternative. what netchoice, what i personally want to see happen, possiblee get the best legislation that goes to the down these sex andfickers, sends the

and, you know, if you roll back to the yen sis of section -- the genesis of section 230, it started because of two services. one's called prodigy, one's called compuserve. this was back in the mid '90s, and prodigy was the family-friendly internet service provider. it would screen to make sure that it was content-appropriate for families and for children. and somebody had put a post on a bulletin board of prodigy's a libelous statement about a financial institution in new york. well, the financial institution couldn't find the actual poster themselves, so they went after prodigy. the new york court took a look at it and said, well, compuserve, we decided that they aren't liable because they no screening whatsoever. they're more like a library where the library or librarian's not really responsible for the content between the covers. but you, prodigy, buzz -- because you say you're going to screen and make it family-friendly, you're a lot more like an editorial board at a newspaper. so we're going to hold you liable for the content of others. and prodigy got hit up for a couple million dolla

you would leave section 230 alone press mark. >> guest: crack.it is because the change is unnecessary. section 230 specifically carves out what is criminal code. to do ... you don't even need to touch section 230. you can leave that where it is. that carveout for federal criminal law will allow federal government and state to enforce federal criminal law. >> that's not under consideration right now. >> that's not what's being considered. >> in the senate. it is being considered in the house. a lot of legislation starts in one chamber or the other. sometimes it's conflicting but in this case is not conflicting, it's just another alternative. what net choice, what i want to see happen is that we get the best possible legislation that goes to the heart of taking down these sex traffickers, send them away and the victims the restitution they need. >> section 230 was described as a bedrock legal protection for online services. you agree with that. >> yes we do. >> wife. >> section 230 is designed to provide protection. that analogy would be if i went

it is a section of the bible code that's to address so the department can address that without section30 being any baanymore whatsoever on the federal or criminal law or prosecution and by amending the code into putting this new sex trafficking on the internet law you don't even need to touch section 230 and the carveout for the criminal law will allow federal government and the state to enforce the criminal law but that isn't under consideration right now. that is an isn't what is being considered. it's being considered in the house and a lot of legislation starts in one chamber or the other. it is just another alternative and what i personally want to see happen is that we get the best possible legislation that goes to the heart of taking a sex traffickers it is a bedrock of protection for the services do you agree with that? >> section 230 is designed to create a platform and unity for content posted by others. a good analogy would be if i went on to lincoln.com and made a defamatory statement about somebody it could be liable with links and whatnot and to regulate all the content o

first what section 702 is. section 702 is a law that has been passed not once but twice by congress with strong bipartisan support. first in 2008 and then reauthorized in 2012. section 702 is constitutional, lawful, consistent with the fourth amendment. every court to consider the 702 program including the ninth circuit has found that. and a lot of those court holdings as well as the privacy and civil liberties oversight board have specifically concluded that those queries i was just describing, the fbi's queries, that practice itself is consistent both with fisa and with the constitution. so what that means is all this debate about potentially tinkering with 702, it's not the constitution that's requiring that. that's not driven by the constitution. the courts have uniformly held that both the program and the way it's being executed are constitutional. so a straight reauthorization of 702 would be fully consistent with the constitution including fourth amendment. so bipartisan support, fully constitutional. wh

for section 6, i would propose a robust disclosure requirement encapsulated in section g. >> so for section 6, you would propose that we accept the staff recommendation on -- >> no, i'm sorry. i would accept the recommendation rather than changing section 3.20784 in such a way by incorporating changes d through f. i'm supportive of replacing 3.20784 with a stepped up regime for behest of payments. >> you'd a do away with the ban and replace it with a disclosure? >> commissioner chiu: yes. >> mr. chairman if commissioner chiu is finished, procedural, is this going to be reduced to writing? if i consider complirgs commissioner chiu's remarks to be a motion, is it going to be reduced to writing? >> let me ask this of the staff, have you captured what commissioner chiu has said? i think that since the staff has captured it and we've sat and listened to it, that rather than the need for it to be reduced to writing before we actually vote on it, i don't think that is necessary because i think that as it is we've gone through this now for so long, and over so much time that we can all -- i speak f

so move on to section six, this section corresponds to section 3.20784 in the ordinance. this is the rule that would prohibit an official from asking someone who has a matter before him or her to convey anything of value to a third party. it covers behested payments and in-kind payments that are goods or services and there are a number of policy questions on this item. the first one top of page five regards whether or not we should be focusing on the definition of anything of value. so should the commission limit the definition of "anything of value" it does not include volunteer services, the fact pattern here is an official asking someone who has a matter before her to take part in some kind of volunteer activity. typically this would probably be a charitable volunteer activity. some kind of community event. staff doesn't oppose this, we see this as being a pattern that poses a lesser risk of corruption. we think this could be carved out of the definition of "anything of value" without weakening 302784. second item should the commission add any exception for any behest

section c. i'll wait. >> why don't you go ahead on section c. >> i think the staff mentioned there's an existing law that prohibits officers and directors from making contributions. that's the staff report on the bottom of page 2. does that include nonprofits because it's not clear? you mentioned -- >> they are not exempt. >> it would be a change from existing law. >> right. >> there are supported directors from serving on boards. one is operationally, how will ethics commission inform all those. i served on the board of a nonprofit that had a contract with the city ages ago and i never knew -- in my experiences with nonprofits we focussed on programs and on the budget and staff issues and we focus on how's that grant coming and focussing on the capital campaign. i wouldn't want the executive director of a nonprofit i'm serving on to have to worry about making sure that i dot my is and cross my ts from a political contribution standpoint. that would be my concern. also, how do we enforce this? h

section 10.100-162(b). we're just going to take that out, exclusively, and that was in recommendation of supervisor kim. >>president breed: okay. >>supervisor cohen: i would like to say i've been in discussion with the mayor office of economic and workforce development and recognize that first source, the city's workforce program may be an equally effective way for us to also achieve our equity incubator hiring goals, so in that plan, i will work with the city attorney's office in trailing legislation that captures and creates an option for nonequity operators to hire through the city's workforce system. that way, we're covering all of our bases, okay? finally, my last amendment is to change section 1618 to say that no cannabis business may employ an individual who is not at least 21 years old unless authorized to do so by the state law. and this is because the emergency regulations that the state recently released raised the age of employees to require -- for employees -- employers to require that employee

that represents 22.7% of the votes cast in this section. the votes cast in this section.st in this section. the votes cast for each candidate in the members section are as follows. richard leonard 9150 votes. applause but that represents 51.896 of the votes. anas sarwar 85ia but that represents 51.896 of the votes. anas sarwar 8514 votes. this represents 48.2% of the votes cast in this section. and finally that total votes cast for each candidate are therefore as follows will stop richard leonard 12469 votes. representing 56.7% of the votes. cheering and applause anas sarwar... cheering and applause ifi if i could just finish, please. anas sa rwar if i could just finish, please. anas sa rwa r 9516 if i could just finish, please. anas sarwar 9516 votes which represents 43.3% of the total votes cast. i am therefore delighted to declare richard leonard elected as leader of the scottish labour party. studio: confirmation that richard leonard, who had in recent weeks become a favourite to succeed kezia dugdale has been elected the leader of the scottish labour party, and after

section 1604 subsection b, 4b. i expand the length of time for consideration for one's conviction history. this is originally from 2009 up to the year 2016 after extensive conversation and an extensive review of the data in both the office of cannabis equity report and the center on juvenile and criminal justice report which found in 2016 and americans in san francisco experienced drug arrest rates ten time higher than san franciscans of any other race and 2.4 times higher than african americans in california and it's time we looked at the impact on targeted communities. i've limited conviction crimes to cannabis only. section 1604b, 4d explain the length of time for consideration of a family member's conviction history but again limited the crime to only cannabis. intersection 04 subsection 4e i explained and expanded the length of time for adding -- excuse me, adding the length of time for attending public schools to include the year of 2016. subsection b4f expands the length of time to 2016 for living in a speci

1060.31, and the revised security plan, as required by section 1060.32. >>president tan: all right. there's a motion. is there a second? >> i second. >>president tan: there's a second. is there any further discussion from commissioners or additional evidence that you want to say was proven? >> starting with one? >>president tan: yeah, just starting with one. procedurally, do we need to take public comment on this one? >> we've already taken public comment on the item. >>president tan: all right, commissioners, why don't we take a vote. >> can you repeat it? we're going one by one, right? >> vice president thomas: yeah, i was just starting. other people can add on. that the charging party proved by a preponderance of the evidence that the permit holder violated its number six, we need to say, section 1060.20.1, number a-6; specifically, that the permitee failed to comply with an approved security plan as required by section 1060.31, and the revised security plan, as required by section 1060.32. >>president tan: all right. crystal, could you take the vote?

section 16.5, transition provision -- i'm sorry. section 16.05, transition provisions, you can find this on page 20, line 10, a cleanup amendment to strike medicinal, which was the intent originally, and it did not get struck, and for clarification supervisors, this is actually for item 9. the third amendment -- bred breed wait, i'm sorry. so 16.02 is the definition, is for item number 8 >> they're all for item 9, president. >>president breed: breed all of them? thank you. >> yeah, all of them are for item #. so the third amendment applicable to 16.18, we are removing suggesti removing -- suggesting that the board require that a business have a safe in which they store their things, and then, this is a cleanup amendment which you can find on page 56, line 19 to strike health and safety and replace it with business and professions to then read california business and professions code. >>president breed: thank you. so just quickly, are there any questions about these cleanup amendments? okay. supervisor fewer, you'd like to make a mot

next, we can find anecwhi equi owner in this section, so you're either the sole owner or operator, you have at least 40% as a corporate applicant, and you're also the ceo, or you're an individual with at least 51% if you're not the ceo, and this is really to get at ensuring the folks that we are empowering actually have decision making power, that they're not just someone who is pushed forward to get in through this program. and then, if you're part of a nonprofit, the majority of members of the board of directors satisfy the residency requirement, the limited assets, as well as two or more of the following, which i will get to in a second, or lastly, for the ownership section, you're an individual with a membership interest in a cooperative, so this is to get it dpsh-varying forms of ownership in the cannabis industry. >> sorry to interrupt, and these are outlined, if you want to be able to take a look at it, on pages 14 through 16. >> so i have a question on that. so this is to qualify to get a permit to operate, correct? >> as an equity operator. >> so is it -- what's the renewal pr

add partner in this section, but it's not in this version that i'm looking at -- who was convicted -- arrested or convicted -- arrested or convicted during the period 1971 to 2009, provided the arrest or convictions meets any other criteria set forth in subsection a of section 4904 of the police code, and lastly, you attended a school in sfusd for at least five years, either consecutively or in total. so that is the criteria to be an operator. we also wanted to touch on the workforce component because we don't want to make presumptions about -- because -- because we don't have all information about the informal market. we can only presume how many folks are really be up and ready to run as an operator, so as currently written, allowed equity applicants, folks that were shutdown in 1996 -- those are the only two classifications that are allowed to go move forward for a permit in 2018, so we wanted to widen that pool, and also creating the opportunity for nonequity operators to be equity incubbators, which means they would help to procure a local, diverse workforce and have the privileg

in particular, section 702. osseo osseo obviously, section 702 collection has grown since its passage in 2008, and we still don't have dpata to show how many americans' communications are being incidentally swept up in that collection. do you believe there's a potential point at which incidental collection of americans becomes so preponderous, so significant that there might be either a policy or a constitutional issue associated with the current query standard? >> well, i think in the abstract, certainly, if the incidental collection was getting so significant that you would actually think there's been reverse targeting taking place, that would be a serious concern. >> when congress passed the fisa amendment back in 2008, do you believe that it was the intent of congress to use that to be intentionally searching americans' communications using that 702 section? >> well, i think -- >> or is that afterthought? >> i think the intent of congress there is just expressed in the language which requires you to use the

what section 3322 does which is called the transition provision as a new section to article 33 of the health code which regulates medical cannabis dispensaries, and if enacted as it's now written, it would immediately authorize permanent mcd's to sell adult use cannabis as part of this existing article 33 permit as soon as this ordinance goes into effect, provided they do a number of things. provided they apply for and receive a temporary state cannabis license, provided they receive a determination from the planning department that the sale of adult use cannabis on the premises is in compliance with the planning code, and that's where this amendment comes into play and that is how it complements this. section 3322 would automatically allow these mcd's to sell adult use without any any further process provided they meet these criteria, one of which is they have to show they comply with the planning code. >>supervisor kim: okay. what did you mean by the statement, there's no such thing as a temporary permit? >> well, people have talked about this as a temporary permit for mcd's. there'

as provided by the administrative code, section 90.4, and police code sections 1060.2 and 1070.17, and related laws and rules, we will conduct this hearing to provide the permit holder with due process. we'll fully consider the evidence provided by the charging party, and by the permit holder, and fulfill our responsibilities in a fair and kbos impartial manner. all right. so i will introduce the participants. so can we have the charging party please come up to the microphone, and please just introduce yourself, your name, and who you represent. >> is this my opening statement? >> it's not your opening statement. just introduce yourself. >> acting director maggie weiland, representing the entertainment commission department. >>president tan: great. thank you very much. and now, can the permit holder please rise and come up to the microphone, or the representative. >> good afternoon. this is susan f. reyes. i'm representing la oficina and mr. escolero. >>president tan: all right. and is mr. escolero here today? >> yes, he is. >>president tan: so we know who the parties are. before we ge

section i, consent calendar, section removed before previous meeting. there are none tonight. section j, introduction of proposals and assignment to committee. there are four this evening. all personnel work related injuries, sale and disposal of books, equipment, and supplies, board policy 0460, local control and accountablity plan, board policy 5145.3, nondiscrimination harassment. unless i hear different from legal counsel, all four board policies are referred to rules, policy, and legislation command. thank you, may i hear a motion and second for first reading to these four board policies. >> so moved. >> second. >>president walton: thank you so much. let the record show miss casco. section k, proposals for immediate action and suspension of the rules, none tonight. brief board member reports, standing committees, ad hoc on personnel matters and labor relations and portablity. >> thank you so much. rules, policy, and legislation. >> i reported out for the policy measures earlier. the legislation in further support of reducing -- [ inaudible ] the next rules committee is de

>>> three-year old girl was shot in the leg in a home in philadelphia's kingsessing section. >> it happened on the 1300 block of south wilson street action news reporter annie mccormack joins us live from southwest texas with the details, annie. >> reporter: at this hour that little girl is at chop and she's in stable condition but right now we are told that by the lieutenant here that she is under going surgery and they are hoping, doctors are hoping, that they are able to save her leg. somehow she got a hold of her father's loaded weapon inside of their home, and she somehow pulled the trigger. now take a look at this video, video from afternoon, this is the air use where this all happen, inside of a home in the 1300 block of south wilson the child was shot once inside her home there. police recovered the weapon at the scene. toddler then rushed to chop. police say that the toddler -- fat shore owns the gun was rushing to get to work and asked his mother who was watching the young girl to put the gun away. he left and went to work and told police his daughter was asleep when he left. we a

staff removed section 3.20784 fe ordinance.this subsection would have creaa conflict of interest provision t would have prohibited officialsm asking a person to convey sometf value to a third party if that d party had a matter pending befoe official. in response to the commission's, we simply removed the subsectiom the ordinance and in its place,i mentioned earlier, we worked wih commissioner chiu and with inted persons to craft a broad discloe system. instead of have been a pr prohie have something that would requie disclosure. i want to go into greater depths particular section, since it's e technical than the other change. so everyone should have a charte table under agenda item 7 and i distributed one to each commissr that's entitled "draft rules for behested payment disclosure expy visuals" i think it would be uso make reference to this for the discussion. do all the commissioners have t? i'll also put it up on the proj. the top half of the chart givesc idea of what a behested paymentk likes visually. you have an official

but they would be taken out of s section and put into another sen because of the way the section s the following are not allowed. however the city attorney solve. >> we'll work it out for the net meeting, whenever it is schedul. >> but the spirit of it was tho, removing the restriction and thr district 2 and allowing it to b. for that particular area. >> understood and we'll prepareo you can circulate it at the next meeting. in terms of the mandatory -- cie mandatory d.r. proposal, it's pg more complicated to nail down. we need to confer with planningo figure out exactly where each oe districts will be. this is the proposal for supervr peskin. we're looking at it now. the mandatory d.c. is turning oe more complicated to nail down. we need to talk to planning andt figured out. >> and if it was affirmative d.h notice, would that make it as complicated or less complicated? in other words, it's stowbt notd people can choose to avail themf discretionary view or not. >> if i understand correctly, ye asking whether we can change whe cannabis retail is currently ped to -- the d.r. would be ava

he points out that sibur is not subject to sections, and he says he has taken to sections, and he says, and he says he has taken steps to ensure the highest ethical standards. when you are in a position to profit, even indirectly, in this case, from a very well—connected russian firm, and europe, as the investor in charge of us trade policy, and have a voice in the sanctions, anybody looking at that will imagine there is a potential conflict, there. and it's wayne rooney! great finish! everton — arsenalfrom a wayne rooney! great finish! everton — arsenal from a few weeks ago. a thrilling advertisement for british football. but what we have found in the paradise papers raises serious questions about our national game. what if one man and his money were secretly linked to both of these clu bs ? secretly linked to both of these clubs? this is a leisure oarsmen off, another billionaire who is close to vladimir fudan. he is one of london's's richest men, and owns 30% of arsenal, one of the wealthiest clubs. we have entered a new error where we win trophies. but we think some of his money ma

in the technology section, endgame might not be the biggest cyber security firm in the market, but itntagon's favorite. i spoke to the ceo of endgame, nate fick. nate: endgame builds a protection platform. we protect our customer's data from attack by preventing breaches on the endpoint and by detecting and responding to breaches and automating the hunt for attackers that may already be inside our customers' networks. julia: how do you stop it spreading? nate: it is an enormous amount of math behind it. a lot of data science and algorithms involved in the detection process. this is a crowded market. we have to put a lot of emphasis on independent third-party validation. not us saying how good our stuff is, but others who are seen as credible and independent verifiers in a market where there are many companies claiming to be the same thing. julia: what about your model is making you different? the thing about hackers is they change. they know you are on to them, and they learn and do something different, and they adapt. can you adapt quick enough for the changes that hackers make in or

. >> section 125. today's agenda what we'd like to cover is what a cafeteria plan is, section 125. the key requirements of the plan. and what's allowable within the section 125 and highlight the discrimination rules and then consequences of non compliance. and this comprise with the tax code. so most of the health and welfare programs are delivered via cafeteria plans. what it does is generally allows an employee to choose between a cash salary reduction or a benefit on a tax-advantage basis. it's both to the employee and employer. pretax dollars are used to pay for benefits. employee payroll reduction are pretaxed and players do not pay payroll tax. there's a few so you're not subject to fica tax and in some cases income taxes withholdings. because they're pretax there's limits on what you can do within the plan. so we'll go into a lot more detail on the following pages of what's allowable changes. the section 125 of the tax code applies even if it's not applied because it's a private sector. arisa doesn't apply in your particular situation, however the tax code does apply for you

that is under article one, section two. to this day, it states for the most part determined qualifications for voting. also under article one of the constitution, africans and 3/5 ofn were considered a person when it counted the number of representatives from each state but certain states to allow people to vote who were not in that traditional group of white males only who owned property. new jersey was one such state. at one time, new jersey allowed women and blacks to vote. it was taken away in 1807. this was because there was an influx of immigrants into the idea, even during that time, was to increase the political power of white americans in one way they could do that was by taking away the property provision and putting more requirements on people of african descent. by taking away the property provision that no longer requiring property ownership for voting, it allowed those poor people coming from western europe to be able to be counted voten those who could within the states. in new york, the debate for black men

. >> it happened this afternoon in the cities kingsessing section, "action news" reporter annie mccormack is live at southwest detectives with the details, annie. >>> walter and sarah detectives here tell us that three-year old girl is in surgery at chop, there surgeons are trying to save her leg. they are saying gun was girl's father and left unlocked when she found it and pulled the trigger. this is video taken a short time ago of the 64 year-old grandmother of the three-year old gunshot victim, grandmother is expected to be charged, authorities say that the girl's father claims he gave his loaded gun to the grandmother when he left for work and then asked her to put ate way. >> she put tonight closet, in a holster does not have a lock on it, and obviously we believe, may have fell asleep but we're not sure but the child, where he gets a hold of his gun and able to pull trigger. >> reporter: later just afternoon time here inside the home the three-year old shares with her grandmother, dad and uncle in the 1300 block of south wilson medics responded to i call for a person bleeding, but t

" we looked like an audience that remember a section and the section and when there was a b section i would say that problems in a section were really really hard to solve. the problems in the b section cygnus solvable to me i think i now have a different view that the b section problems are the politics that make it very very hard, but i really thought that k-12 education would need a significant reform and i knew that from being a student in the new york city school system and reading the b section where va there was a story about kids not getting the education they deserved and were entitled to and so i decided to run for office. it was a bit of a crazy idea at the time and i lost my first election in 1997, although, it was the closest race in the city of new york that year and in 1999 i won and benefited from some good timing. i got involved in a speaker's race and became chair of the education committee and it was an incredible honor to be that chair of the education committee i didn't realize it was previously such a sleepy institution. i remember joel klein asking me where did

yet there's a grill separating this church in eastern germany into two sections. this division has existed for nearly five hundred years st peter's in bautzen is one of the oldest and largest intercon fashionable churches in germany. inside there are two of everything but they're not identical catholic pews have an eel or protestants don't generally kneel in church. and of course there are two altars the catholic altar at the back. and the protestant altar at the front. each of the parishes has its own organ though thank god they're not used at the same time. the service times are staggered so that the two communities don't tread on each others toes. and of course confessionals and votive candles are only found in the catholic section. the tabernacle and its light are also specifically catholic st peter's is a church divided in space and in time. the roots of these intricate sessional churches lie in the reformation in fifteen twenty the good folk of bautzen were pretty enthusiastic about martin luther's reform ideas and just four years later the city council deci

better,section is much a geographical cross-section.he other argument that hard topowerful and answer is that you have to torantee or do your best guarantee a candidate who has much less support than any other presidential candidate has, somebody in the low 30's. you have to have some kind of screening messianism -- screening mechanism to ensure the ultimate winner is at least in the 40's. well, if you have a runoff, you end up with the majority, but you end up with a rather strange majority potentially. been proposed that the way you prevent an extreme minority resident dennis president, again, somebody with only 30% support, if you have a 40% rule, something in that neighborhood, if someone does not cost that threshold in the election, there is a runoff. i am pretty well persuaded by the argument that this does not only some third-party candidacies, but ine third party candidacies any given year, an imitation of that when a third-party candidate enters, others get into it as well. you could easily end up with a runoff between two cand

be an influential and enforcement advocate in those tools you believe will keep citizens safe like section 702. i can assure you that this committee will faithfully follow its charter and conduct vigorous and real-time oversight over the intelligence community, its operations and its activities. we will ask difficult and probing questions of you and your staff and expect honest, complete and timely responses. you've already successfully negotiated one hurdle, 20-0 on october 19th, 2017th. i look forward to supporting your nomination and insuring its consideration without delay. i would notify members we're under a fairly tight time frame so it's my intentions to move this nominee as quickly as we possibly can. >> thank you, mr. chairman and welcome, mr. demers. congratulations on your position to serve as assistant national attorney general at doj. i've reads your testimony before the senate judiciary committee. i appreciate your candor and forth riet responses to the equestion and the bipartisan support you've gotten from doj officials in terms of your nomination. if confirmed, you will l

he for the civil war, the republican party had been entirely sectional party. president lincoln is not even on the ballot in the south state of virginia. without support, the republicans have a tenuous hold on power at the national level but without black suffrage in the south, the party has very little prospect of success unless they're going to disenfranchise very large families of rubble whites, seemed to think was a long-term viable solution. the problem is exacerbated by the fact that the south was going to gain congressional representation as a result of the amendment. blacks are now going to count 5/5 rather than 3/5. guarantees need to puts for southern blacks but imposing black suffrage in the north runs the risk of constituents,ir who of repeatedly made it clear that they do not think african-americans in the north need to be voting. thefirst shot at solving dilemma was section two of the 14th amendment which seem like the ideal answer to their problems. it creates a powerful inducement for southern states to threateninglacks by to reduce their congre

3.620, because section e on notification doesn't have an amount listed on it. it says any time you solicit money from anyone, you have to go over this disclosure section in case they eventually go up to $1,000. if i'm fund raising in new york city for any organization, i'm still going to have to do this sort of thing because this is what the rule says: you have to notify people regardless of whether they even live in san francisco. somebody earlier had mentioned that people are allowed to comment in committees anonymously, and that's a very important thing, and that's not something that a commissioner, you know, should have the ability to override, that right to anonymity and privacy in the engagement of civil affairs. i think you should hold onto this for some more time and think about the interests that you're trying to provide here while also thinking of volunteer workers who are volunteering in a private capacity fore the city. thank you. >> president keane: yes, commissioner chiu? >> commissioner chiu: pat, could you please clarify, if you would, the fact

two small sections survived. in its 25 years the georgia dome hosted two superbowls, three final fours and olympic gymnastics. it's been replaced by a $1.6 billion stadium next door. >>> up next, a royal wedding anniversary. >>> receiving a 70 anniversary is rare for any couple. today, queen elizabeth and prince philips celebrated that milestone as did london. mark phillips is there. >> reporter: if queen elizabeth and prince philip know the secret of what makes a marriage work for 70 years they weren't saying today. just a few silent photos have been released to mark the occasion. the royal platinum anniversary is a quiet family affair. but london wasn't quiet. the bells of westminster abbey rang out for hours, just as they had on this day in 1947, when then princess elizabeth married a dashing naval officer named phillip mounbaton, some around the royal court thought may be too dashing. according to one of the queen's brides maids margaret rhoads. >> of course prince philip was the most utterly good looking, vi

which is the purpose of section 249.49, the s dutch. so it -- sud. it is irrelevant whether it's internal or external, just the presence of the garage, period, was not allowable at this location under current code. >> supervisor kim: previous to the 2010 telegraph hill to regulate offstreet parking, where we placed restrictions on garages in the neighborhood, to i guess, assume zero, previous to that, one garage was permitted in this alleyway when these two illegal garages were built, is that correct? >> at 20 nobles specifically? >> supervisor kim: yes, 20 nobles specifically. >> yes, it would have been prior to the sud. >> supervisor kim: what was the language, if you were allowed one garage, was it a two-car garage? was what was regulated was the number of doors or the number of parking spots? >> section 144 of the planning code deals with street frontages in districts that are zoned for residential, rh districts and the language of the section discusses limitations on the amount of the ground floor building facade that could be dedicated to entra

we'll reconvene, start the next section promptly at 11:45. be back in your seat by 11:40 so we can start the next session on time. thank you. >>> good morning. good afternoon. one bit of housekeeping information. tom bossert is duty calls. he's responding to obviously the devastating effects in puerto rico and since his job is to be head of homeland security, cyber, counterterrorism, he's kind of running in a million directions but we are truly fortunate to have rob joyce in his place. for those that don't know rob, rob is the cyber lead at the national security council. he's the so-called cyber czar, the coordinator for all things cyber. he comes to the white house from the national security agency where among other roles he ran t.a.o. which i think has gotten a little more noticed in recent years and there was a time we couldn't even mention that, but rob comes to this job with true professionalism. and he has a natural ability to translate sort of those ideas into policy and the like. so rob, thank you for doing this, especially at last mi

. >> well, just to be clear, we models that section of the amendment after los angeles which is using the same penalty structure, and again, we have the protection of it having to be found as a violation, and it's up to $500. it's not an outright payout, but there has to not a full investigatibe a t a person was discriminated against because of their conviction history. >> commissioner ortiz-cartagena. >>commissioner ortiz-cartagena: i just want to actually just thank you, your office, you and supervisor cohen. i appreciate it. you really understood. you understand the constituency behind this, and me being formerly incarcerated, you guys truly understand what this is about, and this is pretty awesome. seriously, for what they've done. they've really listened to the constituency, so i just want to say thank you. >> thank you. >>commissioner ortiz-cartagena: thank you. >> thank you, and i will take that warm response back to the supervisor, but at the end of the day, we want to introduce something that all parties are aware of the changes, and what the goal is is to widen the workforce

up into western sections of pennsylvania.t of this is a mix, too, up here, very, very light but as this swings on across, maybe northwestern suburbs just gets touched by some showers. hagerstown perhaps martinsburg, over here in northern frederick county, northern carroll county, westminster, you may get a shower during the morning hours. but it does look like most of the core of that will stay to the north of us and as this comes on across -- this is just kind of the first wave of showers. i really think what we end up with the potential late this afternoon is farther back out to the west, out ahead of the front. there's a chance that we could start seeing some showers back to the west of us that will swing on across. most of the day today does look dry, okay. the rain comes across tonight. things get gusty for tomorrow. notice this 54 degrees tomorrow. this is probably going to be a late morning to early afternoon high temperature. and then temperatures will start dropping off a little bit. so, officially today, 58 degrees

a glassware section, an appliance section, a cutlery section -- it's not here.rything seems random. howard: welcome. lemonis: i'm marcus. howard: marcus, i'm howard. i'm the nice guy, usually, and this is robyn, my partner. robyn: i'm robyn. lemonis: hey, robyn, how are you? nice to meet you. robyn: nice to meet you, marcus. lemonis: so how long have you guys been in business? robyn: 20 years. lemonis: how did you guys get in business together? howard: we knew each other since high school. lemonis: okay. howard: best friends. robyn: this is my ex-husband. we have two human children, and bowery kitchen is our first child. lemonis: you guys are 50-50? robyn: yes, absolutely. lemonis: who's in charge, between the two of you? robyn: howie. howard: i would say me. robyn: only because it's just like howie maybe started the business, but i'm not allowed to touch the knife wall. howard: yeah. lemonis: this place is big. howard: yeah, we can take you around and show you. lemonis: i would love to see. how many square feet is it? robyn: 4,000 square feet. lemonis: it looks